SH Archive Chronology: of the World, of Rome, of Christ...

[KD Archive]

This is probably the most important thread I will ever participate in. I'm locking the original one to summarize everything in this thread. It appears we are close to solving the phantom time issue. Looks like those extra 1,000 years suggested by Fomenko and Nosovsky are indeed equal to 1,000 years. We cannot simply subtract 1,000 from 2020 for there is a method to the PTB trickery. Here is what this 1,000 years consist of:

• 753 years + 247 years = 1,000 years
  • 247 years: difference between "year of Christ" and "year of Rome"
  • 753 years: maliciously added number to create 1,000 years
  • 753 BC: the official date of when the city of Rome was founded.
  • This was needed to fraudulently present I / i / J / j as #1. I.e.:
    • I653 became 1653
    • i587 became 1587
    • J472 became 1472
    • i725 became 1725
  • Whether these I / i / J / j stand for Julius Caesar is up to us to determine. They sure do not stand for Jesus Christ or #1.
• It's of paramount importance to understand when they convinced us that "I" was "1".
  • If we figure this out, we can understand when the count "of Rome" stopped, and lies started.
  • The switch from "of Rome" to our fake dating would probably mean some big event.

First of all, to preserve the evidence, I recommend you download this book , for this is where the key to the riddle is located.

Wanna know why America was not discovered in 1492?​

Let me show you something interesting. For our calculations we are going to use the below chronological reference from the above book. The most important thing to understand is that all three of the below dates mean the exact same year. That means:

• Year of the World = Year of Rome = Year of Christ
• 4739 = i530 = 777 ... these are the same year

​

I am not going to use "year of the world" for we do not need it for our calculations, and I do not really know what it means, though we all might have an idea. The "year of the world" is for a totally different thread.

The above cutout means:

• Year of Rome: 530 = I530 ≠ 1530 AD
  • "I" stands for something we do not quite understand yet, but "I" ≠ "1".
  • "I" is not a digit.
• Year of Christ: 777
• Difference: 777 - 530 = 247 years
  • That means that Christ was born/dead 243 before something happened to Rome (established/demolished, Julius Caesar born/died, etc).
  • Christ came 247 years earlier than Rome... that's for simplicity.
• Catch 22: They took year 530 (of Rome) and used "I" to present it as "1". Now we have year 1530.
  • Year 1530 was presented as a "year of Christ."
  • In reality the year "of Christ" was 777, but now it became year 1530 "of pseudo-Christ"
• As you remember from above, the original difference between "year of Christ" and "year of Rome" was 247 years.
• Now we do not have any year of Rome left. We only have "year of Christ" - 777 and year "of pseudo-Christ" - 1530.
  • The difference became 1530 - 777 = 753 years.
  • "Coincidentally" the city of Rome was founded in 753 BC.
  • In reality, 753 years is the difference between the made up year "of pseudo-Christ" and the year "of Christ."

Columbus and 1492.​

Now let's see how it works when applied to the discovery of America. If this thing works out, it's gonna be super weird and rewarding.

• Discovery date #1: 1492 "of pseudo-Christ" - false
• Discovery date #2: I492 "of Rome' which is 492
• Discovery date #3: 492 + 247 = 739 "of Christ" - true
  • Now we need to convert "of Christ" to "of pseudo-Christ" by adding our 753 year difference.
• Fake date: 739 "of Christ" + 753 "difference" = 1492 "of pseudo-Christ"

True discovery dates of America:

• 492 - Year of Rome aka "I"492
• 739 - Year of Christ
• 1492 - Year of pseudo-Christ

Now let's go over a few known events. We will only use normally looking dates. I do not understand what BC/AD mean any longer.

