Dinosauria: Fact or Fiction?

SH.org OP Username
TH Dialectic
SH.org OP Date
2019-01-23 15:12:15
SH.org Reaction Score
47
SH.org Reply Count
42

TH Dialectic

Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2020
Messages
67
Reaction score
69
Reference
-Robbin Koefoed, “The Dinosaurs Never Existed”
-David Wozney, “Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction”
-Eric Dubay, “The Atlantean Conspiracy”

I would like to take you through some reference material around Dinosauria as a whole. We have been lead down a one way street with theories and claims to propagate the nihilistic evolutionary narrative. Think of it as the missing link the animal kingdom needed to bridge the gap between man and beast. I am sure huge animals/cryptids have inhabbited these plains before, but to come to conclusions on animals from 250 million years ago, from their skin to their mannerisms is outlandish to say the very least!

Non-bird dinosaurs lived between about 245 and 66 million years ago, in a time known as the Mesozoic Era. This was many millions of years before the first modern humans, Homo sapiens, appeared. Scientists divide the Mesozoic Era into three periods:
  • The Triassic
  • Jurassic
  • Cretaceous

With the overall goal to hide the existance of intelligent design a quick preface on evolution as a whole, Darwin and his lavish claims with no physical objective proofs hold no weight in real natural science. Remember even if the argument is “its happened over millions of years” for one animal to completely change its genus, we would have to have one animal giving birth to a totally different animal at some point in them "millions of years".

We can have hundreds of breeds of Dogs and Cats due to micro evolution, but the idea of one totally changing to another belongs in the the categories of fairytales.

Darwin hoped that transitional forms of animal species gradually evolving into different species would eventually be discovered at some future time in the fossil record (Will be waiting a while). To this day, however, no such transitional forms have ever been found anywhere in the world. Darwin’s observations regarding natural selection and adaptation were certainly correct. So-called “micro-evolution” of various traits and characteristics within a species has been confirmed and widely exists, but “macro-evolution,” the supposed transformation from one species into a completely different species has never been observed, and no evidence of such evolution exists anywhere in the fossil record.

Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist for the British Museum of Natural History and an ardent evolutionist, even he admits that Darwinists must concede natural selection has never been observed to actually cause anything to evolve:

“No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection. No one has ever got near it and most of the current argument in neo-Darwinism is about this question.”

Jurassic Park ... (cue dramatic music)

The class “Dinosauria” was originally defined by “Sir” Richard Owen of the Royal Society, and Superintendent of the British Museum Natural History Department in 1842. In other words, the existence of dinosaurs was first speculatively hypothesised by a knighted museum-head “coincidentally” in the mid-19th century, during the heyday of evolutionism, before a single dinosaur fossil had ever been found. The Masonic media and mainstream press worldwide got to work hyping stories of these supposed long-lost animals, and then lo and behold, 12 years later in 1854, Ferdinand Vandiveer Hayden during his exploration of the upper Missouri River, found “proof” of Owen’s theory! A few unidentified teeth he mailed to leading palaeontologist Joseph Leidy, who several years later declared them to be from an ancient extinct “Trachodon,” dinosaur (which beyond ironically means “rough tooth”).

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 14.22.17.png

Sir Richard Owen (above) - Richard Owen

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 14.23.14.png

Ferdinand Vandeveer Hayden (above) - Ferdinand Vandeveer Hayden

Firstly, it should be needless to say that it is impossible to reconstruct an entire hypothetical ancient animal based on a few teeth! But even more importantly, it is dubious that a myriad of ancient reptile/bird and reptile/mammal transitional forms necessary for the blossoming theory of evolution, would be hypothesised and then conveniently “discovered” by teams of evolutionist archeologists purposely out looking to find such fossils! And it is even more dubious that such fossils have supposedly existed for millions of years but were never found by or known to any civilisation in the history of humanity until evolutionism’s Masonic renaissance in the mid-19th century!

“Why are there no discoveries by native Americans in all the years previous when they roamed the American continents? There is no belief of dinosaurs in the Native American religion or tradition. For that matter, why were there no discoveries prior to the nineteenth century in any part of the world? According to the World Book Encyclopedia, ‘before the 1800’s no one ever knew that dinosaurs existed.’ During the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, large deposits of dinosaur remains were discovered …Why has man suddenly made all these discoveries?”
-David Wozney, “Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 12.40.11.png

No tribes, cultures or countries in the world ever discovered a dinosaur bone before the mid-1800s, and then they were suddenly found all over the world in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Argentina, Belgium, Mongolia, Tanzania, West Germany and many other places apparently had large deposits of dinosaur fossils never before seen. All these places were inhabited and well-explored for thousands of years before this time, why had no one ever found a dinosaur fossil before?

