The Nature of the Beast (Part 4) Rituals, Thought-Forms & The Cult of Zaddik

Felix Noille

Well-known member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2020
Messages
238
Reaction score
780
Location
Spain
Having hopefully made a case for a shared source between the UFO phenomena (Part 2) and that of Miracles and Apparitions in Part 3, I would now like to explore the possibility of collaboration and cooperation, between ‘The Phenomena’ and humans.

[Due to its size, this series of posts was originally published in two parts under the title “The Doctrine of Suffering - its Origin & Effect on History.” Due to technical difficulties during restoration from the SH1 archive, many of the images were lost. I have taken the opportunity to re-post the entirety in six smaller parts]

19th to 20th century transition

The Israel-Palestine problem, the development of Iraq, Fascism, Nazism, Communism, Maoism, national self-determination, the centralization of society and economic organization in the West, women’s rights, the rapid and radical development of aircraft, military technology, and the arts, the end of the old British Liberal Party and the rise of the Labour Party, the break-up of Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union, the decline and fall of European empires and colonialism, the movement for European unity, the United Nations and the emergence of the United States as world superpower—all these were to a greater or lesser degree rooted in or made possible by the Great War.” Source

WWI was the defining point between two ages. Western civilisation lost its impetus and in spite of space rockets, the Beatles, the Pill, the Internet and all the technological gadgets, the fundamentals of civilisation remained static, or it could even be said that they deteriorated. Issues such as the use of energy, the direction of medicine, the grip of materialism on intellectual life, relations between the sexes and classes, the problem of nationalism, the nature of architecture and music, were all on the cusp of creative new solutions at the very beginning of the 20th century. Those innovations were either lost or corrupted by the ‘Great War’ and the same issues remain unresolved today.

WWI – part of a planned agenda

In his book, ‘The Transcendental Universe’ published twenty-four years before the Russian Revolution, C. G. Harrison speaks of “the next great European war” and of how the

national character” of the Slavic peoples would “enable them to carry out experiments in Socialism, political and economical, which would present innumerable difficulties in Western Europe.”

Harrison,was a strange mixture of English occultist and Anglican Christian. He was described as a “mysterious and unknown figure” who obviously had an unrivalled source of information. He claimed that a particular secret elite, which he doesn’t mention by name, had planned these events so that

the Russian Empire must die that the Russian people may live.”​

This was all being said in 1893, 21 years before the First World War. Was Harrison the press-agent for entities who had given him these prophecies?

60.jpg


The Kaiser’s Dream.” 1890
Source

A cartoon map of Europe appeared in the Christmas 1890 edition of the satirical English weekly, The Truth, entitled “The Kaiser’s Dream.” The magazine’s editor, Henry LabouchEre, was a Freemason. It shows republics where at the time there were monarchies. The Austro-Hungarian Empire of the Hapsburgs has gone along with the Russian Empire. Over Russia/Tartaria is written “Russian Desert.” Germany is identified with the words “German Republics” in plural. Source

Chaos in Portugal

This experiment in Socialism got underway in Portugal by means of a revolution in 1910 followed by a severe persecution of the Catholic Church throughout the country. After a chaotic period, Portugal entered into the First World War believing it would consolidate the country, prevent Spanish invasion and secure their overseas colonies. However, it had the opposite effect and by the time of the materialisations in Fatima, there was a dictatorship in power and an easing of relations with the Vatican.

60a.jpg


Rasputin
Source

The Socialist 'Experiment' Begins

The assassination of Rasputin, December 1916, put paid to the the last representative of native opposition to western esoteric plans for Russia. He was murdered by Prince Yussopov, a Freemason initiated in Oxford; the murder was assisted by the British Secret Service. Source

During the next five months the Czar had abdicated; America had entered the war against Germany; the German High Command had facilitated Lenin’s return to Russia, while the Americans and the British allowed Trotsky to join him.

So who exactly were these stout-hearted Russian patriots who freed their proud nation from the tyranny of the aristocracy?

In 1917 of the 52 persons who took over the direction of Russia, all but Lenin were Jews. The Rev. George Simons, who was Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church in St. Petersburg from 1907 to October 1918, appeared before a Committee of the United States Senate on the 12th February, 1919, and gave them a report of his personal knowledge of the happenings in Russia up to the time he left.

"In December, 1918, out of 388 members of the revolutionary government, only 16 happened to be real Russians; all the rest were Jews with the exception of one U.S. Negro. Two hundred and sixty-five of the Jews come from the Lower East Side of New York." (Source; ‘The Rulers of Russia’ Father Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp.)

Dr. Fahey also relates that even in 1935 the Central Executive of the Third international, which ruled Russia,

"consisted of 59 men, of which 56 were Jews. The other three, including Stalin, were married to Jewesses.” (ibid.)

Igniting the Flame of War

According to the occultist Rudolph Steiner (yes, him again), the actual causes of the war had been made so nefarious and complicated that Europeans were unable or just too lazy to seek the truth. As a direct result of this they became paralysed with fear. This fear created the poisonous climate into which the spark of war could be thrown. That spark, however, was thrown consciously.

