SH Archive 1530: The Great Flood of Rome

SH.org OP Username
KorbenDallas
SH.org OP Date
2020-01-21 00:36:40
SH.org Reaction Score
38
SH.org Reply Count
38

KD Archive

Not actually KorbenDallas
Active Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2020
Messages
4,691
Reaction score
1,499
The below video popped up in my YT feed. I guess I would like to recommend watching it, for the video is really interesting. It is obvious the author spent days researching, translating and presenting his findings. Here is the description provided with the video:
  • This is a project that has been months in the making. We came across these two documents from the "1530"s or "i/J530" that gives an account of the incredible damage of Rome from a huge flood. Have you ever wondered how "ancient Rome" was destroyed and turned into ruins? We might have the answer!
The author's subscription count is ridiculously low. If you enjoy the video I posted below, please consider subscribing to Regaining The Balance on YT.



The research, as far as I understand, is based (in part) on two older books written in Middle French:
deluge.jpg
Judge for yourself, but may be the information presented in the above research could shed some light on why the Rome had to go through some excavation activities. But essentially, there is much more in this video than just the mud flood alone. The author talks about timing, papal inconsistencies, and many other things.


KD: Please feel free to share your opinions, and don't hesitate to contribute if you run into something you deem important.
Note: This OP was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Mabzynn
Date: 2020-01-21 01:11:08
Reaction Score: 11
Not quite the same year but pretty startling and sounds straight out of Velikovsky.

The Life of Martin Luther Gathered from His Own Writings
1.JPG
SOURCE
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2020-01-21 02:28:38
Reaction Score: 9
I think one of the main points presented in the video comes down to this devastating flood not being properly advertised in the official Rome related historic narrative. The other point would be people and events existing during the wrong historical periods.

At the same time in November 1530 we allegedly had a major flood in Netherlands:
  • The St. Felix's flood happened on Saturday, 5 November 1530, the name day of St. Felix. This day was later known as Evil Saturday (kwade zaterdag). Large parts of Flanders and Zeeland were washed away, including the Verdronken Land van Reimerswaal. According to Audrey M. Lambert, "all the Oost Wetering of Zuid-Beveland was lost, save only the town of Reimerswaal."
  • St. Felix's flood - Wikipedia
May be this event was a bit more global than we are lead to believe.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Starmonkey
Date: 2020-01-21 02:31:24
Reaction Score: 1
Oh, I thought we were just cheering Rome getting flooded...
Just kidding!
Probably LOTS of the missing narratives are current narrators getting their asses handed to them in one way or another. Shows weakness. Loses face. Either by nature or peasant revolt.
Empire rewriting itself.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Mabzynn
Date: 2020-01-21 11:14:00
Reaction Score: 11

It's referencing 1530:
Loosely: In this year in the middle of October a flood came to the city of Rome causing the Pope, Cardinals, and large part of the population to abandon the city. Around November a similar flood hit Flandres and Holland.

It also mentions Cardinal d'Yort (Thomas Wolsey) saying he was poisoned.

Then you have these works commemorating it later:
Capture.JPG
Also explains this flood map popping up between 1500-1699
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2020-01-21 12:21:51
Reaction Score: 3
Does it by any chance mention the Pope’s name in there?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2020-01-21 12:38:53
Reaction Score: 0
I think in the video the author is talking about a different Pope mentioned in the texts he based his video on.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Mabzynn
Date: 2020-01-21 12:39:50
Reaction Score: 9
"Clement" but there's no association with the Medici's. Never gives a family name from what I can remember. I'll dig through it later because it parallels a lot of that what the book on the destruction of Troy was saying. (edited for Synchronicity because this book came up again through more digging).

So it seems to be discussing the known "Clement (but never once is Medici mentioned)" because they both may have died from poisoning.

Also interesting... Prince of Orange shows up in 1534 right before the death of the Pope. Then Paul III is made Pope who legitimizes the Society of Jesuits.

Capture.JPG
Also another source:


Les annalles et cronicque de France, Volume 2 - 1538
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG
SOURCE

In July of 1530 many children returned to France after a great deluge in Rome that killed many great people.
In October another deluge that caused the Pope, Cardinals, and population to abandon the city.
In November a deluge in Flandres and Hollande that killed a noble Princess Marguerite de Flandres (weird).
This year in Portugal many cities and castles were built where many people died.
Has the bit referencing the Thomas Wolsley character being poisoned as well calls him - "Cardinal Dyorth"

So Marguerite de Flandres is referencing Margaret of Austria because the last Margeurite de Flandres was in the early 15th century. Margaret of Austria... Go here for some more info on why this character is so important: 1516: Noah in Tartary

She had a book commissioned that I think was way too revealing, but if Flandres did indeed exist at this point then she was not working on behalf of the Holy Roman Empire which is even more interesting. This is how they say she died officially... lol:

In November 1530, one of Margaret's maids broke a glass goblet. A splinter of glass went into Margaret's foot and the wound became gangrenous. Her doctors strongly recommended that she agree to having her foot amputated. She gave her consent for the operation, received the sacrament, and revised her will. Before the amputation could be performed, however, she died, apparently from an overdose of opium given to her in preparation for the operation.