According to the book, “The Dinosaur Project,” paleontological journalist Wayne Grady claims the period following this, from around 1870 to 1880 became “a period in North America where some of the most underhanded shenanigans in the history of science were conducted.” In what was known as “The Great Dinosaur Rush” or “Bone Wars,” Edward Drinker Cope of the Academy of Natural Sciences and Othniel Marsh of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, began a life-long rivalry and passion for “dinosaur hunting.” They started out as friends but became bitter enemies during a legendary feud involving double-crossing, slander, bribery, theft, spying, and destruction of bones by both parties. Marsh is said to have discovered over 500 different ancient species including 80 dinosaurs, while Cope discovered 56. Out of the 136 dinosaur species supposedly discovered by the two men, however, only 32 are presently considered valid; the rest have all proven to be falsifications and fabrications! None of them once claimed to find a complete skeleton either, so all their work involved reconstructions. In fact, to this day no complete skeleton has ever been found, and so all dinosaurs are reconstructions.

“Discoveries and excavations seem not to be made by disinterested people, such as farmers, ranchers, hikers, outdoor recreationists, building construction industry basement excavators, pipeline trench diggers, and mining industry personnel but rather by people with vested interests, such as paleontologists, scientists, university professors, and museum organization personnel who were intentionally looking for dinosaur bones or who have studied dinosaurs previously. The finds are often made during special dinosaur-bone hunting trips and expeditions by these people to far-away regions already inhabited and explored. This seems highly implausible. More believable is the case of the discovery of the first original Dead Sea scrolls in 1947, which were unintentionally discovered by a child, and which were all published by 1955. In some cases of a discovery of dinosaur bones by a disinterested person, it was suggested to them by some ‘professional’ in the field to look or dig in a certain area. Also very interesting to note are special areas set aside and designated as dinosaur parks for which amateur dinosaur hunters are required to first obtain a dinosaur hunting license.”
-David Wozney, “Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 12.45.31.png

Whatever destination these establishment-funded archeologists and paleontologists set, it seemed they found incredible numbers of fossils in tiny areas. In one of the largest dinosaur excavation sites, called the Ruth Mason Quarry, over 2,000 fossils were allegedly discovered. Casts and original skeletons assembled from these bones are currently on display in over 60 museums world-wide. Florentino Ameghino, head of paleontology at La Plata Museum is amazingly responsible for 6,000 fossil species supposedly discovered throughout his career all in Argentina. Dinosaur hunter Earl Douglass sent 350 tons of excavated “dinosaur” bones to the Carnegie Museum of Natural History throughout his career, all coming from the “Dinosaur National Monument” in Utah. During an expedition to Patagonia, Dr. Luis Chiappe and Dr. Lowell Dingus supposedly discovered thousands of dinosaur eggs at a site of only a few hundred square yards. Many experts have mentioned how such finds of huge quantities of fossils in one area, by just a few highly-invested individuals, goes against the laws of natural probability and lends credence to the likelihood of forgeries or concentrated planting efforts.

“‘Dinosaur’ bones sell for a lot of money at auctions. It is a profitable business. There is pressure for academics to publish papers. Museums are in the business of producing displays that are popular and appealing. Movie producers and the media need to produce material to sell to stay in business. The mainstream media loves to hype alleged dinosaurs finds. Much is to be gained by converting a bland non-dinosaur discovery, of a bone of modern origin, into an impressive dinosaur find, and letting artists' interpretations and imaginations take the spotlight, rather than the basic boring real find. There are people who desire and crave prestige, fame and attention. There is the bandwagon effect and crowd behaviour. And then there are people and entities pursuing political and religious agendas. Highly rewarding financial and economic benefits to museums, educational and research organizations, university departments of paleontology, discoverers and owners of dinosaur bones, and the book, television, movie, and media industries may cause sufficient motivations for ridiculing of open questioning and for suppression of honest investigation.”
-David Wozney, “Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction”.

