The Falsified Human: The Search For The Origin Of The German Soul

[dreamtime]

I found an awesome german book (published 2003 by G. Ullrich) about the forgery of European and Germanic history, and in this thread I am going to translate chapter for chapter. The german title is "Der gefälschte Mensch: Zur Befreiung vom materialistischen Wahn oder die Suche nach dem Ursprung des Deutschen Wesens, der idealistisch-deutschen Lebensordnung" (The Falsified Human: For liberation from materialistic delusion or the search for the origin of the German soul, the idealistic-German order of life). G. Ullrich died sometime around 2006, and his works are virtually unknown in Germany, and haven't been translated. He built most of his theories on top of the work by chronology critic Wilhelm Kammeier.

Please create a seperate thread if you want to discuss the contents of the book. This thread is for the translation only.

Introduction

Even today, at the beginning of the third millennium, we still have an image of history filled with contradictions and fantastic impossibilities, which are presented to us in their multitude by science as so-called "historical puzzles". In the end, this leads to the fact, especially when we move further away from the individual parts and details, when we look at the overall picture presented to us from a distance, that we have to realize that not only individual "historical puzzles" cause incomprehension and ambiguity, but that this overall picture contains such tensions that it literally tears apart at innermost contradictions.

Our view of history is a work that takes all confidence away from itself and thus completely lacks the most important thing for our time, namely, to give us the opportunity to learn from past experiences. Only where a clear view is not possible, yes, where the sciences have already proven the most extensive falsifications, where purposeful manipulators have already been caught in many cases, the whole picture has lost its value. Not to mention the purpose of learning from it. Mankind is therefore in the condition of being largely ahistorical and for many periods of time has only single parts of the puzzle at its disposal, which can be put together quite arbitrarily in many way without providing a coherent picture. How can it be surprising that the insecurity even goes so far that history is even called subjectively interpretable, which means that actually everybody can write his own history. It is not only this nonsense that needs to be cleared up, even if it costs us the entire view of history today.

Because today it is not so much a matter of preserving a patched-up view of history, but rather the future of the whole of humanity is at stake. And these forces need history, which has been pieced together in their sense, in order to be able to credibly convey their current political acting based on it. The human history behind it, the current politics, as well as the future that is being created from with it, look completely different than we are led to believe every day!

The great philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche had, by avoiding all history, advanced considerably further than all researchers in history have ever been able to do. Probably the greatest thinker of the 19th century, unequalled in combination of intellectual height and breadth, philosophically unmasked Christianity and the Christian religion like no other. He unmasked it until it was completely naked. Nietzsche had succeeded in overcoming Christianity without even touching its history. What Nietzsche achieved and was forced to achieve on a purely philosophical level, still lacks any parallel in history.

Why? The answer to this question is banal and not at all astonishing: because all historians at all times lacked the freedom that Nietzsche first found in his intellectual height. But how could Nietzsche's work have looked like, if he had not had to spend his whole life approximately with the unclothing and overcoming of Christianity, if he could have even built on historical truths instead of on falsifications? For philosophical thinking in particular always requires an underlying intellectual knowledge structure. If from this subordinate structure falsifications are superimposed and taken up as foundations, the philosophical search must almost always be denied the finding of the last truth. But nothing is more alien to philosophers than historical political thinking, the concept of deception and manipulation.

This is so simply because political thinking is not only too cheap and superficial for philosophy, but because such thinking is fundamentally contrary to philosophical thinking, which is searching for truth and meaning. In the sense of knowledge and truthfulness, political thinkers thus form the negative antithesis to all philosophical seekers. And this antipole has also used up much of Nietzsche's intellectual power. Philosophical thinking has the lure of freedom.

Political thinking, on the other hand, is a servile achievement. A service to the power from which the thinker exists and from which he expects a reward for his achievement. How much more beautiful, how much more enjoyable it is to be a free philosopher instead of a henchman of deceit. Was perhaps the need for intellectual freedom the real reason, not only in regard to the great German thinkers, that political thinking in Germany was and is so underdeveloped?

Did the Germanic peoples and the now German part of their descendants fail again and again only because of their inner need for freedom? Since freedom is the highest value carried in the so-called German being over the centuries and millennia, it was obviously always and at all times the German being, which, with few but then excellent exceptions, made the understanding of politics so incomprehensible to all Germans. Consequently, a political and not a philosophical approach had to be chosen for this book.