Pompeii Destruction: 79 A.D. no more: Pompeii got buried in 1631

• 631 - Year of Rome aka "I"631
• 878 - Year of Christ
• 1631 - Year of pseudo-Christ

Russia adopts Gregorian Calendar: Russian Calendar History

• 700 - Year of Rome aka "I"700
• 947 - Year of Christ
• 1700 - Year of pseudo-Christ

Independence Day (United States): Independence Day (United States) - Wikipedia

• 776 - Year of Rome aka "I"766
• 1023 - Year of Christ
• 1700 - Year of pseudo-Christ

French invasion of Russia: French invasion of Russia - Wikipedia

• 812 - Year of Rome aka "I"812
• 1059 - Year of Christ
• 1812 - Year of pseudo-Christ

London Fire: Great Fire of London - Wikipedia

• 666 - Year of Rome aka "I"666
• 913 - Year of Christ
• 1666 - Year of pseudo-Christ

​

Now think about this. Why do we have all that?

• When Jesus abandoned America, or why TPTB prefer Pagan Gods
• Roman monuments to non-Roman individuals
• Questionable antiquity of the "ancient" statues
• The History of Rome has no Surviving Sources
• Giant "Ancient" Romans, Human Engineering and the Real Slavery
• Fake Antiquity: this is Julius Caesar. Really?
• 19th Century Victorian Balls: where are the photos?
• 19th Century World Leaders Meetings: where are the photos?
• Three Wars - Where Are Combat Photographs?
• 19th century photographs of the US Government in session prior to 1865. Where are they?
• Pope is a Liar: #5 The Dark Secret of the Vatican Pagan Gods
• Ask Pro | - Julius Caesar: Medieval vs. Ancient
• Will the real Pontius Pilate please stand up, and show us your toga?
• Was Cleopatra a medieval queen?
• Questionable Alexander the Great Narrative
• Prehistoric cave art appears to be fake... all of it
• 79 A.D. no more: Pompeii got buried in 1631

All those ancient Roman, Greek and Egyptian cities, statues and busts we suddenly started to discover at the end of the so-called 18th and throughout the 19th centuries. How come those were not discovered before? We are being told that back in the day people were not interested in stuff like that. Really?

Why do we justify images like below with some sentimental nonsense?

And why do we ridicule artists of the past who, long before Julius Caesar “put” toga on, were depicting him looking like this .

And what if, for example:

• Year 1795 is really year 795 of Rome aka "I"795
• Year 1812 is really year 812 of Rome aka "I"812

This way the so-called "antiquity" is in the rear view mirror, and not behind 15 blind curves this mankind passed thousands of years ago.
Consider this possibility:

• The so-called "medieval" clothing was before this mankind was forced to don them togas, and not the other way around. This is why statues of the people who have no business wearing togas have them on.

I don't know if Washington was really Washington, if Napoleon was really Napoleon or if Peter the Great was really Peter the Great. But I would only wear a toga if it was super hot outside. Hot to the point when you do not need to hit your house.
What's our Power Elite concerned about the most? I think it would be the Global Warming a.k.a. Climate Change .

​

KD: Please fell free to contribute. This could be important.

• Just like I said, I do not know when "I" turned into "1."
• The pure offset is supposed to be 753 years. They added 1,000 years to the "from Rome" date.
• At the same time we really do not know how long the 19th century lasted.
• Under ideal conditions today's date could be:
  • Year 1020 - of Rome. Depending on the duration of the 19th century.
  • Year 1267 - of Christ. Depending on the duration of the 19th century.
  • Year 2020 - of pseudo-Christ
  • Year 5229 - of the World
  • Year 5780 - Jewish Chronology

I don’t think there is any reason to doubt the Jewish Chronology. This way somewhere along the way we lost 551 year of events and characters, and those events and people got replaced with 753 years of made up, or doubled events and characters. Hypothetically...
"I can’t tell you exactly what year it is because we honestly don’t know." - Morpheus

Note: Archived SH.org replies to this OP: Chronology: of the World, of Rome, of Christ...

