The making of Antarctica

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
447
Reaction score
1,376
I have been wondering out the validity of the claim that the Antarctic is a place where people are kept away from by an international fleet of warships and aircraft. Given the circumference of the coastline of the shape we are told is Antarctica it seems a possibility that there are indeed aircraft and to a lesser extent warships permanently patrolling to keep people away however the logistics of keeping both men and machinery supplied and maintained in the area makes it improbable.
So what follows has to be seen in the light of the fact I am highly sceptical of the claim.

As I have never actually read through the Antarctic Treaty text I reckoned it is as good a starting place as any to try and throw some light on the claim, and what a rabbit warren it is. This is written as I'm doing the reading so it may be lengthy.

Source for the quoted text; https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume 402/volume-402-I-5778-English.pdf

Lets begin.

No. 5778. THE ANTARCTIC TREATY.1 SIGNED AT WASHINGTON, ON 1 DECEMBER 1959
The Governments of Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, the French Republic, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the Union of South Africa, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America,

Recognizing that it is in the interest of all mankind that Antarctica shall continue forever to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and shall not become the scene or object of international discord ;
Acknowledging the substantial contributions to scientific knowledge resulting from international cooperation in scientific investigation in Antarctica;
Convinced that the establishment of a firm foundation for the continuation and development of such cooperation on the basis of freedom of scientific investigation in Antarctica as applied during the International Geophysical Year accords with the interests of science and the progress of all mankind ;
Convinced also that a treaty ensuring the use of Antarctica for peaceful purposes only and the continuance of international harmony in Antarctica will further the purposes and principles embodied in the Charter of the United Nations ;
Have agreed as follows :
There is so much revealed that I didn't know of in that opening statement its staggering.

SIGNED AT WASHINGTON
A very strange way of wording surely it should be "SIGNED IN WASHINGTON" makes me wonder what Washington is and what Antarctica is.
I suspect that this document is written in Legalese which is the language of the Law Society and although it it is written appearance is the same as English the words have very different meanings. That said there is no way for me to prove it one way or the other so will proceed as though it is plain English.

The list of Governments is also a strange collection. More so for which governments were omitted rather than the ones included. Not that it makes too many odds as we are probably looking at the public facing aspect of one world governance.

Recognizing that it is in the interest of all mankind that Antarctica shall continue forever to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and shall not become the scene or object of international discord
is a rather bold claim which does show up that the probability that there was a time where there was no world governance as in an overarching authority that demands individual humans compliance with its diktat.

Peaceful purposes
is not defined which of course leaves everything up to the interpretations of the legal people and those who sit in judgement over others. Sounds very grand and very moral but has no real meaning.

Something called the
International Geophysical Year
is used as the measure for according with
the interests of science
and
the progress of all mankind
. Again neither is defined in any way and as they are separated clearly they are not the same thing. Something to bear in mind when science is held up as the messiah.
What interests me is the second statement of
all mankind
. This takes me into the realms of known world and unknown world on a physical level. But that is outside of the scope of this little investigation so resisting the urge here is the skinny on the International Geophysical Year which is worthy of a thread all of its own most likely and what it has evolved into Welcome to SCAR

International cooperation features prominently as does science and scientific indeed the two things are linked and are used to present the idea of the United Nations as the primacy body of governance above all others in the known world. But crucially there is no mention of protecting Antarctica from harm by the use of forceful deterrent.

Article I
1. Antarctica shall be used for peaceful purposes only. There shall be prohibited, inter alia, any measures of a military nature, such as the establishment of military bases and fortifications, the carrying out of military maneuvers, as well as the testing of any type of weapons.
2. The present Treaty shall not prevent the use of military personnel or equipment for scientific research or for any other peaceful purpose.
So as long as military people do not fight each other then they are given permission to physically be in Antarctica for 'peaceful purposes' which again are not defined. Only the things they must not do are defined.

Article III
2. In implementing this Article, every encouragement shall be given to the establishment of cooperative working relations with those Specialized Agencies of the United Nations and other international organizations having a scientific or technical interest in Antarctica
other international organisations
is not defined either so this leaves an open door for any corporate entity or group of entities which can prove or otherwise establish a
scientific or technical interest in Antarctica
to pitch up and start using Antarctica.
It is this sort of seemingly innocuous statement which shows me Antarctica is not as we are told it is.

