Klaus Schwab and his Great [Delusion] Reset

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
560
Reaction score
1,816
You know you want one!
This smart face mask tells you when to wash it
Posted February 19, 2021
The BreathTech-S³ mask is sustainable and includes biodegradable and recyclable components[.quote]
Edit to add
Truly amazing how quickly the UN can pull such huge and accurate figures out of its arse, oh wait it doesn't have an arse its neither living nor dead!

USD 166 Billion was estimated to be spent on disposable masks in 2020. Up from USD 800 million in 2019. Approximately 75 % of used masks and other pandemic-related waste will end up in landfills, or floating in the seas.

Aside from the environmental damage, the financial cost in areas such as tourism and fisheries is estimated by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) at around USD 40 Billion
Source: un.org
And the company behind the smart mask must be one of the new world companies seen as so many old world companies are going bust.

Screenshot_2021-03-17_10-39-23.jpg
But you still will not get rid of that reset button in your pocket, the mobile phone. will you because... reasons. Wake up!
 
Last edited:

fabiorem

Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2020
Messages
30
Reaction score
72
So you think the vaccination programme is actually intended to fail by design and be seen as a disaster to make people who strongly trusted and supported the system turn on it and demand its replacement, which the globalists will gladly oblige?

Interesting, would explain why they are slowly but surely allowing news of adverse reactions and deaths from the vaccine to trickle into the mainstream media, they don't seem to be going out of their way to cover it up.

They would not let these news hit the mainstream media. The journalists reporting it would be fired and persecuted.
We have two scenarios here: they either dont have control over the mid-levels, or this is what they actually intend to happen.
Notice that Bill Gates rushed too fast to the front, which allowed normies to become suspicious of him. It looks like he want to play a cynical villain on purpose.
The thing they most certainly wanted to do with this plandemic, was to crash the economy, so small business could be bought cheap by big conglomerates, and the printing of money would boost the stock market and give reason for the implementation of a financial reset, using CBDCs to replace fiat money.
Another objective they have is to prove global warming. We all know global warming is fake, as the planet was cooling in recent years. However, with the lockdowns, carbon emissions have decreased, allowing for more sunrays to hit the Earth and then warm it. They will say the increase in temperature is a proof of global warming, so advancing that agenda where they plan to cover the sun with a spray, a idea which also comes from Bill Gates. And in this spray, they could put smart dust, which would interact with the vaccines, 5G antennas and cellphones to turn people into machines. The carbon emissions could interfere with this dust, so the lockdowns have the purpose of stopping these emissions, or at least decreasing them to a manageable level.
 
Last edited:

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
560
Reaction score
1,816
Notice Klaus and Bill or George or Warren or Tony haven't signed it?
Neither has Joe, Vladimir, XI, Ran, Wee Nippy, Kim Jong, and many others. Queens and Kings are also absent from the List as is António.


The article signed by 24 world leaders

'The Covid-19 pandemic is the biggest challenge to the global community since the 1940s. At that time, following the devastation of two world wars, political leaders came together to forge the multilateral system. The aims were clear: to bring countries together, to dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and cooperation: namely, peace, prosperity, health and security.

'Today, we hold the same hope that as we fight to overcome the Covid-19 pandemic together, we can build a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations. There will be other pandemics and other major health emergencies. No single government or multilateral agency can address this threat alone. The question is not if, but when. Together, we must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond to pandemics in a highly coordinated fashion. The Covid-19 pandemic has been a stark and painful reminder that nobody is safe until everyone is safe.

'We are, therefore, committed to ensuring universal and equitable access to safe, efficacious and affordable vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for this and future pandemics. Immunisation is a global public good and we will need to be able to develop, manufacture and deploy vaccines as quickly as possible. This is why the Access to Covid-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A) was set up in order to promote equal access to tests, treatments and vaccines and support health systems across the globe. ACT-A has delivered on many aspects but equitable access is yet to be achieved. There is more we can do to promote global access.