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 12.45.50.png

The fact that “T-Rex” bones have sold at auctions for upwards of $12 million shows how lucrative the field of dinosaur-hunting can be, and it just happens to be Museum officials who serendipitously seem to make the most prolific finds! The first dinosaur to ever be publicly displayed was the “Hadrosaurus foulkii,” at Edward Drinker Cope’s Academy of Natural Sciences in Philidelphia. The bones were co-discovered by Joseph Leidy, Cope’s esteemed professor, and the man responsible for the “Trachodon” toothosaurus. The original Hadrosaurus reconstruction, which is still on display today, shows a huge plaster cast bipedal reptile standing upright using its tail as a third-leg. What few people know, however, is that no skull was ever discovered and no original bones were put in the public exhibit.

“A visual and a sculptural artist were promptly hired to invent a skull, and from the illustrations of another artist, who had depicted the Iguanadon, the two artists drew the same face for the Hadrosaurus foulkii. The people involved could now technically defend the existence of this dinosaur, if someone were to ask. The stunt worked out so well, and fooled the public so thoroughly, that they could later change the head of the creature without anyone noticing. To this day, Hadrosaurus foulkii is on display at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia. The bones are said to be kept behind heavy, closed doors, but a plaster copy is exhibited in their place … So we learn of an iguana skull being substituted for the skull of a dinosaur on display. Was the public told at the time? What are we not being told today?”
-David Wozney, “Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction”

What we are not being told is that this is the rule and the not the exception. To this day not a single complete skeleton of any dinosaur has ever been found! All the museum displays, models, mannequins, cartoons, and movies of prehistoric monsters you have ever seen are all imaginative reconstructions based on incomplete skeletons arranged in a manner paleontologists believe to be most realistic. Furthermore, the skeletons exhibited in museums are all admittedly intricate fabrications made of plaster, fiberglass, various epoxies, and other animal bones, not original fossils.

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 12.46.02.png

When “dinosaur” bones are transported and prepared they use strips of burlap soaked in plaster to jacket over the fossils. Then after applying a tissue separator to keep the plaster from direct contact with the bone, the soaked burlap strips are laid on until it is totally encased in a protective mummy-like coating ready for safe transport. In an article titled “A Fossil’s Trail From Excavation to Exhibit” one insider remarked that, “Through moldmaking and casting we can totally fabricate limbs, ribs, vertebrae, etc., for the missing pieces of an articulated skeletal mount. Plaster, fiberglass and epoxies are often and commonly used. In reconstruction work on single bones, small to large cracks can be filled in with mache or plaster mixed with dextrin, a starch that imparts an adhesive quality and extra hardness to regular molding plaster. We’ve also had success using epoxy putties. Large missing fragments can be sculpted directly in place with these same materials.”

In other words, Museum personnel work with plaster and other materials to transport and fabricate skeletons and missing or incomplete bones all the time. In fact, the huge “dinosaur bone” displays found in museums across the world are admittedly carefully prepared fakes! No independent researcher has ever examined a real dinosaur skull! They claim all the actual fossils are kept in high-security storage, but only a select few paleontologists are ever allowed to examine them, so the ability to ascertain their authenticity is kept from the general public.

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 12.46.08.png

Most people believe that dinosaur skeletons displayed in museums consist of real dinosaur bones. This is not the case. The real bones are incarcerated in thick vaults to which only a select few highly placed researchers hold a key, which means that NO independent researcher has ever handled a tyrannosaurus rex bone. When people unaffiliated with the paleontological establishment attempt to gain access in order to study these dinosaur bones, they are met with refusal upon refusal … Only around 2100 dinosaur bones sets have been discovered worldwide, and out of these, only 15 incomplete Tyrannosaurus Rex bone sets have been found. These dinosaur bone sets have never formed a complete skeleton, but from these incomplete bones sets, paleontologists have constructed a hypothesis about the appearance of the whole skeleton, which they have modeled in plastic. If thousands of longnecks and large carnivorous reptiles had really roamed Earth, we wouldn’t only have found 2100 dinosaur bone sets, but millions of bones, with ordinary people tripping over them when digging in their vegetable patches.”
-Robbin Koefoed, “The Dinosaurs Never Existed”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 14.14.19.png