61.jpg

(Source)​

Ritual Manipulation

“...the events of the war could not be understood without taking into account the existence and activities of elite brotherhoods in the West—mostly of a Masonic or semi-Masonic nature—with a deep occult knowledge of the human being and of the evolution of consciousness. They abused this knowledge and put it at the service of special interest groups, one-sided national egoisms, in order to bring about far-reaching historical aims. These brotherhoods were masters at the grey (the media) and black (ritual) arts of manipulation, at long-range planning, networking of all kinds and, above all, ensuring the right people were in the right place at the right time.Source

Thought Environments

The brotherhoods realise their plans over long periods of time and employ a certain cold-blooded detachment that is necessary to work with spiritual forces on the physical plane. They often make use of intermediaries to achieve their ends, pulling strings and obliterating their tracks; sometimes, in a kind of pseudo-Hegelian dialectic, they even deliberately set up counter-strategies that appear to cross their own paths, i.e. the opposite of what their representatives and puppets say they want. Through their direct or indirect control of the media they create thought ‘environments’ or atmospheres into which ideas can be seeded. They exploit to the full the fact that most people are inattentive most of the time. Occult ideas slip or are slipped into society by means of popular literature, TV and films.

62.jpg
63.jpg
64.jpg
65.jpg
2019
(Source)​
2016
(Source)​
2017
(Source)​
1999
(Source)​

Symbolism

Steiner emphasised the “need to be aware of rhetorical devices in the media and by public figures, their pictorial descriptions, use of images, intensifications and comparisons. For example the phrase “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!” from 1789 was replaced by “Order, Duty, Justice!” in 1914. We should pay attention to the significance of names chosen by people for certain purposes and take note of what is done on particular days and under astronomical constellations which echo similar configurations in the past, calling forth unconscious or semi-conscious reactions in people. One needs to be aware that brotherhoods reckon with long periods of time; they set things going and leave them to develop. New leaders emerge to carry on predecessors’ impulses.” (Ibid.)​

The Grey Magic

Just as ‘poisons’ can be introduced into the body to create disease, Steiner believed that can they also be led and guided into the social organism to bring about sickness or virus — this is what he calls ‘the grey magic’ of the Press (today, ‘the Media’). In view of his statements that nothing is better for a person than real insight into how things work in the world and that what people think is far more important than what they do, the Media can with justification be called the real ‘drug dealers’ of the social world as they form and influence so many judgements on the basis of untruth, lies, sensationalism, distortion and prejudice. Source

In fact it’s evident that today this grey magic is being utilised in the extreme. The media have created a totally false reality by implanting a virus into the social organism which they have manipulated into a pandemic that they maintain through untruth, lies, sensationalism, distortion and prejudice. The knock-on effects of this are obvious for all to see. “One needs to be aware that brotherhoods reckon with long periods of time; they set things going and leave them to develop.”

Furthermore, why would it be that one specific candidate for the US presidential election had to be hated and despised by the entire world – not just the voters in the USA? Because what people think is far more important than what they do.

Could it be that certain elite groups within this world have known exactly how to make use of ‘the phenomena’ to achieve their objectives for a very very long time?

Definitely.

...there are individuals who, by some means or other, learn through the secret brotherhoods about the spiritual forces that exist and consciously misuse this knowledge for some other ends… I have often pointed out here that there are... lines of connection, via the most varied intermediate links, between the external world and the secret brotherhoods, and onwards from the secret brotherhoods to the spiritual world. To understand this rightly it is necessary to take into account that wherever human beings work with the help of spiritually effective forces, whether with good or evil intent, they have to reckon with long stretches of time... One characteristic of those who make use of spiritual forces is that very frequently… they have reasons for not wishing to appear on the stage of the physical plane. Instead they make use of intermediaries through whom certain plans can be realized... Someone who is intent on influencing people, someone who, as an occultist, is not entirely scrupulous, can indeed gain power over people in this way.

Jesuit Masons

It is necessary sometimes ...that certain things become confused, so that certain tracks are covered up, and other things are lost in an impenetrable thicket. This is very important …I could point to a place in Europe where so-called Freemasonry, so-called secret societies, had a great influence at a certain time... It was then necessary to obliterate the tracks at this point. So a certain Jesuit influence was brought to play so that the Masonic and Jesuit influences met; for there are higher instances, ‘empires’, which can quite well make use of both Masons and Jesuits in order to achieve what they want to achieve through the collaboration of the two. Do not believe that there can be no individuals who are both Jesuit and Freemason.

66.jpg


Archduke Ferdinand of Austria just before his Assassination
Source

The Focal Point for Powerful Forces

one of the main causes of today’s painful events [1917} is the fear in which the whole world was drenched, ...That soul [Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria] was connected in a certain particular way with this aura of fear. Therefore that violent death was in no way merely an external affair...

[F: The assassination by one of the ‘secret brotherhoods’ of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria was used as the spark to ignite WWI.]

What rose up as the soul of Franz Ferdinand into the spiritual worlds became a focal point for very strong, powerful forces, and much of what is now happening is connected with the very fact that a unique transition took place between life and so-called death, so that this soul became something quite different from what other souls become.
...there was something present before the assassination of Franz Ferdinand that became different after that event.

[Makes you wonder about other assassinations – JFK, John Lennon, Lady Diana, etc., etc. Also, consider this in relation to what was mentioned earlier – the need to have one specific candidate for the 2020 US presidential election hated and despised by the entire world. Did this make him the Focal Point for Powerful Forces?]