For it is not philosophical but political truths and contexts - on which then clever minds may like to base their philosophy - that are to be found. Politics, however, is always a two-track process, and not only since today, but since politics has existed in a conceptually planned form - as we shall see, for many hundreds of years. If political machinations were based solely on lies and falsifications, some of which are quite easy to see through, no matter how intensively and permanently they are repeated and spread, no matter how arbitrarily and with what terror their exposure is prevented (which is not least of all a distraction from finding the "second track"), they would not be successful in the long run, they could not endure, they would fail due to the inner resistance of all people.

What helps all political falsifications, lies, and hypocrisies to their success that lasts until today is the materialistic, the ideological straitjacket into which every individual man is pressed, both spiritually and physically, as soon as he sees the light of day. It is only the accompanying psychological manipulation that forces schizophrenia and this in turn lends stability and acceptance to the daily political lies and deceit. With these mental manipulations the materialistic world view is presented as without alternative! As if there was nothing else.

For it is only by means of the materialistic values imposed on man, from the individual striving for prosperity and success, to the point of considering oneself, one's needs (which have been artificially created), and one's existence as the most important thing, that the individual willingness is generated to accept every lie and deceit, or at least to come to terms with them, as long as this is not detrimental to one's personal well-being. In the end, each individual is thus made a purchasable object through his materialistic world view, which forbids itself any criticism of political contempt for mankind, since it owes its prosperity and existence solely to it.

And even those who still think today that they have found somewhere a niche of survival that is bearable for them will soon find that even the smallest niche will at one point disappear. He who was originally born a free man is caught in a world-view web whose sole purpose is exclusively to take away his freedom, to dominate him, and thus to cheat him of everything that was put into his cradle as a man. This is how man has often become an externally controlled, functioning robot creature to this day.

Anyone who wants to live again as a human being in his natural environment in the footsteps of his ancestors - whereby this "wanting" is hereditarily influenced by these very ancestors as so-called "fate" in every human being, as the researchers of inheritance and genetics have long since found out - is consequently made it his first task to free himself from the materialistic world view - whatever that may be - that has been forced upon him, no matter what "sacrifices it may cost". The profit will compensate and far exceed any sacrifice.

For the profit, as the result is to be called, lies in having finally become man, in harmony with his ancient human values stored in his soul and his natural environment of which he is aware.

 

[dreamtime]

Chapter 2: The world view, the central object of manipulation of materialist-imperialist politics (part 1)

The self-imposed demand could hardly be greater. With our search and analysis starting here, we want to achieve nothing less than to gain an overview of the nature of today's politics, the obviously uniform, destructive, anti-human and decadent goals pursued worldwide, and what alternative still exists to put an end to this activity. The illusory alternatives of so-called right and left masterminds and groups remain unconsidered, and everyone may classify them according to his own knowledge. Before a real alternative to the current, Christian-supported, plutocratic (from Pluto, the Greek god of wealth) globalism can even be thought of, which will find the full support of all internationalist socialists in the hope that one day, after the work is done, it will be possible, to be able to inherit the plutocrats - contrary to all previous experience from past power struggles, according to which they were and must always be defeated - the foundations and prerequisites must first be determined which created the present situation and which preceded the current developments, which is nothing other than a derivation of the present from the past.

But just as current political projects are generally carried out behind false information and interpretations that serve only to deceive, even the cheapest acting, so too, in relation to the past, it must not be assumed that politically intended falsifications are an invention of the present time. After all, their origins reach back to the most distant historical times. In order to give the current and future its transparency, the manipulations made on our historical knowledge must first be recognized and corrected as far as possible and necessary for the claim made here.