 

[_harris]

a minor thing i noticed, before i get properly into this juice:

that book says "Anno. 1571", they are both definitely 1s, same character!
buttttttt above it is mentioned "the great warres of Iulius Ceaser and Pompeiius Magnus".

1571, and speaking of Pompeii? how did they know?

 

[Mabzynn]

This was a wrong line of thought. The source itself disproved it. He did not account for multiple other dates with the i/1 configuration that contradicted his hypothesis within the book.

There was some interesting information in the source related to King Arthur and early "Roman" history related to King Lud.

In retrospect I should not have been so condescending towards him as there was a clear change in his abilities. Hopefully it was not health related. If you're lurking KD, I hope all is well.

 

[dreamtime]

a minor thing i noticed, before i get properly into this juice:

that book says "Anno. 1571", they are both definitely 1s, same character!
buttttttt above it is mentioned "the great warres of Iulius Ceaser and Pompeiius Magnus".

1571, and speaking of Pompeii? how did they know?

Didnt they mean this guy? Pompey - Wikipedia

 

[_harris]

Didnt they mean this guy? Pompey - Wikipedia

didn't make that connection, cheers! there's a few place names here in SWUK, ending with "Magna" so i was thinking of Pompeiius Magnus as a place name!

one other thing i noticed from that front page... Emperor Maximilian died (on wiki) "12 January 1519"... 52 years before this book was published? so even this source text must be a "re-print"

 

[Taira Earth]

I'm using machine translation.

I believe the lie of the West was exposed in the "pope is lier" sled series.
I learned this from a specialist at the old SH site.
"There's no such thing as a B.C." and it's now 99?
The term "millennial kingdom" is in Christianity, isn't it?
Mithraism also changes the god in charge every thousand years.
I think it's common by now that radiocarbon measurements are ridiculous and worldly.
The mysteries of calendars like J, I, A, etc. are very difficult to solve.

 

[wild heretic]

This was a wrong line of thought. The source itself disproved it. He did not account for multiple other dates with the i/1 configuration that contradicted his hypothesis within the book.

There was some interesting information in the source related to King Arthur and early "Roman" history related to King Lud.

In retrospect I should not have been so condescending towards him as there was a clear change in his abilities. Hopefully it was not health related. If you're lurking KD, I hope all is well.

Might not have been the same person, aka Miles Mathis team. He posted it the day after I had spent several hours writing my Noah's flood 1000 AD idea on my own forum.

The original SH forum came about fairly soon after I started the mudflood thread on wildheretic around 2017 I think, which turned out to get the most views on my site by far. In fact, Korben started off with material from that very thread (not linked back either). Was that rude, or Intell trying to steer potential interested parties away from that thread, form their own and misdirect as to why (aka weapon, not natural causes)?

Maybe, maybe not. But I most certainly leave that open as a decent possibility.

 

[grav]

Wild Heretic? the Concave Earth site that I like so much? Then I am in good company, though a lowly flatearther.

If we take the phantom medieval period for granted, then how long is human history?
6000 years? or much less?

How long is the average world age? 500 years, 300?
My wild guess, unsubstantiated and full of many errors:
1. the Golden Age, the Purple Dawn when Saturn was the sun and the living was easy. I also reckon the Saturn god was the Demiurge of gnostic lore. This is also the time of the Anunnaki
2. the Silver Age, when Sumeria and Egypt came along, a new sun and the first moon
3. the Bronze, Greece, Rome, Byzantium (Jesus)
4. the Iron Age, Tartatia
5. the Aluminum age, now

Yes, I made up the last one. It seems like as good a metal as any to suggest the low quality toxic environment we have created.

 

[Anachronos]

Wild Heretic? the Concave Earth site that I like so much? Then I am in good company, though a lowly flatearther.

If we take the phantom medieval period for granted, then how long is human history?
6000 years? or much less?