Manufactured Thought-Forms


...forces are at work which are being managed by human beings for certain ends, by means of utilizing the passions and feelings of nationality, which have, however, in their turn first been manufactured. This is most important. Many attempts fail. But account is taken of long periods of time and of many possibilities. Above all, account is taken of how little inclination people have to pay attention to the wider—the widest, contexts.

67.jpg


Your Country Wants You to Suffer and Die
Source

Guiding Poisonous Effects

...poisons work as actual substances in the human organism, so do they also work spiritually in social life. And in social life it is possible to guide and lead them. What is grey magic really? Grey magic is nothing other than the guiding of poisonous effects in such a way that they cause damage and bring about sickness in the social sense.” (Source: The Karma of Untruthfulness, Secret Societies, the Media, and Preparations for the Great War, Volume 1. Thirteen lectures given in Dornach and Basel between 4 and 31 December 1916, Rudolph Steiner.)

You can almost forgive him for the “suffering is connected with the highest in man” quote in the first section… nah, maybe not.


Religion Revisited

Is there any evidence that the ‘spiritual forces’ or their human co-conspirators were involved in the foundation of the Abrahmic religions? Whilst it’s clear that neither the Hebrew Bible nor the New Testament are reliable historical records, can anything be deduced from those texts and also the Nag Hammadi Codices?

68.jpg

Source

The Priest of Zadok

The idea of Jewish kingship in the Old Testament seemed to suddenly appear out of nowhere with King Saul. When the next one, David, handed over to King Solomon, he said,

Call [to] me Zadok, the priest, and Nathan, the prophet, and anoint him there [Solomon] king of Israel… And Zadok, the priest, took a horn of oil out of the tabernacle, and anointed Solomon." (l Kings l:34,39)​

This Zadok character is quite a mystery. It’s difficult, if not impossible, to associated him with the hereditary priesthoods of Benjamin, Aaron, and Levi. Zadok was from the same priestly line as Melchizedek, the King of Salem. He is another shadowy figure who pre-dates Abraham and was the one who chose Abraham to be the ‘press-agent’ for Yahweh. It was also actually Melchizedek who made the Covenant with the Jews and declared them to be the ‘Chosen People.’

"And Melchizedek, king of Salem, brought forth [to Abraham] bread and wine; and he was the priest of the most high" (Gen. L4:18).

It’s from this meeting that the Christian sacrament of bread and wine originated.

Melchizedek

Here again we have the same dilemma, did Melchizedek chose the Israelites or the Jews? One is a race of people, the other is a religious group. To question the choice of ‘the Israelites’ as the supreme creator’s choice to represent him to all the nations of the earth and fulfil his plan, would be declared racist – but no, wait a minute, it would be declared anti-Semitic... even though it clearly isn’t. For the creator God to favour one group of his people and place them above all others is anti-human.

After this episode, Melchizedek disappears. His title, "King of Salem," relates to the future site of Jerusalem. His name, Melchi-Zedek, incorporates the Sumerian root melki-, which means "prince," "divine inheritor", giving "prince of righteousness." The Hebrew ‘zedek’ is a variation of zadok, also spelled tsedeq, tzaddik and zaddik. The name Zadok is related to the Hebrew ‘zado,’ which gives, "the just one," or "the righteous." Examples are Daniel the Just in the Old Testament and James the Just, brother of Jesus, in the New Testament.

69.jpg


Revealed from behind the curtain, like the Wizard of Oz, Melchizedek is handed sacrificial offerings – a miniature sheep (maybe) and a child. A hand reaches down from above. Note the symbol of the Cross on the altar.
Source

The Zaddik Cult

In a loose sense the zaddik is simply a better human being, judged by his obedience to God, but in the strict sense it is someone who meets a standard of purity and perfection that is superhuman. (The same ideology of a superior superhuman ‘Aryan’ race would appear once again thousands of years later as the arch enemy of the Chosen People.) This was, or even is, the nature of the Zadok priesthood who were the arbitrators of the Covenant between the Israelites and Yahweh. The divine mission of Yahweh’s chosen people concealed something even darker. At its core was Melchizedek’s Zaddik cult. Their ideology is preserved in the scrolls found at Qumran near the Dead Sea in 1947.

Some of the material is written in code, and key documents such as the Community Rule use code names for various people such as the Teacher of Righteousness, the Messiah, the Wicked Priest, the Sons of Zadok, the Kittim and the Man of Lies. Different people enact these roles over seven or eight generations. The Zaddikim saw themselves acting out a pre-written script, a historical plot that reflected, so they believed, the providence of God the Father. Curiously, the twists and turns of the plot were not always favourable to the righteous few who starred in God's epic historical drama.” Source: ‘Not in His Image,’ John Lamb Lash.

The interesting points about this are:
  • The acting out of a pre-defined role over many generations. As will be shown later, this acting or personal disassociation, is significant.
  • That the pre-defined plot sometimes seemed to go against the goal of the drama. This behaviour was described by Rudolph Steiner in relation to the long-term agenda of ‘the brotherhoods.’