“When children go to a dinosaur museum, are the displays they see displays of science or displays of art and science fiction? Are we being deceived and brainwashed at an early age into believing a dinosaur myth? Deep probing questions need to be asked of the entire dinosaur business. There may have been an ongoing effort since the earliest dinosaur ‘discoveries’ to plant, mix and match bones of various animals, such as crocodiles, alligators, iguanas, giraffes, elephants, cattle, kangaroos, ostriches, emus, dolphins, whales, rhinoceroses, etc. to construct and create a new man-made concept prehistoric animal called the dinosaur. Where bones from existing animals are not satisfactory for deception purposes, plaster substitutes may be manufactured and used. Some material similar or superior to plasticine clay or plaster of Paris would be suitable. Molds may also be employed. What would be the motivation for such a deceptive endeavor? Obvious motivations include trying to prove evolution, trying to disprove or cast doubt on the Christian Bible and the existence of the Christian God, and trying to disprove the ‘young-earth theory.’ The dinosaur concept implies that if God exists, He tinkered with His idea of dinosaurs for awhile, then probably discarded or became tired of this creation and then went on to create man. The presented dinosaur historical timeline suggests an imperfect God who came up with the idea of man as an afterthought, thus demoting the biblical idea that God created man in His own image.”
-David Wozney, “Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 13.31.21.png

Type “Dinosaur Skulls” into a search engine and you will find a variety of replicas, tailor made dinosaurs, and “museum-quality” skeletons. One of the largest and most-renowned suppliers of fake dinosaurs is the Zigong Dino Ocean Art Company in Sichuan, China which provides natural history museums worldwide with ultra-realistic dinosaur skeletons made from real bones! Chicken, frog, dog, cat, horse and pig’s bones are melted down, mixed with glue, resin and plaster, then used as base material for re-casting as “dinosaur bones.” They are even given intentional fractures and an antiquated/fossilized look to achieve the right effect. Their website boasts, “Over 62% of our output goes to American and European markets, which means we will understand and are familiar with the intricacies and regulation of exporting to these regions … Since we are a partner of Dinosaur Museums, all products are made under the guidance of experts of the Chinese Academy of Sciences … We have gained a global sales network reaching the USA, Brazil, France, Poland, Russia, Germany, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Thailand, Indonesia, exhibited in Peru, Argentina, Vancouver, Cincinnati, Chicago and other places.

20190123_234415.png

“I have heard there is a fake-fossil factory in northeast China, in Liaoning Province, near the deposits where many of these recent alleged feather dinosaurs were found.”
-Alan Feduccia, University of North Carolina Paleontology Professor

On November 21, 2002, the journal Nature published an article named "Archaeoraptor's Better Half: The Other Component of the Infamous Fossil Forgery is Identified as a Fish-Eating Bird." (VOl 420, 2002) After careful measurements and morphological study, scientists concluded that the Archaeoraptor fossil that was once proclaimed as a key intermediate between carnivorous dinosaurs and birds is now known to be a forgery. It is a chimera formed of bird and dromaeosaur parts.

Fake Fossil Factory

“The possibility exists that key dinosaur bones on display have been artificially modified through sculpture and carving. Bone sculpture is not an unknown human activity. Many cultures participate in creating man-made objects out of existing bones, totally unrecognizable from the original shape. Is the dinosaur industry a customer of this sort of business? Is it possible that dinosaur skeleton replica are secretly assembled or manufactured in private buildings out of public view, with bones artificially constructed or used from a number of different modern-day animals? Why bother having any authentic original fossils at all if alleged replicas please the public?”
-David Wozney, “Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 13.33.28.png

Another problem with dinosaurs is their unnatural structural dynamics. Many dinosaur skeletons and reconstructions feature bipedal monsters like the T-Rex with a forward-leaning torso and head far larger and heavier than its counter-balancing tail. Many museum displays cannot even stand up under their own weight; it is highly unlikely that beasts this large and disproportionate could exist at all. The loads acting on their skeletons are so great that calculations indicate t ophe bones of the largest dinosaurs would buckle and crack under their own immense weight! Experts have also pointed out that dinosaurs would have to have moved much slower than portrayed in movies to prevent sudden shocks to their skeletons.

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 13.37.54.png

“This idea of slow moving animals does not agree with the bio-mechanical analysis of dinosaurs, which indicate that the Dinosaurs were agile, active creatures. This is the paradox between the Dinosaurs size and lifestyle. Many displays and drawings of dinosaurs appear to be an absurdity, showing a two-legged animal that would be totally off-balance, with the weight of head and abdomen much greater than weight of tail, which is supposed to act as a counter-balance. Is the dinosaur industry a case of science trying to meet public desires or expectations? The movie Jurassic Park is an example of showing dinosaurs much larger than any current displays in museums. After the movie came out, it is interesting to note that many articles were written asking ‘Is this possible?’ I can recall a report of dinosaur DNA being discovered preserved in amber, which later turned out to be false.”
-David Wozney, “Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 13.34.25.png