'To that end, we believe that nations should work together towards a new international treaty for pandemic preparedness and response. Such a renewed collective commitment would be a milestone in stepping up pandemic preparedness at the highest political level. It would be rooted in the constitution of the World Health Organisation, drawing in other relevant organisations key to this endeavour, in support of the principle of health for all. Existing global health instruments, especially the International Health Regulations, would underpin such a treaty, ensuring a firm and tested foundation on which we can build and improve.

'The main goal of this treaty would be to foster an all-of-government and all-of-society approach, strengthening national, regional and global capacities and resilience to future pandemics. This includes greatly enhancing international cooperation to improve, for example, alert systems, data-sharing, research, and local, regional and global production and distribution of medical and public health countermeasures, such as vaccines, medicines, diagnostics and personal protective equipment.

'It would also include recognition of a 'One Health' approach that connects the health of humans, animals and our planet. And such a treaty should lead to more mutual accountability and shared responsibility, transparency and cooperation within the international system and with its rules and norms.

'To achieve this, we will work with heads of state and governments globally and all stakeholders, including civil society and the private sector. We are convinced that it is our responsibility, as leaders of nations and international institutions, to ensure that the world learns the lessons of the Covid-19 pandemic.

'At a time when Covid-19 has exploited our weaknesses and divisions, we must seize this opportunity and come together as a global community for peaceful cooperation that extends beyond this crisis. Building our capacities and systems to do this will take time and require a sustained political, financial and societal commitment over many years.

'Our solidarity in ensuring that the world is better prepared will be our legacy that protects our children and grandchildren and minimises the impact of future pandemics on our economies and our societies. Pandemic preparedness needs global leadership for a global health system fit for this millennium. To make this commitment a reality, we must be guided by solidarity, fairness, transparency, inclusiveness and equity.'

J. V. Bainimarama, prime minister of Fiji;

António Luís Santos da Costa, prime minister of Portugal;

Klaus Iohannis, president of Romania;

Boris Johnson, prime minister of the United Kingdom;

Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda;

Uhuru Kenyatta, president of Kenya;

Emmanuel Macron, president of France;

Angela Merkel, chancellor of Germany;

Charles Michel, president of the European Council;

Kyriakos Mitsotakis, prime minister of Greece;

Moon Jae-in, president of the Republic of Korea;

Sebastián Piñera, president of Chile;

Carlos Alvarado Quesada, president of Costa Rica;

Edi Rama, prime minister of Albania;

Cyril Ramaphosa, president of South Africa;

Keith Rowley, prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago;

Mark Rutte, prime minister of the Netherlands;

Kais Saied, president of Tunisia;

Macky Sall, president of Senegal;

Pedro Sánchez, Prime Minister of Spain;

Erna Solberg, prime minister of Norway;

Aleksandar Vučić, president of Serbia;

Joko Widodo, president of Indonesia;

Volodymyr Zelensky, president of Ukraine;

Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organisation.
 

Citezenship

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
586
Reaction score
1,687
Location
Bristol UK
Notice Klaus and Bill or George or Warren or Tony haven't signed it?
Neither has Joe, Vladimir, XI, Ran, Wee Nippy, Kim Jong, and many others. Queens and Kings are also absent from the List as is António.


The article signed by 24 world leaders

'The Covid-19 pandemic is the biggest challenge to the global community since the 1940s. At that time, following the devastation of two world wars, political leaders came together to forge the multilateral system. The aims were clear: to bring countries together, to dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and cooperation: namely, peace, prosperity, health and security.

'Today, we hold the same hope that as we fight to overcome the Covid-19 pandemic together, we can build a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations. There will be other pandemics and other major health emergencies. No single government or multilateral agency can address this threat alone. The question is not if, but when. Together, we must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond to pandemics in a highly coordinated fashion. The Covid-19 pandemic has been a stark and painful reminder that nobody is safe until everyone is safe.

