Aurora Narrative Observations

feralimal

Core Member
Active Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2020
Messages
1,140
Reaction score
2,176
If you were in the 'Northern hemisphere' last week, you would likely have seen lots of photos of the aurora borealis. There were lots of great photos. Eg:
1716120912087.png
from In pictures: Northern Lights dazzle around the world

However, this post is about the narrative of the Aurora.

Firstly - I want to give the younger reader a warning. This post is a bit lewd, even obscene - depending on your age it may not be age-appropriate content! But on the other hand, this is science... so who knows?

Its clear there's some sort of sex element to the whole 'space' idea. From the 1940s, there's the story of Jack Parson and L Ron Hubbard.
Parsons was one of the principal founders of both the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the Aerojet Engineering Corporation
In 1945, Parsons separated from Helen, after having an affair with her sister Sara; when Sara left him for L. Ron Hubbard, Parsons conducted the Babalon Working, a series of rituals intended to invoke the Thelemic goddess Babalon on Earth. He and Hubbard continued the working with Marjorie Cameron, whom Parsons married in 1946. After Hubbard and Sara defrauded him of his life savings, Parsons resigned from the O.T.O., then held various jobs while acting as a consultant for Israel's rocket program.
from Jack Parsons - Wikipedia

Soon, Parsons and Hubbard were completely enveloped by Thelema. They embarked on Operation Babalon Working, a series of rituals and experiments intended to incarnate the Thelemite Goddess Babalon in the earthly realm. One of these rituals included Parsons masturbating onto magical tablets to Prokofiev’s Second Violin Concerto while Hubbard took notes and explored the astral plane. Another involved Parsons and Hubbard impregnating an anonymous woman somewhere on Earth through immaculate conception with a “magical child,” who would become Thelema’s messianic embodiment of Babalon.
The Occult History Behind NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Then we have Elon's Space X (sounds like 'space sex') and Blue Origin, which many have commented looks phallic.
1716061589413.png

So - it seems plain to me that there is an underlying sex narrative around flying into space. When I first came across it, I was surprised, and found it odd! However, I'm far from the only one to have spotted this - a German feminist art group has even gone so far as to design a 'yonic spacecraft':
1716067184778.png
"The Vulva Spaceship was designed to counter the predominance of phallus-shaped space imagery"
from "Vulva Spaceship" aims to counter prevalence of phallic spacecraft

However, what was very surprising to me and caught me totally offguard, was reading the wikipedia page on the Aurora. I was expecting a scientific description... and while, it may be my reading.. maybe this is 'science'.. but the provided text seems highly suggestive! From this page: Aurora - Wikipedia.

This is the second paragraph:
Auroras are the result of disturbances in the Earth's magnetosphere caused by the solar wind. Major disturbances result from enhancements in the speed of the solar wind from coronal holes and coronal mass ejections. These disturbances alter the trajectories of charged particles in the magnetospheric plasma. These particles, mainly electrons and protons, precipitate into the upper atmosphere (thermosphere/exosphere). The resulting ionization and excitation of atmospheric constituents emit light of varying colour and complexity. The form of the aurora, occurring within bands around both polar regions, is also dependent on the amount of acceleration imparted to the precipitating particles.
Erm.. "Coronal holes and coronal mass ejections"? "Charged particles in the magnetospheric plasma"?

'Perhaps its just me', I thought, but I could not rid myself of the sense that this read like a scientist with a schoolboy's affinity for the double entendre describing the sexual act.

