On ancient maps of northern Africa, the Sahara looks like a blooming land. There are no hints of endless sands there. Climate change, historians will say. But how could the climate have changed so much in a few hundred years?
Today these are now the territories of: Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya and Egypt
On Slavic-language maps, the name is spelt "Варварiя", but it sounds like "Warwaria".The name Barbaria is consonant with the name of the people living in Morocco: the Berbers.
The Berber self-appellation is Imazighen (free people). Some of them look like Eastern Europeans in their national costumes.
I suggest comparing an old medieval map with modern geography to see how many ancient cities have survived to the present day. The comparison will be with the 1787 map of Africa on retromap.ru:
Source: Варвария – страна городов северной АфрикиWhat is also interesting is that these are cities standing on rivers. As you can see, the river network was large in northern Africa at the time. The map shows the era after all the Arab conquests. The cities were not destroyed here (otherwise, I don't think they are draw it on the map). But what happened that many cities have disappeared and everything is now in the sands and only in the mountainous areas in Morocco you can still find some green?
This map shows fewer cities in Europe than in Africa. And this is a medieval map. We are used to thinking of Europe at that time as densely populated areas, and Africa as an untamed land of Tuareg and Arab nomads wandering from oasis to oasis. This map tells a different story.
Use of material from the article for youtube channels only with the permission and agreement of the author (c).
Comparison of maps: Open Street Standard Map