'We are, therefore, committed to ensuring universal and equitable access to safe, efficacious and affordable vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for this and future pandemics. Immunisation is a global public good and we will need to be able to develop, manufacture and deploy vaccines as quickly as possible. This is why the Access to Covid-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A) was set up in order to promote equal access to tests, treatments and vaccines and support health systems across the globe. ACT-A has delivered on many aspects but equitable access is yet to be achieved. There is more we can do to promote global access.

'To that end, we believe that nations should work together towards a new international treaty for pandemic preparedness and response. Such a renewed collective commitment would be a milestone in stepping up pandemic preparedness at the highest political level. It would be rooted in the constitution of the World Health Organisation, drawing in other relevant organisations key to this endeavour, in support of the principle of health for all. Existing global health instruments, especially the International Health Regulations, would underpin such a treaty, ensuring a firm and tested foundation on which we can build and improve.

'The main goal of this treaty would be to foster an all-of-government and all-of-society approach, strengthening national, regional and global capacities and resilience to future pandemics. This includes greatly enhancing international cooperation to improve, for example, alert systems, data-sharing, research, and local, regional and global production and distribution of medical and public health countermeasures, such as vaccines, medicines, diagnostics and personal protective equipment.

'It would also include recognition of a 'One Health' approach that connects the health of humans, animals and our planet. And such a treaty should lead to more mutual accountability and shared responsibility, transparency and cooperation within the international system and with its rules and norms.

'To achieve this, we will work with heads of state and governments globally and all stakeholders, including civil society and the private sector. We are convinced that it is our responsibility, as leaders of nations and international institutions, to ensure that the world learns the lessons of the Covid-19 pandemic.

'At a time when Covid-19 has exploited our weaknesses and divisions, we must seize this opportunity and come together as a global community for peaceful cooperation that extends beyond this crisis. Building our capacities and systems to do this will take time and require a sustained political, financial and societal commitment over many years.

'Our solidarity in ensuring that the world is better prepared will be our legacy that protects our children and grandchildren and minimises the impact of future pandemics on our economies and our societies. Pandemic preparedness needs global leadership for a global health system fit for this millennium. To make this commitment a reality, we must be guided by solidarity, fairness, transparency, inclusiveness and equity.'

J. V. Bainimarama, prime minister of Fiji;

António Luís Santos da Costa, prime minister of Portugal;

Klaus Iohannis, president of Romania;

Boris Johnson, prime minister of the United Kingdom;

Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda;

Uhuru Kenyatta, president of Kenya;

Emmanuel Macron, president of France;

Angela Merkel, chancellor of Germany;

Charles Michel, president of the European Council;

Kyriakos Mitsotakis, prime minister of Greece;

Moon Jae-in, president of the Republic of Korea;

Sebastián Piñera, president of Chile;

Carlos Alvarado Quesada, president of Costa Rica;

Edi Rama, prime minister of Albania;

Cyril Ramaphosa, president of South Africa;

Keith Rowley, prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago;

Mark Rutte, prime minister of the Netherlands;

Kais Saied, president of Tunisia;

Macky Sall, president of Senegal;

Pedro Sánchez, Prime Minister of Spain;

Erna Solberg, prime minister of Norway;

Aleksandar Vučić, president of Serbia;

Joko Widodo, president of Indonesia;

Volodymyr Zelensky, president of Ukraine;

Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organisation.
I am real suspicious of treaties lately, an agreement of the few for the many, when treaties get broken they can also have dire consequences that the few have agreed the many will be liable for, just like our death cert system but for whole countries, truly the paper/papal that binds!

Wonder if this guy will be sining(not mistake) us in.


 

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
560
Reaction score
1,816
Solidarity is a legal term, the entire article is in reality a document written in legalese but Solidarity is the literal key word to understanding what is being written.

What is SOLIDARITY?
a term given to the situation where a group of people will band together for the performance of a contract.