How long is the average world age? 500 years, 300?
My wild guess, unsubstantiated and full of many errors:
1. the Golden Age, the Purple Dawn when Saturn was the sun and the living was easy. I also reckon the Saturn god was the Demiurge of gnostic lore. This is also the time of the Anunnaki
2. the Silver Age, when Sumeria and Egypt came along, a new sun and the first moon
3. the Bronze, Greece, Rome, Byzantium (Jesus)
4. the Iron Age, Tartatia
5. the Aluminum age, now

Yes, I made up the last one. It seems like as good a metal as any to suggest the low quality toxic environment we have created.

It should be the iron and mud/clay age, as per the book of Daniel, chapter 2.
Daniel has a vision of a statue, with each body part being made of a different material. Each material is supposed to be representative of an age of Civilization. The last age is dirty.

 

[grav]

Wild Heretic? the Concave Earth site that I like so much? Then I am in good company, though a lowly flatearther.

If we take the phantom medieval period for granted, then how long is human history?
6000 years? or much less?

How long is the average world age? 500 years, 300?
My wild guess, unsubstantiated and full of many errors:
1. the Golden Age, the Purple Dawn when Saturn was the sun and the living was easy. I also reckon the Saturn god was the Demiurge of gnostic lore. This is also the time of the Anunnaki
2. the Silver Age, when Sumeria and Egypt came along, a new sun and the first moon
3. the Bronze, Greece, Rome, Byzantium (Jesus)
4. the Iron Age, Tartatia
5. the Aluminum age, now

Yes, I made up the last one. It seems like as good a metal as any to suggest the low quality toxic environment we have created.

It should be the iron and mud/clay age, as per the book of Daniel, chapter 2.
Daniel has a vision of a statue, with each body part being made of a different material. Each material is supposed to be representative of an age of Civilization. The last age is dirty.
View attachment 1176

I am aware of Daniel's dream statue.
But I took a view of world ages that preceded biblical writings.
Specifically, the age of Saturn that the scribes left out of the canon. Its location/s and culture/s are unknown.

I also cram the ancient world into one world age, with 2 parts: Sumeria, Babylon, Egypt into one (silver) and Greece, Rome, "medieval" Europe into a silver-bronze age.
The iron age would be the mysterious one before ours. Tartaria maybe. Byzantium?

When did our age begin? around 1700 or 1800? After a mud flood. yes.

So when was the Great Flood? Before Sumeria, since Gilgamesh knew it second hand after visiting Noah/Utnapishtim.

Looking from an amateurish and unqualified gnostic perspective, I will guess (wildly) that the Golden Age was the original world that Sophia/Gaia created. The Demiurge confiscated it, unleashed his Archons into it, who then created giants by mating with women, at which point the Deluge obliterated that age.
The Anunnaki may have belonged in this period.

 

[dreamtime]

Wild Heretic? the Concave Earth site that I like so much? Then I am in good company, though a lowly flatearther.

If we take the phantom medieval period for granted, then how long is human history?
6000 years? or much less?

How long is the average world age? 500 years, 300?
My wild guess, unsubstantiated and full of many errors:
1. the Golden Age, the Purple Dawn when Saturn was the sun and the living was easy. I also reckon the Saturn god was the Demiurge of gnostic lore. This is also the time of the Anunnaki
2. the Silver Age, when Sumeria and Egypt came along, a new sun and the first moon
3. the Bronze, Greece, Rome, Byzantium (Jesus)
4. the Iron Age, Tartatia
5. the Aluminum age, now

Yes, I made up the last one. It seems like as good a metal as any to suggest the low quality toxic environment we have created.

It should be the iron and mud/clay age, as per the book of Daniel, chapter 2.
Daniel has a vision of a statue, with each body part being made of a different material. Each material is supposed to be representative of an age of Civilization. The last age is dirty.
View attachment 1176

I am aware of Daniel's dream statue.
But I took a view of world ages that preceded biblical writings.
Specifically, the age of Saturn that the scribes left out of the canon. Its location/s and culture/s are unknown.