Article IV
1. Nothing contained in the present Treaty shall be interpreted as :
(à) a renunciation by any Contracting Party of previously asserted rights of or claims to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica;(b) a renunciation or diminution by any Contracting Party of any basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica which it may have wether as a result of its activities or those of its nationals in Antarctica, or otherwise ;
c) prejudicing the position of any Contracting Party as regards its recognition or non-recognition of any other State's right of or claim or basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica.
2. No acts or activities taking place while the present Treaty is in force shall constitute a basis for asserting, supporting or denying a claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica or create any rights of sovereignty in Antarctica. No new claim, or enlargement of an existing claim, to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica shall be asserted while the present Treaty is in force.
Wowsers. So any previous claims made by any
Contracting Party
Capitalisation of this term is clear evidence that this treaty is Legalese not English or at least parts of it are. The conflation of the two identical in appearance written languages in one document is not unknown. A Contracting Party means there is a Contract to be signed not a Treaty. It may be titled a Treaty but the reality is the Parties to the Contract are Contracting under mutually agreed terms.

This snippet suggests, nothing more, suggests the likelihood that whatever Antarctica is the land and the waters around it are populated by humans not from what we are told is the known world. Possibly it is they who are using the one world governance mechanism to keep people who they have decided could have a negative effect on their land and/or themselves.

All claims previous to the signatures being given to the Treaty document stand inviolate and whilst the Treaty survives no new claims can be made or enlarged. It would be a job and a half to find out all the claims made prior to this Treaty being signed, but would likely be very illuminating. I did mention this is a rabbit 'warren' a word chosen with care.

That aside there is still no mention of protection of Antarctica by force.

This is the part that is really designed or constructed in such a way as to keep people away.

Article VI
The provisions of the present Treaty shall apply to the area south of 60 South Latitude, including all ice shelves, but nothing in the present Treaty shall prejudice or in any way affect the rights, or the exercise of the rights, of any State under international law with regard to the high seas within that area.
any State under international law
is the key wordage. The State as defined in international law is like all legality not fixed The Definition of the State in International Law

But the key thing is the State is the only thing or entity that can exercise rights except of course the obvious truth States do nothing as they are not living entities. Nevertheless they are used by people to impose restrictions,penalties,harm death on other people the world over.

Article X
Each of the Contracting Parties undertakes to exert appropriate efforts, consistent with the Charter of the United Nations, to the end that no one engages in any activity in Antarctica contrary to the principles or purposes of the present Treaty.
The Contracting Parties are States not living people.
means 'no single Contracting Party' not no-one as in 'no individual human being'. At no point during this document have human beings or living beings been mentioned.


There is absolutely nothing within that Treaty which renders it able to be used to enforce a continuous international military presence in the seas or on the lands of Antarctica to keep individual people or indeed any States which are not Contracting Parties away. The Treaty itself is made between people acting, as in playing the role of a representative of States. They have to do this because no State can present itself simply because they are fictions.

I along with most other people have no idea where Antarctica is in relation to where I sit typing this out.
I have no idea what Antarctica is beyond a word used to hide something from anyone interested in finding out where it is and what it is.
The notion that the military establishment of the one world order has the physical capability to prevent anyone from landing upon or walking to Antarctic shores, if such a thing is even possible, is laughable. All there are ifs, lots of them.
If it's an island, if its a frozen land, if its south of north, if its populated, if its actually called Atlantis, or Hyperborea, if there's an ice wall, if there is a sea passage through to a verdant land, if Byrd actually saw things.
Truth is when a warship goes to sea few people know where it actually goes to and fewer still know why it goes where it goes so it is indeed entirely possible for warships to sail in Antarctic regions and next to know one would know. There is a veritable web of myth and mystery woven around the word Antarctica, far more than the Arctic, and truths about it are as rare as hens teeth, just like the Arctic.