Follow the fake history: Category:1530 deaths - Wikipedia

Constantine Komnenos Arianites - This a strange name. Check out his heraldry:

Capture.JPG
A Boniface IV who was never a Pope. Died falling off a horse.
A whole bunch of Brits.
Too many to list but people and rulers all over the world:

Tenochtitlan - Andrés de Tapia Motelchiuhtzin Huitznahuatlailótlac was the ruler of Tenochtitlan (1525–1530).

Southeast Asia - Sultan Mahmud Shah ibni Almarhum Sultan Muhammad Shah (died 1530) is the fifth Sultan of Pahang who reigned from 1519 to 1530.

Korea - Queen Jeonghyeon or Queen Jung-Hyun (21 July 1462 – 13 September 1530)

Scotland - Alexander Gordon, Master of Sutherland (c.1505-1530), Scottish magnate.


Wallachia - Moise (died 29 August 1530)

A Roche - Estienne de La Roche (1470–1530) was a French mathematician.

Maximilian Sforza (1493 – 4 June 1530) was a Duke of Milan from the Sforza family
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2020-01-21 15:41:14
Reaction Score: 1
Somewhere about 30 minute mark, he talks about Pope Gregory. I guess this pope was mentioned in the researched texts and is somehow related to the 1530 flood. There is no sequential number attached to Gregory, and Clement was the Pope at the time, at least per the narrative.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: usselo
Date: 2020-01-21 17:26:30
Reaction Score: 5
That sounds close to a newly-suspected 1531 Portuguese earthquake (not to be confused with the heavily-promoted 1755 Lisbon 'earthquake' and tsunami). PDF too large to upload unfortunately but it is WCEE2012_0685.pdf after jd755 found it online (thanks jd755!).

Title: The 1531 Lisbon earthquake and tsunami
Authors: J. Miranda, J. Batlló, H. Ferreira, L. M. Matias
Institution: Instituto Dom Luiz, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal

Presumed supervisor: M. A. Baptista
Institution: Instituto Superior da Universidade de Lisboa, IDL, Lisboa, Portugal

Presumed presented at: 15 WCEE, Lisboa 2012

I came across this event last summer after noting that mainstream explanations for Portugual's ossuaries sometimes self-contradict. Mainstream claims they are bones of thousands of clergy who died helping Portuguese plague victims but sometimes alleges they are the bones of thousands of plague victims themselves. In one case, local myth contradicts clerical myth, claiming they are the bones of victims of a celestial event.

That said, one's eyebrow twitches at the presented explanation, it being an relatively run-of-the-mill explanation for an event whose historiography is 'an unusual story' in a country where clerical myth-making has transformed into academic myth-making.

Have been working up a post on the plentiful mythological and physical evidence of celestial events in Portuguese skies (pre-Fatima). But while the evidence is plentiful; the time to write them up is less so.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Mabzynn
Date: 2020-01-21 17:32:22
Reaction Score: 1
Alright so another source here has a bunch on the New World. Like the Spanish controlled the Fort of Saint Helen which was the marker for the northernmost point of the Norumbega region. So definitely not built in 1820. The people born over here are a brass color from a certain ointment they use in the sun but are often born quite white. Lots of hermaphrodites. Says the Spanish only hold 3 well manned forts with people and cannons in this region. One fort had already fallen to the "Drak" (Dragon or Francis Drake). No more derailing.

The book also discusses the recent damages in Rome and in the Netherlands area and describes another flood event in 1532:

 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2020-01-21 17:32:25
Reaction Score: 1
Right at the start of their? translation the say
Here's Saint Gregory. Pope Saint Gregory the Great - Saints & Angels - Catholic Online
This it? The 1531 Lisbon earthquake and tsunami
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2020-01-21 17:38:17
Reaction Score: 0
Does anyone have any sort of dictionary access to a dictionary in any language of the time to see just what deluge actually meant back then?
I share your mistrust of dates of these claimed events but 900 years is one hell of a long time between floods let alon remebering what a long dead pope/saint said about them, or am I misconnecting things?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2020-01-21 17:55:47
Reaction Score: 1
According to that page dug up by JD, Rome got flooded quite a few times. 600ad not on the list though.
As far as his excellence Saint Gregory goes... are we even sure we are talking about a Pope here?

If we indeed are, I do not see why some thousand year old event/pope would get referenced in docs pertaining to 1530s.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Starmonkey
Date: 2020-01-21 17:58:28
Reaction Score: 1
Damn near everybody else around that mud puddle would have been soggy as well. Europe and Africa...
Where did the papacy retreat to?...
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top