“Overall, several millions of dollars have been spent promoting the existence of dinosaurs through movies, TV, magazines and comics. The world of movies and paleontology are like Siamese twins. People’s view on the existence of dinosaurs is based not on firm evidence, but on Hollywood fixated artistic impressions. Documentaries colorfully illustrate each dinosaur’s characteristics, like colors, weight and muscle mass, but Don Lessem (advisor for Jurassic Park) admits that this is pure guesswork - consider for instance the question of how much these dinosaurs weigh. Don Lessem says, ‘Scientists don’t know how much dinosaurs weighed!’” -Robbin Koefoed, “The Dinosaurs Never Existed”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 14.29.07.png

Dinosaurs are presented to the public with colorful artistic reconstructions, drawings, models, mannequins, gigantic skeletons in museums, cartoons and movies showing these beasts in explicit detail, but the fact is from the assigning and arrangement of bones in each species, to the impossible to discern soft tissue, skin, eyes, noses, color, hairyness, texture etc., just like the many supposed Ape-Man species, all dinosaur reconstructions are 100% fictional fabrications created by invested and inventive evolutionists. They purposely present dinosaurs to children in the media to spark and bias their young imaginations towards their machinations. Cartoons like “Ice Age” and “The Land Before Time” movies like “Jurassic Park” and “Dinosaur Island” coloring books, dolls, plastic toys, elementary school textbooks, and huge displays in children’s museums certainly have an effect on budding young minds.

National Geographic and the Ice Age movies were produced by Mason Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. and 20th Century Fox. The Masonic production company Universal Studios created Jurassic Park and The Land Before Time. They are owned by Comcast, whose main shareholders are Masons JP Morgan and the Rothschilds. Discovery Channel which features many dinosaur documentaries is also financially advised by N M Rothschild and Sons Limited.

Former Paleontology student Michael Forsell claimed on a radio interview with leading paleontologist Jack Horner, that he was “a total fraud, fabricating evidence and perpetuating the myth of dinosaurs.” He continued on saying,

“I started my career in the field of paleontology, only to leave my studies once I realized the whole thing was a sham. It’s nonsense, most of the so-called skeletons in museums are actually plaster casts. They even do it openly on documentaries now, preserving the bones my ass! I struggled as a student, mainly because I could not tell the difference between a fossilized egg and an ordinary rock, and of course there is no difference. I was treated like a leper when I refused to buy into their propaganda, and promptly left the course. Dinosaurs never existed, the whole shebang is a freak show, they just grab a couple of old bones and form them into their latest Frankenstein’s monster-like exhibit. We are all being fooled and it’s wrong, but together we can stop it.”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 14.18.26.png

Many claim that since dinosaur fossils have been radiometrically dated to be tens of millions of years old that their authenticity is thus proven. The fact is, however, that the methods used to date dinosaur fossils involve not measuring the actual fossils, but the rocks near where they are found. Most fossils are found near the surface of the earth, and if a modern-day animal were to die in the area, paleontologists would be likely to date them the same age! Dr. Margaret Helder in her book “Completing the Picture, A Handbook on Museums and Interpretive Centers Dealing with Fossils,” she writes, “Scientists used to be very impressed with the potential of radiometric for coming up with absolutely reliable ages of some kinds of rocks. They do not feel that way anymore. Having had to deal with numerous calculated dates which are too young or too old compared with what they expected, scientists now admit that the process has many more uncertainties than they ever would have supposed in the early years. The public knows almost nothing about uncertainties in the dating of rocks. The impression that most people have received is that many rocks on earth are extremely old and that the technology exists to make accurate measurements of the ages. Scientists have become more and more aware however that the measurements which the machines make, may tell us nothing about the actual age of the rock.”

One of the main reasons that evolutionists “needed” the existence of dinosaurs was to answer the complicated problems present in the theory of evolution including: sea-dwelling animals evolving into land-dwellers; reptiles evolving wings, feathers, flying and becoming birds; as well as other reptiles evolving warm-blood, live births, breasts and becoming mammals. Through their imaginary multi-million-year timeline and a variety of supposed transitional dinosaur forms, the paleontological establishment has been promoting various sea-dinosaur, reptile/birds and reptile/mammals to bridge these gaps. Many professionals and experts in the field have disputed such findings as often as they have been presented, however. Dr. Storrs Olson, a Smithsonian Institute Scientist, wrote, “The idea of feathered dinosaurs and the theropod origin of birds is being actively promulgated by a cadre of zealous scientists acting in concert with certain editors at Nature and National Geographic who themselves have become outspoken and highly biased proselytizers of the faith. Truth and careful scientific weighing of evidence have been among the first casualties in their program, which is now fast becoming one of the grander scientific hoaxes or our age.”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 14.17.33.png