70.jpg


Abraham is ‘Blessed’ by Melchizedek
Source

The Covenant Drama

The narrative of the drama is what you would expect, the Teacher of Righteousness would command The Messiah to lead the Sons of Zadok to overthrow whoever was standing between them and the establishment of the Kingdom of Israel (i.e. the Kittim). The really weird thing is that the drama has the failure of this goal built into it in the form of the Man of Lies and the Wicked Priest. The role of the Man of Lies, also called the Scoffer, the Spouter, and the Man of Mockery, is to infiltrate the Covenant, (as the inner circle of the cult called itself) and turn against it, thereby leading many Israelites astray. The role of the Wicked Priest is to be the head of the Sadducees at the Jerusalem temple, who were the opposition to the fanatical ideals of the Zaddokite Teacher of Righteousness. This isn’t just controlled opposition, it’s controlled defeat as well!

The spell of this ‘Groundhog Day’ scenario will only be broken by the end-time battle, which would take place on a worldwide basis. The Messiah and the Sons of Zadok will be assisted by the ‘celestial host’ led by ‘The Nasi,’ who is Melchizedek in the role of supernatural avenger. This is God vs Belial, the Children of Light vs the Children of Darkness, the main event, the Zaddokite end-level boss, just before the final apocalyptic curtain comes down and the end credits roll. A walkthrough in glorious technicolour is available in the Qumran DSS War Scroll.

The ‘rank and file’ of the Israelite community believed that accepting the role of the Chosen People meant that Israel could strive to be an exemplary nation within the world, rather than being alienated from it or against it. However, the narrative presented in the Hebrew Bible and indeed, ‘history’ itself, illustrates how they have constantly been driven into conflict with the world. Unfortunately, this was all part of the plan as shown above.

The Righteous Few

The historian Josephus who wrote The Jewish Wars wrote,

"As much as the Jews believed that Yahweh would save them, he consistently refused to do so, and the greater their longing, the worse their suffering."

All through Jewish history a palpable, agonized tension plays between these two elements: the stated aim to establish an Israelite political kingdom for the people, and the hidden aim of a righteous few whose standard of superhuman purity alienated them from the very community that sheltered them.” (Source: ‘Not in His Image,’ John Lamb Lash.)

Pawns in the Game

John Allegro, the noted DSS scholar and also John Lamb Lash, both consider that the Israelites in general were merely pawns in the game and the true Chosen People were the Covenant – the inner circle of the Zaddokite movement – and they were the only ones who would be saved by Nasi (Melchezedek) after the final battle. Furthermore, the Covenant constantly reminded the Israelites that they had failed in their responsibility to carry out Yahweh’s divine plan and were therefore sinners and that all their misfortunes were punishment from God. This, naturally, imprinted a masochistic persecution complex into the Jewish psyche which continues to this day, but the cards were always deliberately stacked against them right from the start.

Let’s not forget the previously mentioned ‘Aryan’ race who in their Nazi (Nasi?) guise had the declared aim of establishing a political kingdom for the Germanic people “and the hidden aim of a righteous few whose standard of superhuman purity alienated them from the very community that sheltered them.” That drama also had the failure of the goal built into it. What was Adolf Hitler’s role? The Messiah makes the most sense, in fact he was often referred to as the ‘Nazi Messiah.’ Who was the Man of Lies, was it Herman Hess or Martin Boorman? It was the same plot as the Covenant Drama just with a different theatrical company and location (20th century Germany) with the Chosen People type-cast in their usual role as the persecuted victims. The association of ‘The Phenomena’ with the establishment and rise of the NSDAP in Germany is difficult to deny.

71.jpg

Source

Celestial UFOs

Dead Sea Scroll fragment 4Q385, relates the adventures of Ezekiel in the ‘merkabah’ or celestial chariot… or UFO. The Zaddikites believed that a whole fleet of these UFOs piloted by ‘angels’ would rescue them at the last moment during the final battle. In Ezekiel 37 of the OT, Yahweh promises to literally raise his people from their graves and lead them back to Israel. I would like to point out at this point that nowhere in the Bible are angels described as having wings – why would they need chariots to fly about in if they could use their wings?

The Destruction of Jerusalem

The concept of literal resurrection was a belief of the Maccabees – the Jewish revolutionaries who were revolting at exactly the same time as the DSS material was supposedly being written. The two Books of Maccabees used to be at the end of the OT, but dropped off at some point. They describe five generations worth of severe political unrest in Palestine caused by what we would today call terrorism. The main and most extreme group of terrorists were the Zaddikim. This period of the same rigged drama being enacted over and over again with failure after failure, inevitably ended in one massive failure - the wholesale destruction of Jerusalem.

Physical Resurrection

The concept of bodily resurrection never featured in mainstream Jewish belief and was reserved for the Zaddikim only. DSS fragment 4Q521, "A Messianic Apocalypse," confirms the power of Yahweh to "heal the wounded, and revive the dead" – suicide no problem. Fundamentalist Christians and Mormons believe in corporeal resurrection. Islamic jihadis believe in a similar variation. There is only one source for this belief and it doesn’t come from ancient Judaism.

Change of tactics

Physical resurrection, transportation to heaven, God the Father’s active role in history, the final battle against Evil, Judgment Day, divine retribution – this is the never ending ultra-righteous drama of the Covenant. The Zaddikim may have been defeated after the destruction of Jerusalem, but the Covenant lived on in Roman Christianity – if you can’t beat the Kittim, co-opt them.