However, the recognition of past historical falsifications should not only serve the discovery of historical truths in order to better understand current machinations. No, truths should not be found only for the purpose of understanding. Far more important than understanding - although this is the prerequisite for everything else - is the search for alternatives based on it with regard to the current ongoing development. And such alternatives, or at least approaches to them, we hope to find behind the veil of historical falsification. The two world-view complexes of opposites - modernly also called levels of consciousness - between which there can be no compromise, as in nature itself, so also in truth, since every compromise is always only a trade, a deal, and therefore can only occur in a trader's philosophy at all, are presented here reduced to some essential features for clarification:

Materialism: Power, Law, Coercion, Laws, Faith, Imperialism, War readiness, Mysticism, Servant, Chaos, Secular, Spiritual Death

Idealism: Freedom, Justice, Tolerance, Morality, Trust, Security, Peacefulness, Knowledge, Human, Culture, Divine, Life

The two positions of materialism and idealism are as contradictory as they could not be more opposite. While materialism pervades and determines all times historically known to us, only our knowledge of the existence of the so-called nature religions, which have always grown out of the natural life of a tribe or people, gives us an indication that the original human communities were not materialistically oriented, but at first idealistically. They saw nature and its human community, which was integrated into it, without any politically artificially constructed world view. The true history of mankind would thus also have to refute the last and greatest error that every man has or must have a materialistic world view.

Exactly the other way round the true story should look like. Only the materialistic world-view makes man a political creature, i.e., human freedom begins where man is free from every politically constructed world-view! A generally accepted value structure forms the central basis for the existence of every community, of every people, just as only the existence of a people is the precondition of every nation. The community value structure, which is maintained over long periods of time and becomes culture, forms the bracket that holds all and everything together, and which itself almost always seeks its hold in the mystical, or created a mystical foundation for itself, in order to anchor the respective human community spiritually more deeply.

Mysticism, order and values thus form the framework for the culture and world view of a people, which, formulated superficially and in a modern way, is often called worldview or ideology. As we will see later, not only the ideologies of the modern age are usually only rationally constructed, power-politically defined, theoretical entities. Their sole purpose is to justify the claim to power of their representatives. Without building on a deeper bond, worldviews were defined abstractly in order to derive new social values from them, whose uniform purpose was always to grant their inventors a position of domination and to justify this domination.

The detachment of all worldviews constructed in this way from deeper spiritual values always showed their weakness particularly clearly when the new worldview was imposed on a people. Not only did every attempt to inspire a people with a new world outlook always go hand in hand with war or revolution, but only the sacrifices demanded of the revolutionary people, i.e. the strength of their resistance, show how contrary or perhaps even appropriate the new ideology fits into the values deeply rooted in the soul of the people. How well a new ideology fits in with a people and its deeply rooted social values can always be very easily seen from the size of the revolutionary cemetery.

A new ideology can be so contrary that, when forced upon a people by force, it robs it of its identity, its deep ideological foundations. Along with the French Revolution, the most negative and frightening example of this kind, by far the most negative, is the Communist Revolution that has swept over Russia. The Russian people and the Russian people's soul were obviously not the appropriate basis for material socialism.

While the Bolshevik revolution cost millions upon millions of lives in Russia alone, not to mention all the other damage, since the middle of the twentieth century a multitude of permanent revolutions have been taking place at an ever-increasing pace, hardly exempting any people on earth. Only that these revolutions were neither recognizable as such, nor were they even noticed as revolutions. Revolutions in the traditional sense were and are not revolutions, even though many peoples have undergone a change of world view, some of them serious.

That which in earlier times always led to a noticeable and unmistakable revolution, the nationwide change in world view, has met with only very limited resistance in the last 50 years. Creeping change instead of spontaneous revolution. For the spread of the new world view and the new values associated with it is no longer in the hands of spontaneously overthrowing revolutionaries, who have always had to assert themselves against the existing power, i.e. revolt against it, but the world view is changed by the ruling power itself, which inevitably means that any openly visible revolutionary activism is no longer necessary.

It is no longer revolutions that lead to revolutionary changes, but these are replaced today by outright fraud. The peoples are deceived by their own democratically elected politicians, who pretend that their policies are solely for the existing, conservative world view, and in the end they are even cheated of this conservative world view and all the spiritual values it contains. According to scientifically elaborated concepts, camouflaged behind a network of prepared interpretations and manipulated information, facts are created step by step, whose true meaning and purpose is kept hidden for as long as possible.

If at some point all peoples and nations have a uniform and identical worldview, then all national borders and demarcations have also lost their meaning and value. In order to subject all mankind as one, it is imperative to have a uniform world-view, whereby the reverse conclusion means that different world-views first created different peoples, i.e. the different world-views have developed the peculiarities of the peoples and are based on traditional values and mystical conceptions based on them.