Here are some other lines from the wiki.
A geomagnetic storm causes the auroral ovals (north and south) to expand, bringing the aurora to lower latitudes. The instantaneous distribution of auroras ("auroral oval")[8] is slightly different, being centered about 3–5° nightward of the magnetic pole, so that auroral arcs reach furthest toward the equator when the magnetic pole in question is in between the observer and the Sun. The aurora can be seen best at this time, which is called magnetic midnight.
"geomagnetic storm", expanding "auroral ovals", "magnetic midnight"?
An electron spirals (gyrates) about a field line at an angle that is determined by its velocity vectors, parallel and perpendicular, respectively, to the local geomagnetic field vector B. This angle is known as the "pitch angle" of the particle. The distance, or radius, of the electron from the field line at any time is known as its Larmor radius. The pitch angle increases as the electron travels to a region of greater field strength nearer to the atmosphere. Thus, it is possible for some particles to return, or mirror, if the angle becomes 90° before entering the atmosphere to collide with the denser molecules there. Other particles that do not mirror enter the atmosphere and contribute to the auroral display over a range of altitudes. Other types of auroras have been observed from space; for example, "poleward arcs" stretching sunward across the polar cap, the related "theta aurora",[18] and "dayside arcs" near noon. These are relatively infrequent and poorly understood. Other interesting effects occur such as pulsating aurora, "black aurora" and their rarer companion "anti-black aurora" and subvisual red arcs. In addition to all these, a weak glow (often deep red) observed around the two polar cusps, the field lines separating the ones that close through Earth from those that are swept into the tail and close remotely.
Ok... what am I reading here?!? "gyrates", "pulsating", "two polar cusps"...

Brekke (1994) also described some auroras as "curtains".[23] The similarity to curtains is often enhanced by folds within the arcs. Arcs can fragment or break up into separate, at times rapidly changing, often rayed features that may fill the whole sky. These are also known as discrete auroras, which are at times bright enough to read a newspaper by at night.
It really is a science report prepared by someone with a erotica on the mind, right? This report could have been published in Viz, fnarr fnarr!
The phenomenon of pulsating auroras is an example of intensity variations over short timescales, typically with periods of 2–20 seconds. This type of aurora is generally accompanied by decreasing peak emission heights of about 8 km for blue and green emissions and above average solar wind speeds (c. 500 km/s).
"peak emission"? Oo-er!
A quiescent solar wind flowing past Earth's magnetosphere steadily interacts with it and can both inject solar wind particles directly onto the geomagnetic field lines that are 'open', as opposed to being 'closed' in the opposite hemisphere, and provide diffusion through the bow shock. It can also cause particles already trapped in the radiation belts to precipitate into the atmosphere. Once particles are lost to the atmosphere from the radiation belts, under quiet conditions, new ones replace them only slowly, and the loss-cone becomes depleted.
The leakage of electrons does not leave the tail positively charged, because each leaked electron lost to the atmosphere is replaced by a low energy electron drawn upward from the ionosphere. Such replacement of "hot" electrons by "cold" ones is in complete accord with the second law of thermodynamics. The complete process, which also generates an electric ring current around Earth, is uncertain.
Ok..
As a result, the solar wind moves magnetic flux (tubes of magnetic field lines, 'locked' together with their resident plasma) from the day side of Earth to the magnetotail, widening the obstacle it presents to the solar wind flow and constricting the tail on the night-side. Ultimately some tail plasma can separate ("magnetic reconnection"); some blobs ("plasmoids") are squeezed downstream and are carried away with the solar wind; others are squeezed toward Earth where their motion feeds strong outbursts of auroras, mainly around midnight ("unloading process").
"Magnetic reconnection", "plasmoids", "unloading process"!?! I'm sure I'm not imagining things now!
Acceleration of auroral charged particles invariably accompanies a magnetospheric disturbance that causes an aurora. This mechanism, which is believed to predominantly arise from strong electric fields along the magnetic field or wave-particle interactions, raises the velocity of a particle in the direction of the guiding magnetic field. The pitch angle is thereby decreased and increases the chance of it being precipitated into the atmosphere. Both electromagnetic and electrostatic waves, produced at the time of greater geomagnetic disturbances, make a significant contribution to the energizing processes that sustain an aurora. Particle acceleration provides a complex intermediate process for transferring energy from the solar wind indirectly into the atmosphere.

The whole page is like this! If a woman with a sultry voice were to read the page out, the subtext would become evident to anyone. There are simply too many overt and inappropriate descriptive terms.

There's more too - one can find out about "collisional quenching", "Birkeland currents", "partial ring current" "magnetically trapped plasma", "dynamo mechanism", "coronal mass ejections", etc, etc.

I appreciate this is all in the name of science - but it seems to me there is clearly a sexual subtext here. I don't know what to make of it.. Has 'space' has always been described in these hardly nuanced terms and I'm just late to get the joke?