No authentic feathers have ever been found with dinosaur fossils, though a few exposed hoaxes certainly attempted to fake it. Dr. Olson called the adding of feathers to their findings “hype, wishful thinking, propaganda, nonsense fantasia, and a hoax.” In the 1990s many fossils with feathers were supposedly discovered in China (suspiciously close to the Zigong Dino Ocean Art Company), but when examined Dr. Timothy Rowe found the so-called “Confuciusornis” was an elaborate hoax. He also found the “Archeoraptor” supposedly discovered in the 90s was composed of bones from 5 different animals! When Dr. Rowe presented his findings to National Geographic the head scientist reportedly remarked “well all of these have been fiddled with!” National Geographic then proceeded with their news conferences and media stories about the Archeoraptor fossils being genuine and having found the missing link in evolution.

“In 1999, National Geographic magazine was busted when they presented, in a colorful and fancily presented article, the missing link. An Archeoraptor dinosaur, which was supposed to support the basic tenet of evolutionary theory, that dinosaurs had slowly developed over millions of years. Their proof consisted of a fossil, where carefully arranged bone imprints gave the impression of a creature half dinosaur and half bird. The scam was discovered during a CT scan which uncovered unnatural bone links. National Geographic magazine was later forced to admit, when pressured, that the fossil was man-made!”
-Robbin Koefoed, “The Dinosaurs Never Existed”

Screenshot 2019-01-23 at 14.30.36.png

Paleontologists claim that “Archaeopteryx” is another transitional form of bird evolved from dinosaurs, but this theory falls on its face against overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Other species like Confuciusornis, Liaoningornis, and Eoalulavis have all been found to be contemporary with the Archaeopteryx and are indistinguishable from present-day birds. Alan Feduccia from University of North Carolina, one of the most famous ornithologists in the world stated, “I’ve studied bird skulls for 25 years and I don’t see any similarities whatsoever. I just don’t see it. The theropod origins of birds, in my opinion, will be the greatest embarrassment of paleontology of the 20th century.” Larry Martin from the University of Kansas, a paleo-ornithologist says, “to tell you the truth, if I had to support the dinosaur origin of birds with those characters, I’d be embarrassed every time I had to get up and talk about it.”

Even if dinosaurs did evolve into birds to fill their evolution gap, it does not explain how something like the common housefly could have evolved. Flies flap their wings simultaneously 500 times per second, even the slightest dissonance in vibration would cause them to lose balance and fall, but this never happens.
  • How could they “evolve” such an amazing and specialized ability?
  • Why were dinosaurs never discovered before the evolutionist renaissance in the mid-19th century?
  • Why do paleontologists think they can reconstruct an entire species of ancient animal from a few teeth?
  • Why have so many dinosaur “discoveries” turned out to be hoaxes?
  • Why are all “authentic dinosaur fossils” kept under tight lock and key away from any independent analysis?
  • Why has erosion and weathering not destroyed all these supposed prints and fossils that are allegedly millions of years old?
  • If dinosaurs were supposedly wiped out by a meteor impact or other such global catastrophe, why is it that all the other various animal species that exist today were not similarly wiped out?
There are many more questions which need to be answered before anyone in their right-mind should consider the existence of dinosaurs anything but a convenient evolutionist myth.

“The paleontological establishment can control which hypotheses will be constructed through textbooks and the curriculum. In this way, students are brainwashed into a pseudo-reality controlled by the text material and the teacher’s authority. A short practical example; a random dental bone is found at an excavation site and from this dental bone, the rest of the skeleton is guessed at. We are not kidding about this. The entire dinosaurian field of the paleontological program is a sham.”
-Robbin Koefoed, “The Dinosaurs Never Existed”

To conclude, we have numerous discrepancies in the whole story of "Dinosauria". For me it seems it was simply a missing piece of the puzzle, brought to fruition from master masons to confuse the masses. I for one have always pondered how carbon dating can be so accurate. As I know now, it’s not.

The word "Giants" seems to resonate with me when it comes to large bones being found, would love some input from you guys.

TH
Note: This OP was recovered from the Wayback Archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP: Dinosauria: Fact or Fiction?
 