In earlier times, the low mobility and the hardly possible exchange of information led to the development of the peoples with their own worldview, on which culture and morality could be developed. The present time strives with all its might towards the One World. The world of the one humanity, which should overcome all borders of races, peoples and world views. All cultures, world views and peoples have lost each other and are taking the last steps on the way to general unity. One world, one humanity, one worldview, detached from every culture.

A stew, where man falls by the wayside, becomes the lowest creature and is not even suitable for grease. If one looks more closely at the current development, something extremely absurd becomes apparent. Peoples are being thrown into confusion, their unity is being dissolved. And without the peoples concerned noticing it, their respective world-views, each individual people previously held together, disappear and with them the culture on which they are based. Mankind becomes a formless, shapeless mass of "free" individuals, in which only state prohibitions and restrictions prevent the actually inevitable anarchy.

It is no longer world view, custom and culture that dictate the individual's duty and conscience. All such ties, all the binding force that results from them is extinguished and abolished. Only the laws enacted on the interests of influential groups and corporations - no longer bound to any people - create new, artificial obligations, enforced and supervised by the use of all technologically necessary means. It is no longer the common world view, culture, customs, duty and conscience that bind people together, but only laws that control the cooperation or even the opposition of the people of unity.

A mass of people that has been made unstable, that has been cheated of its identity, is arbitrarily rearranged and grouped and, as required, set against each other in order to clear the political playing field for the actual goals. A "Weltanschauung" embracing all peoples is in the process of being established. The world view is based on the belief in the material and the external world of appearance, the "peaceful" standard materialism based on military superiority.

The standards of political, social, and personal life are now taken only from economic-political thought, and every policy which is oriented solely to materialism has the great advantage that it imposes on itself no restrictions of its own, be they duties, morals, or even a conscience. After all, these are concepts which are rather pitifully smiled at in materialism and are only useful to its propagandists.

Thus nothing else remains but to derive moral action from considerations of expediency and usefulness of any kind or from any materialistically produced sentiments and to adjust it to the pure striving for happiness of the individual. Already in 1927 Dr. phil. A. Pfannkuche wrote in his paper "Freemasonry and the Volkish Question":

This striving was particularly pronounced among the English. For centuries, the Englishman has been a cosmopolitan in the sense that he considers himself to be the crown of creation and considers himself personally and among his own kind - called to rule the world. This cosmopolitanism keeps itself free of all moral considerations. In this all-dominant self-consciousness a natural instinct is at work, which is inherent in every healthy people that has the will to live and thus the will to power. The English people have for centuries indulged in this instinct in an extremely individual and selfish way.​

 

[dreamtime]

Chapter 2: The world view, the central object of manipulation of materialist-imperialist politics (part 2)

German idealism, on the other hand, recognized only the folkish, but not the English-individual natural instinct, but tied it to the demand for a higher moral world order - the German being - and also demanded justice, air and light for the others. The will to power was stripped of its brutality. It was tamed and moralized. Thus German idealism had established a special way of looking at the problem at hand that corresponded to the German being.​

​

Today, Germanic-Christian idealism also belongs to the lost world views, which were the standard of the German way of thinking during the time until 1914. (Authors Note: in retrospect, the same ideological revaluation tendencies could already be observed during the Weimar Republic as they began again after 1945 and continue to this day, whereby the radical changeover to materialism in West Germany was much more strongly promoted and also much more subtly pursued than in the German Democratic Republic).​

​

The Germanic-Christian idealism was a world view as held by the elite of the German intellectual greats: Luther, Kant, Hegel, Fichte, Goethe, Schiller, and Kloppstock. German idealism is the worldview as it found its most powerful revelation in the Gospel, as it entered the thinking of the Nordic peoples with special power because it corresponded especially to their peculiarity, the primeval Germanic worldview. It is also that which gave the German spirit that momentum of thinking, feeling, and willing, that Faustian sense and urge, which enabled it to come nearest to the highest truth. In all the great heroic poems of the German people there lives something of that longing for heaven which undertakes to free itself from all earthly difficulties and which is carried by the belief in an unconditional, eternal truth.​

In the book "Germany and Socialism" of 1924, Fr. Brunstäd once hinted at the German Nation in this way:

The individual stones that form the vault are held together by the resistance and pressure of the neighboring stones. It is this mutual pressure and resistance that holds the whole together, lends duration to the whole, and also protects the individual stones from falling into the void. Thus one stone carries the weight of the other, and in this mutual "carrying the weight of one another" the whole and the individual parts find life and freedom. It is only in this insertion, in this mutual connectedness that the individual purpose of existence, security and independence is guaranteed.​

Dr. phil. A. Pfannkuche continues:

From there is only one more step to the comprehension of the people as a living organic whole. If I am soul and spirit, if I am more than a dead stone, if I comprehend myself in my existence, in what I am and should be, then I grasp and feel myself now as a member of the great folk structure, which is created and formed from the spirit of the eternal source of all things, and which carries spirit and soul within itself. As a member which is probably limited and burdened by the resistance and pressure of the neighboring parts, the people's comrades, but is also held and preserved in its peculiarity and purpose. In this way I feel secure in this connection and experience my independence and freedom in this restriction.​

​

Out of this feeling of solidarity, the awareness of mutual obligation now arises of its own accord. We find this feeling of mutual obligation expressed in the demands of duty, responsibility and conscience. Only where this feeling of mutual obligation is given by duty and conscience and becomes the determining reason for life, only there is German national and state community possible.​

​

Now it is also understandable why our great thinkers did not want to build our nation on the individual's striving for utility and happiness, as the English did and do, but on the idea of duty and conscience. It is also why they saw in the State something else, something more than a trading company, why they expected the State to become the realization of a great moral idea. If only in this way the sovereignty and dignity of the State is grasped, so is the sovereignty and dignity of the individual. The individual ceases to be a detached individual, satisfied in himself and finally consuming himself; he becomes a personality. That is, there shines within him something from the original unity, from the idea of the whole.​

So far Dr. Pfannkuche.

Even if these remarks are still based on various misinformation, they are ultimately heading in the right direction. And this could be summarized as follows:

The German Volksgemeinschaft (folk community) will not be able to exist materialistically alone in the long run. The spiritual emptiness and the moral contradiction are too great. Whether other nations than the Germans can do this without losing themselves in the process is extremely questionable as well.​

The future of all peoples, the future of humanity, the future of our entire globe, is "in work". Trade-plutocrats, the super-rich, who trade with everything, whose objects are goods and people (often called "human capital"), whose politics is nothing else but the trade with power, who have obviously reached their highest goal in life when life has become a permanent party, want to make the earth happy and impose their views and values on mankind! But they too have their origins and their predecessors. Even the richest of all the plutocrats did not stand at the beginning of time, but owe it - besides their independence of character and morals - to historical developments which have flushed them upwards. So we cannot avoid looking around in the past.

In contrast to the many studies and analyses already available, which mostly try to find answers with philosophical approaches, we want to take a somewhat different path. It is becoming more and more obvious that it is not philosophies that have led to great changes - most of them were only used in retrospective steps to reveal the intellectual background, connections or effects of a certain development, or to put them into it in the first place - but that almost the entirety of known human history is a product of political thoughts and concepts. This forces us to always consider the political expediency of the existing materialistic power groups in the following considerations. They should provide us with the actual yardstick for the consideration of historical developments.

First, however, a fundamental consideration. At the center of the intellectual-political power of materialism is the concept of faith, the compulsiveness of which extends to religious meaning and form. A concept of faith as it has never been interpreted and pronounced in a more extreme and open manner than by the Jesuits. The concept of faith created by Christianity is no longer to be understood in its very own sense - trust - or to close the gaps in knowledge in an overall picture with believed assumptions, but it became the all-encompassing foundation of worldview. The entire world view as a believed one! Thus faith in its form built up over centuries ultimately became the basis of all - but especially of political - deception. The common ground of all Christian and materialistic, even many esoteric worldviews is faith. Be it the reality of the life and work of Jesus, the daily proofs of the power that emanates from the people or the constitutional state in which one believes to live, or the interpreted and interpreted esoteric foundations. Replacing any faith with these, at least in those areas where knowledge and expertise are available, must almost inevitably lead to the collapse of almost all world views and doctrines of faith, given the current state of science. First of all, however, the focus should not be on today, but on yesterday, the ancient yesterday, the Germanic time and world, the time in which the German being developed.