The standard roles within the Covenant drama were modified to better facilitate their appeal to a new European audience. The most appropriate first audience was, quite literally, the captive one – the slaves. The gentle Jesus was promoted to the downtrodden slave community with a familiarly bolshevik communistic image, promising them a spectacular salvation from their persecution.

Co-opt and Infiltrate

In order to gain sympathy with the masses, the Messiah role took on a more mystical characteristic with Jesus the magician, miracle worker, healer – a familiar shamanic characteristic. In this manner, Jesus could be sold on the basis that he was just an updated version of the old gods.

72.jpg


The Conversion of St. Paul
Source

The Nazarene Party

Acts 24:5 describes the indictment of Paul before the Roman governor Felix (no relation) in Caesarea:

"For we have found this man a plague-carrier, and an agent of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ring-leader of the sect of the Nazarene party."

DSS scholar Robert Eisenman has demonstrated that the ‘Nazarene’ doctrine has nothing to do with the village of Nazareth, but everything to do with the extremist ideology of the Zaddikim. However, Paul was not in the role of the Teacher of Righteousness or the Messiah – he was in fact the Man of Lies. [Insert dramatic sound effect - ”Da-Da-Daaaaa!]

The Cast

In the role of the Teacher of Righteousness we had James the Just. Starring as the Messiah, his brother Jesus. James struggled against the betrayal of the Man of Lies who wanted to hijack the Messiah and turn him into the figurehead of his new religion that added a veneer of God’s love and grace onto the core ideology of the Covenant – Christianity. The Damascus Document of the DSS alludes to a time,

When there arose a Scoffer,
Who distilled for Israel deceptive waters,
And caused them to go astray in the trackless wilderness.
To suppress the old paths,
So as to turn aside from the righteous ways”​

The traditional ‘Road to Damascus’ story (not the Bob Hope and Bing Crosby one) doesn’t make any sense. How could Paul or rather Saul of Tarsus, have been going to Damascus to persecute Christians when there weren’t any at that time. It’s a kind of Catch 22 - Paul created Christianity after he was converted.

Hitman

Paul was clearly a one man task force who was sent in to root out terrorist groups, such as the Zealots (Zaddikim/Sons of Zadok.) The Romans frequently assisted him with troops and a personal guard. The head of the Sanhedrin (the Wicked Priest don’t forget) wanted the Zealots suppressed and also supported Paul. This is all clear even from Acts in the Bible.

This would indicate that Saul/Paul went to Damascus with the purpose of defeating the Covenant ‘cell’ that was based there. Instead, something happened to turn things around 180 degrees. Who knows if his vision of the luminous figure was similar to later ones at Lourdes, Fatima, etc.? Maybe there was no vision involved and his stay with Ananias was enough to convert him? It was certainly enough to make him change his name, which is something else to bear in mind for later.

Double Agent

Acts 4 relates how the Zealots were so outraged at Paul going around preaching the Covenant’s doctrines to all and sundry that 50 of them went on a fast until he had been murdered and another 12 threw their rattles out of their prams in a temper (sorry, couldn’t resist.) The Romans continued protecting him though as the knowledge he possessed regarding the Covenant's activities made him a useful double-agent… until that is, they decided to execute him. However, in the meantime Paul’s new religion, which was in fact nothing new at all being the doctrine and agenda of the Melchizedek cult, spread like wildfire among the slave population.

73.jpg


Melchizedek, Supernatural Avenger
Source

The Overlord

The resurrection of Jesus resonates with the supernatural, deathless status of Melchizedek. In Hebrews 7, Paul asserts that Melchizedek is the power behind Christ and reveals that he [Melchizedek] is,

"without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days nor end of life."​

We also discover that the priesthood of Melchizedek overrules and cancels out the traditional priesthoods of Levi and Aaron, thus freeing Christianity from its Jewish roots.

Postscript.

This eternal drama with its built-in failures and destructive consequences, certainly rings true if we look at what we call ‘our history.’ William Shakespeare (whoever he really was) said,

“All the world’s a stage,​
And all the men and women merely players,​
They have their exits and their entrances.”​

In his version, “this strange eventful history” ends in “mere oblivion.” Upon reflection, this unfortunately makes about as much sense as the apocalyptic nightmare of the cult of Zaddik or the fanaticism of the Aryan Race. Perhaps the mistake is to look for, or even expect there to be any sense involved. The Phenomena supports the script because its essence is the script as we shall see...

To be continued in Part 5.
The Nature of the Beast(Part 1) Religion: Old World vs New World
The Nature of the Beast(Part 2) Denizens of the Invisible Realm
The Nature of the Beast (Part 3) Miracles and Apparitions
The Nature of the Beast (Part 4) Rituals, Thought-Forms & The Cult of Zaddik
The Nature of the Beast (Part 5) The Gnostics, Archons & Devas
The Nature of the Beast (Part 6) The Holiness of Sin, Consent Extraction

(Responses to the original thread are preserved here.)

It would be my pleasure to reciprocate the respect shown by members who make comments based upon having actually read the OP and preferably also the previous parts. Thanking you in anticipation.
 
Last edited:

Whitewave

Well-known member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2020
Messages
99
Reaction score
260
Fascinating read however I find several logical errors in the article which, for me, taints the conclusion.

You were correct in distinguishing between Israelites (a race of people) and Jews (a religious order).