PactolusKY

New member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
2
Reaction score
8
I was directed to post here about this. I think alot if not most dinosaur skeletons are just bones put together that happen to fit. Take this for example, I don't know how this supposed Quetzalcoatlus would even be able to feed with that kind of mishapen beak.

QuetzalcoatlusROM.JPG

Post automatically merged:

Also, it's not just dinosaurs. The species Gigantopithecus has been entirely reconstructed from a single mandible and (supposedly) over 1,000 teeth.
 
Last edited:

Oracle

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Messages
310
Reaction score
871
The fact that “T-Rex” bones have sold at auctions for upwards of $12 million shows how lucrative the field of dinosaur-hunting can be
Sounds like it was the 19th century equivalent to modern "art" use for money laundering of the proceeds of human and drug trafficking.
Could the surfacing of the dinosaur bone craze then be related to a micro reset and hence no records of them in indian stories?
I believe them to in fact have existed ( though not necessarily as decribed by science) as I have seen a small live dinosaur in the flesh some 25 years ago.
 

Oracle

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Messages
310
Reaction score
871
I have written about it here previously.Proof of Dragons?

I was reading this thread offline and thinking I'd love to add a dinosaur experience I had back in the 90's but having been ridiculed in real life on sharing my experience back then, I've kept it to myself ever since.
Since you have been brave enough to add yours,I will do likewise as I can confirm they do still exist in some shapes and forms.
I lived back then on our property in the bush in southern nsw Australia. One afternoon I was driving back from work through the forest about 3pm on a beautiful clear summers day.
I'd driven about 10 kms through the forest and was about 8km from home when rounding a bend I caught movement in the corner of my eye to the right and when I looked in that direction saw about 20 feet from me a small dinosaur ( I would say from the ground to the top of it's back it was about 2 feet high) racing up the bank away from the road into the bush.I was stunned with surprise and wanted to pull up and further investigate,however the road was dangerously windy at that point and the banks gave no room to pull up. By the time I got to a section where I could pull up, I had driven about a km and so being hot and sweaty and keen to get home for a swim in the river I kept going.I looked out around that area ever after driving past but never saw it again. My partner and friends all said I'd seen a goanna which is ridiculous since it looked and ran nothing like a goanna and I've killed and eaten a few so I should know the anatomical difference in what I saw.
The best I can describe it is it was the shape of a raptor but smaller. It's skin was a grey colour mostly but greenish on its back and shoulders. It ran just like you'd see a raptor run in Jurassic park, the back legs were strong and similar to that and it had two shorter legs at the front hanging in that same dinosaur manner as it ran on two legs.
I have had two other sightings of bizarre paranormal things in the 5km radius of that area but that's for another thread.
This dinosaur sighting is also 100 per cent true, whether you believe or not, I can say for a fact
 

wild heretic

Staff Member
Staff member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
319
Reaction score
136
Location
Ireland
Site:
www.wildheretic.com
I have written about it here previously.Proof of Dragons?

I was reading this thread offline and thinking I'd love to add a dinosaur experience I had back in the 90's but having been ridiculed in real life on sharing my experience back then, I've kept it to myself ever since.
Since you have been brave enough to add yours,I will do likewise as I can confirm they do still exist in some shapes and forms.
I lived back then on our property in the bush in southern nsw Australia. One afternoon I was driving back from work through the forest about 3pm on a beautiful clear summers day.
I'd driven about 10 kms through the forest and was about 8km from home when rounding a bend I caught movement in the corner of my eye to the right and when I looked in that direction saw about 20 feet from me a small dinosaur ( I would say from the ground to the top of it's back it was about 2 feet high) racing up the bank away from the road into the bush.I was stunned with surprise and wanted to pull up and further investigate,however the road was dangerously windy at that point and the banks gave no room to pull up. By the time I got to a section where I could pull up, I had driven about a km and so being hot and sweaty and keen to get home for a swim in the river I kept going.I looked out around that area ever after driving past but never saw it again. My partner and friends all said I'd seen a goanna which is ridiculous since it looked and ran nothing like a goanna and I've killed and eaten a few so I should know the anatomical difference in what I saw.
The best I can describe it is it was the shape of a raptor but smaller. It's skin was a grey colour mostly but greenish on its back and shoulders. It ran just like you'd see a raptor run in Jurassic park, the back legs were strong and similar to that and it had two shorter legs at the front hanging in that same dinosaur manner as it ran on two legs.
I have had two other sightings of bizarre paranormal things in the 5km radius of that area but that's for another thread.
This dinosaur sighting is also 100 per cent true, whether you believe or not, I can say for a fact
Cheers.
 