I also cram the ancient world into one world age, with 2 parts: Sumeria, Babylon, Egypt into one (silver) and Greece, Rome, "medieval" Europe into a silver-bronze age.
The iron age would be the mysterious one before ours. Tartaria maybe. Byzantium?

When did our age begin? around 1700 or 1800? After a mud flood. yes.

So when was the Great Flood? Before Sumeria, since Gilgamesh knew it second hand after visiting Noah/Utnapishtim.

Looking from an amateurish and unqualified gnostic perspective, I will guess (wildly) that the Golden Age was the original world that Sophia/Gaia created. The Demiurge confiscated it, unleashed his Archons into it, who then created giants by mating with women, at which point the Deluge obliterated that age.
The Anunnaki may have belonged in this period.

I think 1492 is a pretty good date when it comes to the turnover of the previous age into the current one. Per Fomenko (Dating of Apocalypse) and also what Michelle Gibson writes on her blog. Something also happened 1800, but not sure whether that also was something that grand.

I also believe, that up until 500 or so years ago, Humanity was on a positive evolutionary path and in Unity Consciousness, and that around 1492 was the beginning of the hijack of this timeline by dark forces, and the replacement of it with one called Rome. Can’t tell you how this was done, just that it looks like that is what happened because the Ancient Global Civilization built everything on the planet. The same styles/designs cross oceans and continents, from ancient to modern!!!

Unfortunately we don't really know when 1492 really was. I think they added either 100 or 200 years, so 1492 could have been around 300-400 years ago.

I am convinced the main purpose of calendars was to understand when a gateway opens between two ages, and one age probably has sub-ages as well. Understanding the cyclical nature of reality probably means a lot of power, especially if you know when certain things happen, as the turnover is probably always accompanied by a cataclysm of sorts. Our past gives us some clues about time frames. Something seems to happen at least every 250 years. Could be that we are looking at four grand descending ages of 1000 year length, and sub-ages of 250 year length, and four ascending ages, with eight total ages, and the eighth one is also the first one of the next grand cycle. (7 and 8 come up a lot in esoterica)

The destruction of the true calendars of the past and it's replacement with the modern calendar happened to conceal this knowledge from the masses. Unfortunately, nowadays we don't have any way to know where we really are in the cycle.

Given the total concealment of knowledge, we are probably in the last parts of downward spiral of the ages, shortly before an upward cycle is beginning.

The knowledge about cycles and cataclysm is necessary to build a thriving civilization, and the PTB probably still have that knowledge, periodically disappearing into underground structures to survive the resets.

 

[air_dance]

1492 = 7000 = 1700 (The catastrophe Europa calendar)
1492 = 7000 = 1812 (The catastrophe America calendar)
1530 = 7030 = 1738 (This date 1530 has no right to exist in history textbooks)

Assume that 1700 is the same date as 1812
Assume that 1750 is the same date as 1862
Assume that 1800 is the same date as 1912
World War I (1914-1918) - World time
World War I (1802-1806) - America time
World War I (1482-1486)
The Great Flood - 1492
World War II (1941-1945) - World time
World War II (1829-1833) - America time

Liberation of countries (worldwide) from the Roman Empire, British empire, Ottoman empire, Russian empire, French empire, Spain empire, Portugal empire (1833-1880)

Then it turns out that Christ lived around 1850-1860. I could be wrong.

Historical documents record the date 1530 as the year of the Flood in Europe. That makes 1738. Then the date for America is either 1738 or 1850.
1492 = 7000 = 1700 = 1812
1530 = 7038 = 1738 = 1850
1492 = 1530 (Years without history)

 

[Whitewave]

1492 = 7000 = 1700 (The catastrophe Europa calendar)
1492 = 7000 = 1812 (The catastrophe America calendar)
1530 = 7030 = 1738 (This date 1530 has no right to exist in history textbooks)

Assume that 1700 is the same date as 1812
Assume that 1750 is the same date as 1862
Assume that 1800 is the same date as 1912
World War I (1914-1918) - World time
World War I (1802-1806) - America time
World War I (1482-1486)
The Great Flood - 1492
World War II (1941-1945) - World time
World War II (1829-1833) - America time

Liberation of countries (worldwide) from the Roman Empire, British empire, Ottoman empire, Russian empire, French empire, Spain empire, Portugal empire (1833-1880)

Then it turns out that Christ lived around 1850-1860. I could be wrong.