And this just in. Very interesting.
IGY_exhibition_SPRI.jpg
 

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
447
Reaction score
1,376

Magnetic

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Messages
103
Reaction score
445
Location
USA
Curious things I have noticed: a few years ago the a major portion of the Russian surface fleet with an aircraft carrier accompanied by the arch bishop of the Orthodox church went there. Why was a major military force dispatched with a religious leader? Vice President Biden left on a plane right after the 2016 election and flew to New Zealand. When he left NZ there was a major earthquake hours later. What was he doing flying to Antarctica literally as they counted votes for the election? Why are there hills that look like pyramids there. How did the thousands of feet ice sheet form there when rains precipitates out of the atmosphere long before reaching the continent? Why is the air pressure lower than it should be given the altitude?
 

irishbalt

Active member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2020
Messages
45
Reaction score
103
Location
united states
So this subject requires further information. We know Leidos, Lockheed and many other defense contractors work there.

There have been many discussions regarding Tesla technology used to energize the ionosphere and weather control from the Antarctic base there. Of course there are many other HAARP bases all over the world.
 
Last edited:

SonofaBor

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
271
Reaction score
603
Wouldn't you think, if so allowed, every young explorer would do nothing but plan and train for years to cross this thing, no matter how cold or inhospitable it is?

We have been fed, since youth, stories about intrepid explorers who barely survived. Blah blah blah about "both" Arctic regions. Those stories probably worked until 1990 or so, or a little earlier, when all sorts of gear and communications improvements would make exploration practical.

That we don't fly over either of them ever is a huge red flag, too. John Kerry also went down there (as did the Pope) following Trump's election. A conference with those contracting parties? After reading your bit, I suspect so.
 

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
447
Reaction score
1,376
I decided to have a close look into the logistics of keeping the ships of operation highjump on station as a point of reference to the claim of constant patrolling and am humbled to say I found myself here.
The story of GEORGE 1
You dear reader could do nothing better than take the time to read it.
 

E.Bearclaw

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2020
Messages
77
Reaction score
281
Location
Northampton, Midlands, UK
I know my brother used to send six months a year in Antarctica on an HMS hydrological ship.

Ocean Surveying | Royal Navy

Purposes of the ship include, mapping the sea floor. Stopping illegal fishing, in particular of the Patagonian tooth fish. I do wonder whether, stopping illegal fishing could be a way of stopping any unauthorised vessels. I will ask him later.

From the above link this is the mission statement:

"Why are we there?
The Royal Navy’s hydrographic ships carry out detailed surveys of the ocean floor and use the data they collect to update worldwide navigational charts.
These charts are used by commercial vessels and Royal Navy ships alike in order to navigate the world’s oceans safely and efficiently.
While on deployment, hydrographic ships are also able to monitor other vessels for any potential illegal activity – in fact, the mere presence of a Royal Navy vessel acts as a powerful deterrent to would-be criminals."



As a keen climber, he has also climbed the Antarctic wall. Which I have asked him about before. He cannot confirm that it goes all around the continent, but he has said that the coast line is quite ice wall like in many places.
 

Citezenship

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
521
Reaction score
1,434
Location
Bristol UK
I will reply in a bit more detail later on but just on initial glance we get the same old shite i should say SC-ATS,


Standing Committee on Antarctic Treaty System or SCATS for short.

Written in the same old paper-lonian/papal-onian/babal-onian, layers and layers of double speak!
 

Safranek

Moderator
Staff member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
124
Reaction score
481
Here's a copy of my post in another thread that ties into this question:

Something very strange and very BIG is going on down there.
Precisely what I surmised after checking into the subject.

The following events occurred within a couple of years;


The DEW Line - 1957

Essentially sealing off and militarizing the north.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Mfwcp6rTjc



The Russians have their own version of this;


and, there's Chukotka base Object C, Gudym built in 1958 in total secrecy. By the way, Chukotka is a militarized 'autonomous' province in the northernmost part of Russia.


here's a video about flying to Russia from Alaska (for those interested), they were detained.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEi_m5C1-Jc



then, there's Norway;

I'm not going deep into Norway, just making a point here




The Antarctic Treaty System - 1959 (in effect in 1961) - essentially sealing off the south.

A bunch of key countries agreeing to a 'protected scientific zone' and keeping this treaty unbroken to date including during the so-called 'cold-war'. This treaty makes it next to impossible for average citizens to explore in that region of the world. Note the definition of Antarctica for the purpose of the treaty being 'all of the land and ice shelves south of 60°S latitude'. NOT as the continent of Antarctica including X miles of territorial waters.