Finally, I looked up the name Aurora in mythology. She is known as Eos in Greek mythology

1716064621810.png
1716064635554.png

Aurōra appears most often in sexual poetry with one of her mortal lovers. A myth taken from the Greek by Roman poets tells that one of her lovers was the prince of Troy, Tithonus. Tithonus was a mortal, and would therefore age and die. Wanting to be with her lover for all eternity, Aurōra asked Jupiter to grant immortality to Tithonus. Jupiter granted her wish, but she failed to ask for eternal youth to accompany his immortality, and he continued to age, eventually becoming forever old. Aurōra turned him into a cicada.
Aurora (mythology) - Wikipedia

In ancient Greek mythology and religion, Eos (/ˈiːɒs/; Ionic and Homeric GreekἨώςĒṓs, AtticἝωςHéōs, "dawn", pronounced [ɛːɔ̌ːs] or [héɔːs]; AeolicΑὔωςAúōs, DoricἈώςĀṓs)[3] is the goddess and personification of the dawn, who rose each morning from her home at the edge of the river Oceanus to deliver light and disperse the night. In Greek tradition and poetry, she is characterized as a goddess with a great sexual appetite, who took numerous lovers for her own satisfaction and bore them several children.
Eos also shares some characteristics with the love goddess Aphrodite connoting perhaps a semi-shared origin or influence of Eos/*Haéusōs on Aphrodite, who otherwise has a Near Eastern origin;[23] both goddesses were known for their erotic beauty and aggressive sexuality, both had relationships with mortal lovers, and both were associated with the colors red, white, and gold.
Eos - Wikipedia

Eos is also close to the term 'eros' - maybe that's not accidental?

Anyway, I was surprised to find so many unexpected erotic references reading up about the Northern lights phenomenon. Maybe I'm scrutinising the writing too closely (and triggering my teenage self in the process!), or maybe these lights are something that readily take to being described in sensual terms.. or something else?
 
Last edited:
Esoterically, space can be seen to be equivalent to the mind. A good representation of this is the Farnese Atlas statue, which is a man holding the celestial sphere in place of where his head should be. You could argue that impregnating the mind means influencing the mind.
 
Esoterically, space can be seen to be equivalent to the mind. A good representation of this is the Farnese Atlas statue, which is a man holding the celestial sphere in place of where his head should be. You could argue that impregnating the mind means influencing the mind.
Maybe the Divinity is at work. Thought creates light which condenses to matter. Everything is vibration and everything is alive and connected. Seem to recall that as gnostic teaching but I maybe wrong. I am pulled towards that view. Our connection to the realm has been removed over time.

Farnese Atlas statue should be holding up the Celestial Dome - the correct scientific term for that which we see above our heads - commonly known as the sky, and as taught to us as children when introduced to the Greek myths and legends.

The celestial sphere is an imaginary concept , a product of the jesuit heliocentric shoite. Didn't Farnese go on to become a fornicating pope at some point?

Celestial Sphere | COSMOS
 
I saw this new age bullshit generator:
New Age Bullshit Generator

One can hit a button that will generate a bunch of plausible sounding new age nonsense. It's just word salad, but sounds ok for a sec. It's nice too that it tells us its generating new age bullshit, cos then we are in on the joke.

That generator is a few years old - nowadays we have AI to generate even better and more convincing BS. Eg, we can ask AI to generate a story in, say, a Victorian literary style with a food theme. Or a story about a cherished pet in the style of a Marxist polemic. Etc.

Which maybe provides another way to approach what I was saying in the original post...

I'm talking about themes in the stories we are provided. Space and its narratives obviously don't have a new age theme, or a Victorian food theme...

However, I'm saying 'space writing' does have a theme, even if it is not explicit. And that it seems to me that for space the theme is 'sex via the medium of scientific terminology'. Perhaps the prompt was something like: "create reams of scientific literature about space with subtle-ish erotic writing undertones". 🙂

(I hope I remember how to get back to reservation....)
 