Historical documents record the date 1530 as the year of the Flood in Europe. That makes 1738. Then the date for America is either 1738 or 1850.
1492 = 7000 = 1700 = 1812
1530 = 7038 = 1738 = 1850
1492 = 1530 (Years without history)

Could you please explain how you're arriving at these conclusions for your historical dating methods? TIA.

 

[Silveryou]

I have the feeling that he himself had not well understood what he found and was not able to counter the just observations made to him. So now I am attempting to give that explanations that he did not provide.

This is his starting point:

753 years + 247 years = 1000 years (aka i/j)

Everyone knows that 753 BC was the foundation of Rome, everyone knows that year 0 is the birth of Christ, but what about that 247? It is simply the number found having a preconceived idea that 1000 = i/j, obviously, because 1000 – 753 = 247.

KD takes as an example the dates on the document you can see above in which it is stated that year 1530 AUC (i530 Ab Urbe Condita, from the foundation of Rome) equals to year 777 AD (Anno Domini, from the birth of Christ) - nothing special about this - and he REMOVES the i (753+247), resulting in a new date 530.

Then he proceeds saying that 777 – 530 = 247 and he subsequently gives numerous examples produced by himself. Obviously people tells him that he is simply applying the addition that he found and he probably goes in confusion not knowing exactly what he was doing.

My reconstruction.
He reproduced this addition to every date found without considering the dating system to which they pertained. In fact i=1000 can be theoretically used for every dating system... AD, AUC, Byzantine, Coptic and so on. We are mainly involved with the AD and AUC so I think he did a great deal of confusion mixing up these two systems. In the example above 1530 is AUC system, 777 is AD and 530 is just another unknown dating system. He tries to sell the idea that this 530 is the true date for the foundation of Rome (and in the end it could be) but he doesn't give explanations. Then he gives other examples, further confusing ideas. In fact he starts with AD dates (not AUC as before) like 1492, then he obtains 739 by subtracting 753 years and then 492 by subtracting other 247 years without understanding whatever these numbers (739 and 492) represent, none of the two is an AD date and they either are not in the same dating system as the 530 he obtained before... because the starting points are two different systems (AUC the first, AD the second).

My explanation.
753 represents the difference between AUC and AD systems
247 represents the difference between AD and UNKNOWN systems
1000 represents the difference between AUC and UNKNOWN system

In this thread I possibly found out that the Gregorian calendar (GC) had 247 AD as a “secret” starting date (the anniversary of the foundation of Rome according to AUC calendar, aka 1000 AUC).
247 years
If GC is just a fancy theory of mine, fine by me, but the reasoning remains the same.

If we take all of this into account then 247 years are the difference between AD and GC, while 1000 years are the difference between AUC and GC.

Simply put:
753 (AUC – AD) + 247 (AD – GC) = 1000 (AUC – GC)

In the light of this his first example means year 1530 AUC followed by 777 AD followed by 530 GC (I say followed because the starting point of these calendars on the time axis are in this order from the oldest to the newest).
His second example is wrong, because he uses 1492 AD as an AUC date. He should have said that, given 1492 AD, then it is preceded by 2245 AUC (1492+753) and followed by 1245 GC (1492-247).

 

[Whitewave]

Thank you. That's where I was getting confused. The dates didn't really match. Thought I was missing something.