So we're told that the same countries which are building up against each other in the north are sharing and keeping their south treaty intact and are in agreement on all things Antarctica since 1959.

And we are also supposed to believe that these countries who don't care about the environment within their own nations where their populations live are so concerned about all the land south of the 60 which are only inhabited by penguins and polar bears. Of course, they have our best interest at heart, making sure we have some pristine place to go after they destroy our forests, strip mine our states and pollute to their heart's content with their industries. (But luckily, they gave us Geo-engineering to fix that.) :)

We also have NASA, established in 1958. to go baldly where men with hair have been before.

They thought of everything. In case things don't work out for us in Antarctica, they will prepare space for us and move us 'off grid' to another pristine place when the time comes. (Of course, after they figure out how to send organic matter through the 'Van Allen Belt', but I'd assume that after the moon landings that will be a piece of cake.) Now this is planning worthy of the close to 20 billion they get each year in their budget.

So, we can't go north, can't go south and can't go up. Fortunately they forgot about east and west. (Actually soon, thanks to the plandemic we can't go there either unless we take the super cocktail they are preparing for us.) :)

PS. I recall a video from a guy who inquired regarding the paperwork to qualify for exploring in Antarctica and if I remember correctly, it turned out that he would have to provide an environmental assessment which only the appointed government authority of the treaty members are qualified complete. The cost? Over a million dollars, after which the project may still be disallowed. Additionally, you can't take motorized vehicles so you're stuck with dog-sleds. Not much ground you can cover like that. (If I find it I'll post it for it's sheer ridiculousness.)

So if I didn't know TPTB better I would say that the end of the soaring 50's early 60's was a highly productive time of locking up the planet which just happened to coincide with the advent of air travel reaching a level where individuals would have been able to explore these places easily with cheap sea planes becoming available to many.

I find the coincidences in timing and purpose overwhelming and am as curious as anyone who has actually looked into this subject. Of course we can entertain consideration of UFO's, aliens, Germans, Aryans, Shamballa, hollow earth realms, bumping our heads into the dome, infinite plains, etc., however that's fiction. And the truth is supposed to be stranger than fiction. :)
----------------------------------------------------------

Why is the air pressure lower than it should be given the altitude?
A key question, the answer to which would tell us quite a bit.
 

pushamaku

Administrator
Staff member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2020
Messages
80
Reaction score
395
Seems there is some push for a new flag for the place.


Image 80.png

What's with the pyramid?

And "Elon" has launched Starlink satellites for the polar regions recently.

During the Joe Rogan Experience Podcast #1609 (Feb 11, 2021), at 100:45, the following exchange takes place:

Elon:
"We have a lot of coverage around 53 degrees. Um, and then, we just started to launch some polar satellites, which will, uh go, have an orbit-like inclination, that allows them to kinda go... have visibility to the poles. Almost, ya know,"

Joe: "Who the fuck is that for?"

Elon: (pauses, looks away from Joe, takes a breath, and kinda tilts his head in an, "I dunno" submission.)

Joe: "Just in case? laughs

Elon: "I mean, there's people that live up there, ya know?"

Joe: "I guess there's a few."

Elon: As he takes a sip of whiskey and sorta grins, "Yeah. There's... Antarctic research stations."

Interesting exchange... And thought that the Antarctic was "down there", so why does he say "up there" ? Maybe I'm just nit picking too much though.
 

Citezenship

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
521
Reaction score
1,434
Location
Bristol UK
Seems there is some push for a new flag for the place.


"Elon" has launched Starlink satellites for the polar regions recently.

During the Joe Rogan Experience Podcast #1609, at 100:45, the following exchange takes place:

Elon:
"We have a lot of coverage around 53 degrees. Um, and then, we just started to launch some polar satellites, which will, uh go, have an orbit-like inclination, that allows them to kinda go... have visibility to the poles. Almost, ya know,"

Joe: "Who the fuck is that for?"

Elon: (pauses, looks away from Joe, takes a breath, and kinda tilts his head in an, "I dunno" submission.)

Joe: "Just in case? laughs

Elon: "I mean, there's people that live up there, ya know?"

Joe: "I guess there's a few."