Last edited:
Watching a clip about the Sun flares that have occurred very recently, I also heard them being called "ejections" and immediately my mind went to a place I would never equate with the sun. I heard the word "ejections" while watching it happen on the screen and I thought, is it more like "ejaculations". I thought I was going crazy, but now that you posted this, I can see that I am not alone in this thought. I did not go as far with it as you did in your post, but I think that it is something to really look at, so Kudos!

The Sun is supposed "masculine" energy and the Moon "female", so it is plausible, then you mention the Eos thing. I don't believe in coincidences and I don't think people made up connections like this if there was nothing to connect. I will now look at space a little differently than usual, and I think that it is a great perspective to explore.

I could of made so many puns, but I digress! Be well!
 
Supposedly we had also had the opportunity to see auroras here in Germany, but I haven't seen any yet.
With the phallus-like rockets, I immediately thought of the phallus-like fertility god who was apparently not only worshipped by Stone Age people, but is still worshipped by modern scientists today. This god certainly has something to do with the planetary god Saturn (I'm actually referring to Cernunnos and not a gas planet with a rocky ring), whose phallus-like shape actually represented a primitive erect embryo and not a penis. But as I have now realized, all of humanity's religions are based on misinterpretations of gigantic life forms that incarnate on Earth at all times. The religious worship of genitals is a very old topic and apparently still modern.
The world egg is also associated with the planetary god Saturn as a kind of egg-shaped spaceship that is actually always an egg cell. And this world egg is also fertilized every time. Even the Flood can be interpreted as a kind of fertilization flood.
And it gets even more interesting: I noticed that the helmets of the gods Athena and Ares resemble those of sperm heads. And the goddess called Eileithyia is almost good German and means "Eileiter" eng:"fallopian tube". The god Hymenaios is a derivation of "hymns".

In terms of space, I realized anyway that we live in a huge cosmic female womb. So I don't even see it as a joke, but as a hint.
 
Last edited:
I could of made so many puns, but I digress! Be well!

There are so many puns.... Coronal mass ejections, black holes.. I can barely read anything about space without noticing something - I suppose I'm looking for it now..

So far, the worst has been this "space cup" to manage the fluid flow:

NASA's sci-fi space cup holds a drink without gravity

1717078170059.png
 
Last edited:
Very interesting. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I'm amazed I've never even noticed that obvious sexual theme in space science. In some way though, it seems pretty natural if you believe that the earth, sun and cosmos is alive entities. In this way, human life must share many core principles, on different scales with the cosmos. Fits well with some of the hermetic principles.
2. The principle of correspondance (As above so below)
7. The principle of gender ("Gender is in everything; everything has its masculine and feminine principles; gender manifests on all planes.")

George Clinton in Maggot Brain: 'Mother earth is pregnant for the third time..'

According to Ben Davidson (suspicious0bservers), earth is being more affected by these geomagnetic storms because of a weakening magnetic field. Way smaller CME's cause way bigger geomagnetic storms than they used to, and this results in the Aurora records both last and this year. I think we'll see this record broken almost every year from now on. And (according to him) it will culminate in a pole shift in the near future, as the field strenght is exponentially decreasing. His guess is around 2040-50 being conservative with the calculations.

I can easily imagine that a cosmic event at that scale, has ties to both resets and rebirths of civilizations and other life in general. The earth will give birth to it's new children, and the father is the sun.

So right now, the sexual act of sun and earth intensifies as Aurora/Eos becomes more present.

I heard another idea from a youtuber (jaydreamerz) in a THC podcast, that fits into this as well... At the moment of non-polarity during the pole shift, the boundry of this earthly realm is dissolved, opening a gate for aetheric entities/spirits/demons to enter and manifest in the physical earthly realm. Sounds like being born...

Milky Way... Sounds pretty fertile.
Galaxy means approximately the same.

Just imagine two galaxies having sex. At first when they meet, they are dancing around each other. It gets more and more intense until they collide. Countless star systems and worlds will be shakened up for millions/billions of years until the galaxies at last either merges or departs, maybe even giving birth to new galaxies in the process. Millions of worlds will be reborn in this process.