 

[feralimal]

247 though? As in 'all the time'? I think that's a joke, that I've seen before:

https://www.goethe-university-frankfurt.de/93203693/Zeptoseconds__New_world_record_in_short_time_measurement
"They measured how long it takes for a photon to cross a hydrogen molecule: about 247 zeptoseconds for the average bond length of the molecule. This is the shortest timespan that has been successfully measured to date."

Its also reminiscent of the axial tilt 'joke':

Axial tilt - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

"Earth currently has an axial tilt of about 23.44°"
Or, in reverse 90-23.44 = 66.56, rounding up to 66.6

 

[air_dance]

The history of the world is hidden in the Balkans.
I give you an example:
1. Alexander the Great conquered the Balkans in 336 BC
2. Roman conquest of Moesia and Thrace. 17BC
3. Valens was killed in the catastrophic battle against the Goths on August 8, 378 at Adrianople.
4. Asparuh of Bulgaria (681-701) founder of Danube Bulgaria.
5. Byzantium in 1018 conquered Bulgaria
6. Bulgaria falls under Ottoman rule 1396
7. Bulgaria was attacked by Russia 1878
Here we have: 336 BC - 17 BC - 378 - 681 - 1018 - 1396 - 1878
This means that the Balkans fall every 300 years and it is 6 times. Incredibly straight.

Post automatically merged: Oct 27, 2020

Bulgarian "Dullo" and Roman "Flavian" dynasty. Even their names are similar

 

[codis]

"Earth currently has an axial tilt of about 23.44°"
Or, in reverse 90-23.44 = 66.56, rounding up to 66.6

So, we see what our evil masters are up to ...

 

[Silveryou]

Thank you. That's where I was getting confused. The dates didn't really match. Thought I was missing something.

You are welcome. Now to validate the possible new dating system starting 247 years after year 0 and 1000 years after 753 BC, we should find a succession of similar/identical events that occur in all the three dating systems at the same time

 

[Ponygirl]

Wild Heretic? the Concave Earth site that I like so much? Then I am in good company, though a lowly flatearther.

If we take the phantom medieval period for granted, then how long is human history?
6000 years? or much less?

How long is the average world age? 500 years, 300?
My wild guess, unsubstantiated and full of many errors:
1. the Golden Age, the Purple Dawn when Saturn was the sun and the living was easy. I also reckon the Saturn god was the Demiurge of gnostic lore. This is also the time of the Anunnaki
2. the Silver Age, when Sumeria and Egypt came along, a new sun and the first moon
3. the Bronze, Greece, Rome, Byzantium (Jesus)
4. the Iron Age, Tartatia
5. the Aluminum age, now

Yes, I made up the last one. It seems like as good a metal as any to suggest the low quality toxic environment we have created.

It should be the iron and mud/clay age, as per the book of Daniel, chapter 2.
Daniel has a vision of a statue, with each body part being made of a different material. Each material is supposed to be representative of an age of Civilization. The last age is dirty.
View attachment 1176

I am aware of Daniel's dream statue.
But I took a view of world ages that preceded biblical writings.
Specifically, the age of Saturn that the scribes left out of the canon. Its location/s and culture/s are unknown.

I also cram the ancient world into one world age, with 2 parts: Sumeria, Babylon, Egypt into one (silver) and Greece, Rome, "medieval" Europe into a silver-bronze age.
The iron age would be the mysterious one before ours. Tartaria maybe. Byzantium?

When did our age begin? around 1700 or 1800? After a mud flood. yes.

So when was the Great Flood? Before Sumeria, since Gilgamesh knew it second hand after visiting Noah/Utnapishtim.

Looking from an amateurish and unqualified gnostic perspective, I will guess (wildly) that the Golden Age was the original world that Sophia/Gaia created. The Demiurge confiscated it, unleashed his Archons into it, who then created giants by mating with women, at which point the Deluge obliterated that age.
The Anunnaki may have belonged in this period.

Age of Clay & Iron for our age makes perfect sense. Clay is mud, and we build things from iron.