A GROUP OF PEOPLE ergo not you or me or anyone outside of those 24 names.


And contract?
What is CONTRACT?
An agreement, upon sufficient consideration, to do or not to do a particular thing. 2 Bl. Comm. 442; 2 Kent, Comm. 449. Justice v. Lang, 42 N. Y. 496, 1 Am. Rep. 576; Edwards v. Kearzey, 96 U. S. 599, 24 L. Ed. 793; Canterberry v. Miller, 76 111. 355. A covenant or agreement between two or more persons, with a lawful consideration or cause. Jacob. A deliberate engagement between competent parties, upon a legal consideration, to do or abstain from doing, some act. Wharton. A contract or agreement is either where a promise is made on one side and assented to on the other; or where two or more persons enter into engagement with each other by a promise on either side. 2 Steph. Comm. 54. A contract is an agreement by which one person obligates himself to another to give, to do. or permit, or not to do. something expressed or implied by such agreement. Civ. Code I,a. art. 1761; Fislc v. Police Jury. 34 La. Ann. 45. A contract is an agreement to do or not to do a certain thing. Civ. Code Cal.

Source
 

matematik

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2020
Messages
233
Reaction score
430
I wonder if the abolition of combustion engine cars in favour of electric cars will be a big part of Agenda 21/2030 rural depopulation. It seems to me that electric cars are only intended to be accessible to a few, and that the charging infrastructure will be very limited compared to petrol stations.

Once conventional cars are banned, people who live outside of "hub cities" will find getting around very difficult. In the UK at least public transport outside of major cities tends to be poor to non-existent, so once conventional cars are phased out living outside of the cities will become unviable for many people, and in the UK this really isn't very far away, the government here has said they will ban the sale of new combustion engine cars starting from 2030. I think abolition most peoples' main mode of transport outside the cities is a big part of how the powers that be will bring about rural depopulation and megacities.
 

Vagabond

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
134
Reaction score
275
I wonder if the abolition of combustion engine cars in favour of electric cars will be a big part of Agenda 21/2030 rural depopulation. It seems to me that electric cars are only intended to be accessible to a few, and that the charging infrastructure will be very limited compared to petrol stations.

Once conventional cars are banned, people who live outside of "hub cities" will find getting around very difficult. In the UK at least public transport outside of major cities tends to be poor to non-existent, so once conventional cars are phased out living outside of the cities will become unviable for many people, and in the UK this really isn't very far away, the government here has said they will ban the sale of new combustion engine cars starting from 2030. I think abolition most peoples' main mode of transport outside the cities is a big part of how the powers that be will bring about rural depopulation and megacities.
yes. i think you might be late to the party, its not speculation , its written down. see WEF "you will own nothing and be happy"
agenda 2030 and many many more documents. we are now slowly moving into the climate lockdown phase, once the vacicne phase is done, they will really get to work
 
Last edited:

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
560
Reaction score
1,816
Here take this or leave it your choice.
Uncle Klaus writes in one of his books "you will own nothing". Well all he is doing is stating the bleeding obvious. You don't own anything, you cannot own anything. Ownership is a myth.
When my father died he left everything he thought he owned here. Life whatever it is left the room and everything including the body he used in life did not travel with him, assuming he went somewhere. The penny didn't really drop until my mother died a couple of years later.
She too left everything she owned ligging around including her body. The spark of life the soul the whatever the hell it is energy of life etc buggered off but nothing else did. Ownership is an idea a notion we idiots adopt as the way things have to be because someone else told us it is so.

Ownership is found in claims made in speech and in writing, usually the latter. It is based on the claimant 'proving' who they are by use of a legal identity. This legal identity goes under the guise of citizen. It is made up of three components, a legal name, a legal address, a date of birth. None of these three things belong to you and crucially you never asked their creator for its permission to use them.
Think I'm nuts, well I likely am but bear with me.