Just some of the few thoughts that came up by digesting yours. I do know that I know nothing, but I appreciate contemplation anyway 😃 As a shaman once said - 'The only way to describe or understand anything, is through metaphors' (from somewhere in the book, The cosmic serpent)

Thank you again my friend 😃 I will keep your point in mind and look for clues about if this sexy space tale is on purpose or natural/coincidental. TPTB seems to always leave breadcrumbs and tell us the 'truth' in some obscure way. Just hoping they're not advanced enough to tinker with the 'impregnation' of earth.
 
If you were in the 'Northern hemisphere' last week, you would likely have seen lots of photos of the aurora borealis. There were lots of great photos. Eg:
View attachment 32046
from In pictures: Northern Lights dazzle around the world

However, this post is about the narrative of the Aurora.

Firstly - I want to give the younger reader a warning. This post is a bit lewd, even obscene - depending on your age it may not be age-appropriate content! But on the other hand, this is science... so who knows?

Its clear there's some sort of sex element to the whole 'space' idea. From the 1940s, there's the story of Jack Parson and L Ron Hubbard.


from Jack Parsons - Wikipedia


The Occult History Behind NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Then we have Elon's Space X (sounds like 'space sex') and Blue Origin, which many have commented looks phallic.
View attachment 32036

So - it seems plain to me that there is an underlying sex narrative around flying into space. When I first came across it, I was surprised, and found it odd! However, I'm far from the only one to have spotted this - a German feminist art group has even gone so far as to design a 'yonic spacecraft':
View attachment 32040
"The Vulva Spaceship was designed to counter the predominance of phallus-shaped space imagery"
from "Vulva Spaceship" aims to counter prevalence of phallic spacecraft

However, what was very surprising to me and caught me totally offguard, was reading the wikipedia page on the Aurora. I was expecting a scientific description... and while, it may be my reading.. maybe this is 'science'.. but the provided text seems highly suggestive! From this page: Aurora - Wikipedia.

This is the second paragraph:

Erm.. "Coronal holes and coronal mass ejections"? "Charged particles in the magnetospheric plasma"?

'Perhaps its just me', I thought, but I could not rid myself of the sense that this read like a scientist with a schoolboy's affinity for the double entendre describing the sexual act.

Here are some other lines from the wiki.

"geomagnetic storm", expanding "auroral ovals", "magnetic midnight"?

Ok... what am I reading here?!? "gyrates", "pulsating", "two polar cusps"...


It really is a science report prepared by someone with a erotica on the mind, right? This report could have been published in Viz, fnarr fnarr!

"peak emission"? Oo-er!


Ok..

"Magnetic reconnection", "plasmoids", "unloading process"!?! I'm sure I'm not imagining things now!


The whole page is like this! If a woman with a sultry voice were to read the page out, the subtext would become evident to anyone. There are simply too many overt and inappropriate descriptive terms.

There's more too - one can find out about "collisional quenching", "Birkeland currents", "partial ring current" "magnetically trapped plasma", "dynamo mechanism", "coronal mass ejections", etc, etc.

I appreciate this is all in the name of science - but it seems to me there is clearly a sexual subtext here. I don't know what to make of it.. Has 'space' has always been described in these hardly nuanced terms and I'm just late to get the joke?

Finally, I looked up the name Aurora in mythology. She is known as Eos in Greek mythology



Aurora (mythology) - Wikipedia



Eos - Wikipedia

Eos is also close to the term 'eros' - maybe that's not accidental?

Anyway, I was surprised to find so many unexpected erotic references reading up about the Northern lights phenomenon. Maybe I'm scrutinising the writing too closely (and triggering my teenage self in the process!), or maybe these lights are something that readily take to being described in sensual terms.. or something else?
Outer space is fake and so are the people that act like it's not.
 
Just imagine two galaxies having sex. At first when they meet, they are dancing around each other. It gets more and more intense until they collide. Countless star systems and worlds will be shakened up for millions/billions of years until the galaxies at last either merges or departs, maybe even giving birth to new galaxies in the process. Millions of worlds will be reborn in this process.
I can imagine it, but does that make it real?? How can one verify without any doubt that said "millions/billions of years" are true, instead of being one of the main pillars of deception brainwashing those with little to no critical thinking?
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top