You say that Zadok translates to "just" and not only a common form of righteousness but a "super human purity and righteousness" yet all the actions and behaviors you ascribe to them are unrighteous, manipulative, and destructive to the very race of people who shelter them.

You also state that "the idea of Jewish kingship in the O.T. seemed to suddenly appear out of nowhere with King David" (I Kings 1:34) even though the Bible says it started with David's predecessor, Saul (not to be confused with the New Testament Saul who changed his name to Paul).
Kingship was already an institution as evidenced by Yahweh's warning to not imitate the surrounding nations who practiced monarchies.

Also, Melchizedek, as you pointed out, means Prince of righteousness (or prince of peace). Melchizedek predates the Israelites and their Jewish religion indicating Melchizedek himself was a king (or at least the son of one).

If, as you posit, "the true chosen people were the Covenant - the inner circle of the Zaddokite movement - and they were the only ones who could be saved by the Nasi (Melchizedek) after the final battle" why would N.T. Paul act as "the father of lies" in order to act as "a one man task force who was sent in to root out terrorist groups such as the zealots/Zaddakim/Sons of Zaddok"?

And who sent Paul in for that mission? The super humanly righteous but secret society of Zaddok?

I enjoy reading your researched articles but put (some of) them in the same category as the TV show, Ancient Aliens. In other words, I enjoy the information presented but don't share the conclusions reached with the information presented. No malice intended.
 

JWW427

Well-known member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
299
Reaction score
884
Location
Wash. DC.
Melchizedek as an ET visitor and prophet makes perfect sense to me. There were many.
To me, resurrection and reincarnation are the same.
An important and stimulating OP.
 

Whitewave

Well-known member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2020
Messages
99
Reaction score
260
We all choose what we're willing to believe.
I question why an extraterrestrial, capable of interstellar travel and obviously technologically superior to ancient goat herders whose only weapons were pointy sticks and rocks would require the assistance of the other Kings to help defeat the enemy.
Why didn't he just vaporize them or even just pull a Bic lighter out of his pocket and cow them all into submission with his magical ability to make fire in his hand?
The OP is important and stimulating. I just don't believe in ancient aliens. I believe in ancient humanoid civilizations. Each to their own, I say.
 

Felix Noille

Well-known member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2020
Messages
238
Reaction score
780
Location
Spain
It would be my pleasure to reciprocate the respect shown by members who make comments based upon having actually read the OP and preferably also the previous parts. Thanking you in anticipation.
Not 'Aliens,' ancient, modern or future.

Fascinating read however I find several logical errors in the article which, for me, taints the conclusion.
I wasn’t aware that I had made any conclusions as yet, there are another 2 parts to go.. Throughout the preceding parts I have made a strenuous effort to highlight the illogical nature of all the events I have described. If you can find the logic in an apparition claiming to be Jesus taking an underage girl as his bride, giving her the stigmata and then forbidding an entire German village from attending a dance upon pain of answering to him personally on judgement day then I would very interested to hear it.

You were correct in distinguishing between Israelites (a race of people) and Jews (a religious order).
I did that in Part 1.

You say that Zadok translates to "just" and not only a common form of righteousness but a "super human purity and righteousness" yet all the actions and behaviors you ascribe to them are unrighteous, manipulative, and destructive to the very race of people who shelter them.
Precisely.

the Bible says it started with David's predecessor, Saul (not to be confused with the New Testament Saul who changed his name to Paul).
Kingship was already an institution as evidenced by Yahweh's warning to not imitate the surrounding nations who practiced monarchies.
Absolutely correct. My error, it suddenly appeared with Saul, not David as you say. I will edit the mistake.

However, I dispute that it was already an institution:

"Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel . . . , And said unto him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us like all the nations." (1 Sam. 8:4-5)

At the time this was a patriarchal society with a strong priestly element, but it was not a theocracy "like all the nations" in the ancient Near East. Theocracy was a foreign institution to them prior to Saul.

Also, Melchizedek, as you pointed out, means Prince of righteousness (or prince of peace). Melchizedek predates the Israelites and their Jewish religion indicating Melchizedek himself was a king (or at least the son of one).
"And Melchizedek, king of Salem, brought forth [to Abraham] bread and wine; and he was the priest of the most high" (Gen. L4:18).
why would N.T. Paul act as "the father of lies" in order to act as "a one man task force who was sent in to root out terrorist groups such as the zealots/Zaddakim/Sons of Zaddok"?
He had a vision and then took on/accepted the role of the 'Man of Lies' and/or he allowed the Zaddikim to think they had converted him.

And who sent Paul in for that mission? The super humanly righteous but secret society of Zaddok?
The Romans frequently assisted him with troops and a personal guard.
I enjoy reading your researched articles but put (some of) them in the same category as the TV show, Ancient Aliens. In other words, I enjoy the information presented but don't share the conclusions reached with the information presented. No malice intended.
Allow me to return the compliment. I respect your opinions. In fact some of them remind me of the reasons why I began this series of posts in the first place. At the same time, some of them make me wonder why I ever bothered.
 
Last edited:

AthroposRex

New member
Trusted Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2020
Messages
11
Reaction score
22
I am lookng forward to the rest of the article. Until I know what your conclusion is, I won't comment on this or that. It is a fascinating perspective, however, and I appreciate you contributing.
 