The legal name is nothing more than a register entry created by a government employee, a Registrar in a Register of Births.
The date of birth is nothing more than an a register entry created by a government employee, a Registrar in a Register of Births.
The legal address is nothing more than a register entry in a Gazetteer of Addresses created by a government employee.

Government employees brought these things into existence on paper, the only place they exist anywhere. You and I can never see these Registers, pieces of paper to check their veracity or amend or do anything to them.

My parents gave me a name and a surname. I had no part in its creation nor given the chance of deciding whether I needed one. The sound it makes is the same as the sound the legal name makes when spoken. That is how I was tricked by ignorance on their part into using another's property for gain thus began a life of fraud.
Same with the D.O.B.
Though present at my birth I had no part in determining the date it occurred and I could not inform the Registrar of anything.
The address at least in the United Kingdom is in two parts both created by different government employees.
The street address is created by the Registrar of the Gazette and the postcode is created by an employee of the Postmaster General.

These three things none all of which I have no claim on which are in the control of government employees are the basis upon which everything I am told is civilised stands.
Think you own your car?
Well you don't as it has a Vehicle Identification Number issued by a government employee and it is recorded in the VIN Register. Stop paying Vehicle Excise Duty on the car and the actual owner will turn up, clamp it then cart it away then crush it.
Were it actually owned by YOU then they would be stealing the property of another and YOU could kick their arse in a Court of Law.
Car ownership being the most obvious example.
People find it hard to realise they do not own the legal name but try asking to see the Register. That may convince you. Or ask yourself why you only ever have a COPY of the Register Entry which bears the title Birth Certificate.
Try getting a mobile phone up and running without using a legal identity.
Think you own title to land, guess what happens when the physical land is required for something else.

As I said I am likely bonkers but you are already in the state of non ownership because that is the natural state of being. Accepting this is hard, too hard for many but please do try and disprove it. Not to me but too yourself.
The good news is that even Uncle Klaus will leave everything including his body ligging about when his light goes out.
 
Last edited:

Vagabond

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
134
Reaction score
275
Here take this or leave it your choice.
Uncle Klaus writes in one of his books "you will own nothing". Well all he is doing is stating the bleeding obvious. You don't own anything, you cannot own anything. Ownership is a myth.
When my father died he left everything he thought he owned here. Life whatever it is left the room and everything including the body he used in life did not travel with him, assuming he went somewhere. The penny didn't really drop until my mother died a couple of years later.
She too left everything she owned ligging around including her body. The spark of life the soul the whatever the hell it is energy of life etc buggered off but nothing else did. Ownership is an idea a notion we idiots adopt as the way things have to be because someone else told us it is so.

Ownership is found in claims made in speech and in writing, usually the latter. It is based on the claimant 'proving' who they are by use of a legal identity. This legal identity goes under the guise of citizen. It is made up of three components, a legal name, a legal address, a date of birth. None of these three things belong to you and crucially you never asked their creator for its permission to use them.
Think I'm nuts, well I likely am but bear with me.

The legal name is nothing more than a register entry created by a government employee, a Registrar in a Register of Births.
The date of birth is nothing more than an a register entry created by a government employee, a Registrar in a Register of Births.
The legal address is nothing more than a register entry in a Gazetteer of Addresses created by a government employee.

Government employees brought these things into existence on paper, the only place they exist anywhere. You and I can never see these Registers, pieces of paper to check their veracity or amend or do anything to them.

My parents gave me a name and a surname. I had no part in its creation nor given the chance of deciding whether I needed one. The sound it makes is the same as the sound the legal name makes when spoken. That is how I was tricked by ignorance on their part into using another's property for gain thus began a life of fraud.
Same with the D.O.B.
Though present at my birth I had no part in determining the date it occurred and I could not inform the Registrar of anything.
The address at least in the United Kingdom is in two parts both created by different government employees.
The street address is created by the Registrar of the Gazette and the postcode is created by an employee of the Postmaster General.