Bitbybit

Active member
Trusted Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2020
Messages
80
Reaction score
105
Dinosours were big because the gravity was much less.
Less gravity is the reason those huge birds could fly.
We have no bird of that size today.
Except for the Ostrich etc that kept the long neck, but minimized its head, maximized its legs and decided to fly no more.
The swan with its long neck still, can barely take off, and its legs struggles to stand up.

To suggest those ancient huge dinosour birds could fly in the current gravity is laughable.
 

Coulness

Active member
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Messages
38
Reaction score
166
Location
Scotland
Another problem with dinosaurs is their unnatural structural dynamics. Many dinosaur skeletons and reconstructions feature bipedal monsters like the T-Rex with a forward-leaning torso and head far larger and heavier than its counter-balancing tail. Many museum displays cannot even stand up under their own weight; it is highly unlikely that beasts this large and disproportionate could exist at all. The loads acting on their skeletons are so great that calculations indicate t ophe bones of the largest dinosaurs would buckle and crack under their own immense weight! Experts have also pointed out that dinosaurs would have to have moved much slower than portrayed in movies to prevent sudden shocks to their skeletons.

A3A78F7B-A0EA-4415-8E3E-D1E03BE081FD.jpeg

56B6C13B-310E-4AE6-8809-D14A2B8B1889.jpeg


x-ray of a beaver tail

It is very odd, the way they choose to characterise dinosaurs by just adding skin to bone with no flesh in between. Boringly unimaginative.​
If they must lie about things, don’t we deserve more creativity?
I love this post!
 

dirtydanisreal

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2020
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I really like the theory that the T-Rex's "arms" were actually what remains of wings. The arms wouldn't have made sense since if they fell over, they couldn't push themselves up. When the small bones of winged animals are missing, what's left of the wings looks very similar to the arms the Rex has. It makes sense considering the power the legs had. I imagine them flying down and picking up whole large animals.
 

irishbalt

Active member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2020
Messages
180
Reaction score
155
Location
united states
No one likes to admit they have been fooled.

To admit we have been fooled is a humbling experience. I prefer to have a sense of humor about it.

The controllers and TPTB (the powers that be), aren't called that for nothin' (a little vernacular never hurt).

Great article, great logic utilized here and a bit of critical thinking. Bravo Thank you for sharing.
 

Magnumopus

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
93
Reaction score
263
Plesiosaurus or tumescent turbot? Something's been creating a splash in a Siberian lake (the first two-and-a-half minutes are relevant).

 

Citezenship

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
831
Reaction score
1,892
Location
Bristol UK
One thing that always comes up for me when posed with this question is the the dinosaurs seemed to have escaped the grip of the golden ratio, the the T rex for example, how the hell could those little arms be of any function, it would neither be able to feed itself or wipe it's own bottom.

Maybe it is one of those elusive transitionary species.
 

JWW427

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
995
Reaction score
2,296
Location
Wash. DC.
My thought is this:

If extraterrestrial races started the dinosaur experiment and it became too dominant, perhaps another race or races threw down cheap but destructive asteroids to kill them off. Mammals suspiciously dominated afterwards.
 
Last edited:

Bitbybit

Active member
Trusted Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2020
Messages
80
Reaction score
105
The size of animal life have decreased simultaneously as gravity has increased which increase is correlating with the age measurements of the oceanic floor spreading, starting with the breakup of "Pangea". (Triassic/Jurassic Era).

No other extinction event is necessary, although its of course very possible. (change in oxygen levels etc)
dragonfly.jpg
dragonfly2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Bitbybit

Active member
Trusted Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2020
Messages
80
Reaction score
105
One thing that always comes up for me when posed with this question is the the dinosaurs seemed to have escaped the grip of the golden ratio, the the T rex for example, how the hell could those little arms be of any function, it would neither be able to feed itself or wipe it's own bottom.

Maybe it is one of those elusive transitionary species.

Just a thought, but perhaps if it descended from a quadrapedal animal, but it grow and evolution gave it advantage in speed in a bipedal configuration where large arms were a burden.
A flesh eating Mega ostrich is a good analogy :)


Being aware of the obvious lower gravity in the past makes it incredible and even laughable to think how human collective has evaded the obvious solution for our planet regarding the "mysteries" regarding megafauna and "supercontinents".

Megafauna.jpg
Paraceratherium.jpg

Platybelodon.jpg
Andrewsarchus.jpg
ptedac.PNG
ptedactyrol.PNG
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top