Must the world view, or rather the view of the world, have had a religious character already in these ancient times? Was perhaps even the concept of religion (in German Rückbindung) created solely for propagandistic purposes? Could faith not have been determined solely by its original value, trust, faith? Faith without any religious connection. And isn't a "backbone", a religion, only then necessary to bridge the separation if a violent separation has taken place before? For no one, and certainly no community, would voluntarily separate itself from creation. The banishment from the paradise of spiritual freedom shows this very clearly. If man lives in harmony with his environment, and does not feel himself to be a being detached from nature and creation, but rather a part of it, why should he need a religion?

An order, without any religion, grown from the original, in which there was a natural world view, which filled gaps in knowledge, among other things also with the assumption, the belief in gods and giants, but which were only part of the explanation of the world view, but not the subject of religious views, feelings or rites. Gods who were called upon to support humans for their help when natural events, attributed to the deeds of giants, brought humans into distress and oppression. Gods as superhumans, on whose support however only the free, in its morality heroic could hope. A world view free from any religion! Where human freedom was not limited by religion, but only by the highest, nature itself, and by one's own morality, the duties toward the community. A morality that was free from all temples, priests, and sacrifices to the gods. Where immoral people were buried, but heroes were burned. Burying the bad, the good, to strengthen their power, rising to the gods. Where life was not seen as an investment in the time after death. Where not a religion, but only morality ordered and regulated the communal life in harmony with nature, where everyone continued his life after death not in a religious hereafter, but in the life of his children. For how can human liberty ever exist or have existed, when its foundation is already spiritually withdrawn from it by a religion, if liberty were thus reduced only to the materialistic, the physical?

On the subject of faith it is indispensable to also briefly address the knowledge-creating science of historical research. For even today, in our supposedly scientifically impregnated world, the overall picture of world history is still held together in many places by historical puzzles, some of them fantastic. Yet these historical puzzles are factual events, at least documented as such, which are sold as knowledge, but only maintained with faith in them. As a result, the use of these historical puzzles for the conception of the overall picture of world history takes the entire character of knowledge that has come to be associated with it and thus turns our entire picture of history into a picture of faith. In other words: only when it is possible to create a picture of history without riddles and contradictions, only then can we speak of a picture of knowledge, which now means that, since the centuries-old science of history has not yet succeeded in creating such a work, this science does not deserve this title. It has created a belief in knowledge whose basis is manifold ignorance. Yes, even fundamental contradictions are made to fit or remain, stared at with wide eyes by all, as so-called historical puzzles. Why it is that this science of ignorance, this theology of history, because only the religious faith in the art image of world history created by it still maintains it as such, has not succeeded until today in freeing itself from its character of faith, has not some highly spiritual reason, but is to this day a banal political one. For the oh so free science was such at no time. It has always been only a crutch of power politics, and consequently it has always moved only in the field of research which the ruling political forces had previously defined and released for it. The fact that the scope of research was not only defined by the scientist's desire to survive, but that it was perhaps even more frequently limited by one's own view of the world, as has never been more evident than in the person of Luther, may serve the purpose of understanding, but is not a suitable excuse. But this remark is not intended to put an earth-shattering person like Luther on the same level as the historians who constructed the valid picture of the 20th century for us and who continue to work on it day after day in order to align the reversal of truths as exactly as possible to 180 degrees (although both were concerned with values of faith).

Since a large part of the even today valid historical picture of human development not only in Europe, the Old World, the Occident, even in the knowledge gained from scientific research, still contains many incomprehensible facts and so-called "historical puzzles" (as such, historical representations or "real" documents are called, which contradict the official narrative of history), we will first take a closer look at different periods of this history.

But before that, a final word about history itself and the meaning of history. If it is correct that information from many generations of his ancestors is handed down to every newborn human being via his parents, information that is guaranteed to correspond to the truth and is therefore unadulterated - even if this truth always remains only subconscious, i.e. it is not directly accessible - then everyone who takes up the following historical considerations will inevitably submit them to this inherited, subconscious knowledge for examination, whereby in the end the very personal subconscious knowledge of every reader should answer the question of truth for him. For there can be nothing more true than he himself, there can be no truer thing for anyone.