Safranek

Active member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
26
Reaction score
103
At the same time, some of them make me wonder why I ever bothered.
I think I know why you bothered. In search of the truth one must obviously sift through an overwhelming amount of material crossing over many intertwined, contradictory, and obfuscated subject areas and all this accumulated info must somehow be carefully scrutinized, assimilated and put into it's proper 'place'. A skeptical (in it's positive sense) person will refrain from jumping to conclusions without having gone through that process of scrutiny, assimilation and proper placement of ideas, characters and events and will only present an opinion and especially a conclusion when they feel they have covered enough ground to be able to confidently take that step. After all, the whole purpose of it all is to know the truth.

In this series of articles I sense that you are ready to present assimilated ideas based on solid research and are awaiting the input of others to be able to challenge and/or confirm your hypothesis, to try and offer a firm grounding from which this very complex and crucially important subject can continue on to its fruition.

As also evident in your OP, there is and always has been great effort by TPTB to derail any attempt to get to that finish line in our search for truth (the truth shall set you free), and we can confirm this by noticing the amount of effort put into forgeries, blatant lies and obfuscation not only at present but throughout our history, ancient and recent.

Thank you for taking the time and effort to present this series as it is and I'm very much looking forward to the following parts. I hope that there will be good discussion to clarify the narrative and emphasis put on the key points of the series on which we all (or at least most) can agree based on our own individual research from the multitude of sources available. What makes this difficult is the tactic of always combining the truth with lies (creating your own opposition - also a part of the OP).

When I see two excellent researchers/truth-seekers like Whitewave and Felix disagree in such a way, I remind myself that there IS only one truth and at least one of them must be wrong. Of course I do not want to be the one to decide which one unless I'm very well prepared to back my point. :)

On a side-note, I just read "The Book of the Damned" by John Fort recently after being inspired by this video:

Insects Storms from a Simulated Sky by Jason Breshears. His videos cover a vast span of historical timeline with dozens of bibliographical references (which is great for new research material sources).

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Thk3FodqX4


After many years of research I am still amazed at how much we don't know regarding our past and how much has been censored from us by TPTB.

In 1917 of the 52 persons who took over the direction of Russia, all but Lenin were Jews.
According to the genealogical research presented by Miles Mathis: http://mileswmathis.com/lenin.pdf , Lenin was a Jew too.
Not only that, but according to MM's research these families have been manipulating the 'system' by taking on these various roles in all key fields of our societies directing most of the important events shaping our reality with their narrative every step of the way.

(Source; ‘The Rulers of Russia’ Father Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp.)
After being given that book by a Russian friend to read, I found "Controversy of Zion" by Douglas Reed on a suggested reading list;


Of course, some of what's written there is based on some of the only available 'official' versions of history making it some of its accuracy questionable, but it still is a good compilation from those versions and aside from that there's still a wealth of information given from his personal experience.

Than I read "Pawns in the Game" by William Guy Carr.


------------------

To me, this series brings to light the interconnections of a few key threads from SH1 and adds some extra elements. A great effort indeed, can hardly wait for the next part.
 

Collapseinrealtime

Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
32
Also keep in mind that there were 12 tribes of Israel. Geographically, the ten northern tribes were called Israel, while the 2 southern tribes (Judah and Benjamin) were called Judah. Also intermingled within both nations were the Levites, the priestly class, of which both Moses and Aaron were a part of. The "Jews" of the scriptures is a misnomer, since the word "Jew" was inserted in place of Judaite, or of the tribe of Judah in later versions of the Old Testament. The modern Jew identification with the people of the book completely fail to take the above narrative into consideration. If they were actually the Judaites, why did they name the land they occupied in Palestine 'Israel', rather than restoring the name of Judah, or perhaps even naming it New Judah, since it doesn't exactly correspond to the southern tribe's original national borders? It becomes easy to see the confusion in all of this and the purpose for such confusion. Great series and look forward to the next installments!
 

Clown Of God

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Messages
13
Reaction score
28
Location
Sweden
Op...
Your first expose (Doctrine of Suffering) presented on the original SH had in my humble view at times a bit of a condescending attitude from your side.Basically saying that if one did not agree upon that which you presented.
One where kind of narrow minded or something along them lines.I do not recall the exact sentences.At that time I chose to keep my mouth shut.

Now here, In your response to Whitewave you wrote ...”you get reminded of why bother.”
Well we are at your mercy of discrimination regarding this decision.I do however not see any benefits in having a condescending attitude towards people who simply do not share ones views and dare to question and even criticize them.
 

Whitewave

Well-known member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2020
Messages
99
Reaction score
260
Please understand that I am neither agreeing or disagreeing with the premise of the OP, just asking questions for the sake of clarification at this point.

The only thing I disagreed with was with what I thought he was suggesting about Melchizedek having extraterrestrial origins. Not sure why it matters if any of us agree with each other.

Would have to read the old testament again to find the spot where Jews were first called Jews but iirc, they considered it an insult. A few guys were working on rebuilding the temple and some other guys came around mocking them and called them Jews which irked the Jews. Lot of little strange tidbits like that in the bible.

The thing that gives me pause about such topics is the innately divisive nature inherent in the premise. I've heard the same rationales given regarding Catholics, Muslims, Russians, Mexicans, blacks, whites, millionaires, Democrats, Republicans, atheists, millennials, boomers, liberals, conservatives, etc. Each of the above mentioned also have histories supporting a negative narrative. A case can be made against each group.