These three things none of which I have no claim on which are in the control of government employees are the basis upon which everything I am told is civilised stands.
Think you own your car?
Well you don't as it has a Vehicle Identification Number issued by a government employee and it is recorded in the VIN Register. Stop paying Vehicle Excise Duty on the car and the actual owner will turn up, clamp it then cart it away then crush it.
Were it actually owned by YOU then they would be stealing the property of another and YOU could kick their arse in a Court of Law.
Car ownership being the most obvious example.
People find it hard to realise they do not own the legal name but try asking to see the Register. That may convince you. Or ask yourself why you only ever have a COPY of the Register Entry which bears the title Birth Certificate.
Try getting a mobile phone up and running without using a legal identity.
Think you own title to land, guess what happens when the physical land is required for something else.

As I said I am likely bonkers but you are already in the state of non ownership because that is the natural state of being. Accepting this is hard, too hard for many but please do try and disprove it. Not to me but too yourself.
The good news is that even Uncle Klaus will leave everything including his body ligging about when his light goes out.
well for Klaus it cant come soon enough as far as im concerned
 

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
560
Reaction score
1,816
And lo and behold the behemoth that is the BBC in the form of a article written
By Katie Prescott
Business correspondent
Source

One leg of legal identity writ large.

Screenshot_2021-04-03 'Having an address got me a job when I was homeless'.png
 

Vagabond

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
134
Reaction score
275
The next phase of the LAME RESET is going to be keeping us destructive little humans out of the oceans. Then the rivers then the seas, then everywhere!

I always like to look at mainstream news for the propaganda for whats coming next. One great example is the Guardian , because they are the most bought and paid for propaganda rag for the RESET of all the newspapers in existence. Almost all content is paid advertising , far leftist propaganda and AI generated bullhickey. Its actually quite astonishing no one notices.

So on to the REVAMP

The Suez incident was to show we shouldn't have humans driving container ships anymore. It should be automated. Humans are to stupid and dangerous, and mess up supply chains. This incident and its follow on is not finished doing its job. They already have the capabilities to do this, This is why long haul recreational boating has been shut down so severely in the last year. So that silly humans stop trying to use the seas. They dont want us in the way. or seeing what they really do.


They also, in Europe, are investing millions into restoring the unused canals. The recreational boaters think this is a nice thing they are doing for them. This is wrong. They are doing it so They can move a lot of haulage by canal in the future. Its very easy to automate canal and river shipping. there is only one path to take, so much less messy than roads! And the ships will be electric/hydrogen.Bill Gates was the trailblazer there huh?


Also they are automating fishing so fishermen will go the way of the dodo eventually. This is just the first step. For the environment, of course.

Next they are planting seagrass gardens for food on the shorelines, so that we will be told we cannot use the beaches. This is why beach use was curtailed, to get us used to staying away.

Next it will be long haul trucking to be automated, maybe because they will be blamed for spreading variants, and of course, pollution.

These people are actually making themelves redundant, and they cant see it.

And all the folk who are lining up to self euthanize with the injections will support this shift too, because they have been trained so deeply that little average humans are so bad, they need to be curtailed. The self hate is indoctrinated so deep, they believe they are like a cancer. Not the big Megacorps and Billionaires, they are not to blame for their excess and forcing of the human race to suck on the consumption teat, oh no . Not them.

I mean, who cares if this ladies brother died from the JAB, she sure doesnt!! Because its all for the greater good!
Notice the wording, he died AFTER, not from, the injection. Exactly backwards from a covid death

And its the youth who will lead the charge, believe me. Watch out because the youth of today are the most brainwashed of all. Their entire lives staring at a screen. They didnt drink the Kool aid, they we intravenously mainlined it pulled into their brains from birth.

So they will love their captors, like they love their jailers right now, and their executioners.


And, on the surface, it looks good right? Who would ever argue with saving the environment? Only terrible nazis and conservatives!