Elon: As he takes a sip of whiskey and sorta grins, "Yeah. There's... Antarctic research stations."
View attachment 6698
Like these folks,

Screenshot 2021-02-15 at 01.55.18.png


Screenshot 2021-02-15 at 01.53.19.png
 

Oracle

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Messages
220
Reaction score
602
Great thread. I notice the mention of the USSR in the treaty snippet in the op. Has there not been an updated version ever done since the 50's ?

I posted a link in Resources to a vast swath of information on Antarctica that may be useful for anyone delving deeper into this.
All things Antarctica
Also I have mentioned before ,a former neighour lived and worked in Antarctica for two years 20 years ago.
If you have any questions you'd like me to ask him let me know.
What's with the pyramid?
I believe that is actually a tetrahedron , which could be symbolising the magnetic field of Earth operating as it does from pole to pole through it's core.

I came across and was reading an obscure book last night which had some interesting information/theories relating to the ozone hole which if I can download it to this device later tonight and it's relevant I will add it in here.
I have highlighted the segment to add to the Variable Sun and Climate Change thread eventually but have not that device at hand.
 
Last edited:

pushamaku

Administrator
Staff member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2020
Messages
80
Reaction score
395
What's with the pyramid?
I believe that is actually a tetrahedron , which could be symbolising the magnetic field of Earth operating as it does from pole to pole through it's core.

I came across and was reading an obscure book last night which had some interesting information/theories relating to the ozone hole which if I can download it to this device later tonight and it's relevant I will add it in here.
I have highlighted the segment to add to the Variable Sun and Climate Change thread eventually but have not that device at hand.
Sure it may seem that way from a 2D perspective, but if we apply some symmetry in the z-axis...

pyramid.png
 

JWW427

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
581
Reaction score
1,964
Location
Wash. DC.
Like all symbols it may have multiple meanings.
As above so below.
Pyramid power for positive and negative uses.
Polarity.

The US Military has been involved with Project Ice Cube down in Antarctica.
A massive array.

ICE.jpeg
 

Oracle

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Messages
220
Reaction score
602
Seems there is some push for a new flag for the place.


What's with the pyramid?

And "Elon" has launched Starlink satellites for the polar regions recently.

During the Joe Rogan Experience Podcast #1609 (Feb 11, 2021), at 100:45, the following exchange takes place:

Elon:
"We have a lot of coverage around 53 degrees. Um, and then, we just started to launch some polar satellites, which will, uh go, have an orbit-like inclination, that allows them to kinda go... have visibility to the poles. Almost, ya know,"

Joe: "Who the fuck is that for?"

Elon: (pauses, looks away from Joe, takes a breath, and kinda tilts his head in an, "I dunno" submission.)

Joe: "Just in case? laughs

Elon: "I mean, there's people that live up there, ya know?"

Joe: "I guess there's a few."

Elon: As he takes a sip of whiskey and sorta grins, "Yeah. There's... Antarctic research stations."
View attachment 6698
Interesting exchange... And thought that the Antarctic was "down there", so why does he say "up there" ? Maybe I'm just nit picking too much though.
Oooo, look what I just came across wrt Elon Musk.

elon-1024x681.jpg
Alternative News – Collective Evolution
Nice beaming black Saturn cube t-shirt Elon complete with brainwashing rays and mind control tunnel !
 

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
447
Reaction score
1,376
Thanks for the replies, they are all appreciated but a polite request is I feel in order. Please refrain from wandering into conspiracy type videos images or documents as they add nothing due to their subjective nature and the frame of reference for this thread is that Antarctica is a prohibited land/ocean region under active military patrolling. This has broadened a bit as its looking like the Antarctic itself is a fabricated idea given the things I've been reading.
I would love to read something from people who have worked in what they are told is Antarctica or in Antarctic waters as these people are not numerous.
I would also like to read through other journals just like I read through the plane crash survivors at the link I posted above as they appear to be quite a rare thing.
I would also love to read peoples personal take on the claim, any evidence they have found to support it or better yet any evidence of all the claims that predate the Antarctic Treaty as they are unaffected by said treaty and are still active claims.

Just one snippet it seems the US pilots overflying the white ice/snow and mountains/glaciers laid claim to them by dropping a piece of paper in different types of containers upon the ice and snow.
Begs the question why as no-one not there could prove or disprove it and each one was a claim of right for the United States so if nothing else the military operation of 1946-7 was a land grab by the people controlling the United States.

Thank you in advance.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top