While I don't support many groups or agree with their philosophies, I've met very fine individuals in each of the above categories. I would hope that we would view one another, not as members of a particular collective, but as individuals with perhaps different viewpoints.

That said, I'll be reading the rest of what's presented with interest as the OP is a fine writer and researcher.
 

Safranek

Active member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
26
Reaction score
103
Your first expose (Doctrine of Suffering) presented on the original SH had in my humble view at times a bit of a condescending attitude from your side.Basically saying that if one did not agree upon that which you presented.
If this indeed was in the post it slipped by me.

I do not recall the exact sentences.
When such criticism is posted IMHO there should be exact sentences to allow the writer an opportunity for clarification and possibly to pay attention to and improve on it in future posts if this is indeed the case.

”you get reminded of why bother.”
seems to add up to

having a condescending attitude
This was taken out of context.

When you read in in context:

Allow me to return the compliment. I respect your opinions. In fact some of them remind me of the reasons why I began this series of posts in the first place. At the same time, some of them make me wonder why I ever bothered.

I read;

- the return of a compliment
- a statement of respect resulting in inspiration
- frustration

I see no 'condescending attitude' in the above paragraph when taken in context.

I do however not see any benefits in having a condescending attitude towards people who simply do not share ones views and dare to question and even criticize them.
I think we can all agree with this sentence and if you had actually showed this to be the case regarding the OP then Felix would get his hand slapped and be told to stand in the corner. :)
 

Clown Of God

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Messages
13
Reaction score
28
Location
Sweden
I have no desire to derail this thread and won’t engage in to polemics with you Safranek regarding this.
You have your views and thoughts regarding this and I have mine.See you on the board...
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
Felix Noille The Nature of the Beast (Part 6) The Holiness of Sin, Consent Extraction Various Organizations 2
Felix Noille The Nature of the Beast (Part 5) The Gnostics, Archons & Devas Various Organizations 0
Felix Noille The Nature of the Beast (Part 3) Miracles and Apparitions Various Organizations 0
Felix Noille The Nature of the Beast (Part 2): Denizens of the Invisible Realm Various Organizations 3
Felix Noille The Nature of the Beast (Part 1) Religion: Old World vs New World Various Organizations 15
Archive SH Archive Even our view of nature may be wrong General 0
M SH Archive Everything we "Know" about Physics (Nature and its Processes) is taken from the Ancients Questionable Ancient History 0
KD Archive SH Archive Georgia Guidestones: Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature Fraternal Oganizations 0
C UPDATE My grandfather and the Templars PART 2 (UPDATES AND PHOTOS) General 12
Coulness Scottish history, part of the persecution Questionable Ancient History 17
A Troy (2 part) Buildings and Structures 1
A The Bible - History of the Balkans (end of imperors) (part 8) Urban Fires and Earthquakes 1
Catalyst Japan was once a part of the Great Tartaria Questionable Ancient History 58
dreamtime The Secret War Against Germania and its Historical Roots (part 5) Questionable Ancient History 60
dreamtime The Secret War Against Germania and its Historical Roots (part 4) Questionable Ancient History 40
dreamtime The Secret War Against Germania and its Historical Roots (part 3) Questionable Ancient History 22
Felix Noille The Betrayal of Albion (Part 7): Conclusion & Modus Operandi Questionable Ancient History 0
Felix Noille The Betrayal of Albion (Part 6): The Glorious Revolution Questionable Ancient History 2
Felix Noille The Betrayal of Albion (Part 5): The Dutch Puppetmasters Questionable Ancient History 0
Felix Noille The Betrayal of Albion (Part 4): The Great Fire of London Questionable Ancient History 2
Felix Noille The Betrayal of Albion (Part 3): The English Revolution Questionable Ancient History 0
Felix Noille The Betrayal of Albion (Part 2): 1066 and all that Questionable Ancient History 3
Felix Noille The Betrayal of Albion (Part 1): The City of London Questionable Ancient History 2
dreamtime The Secret War Against Germania and its Historical Roots (part 2) Questionable Ancient History 49
dreamtime The Secret War Against Germania and its Historical Roots (part 1) Questionable Ancient History 26
Archive SH Archive High Strangeness of Fossil Fuel Formation & Consumption: Part One: Does history even exist??? Questionable Ancient History 0
Archive SH Archive Riddles in the buildings of St. Petersburg. Part 4 (sibved) Buildings and Structures 0
Archive SH Archive Is the American Civil War part of the War of 1812? Wars and Conflicts 0
Archive SH Archive Is it American continent? Second part of 18 century. Unmatched 1
Plissken SH Archive Library of Congress Part II Buildings and Structures 0
Plissken SH Archive Library of Congress: Part I Buildings and Structures 0
Archive SH Archive What caused the global cataclysm? Part two. Mud Flood and Dust Storm Hypotheses 0
Archive SH Archive What caused the global cataclysm? Part one. Mud Flood and Dust Storm Hypotheses 0
Archive SH Archive Is the Sahara part of the land that the Israelites attacked? Questionable Ancient History 0
KD Archive SH Archive Continent of North America does not exist... or could it be a part of Asia? Known Parts of the World 1

Similar threads

Top