But I dont think the plan is really to do that, its to keep us from seeing what they are doing to the environment, because the earth is just for them to mine for resources. I do start to think those in the top eschelons are Aliens trying to get back to their planet or something and we are only just a means to an end.They are doing just enough to keep up cooperating and working for their goal.

WERE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER, RIGHT? Hip Hip Hooray for the RESET
 
Last edited:
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
V Cannibalism in humans, Great Apes, Prion diseases, and mRNA therapy Nutrition and Health 54
Will Scarlet Iron, the Great Protector - its Removal from Society General 36
Timeshifter The Great Martian War 1913 - 1917 TV Shows 4
freygeist Great Northern War General 5
Z Serial and experimental the Great War armors and weapons Wars and Conflicts 0
Z The Great Tataria Discovery and Re-Discovery 37
Z The Great Wall of China and New Chinese Antiquities Fake Architects 17
WorldWar1812 1530 The Great Flood of ROME Mud Flood and Dust Storm Theory 5
S The Great Divergence Investigation Requests 3
Catalyst Japan was once a part of the Great Tartaria General 69
Catalyst A great new book about Tartaria by James W. Lee Books and Comics 12
Archive SH Archive Freemasons descend from Great Tartaria, and their secret aim is to restore it worldwide. Unmatched 2
KD Archive SH Archive Static in the Attic and the Great Conjunction Mud Flood and Dust Storm Theory 0
KD Archive SH Archive 1860s Thessaloniki, Greece: The Great Wall Buildings and Structures 0
Archive SH Archive The only true inscription on the great pyramid Etymology and Languages 0
Archive SH Archive Peter the Great Famous Personalities 0
KD Archive SH Archive The Great Wall of China: what is it made of? Photographic Analysis 0
TatarKhan World Greatest Lie?: the Great Wall of China Buildings and Structures 5
F The Betrayal of Albion (Part 4): The Great Fire of London General 2
KD Archive SH Archive Great Wall of China: could it be a road? Buildings and Structures 0
Timeshifter SH Archive Wyld's Great Globe: Concave earth no big deal in 1851? Buildings and Structures 0
Archive SH Archive Customs House in Saint John, NB: Great Fire of 1877 Fires and Earthquakes 0
KD Archive SH Archive 323 BC: Alexander the Great's Funeral Carriage Famous Personalities 0
Broken Agate SH Archive The Great Fire of Prescott, Arizona, 1900 Fires and Earthquakes 0
KD Archive SH Archive 1882: The Great Fire of Haverhill Fires and Earthquakes 0
KD Archive SH Archive 1885: The Great Fire of Galveston Fires and Earthquakes 0
KD Archive SH Archive Questionable Alexander the Great Narrative General 0
Archive SH Archive Alexander the Great, Super Hero Investigation Requests 0
Broken Agate SH Archive Great postcard finds showing old buildings Buildings and Structures 0
Timeshifter SH Archive Alyosha Monument to the Defenders of the Soviet Arctic During the Great Patriotic War, Murmansk. Buildings and Structures 0
Broken Agate SH Archive Mud flood history and the Great Unconformity Mud Flood and Dust Storm Theory 0
KD Archive SH Archive The Great Seal of the State of California: Horned Creature and the War Goddess Symbology 0
AgentOrange5 SH Archive Great/Grandparents and What We Learn From Them General 0
KD Archive SH Archive Real mission of the 1907-1909 US Great White Fleet, what was it? Wars and Conflicts 0
KD Archive SH Archive The great Tartar wall in China General 0
R SH Archive The Vacuum Sugar Incident at the 1851 Great Exhibition in London Buildings and Structures 0
KD Archive SH Archive Faux marble, Alexander the Great, Dhul-Qarnayn, Ivan the Terrible and our Lost History General 1
KD Archive SH Archive Did Napoleon build the Great Egyptian Pyramids? Buildings and Structures 5
KD Archive SH Archive 1854-59 ship: SS Great Eastern a.k.a. Leviathan General 0

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Top