SH Archive Albert Einstein a Cog in the Synagogue of Satan’s Machine

[Archive]

Somethings they won't tell you in school

​

2800 page book called The Manufacture and $ale of Einstein. No I didn't read it and you should

The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein - The Propaganda of Supremacy : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Note: This OP was recovered from the KeeperOfTheKnowledge archive.

Note: Archived SH.org replies to this OP: Albert Einstein a Cog in the Synagogue of Satan’s Machine

 

[dreamtime]

Seems there's a Jesuit connection.

A guy called Roger Joseph Boscovich wrote a theory similar to the General Theory of Relativity and Einstein may have simply rewritten his work and published it under his own name.

“Very soon after the middle of the eighteenth century Father Boscovich gave his brilliant doctrine (if infinitely improbable theory) that elastic rigidity of solids, the elasticity of compressible liquids and gases, the attractions of chemical affinity and cohesion, the forces of electricity and magnetism in short, all the properties of matter except heat, which he attributed to a sulphureous essence, are to be explained by mutual attractions and repulsions, varying solely with distances, between mathematical points endowed also, each of them, with inertia.”​

https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Relativity Theory/Download/7953

The ideas for Einstein's relativity theories comes from an 18th Century priest called Father Boscovich. Attention to Boscovich's theory has been diverted by the massive publicity directed at Einstein. (...)​

Boscovichian physics has its roots with Pythagoras; and the dispute there with religion is that Pythagoras seems to be a version of pagan Sun worship. Mainstream Christianity has been opposed to the Sun god religion, despite Emperor Constantine believing that this was what Christianity was dealing with, when he adopted it as the religion of the Roman Empire. And despite it being known that Christianity adopted Christmas Day 25th December from pagan Sun-god religion, and adopted Sunday the holy day etc. Jordan Maxwell has looked into the issue and explains that Christianity is really the pagan Sun-god religion. Of course, the majority of Christians do not treat their religion as pagan Sun-god and are opposed to such a belief. So, it seems to be another case of people misunderstanding. Instead of Christianity having adopted certain pagan ideas as most believe, it might be that Christianity is a pagan religion that has been misunderstood and changed into something else. (...)​

​

Jon Bjerknes accuses Einstein of plagiarist in his book Albert Einstein the Incorrigible Plagiarist, because Einstein does not provide any references in his science papers that revolutionised 20th Century physics. What Bjerknes seems to fail to realise is that Einstein did not have the same restrictions in his era that modern science papers make, so he was allowed not to provide references. He was in a different era and allowed different freedoms. However the historical record of where the ideas that Einstein was working on came from Einstein’s co-worker on UFT, namely Lancelot Law Whyte, and that is mainly Boscovich, whom Bjerknes has suspected of as being very important.​

::www.einsteinconspiracy.co.uk

 

[Blitzur]

I recently was thinking about a lot of physical things and then something re poped into my head. A thought I once had when I was like 15 waiting to ride a coaster which will accelerate you to 100 km/h in like 1.4 seconds or something. I was thinking about something I learned where they claimed, acceleration an gravity are equal to each other. I tried to develop a theoretical construct on how we could use artificial gravity, to counter the effects of acceleration. I don't know what is max G for a human, but you won'T feel good, when you have like 6 Gs on you for hours. Which would be needed if we'd ever wanted to go far and fast. So i thought you could put artificial gravity in front of the seat, so when you accelerate with 5 Gs you just simulate 5 Gs in front of you and then you feel like 0 Gs again. So even 1000 Gs would be possible. But only if there is artificial gravity.

But then I noticed. Gravity (or as i know it, maybe my understanding is wrong) is acting on all atoms in my body at the same time. Of course, my feet are closer to the earth then my head, so maybe the effect on my feet is a little bit earlier and stronger, but in this example we will ignore this tiny tiny difference. As i know they claim, gravity moves with the speed of light. So when I jump from a plane, every atom in my body will be pulled towards earth AT THE SAME TIME with the SAME FORCE.

When we compare this to de-/acceleration now, we will notice, that we are being pushed or pulled. But only at the surface of contact. And the Information of this is only transferred through the mechanical pushing of the atoms inside my body onto each other. So the information of it moves only with the speed of sound.

So artificial de-/acceleration is nothing alike gravity.

