They made good forts on occasion, the many battle illustrations from back in the day a clue. But were they forts originally? Or civilian structures expensively converted with heavy masonry, barracks, and cannon embrasures for war?
But when studied as a worldwide city and fort "system," another concept emerges, one that makes the official narrative very questionable.
The earthen ones in fields that remain only as vague outlines are telling, so are the fortifications in the remote deserts.
Why build entire cities and towns inside when mortars and howitzers can decimate the finely-made buildings and unprotected residents?
Mortars were first introduced in 1453. It makes no sense.
View attachment 712
St. Malo is a "fairly tale" town. Why is all this old world architecture referred to in this way?