Or did I do a mistake anywhere?

edit::// It's like magic, every time I order my thoughts like that I almost immediately have another idea ^^
What is equivalent is, when we are standing on a flat surface, e.g an elevator, and it's not moving, we experience 1G. Gravity pushes all ou Atoms into the ground at the same time, but our feet resits the force, an the atoms push back with the speed of sound again!
When it now is moving with a constant acceleration of 9.8 m/s² up, it feels the same as 2 G or if it moves down with that rate it feels like 0 G. The effect of the pushing into the ground with gravity is when staying still! While with the acceleration we have to constantly move. That's where I had my mistake. I compared the states wrong.

 

[InchoateTulpa]

Somethings they won't tell you in school

2800 page book called The Manufacture and $ale of Einstein. No I didn't read it and you should

The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein - The Propaganda of Supremacy : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Gotta love the one review at archive.org:

Reviewer: liveFreeOrDie259 - September 16, 2021
Subject: log in required

"you can go to pornhub and watch people sodomize each other but non-obscene writing is log in required. five stars for pissing off archive.org to this extent"

 

[Magnetic]

I recently was thinking about a lot of physical things and then something re poped into my head. A thought I once had when I was like 15 waiting to ride a coaster which will accelerate you to 100 km/h in like 1.4 seconds or something. I was thinking about something I learned where they claimed, acceleration an gravity are equal to each other. I tried to develop a theoretical construct on how we could use artificial gravity, to counter the effects of acceleration. I don't know what is max G for a human, but you won'T feel good, when you have like 6 Gs on you for hours. Which would be needed if we'd ever wanted to go far and fast. So i thought you could put artificial gravity in front of the seat, so when you accelerate with 5 Gs you just simulate 5 Gs in front of you and then you feel like 0 Gs again. So even 1000 Gs would be possible. But only if there is artificial gravity.

But then I noticed. Gravity (or as i know it, maybe my understanding is wrong) is acting on all atoms in my body at the same time. Of course, my feet are closer to the earth then my head, so maybe the effect on my feet is a little bit earlier and stronger, but in this example we will ignore this tiny tiny difference. As i know they claim, gravity moves with the speed of light. So when I jump from a plane, every atom in my body will be pulled towards earth AT THE SAME TIME with the SAME FORCE.

When we compare this to de-/acceleration now, we will notice, that we are being pushed or pulled. But only at the surface of contact. And the Information of this is only transferred through the mechanical pushing of the atoms inside my body onto each other. So the information of it moves only with the speed of sound.

So artificial de-/acceleration is nothing alike gravity.

Or did I do a mistake anywhere?

edit::// It's like magic, every time I order my thoughts like that I almost immediately have another idea ^^
What is equivalent is, when we are standing on a flat surface, e.g an elevator, and it's not moving, we experience 1G. Gravity pushes all ou Atoms into the ground at the same time, but our feet resits the force, an the atoms push back with the speed of sound again!
When it now is moving with a constant acceleration of 9.8 m/s² up, it feels the same as 2 G or if it moves down with that rate it feels like 0 G. The effect of the pushing into the ground with gravity is when staying still! While with the acceleration we have to constantly move. That's where I had my mistake. I compared the states wrong.

Gravity is an incredibly weak force. Imagine in a children's playground a disc 8 feet in diameter and you push it to spin on an axis and jump on and its revolving at 20 miles an hour. The force you are subjected to is incredibly forceful and you need to hang on to the metal bars to keep from being thrown out from this spinning mechanism. Now imagine at the equator of earth you are spinning at 1000 miles per hour and the fantastic forces that would launch you away from your position! It would be a force you could do nothing about except fly away at speeds we dare not contemplate unless death was of no concern. Yet a glossemer creature like a butterfly can flit about with no injury or damage from these forces. Gravity is not what we are told and the world is not revolving as in the textbooks. It is still and the sun and stars revolve around us. The gravitational constant is the acceleration toward the null point or Block Wall in a MAGNETIC FIELD.

 

[FarewellAngelina]

I'd add that gravity is non existent if defined as an attractive force between masses at any distance.

 

[Deleted member 37]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Xs9Qbg4cbg

​

 

[Arcadia137]

Whom do you ridicule?
Against whom do you make a wide mouth
And stick out the tongue?
Are you not children of transgression,
Offspring of falsehood.
Isaiah 57:4

 

[Udjat]

I think that if you want to know what Einstein really represented, look at his position in quantum physics. Niels Bohr argued that the mere act of indirectly observing the atomic realm changes the outcome of quantum interactions. Einstein refuted this, and if I am understanding this correctly is very deep, almost philosophical? I happen to sway towards Bohr's theory, but I am not a scientist and quantum physics is some hearty oatmeal that is sometimes hard for me to swallow.