SH Archive American Civil War a Photographic History

SH.org OP Username
sharonr
SH.org OP Date
2018-09-02 21:14:52
SH.org Reaction Score
151
SH.org Reply Count
114
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-09-05 17:38:53
Reaction Score: 7
  • Reproduction Number: LC-DIG-cwpb-04339 (digital file from original neg.) LC-B8171-7949 (b&w film neg.)
Source: Antietam, Md. Allan Pinkerton, President Lincoln, and Maj. Gen. John A. McClernand

It's still weird. Did they know they were photo-shooting? Or was 7949 placed on the sign later to cover up whatever was on there before?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-09-05 17:56:40
Reaction Score: 6
photographichist02mill_0170.jpg

Looks like at least 3 of these soldiers are female (1 on far left, fiddler, and standing one on far right). Also, the second from the left with the messed up fingers looks like he has 2 right arms.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-09-05 18:03:27
Reaction Score: 5
LOL. Great eyes. After looking at the pic, I think all of them are.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: LordAverage
Date: 2018-09-05 18:23:44
Reaction Score: 10
fingers.png

I honestly can't tell what is going on here at all lmao and yes there are some very feminine faces and features there.

Also can someone explain what is meant to be going on this pic I don't know if i can relate this to any knowledge I actually have in any way?

um.png
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: sharonr
Date: 2018-09-05 22:03:09
Reaction Score: 10
They keep managing to make any photo, fake or staged, of the Confederates look like deranged shape shifting aliens. Telling us something? Plus they stated straight up the other photo was the only one they had of Confederates (which looked like a group of bogeymen.)
Good catch..... thas a big boy

The black horse behind the white one is rather large also. (Compared to the "normal" size people?)

 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: BStankman
Date: 2018-09-06 08:41:36
Reaction Score: 11
I agree. I count 9 probable ladies.

With this in mind I watched Ken burns again. It is strange how everyone head was too big for their body in this war.
For many portraits, it is like they dressed up some dummies in civil war clothes, but only had ladies mannequins available.
And then pasted a face over it in the photo.

If you google confederate soldier, there appears to be plenty of undoctored photos that could pass for women.


When doing so, It is important to keep in mind what women looked like before they were hit with our modern beauty propaganda.


Calamity Jane
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: sharonr
Date: 2018-09-06 13:48:22
Reaction Score: 7
Yes I did enjoy that, and thank you. It's hard to keep up with all posts, and have a life....The video is amazing in itself when you look at all the octogenarian elderly people who are spry and healthy. One man, 84, looked like any other 65 year old today. Now most people don't live to be that old, and if they do, they have Alzheimer's disease and locked away in a home. Sad.

The development in that thread that these men were fighting the "Dutch" is also very interesting. These men were not out there fighting to keep slavery in tack. That is preposterous. How these people get away with these lies is more than maddening. I will spend the rest of my life researching this and exposing the truth of what my southern relatives were actually about. If they fought, they were fighting against a real enemy.

Off topic but related: I play an old video game (1999 maybe) on my computer which is about the pirates, takes place in the Caribbean, and the 4 forces who control this territory are the English, French, Spanish, and Dutch. They are always fighting each other and you are the "pirate" and can attack any one of them, but you are also working for any one of them at any time. They need you as an independent force to do their dirty work for them. At the end of the game you are very wealthy and can retire as "governor" long after you have fought and pillaged and you have married one of the governors daughters. Not your typical story of the ruffian, scoundrel pirate. This is a Sid Meyers game and we also play his Civilization Revolution which has some brilliant tid-bits in it also. The pirates, East India Company ect. story line is very interesting. Something was going on there that relates to all of this.
I like your theory on the mannequins bodies with the pasted on faces. The legs (and much else) are just not right. They have blacked out the eyes though. Not sure why if they are pasting "real" faces on. This seems an obvious "staged" photo. Have to show some "real" rebel forces somewhere to convince the people they really existed as we are told. They did exist, but not according to the made up narrative they tell. I think the photos of the dead bodies are also some real rebels, even if I can't explain the photos yet.

RE: Your post in the other thread Where were US flags prior to the Civil War? , and the video with the octogenarians is a brilliant find. Also this more extended photo of the confederate mannequins. I certainly couldn't do this research without everyone else's help. Thank you.

Maybe some women fought for the rebels? Why not?
Looks like a match.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-09-06 21:46:43
Reaction Score: 1
This bird nest got me going. Unfortunately to nowhere for it appears to be a dead end.

What could it be if not a nest?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: sharonr
Date: 2018-09-06 21:52:54
Reaction Score: 3
I thought the birds nest is a great idea. Or they dug up the tree and roots? but what would be supporting it? It seems it could be a little low for a birds nest, but not if the ground was lower at one time. There is a house next to it, so the tree would have been taller before the mud flood, and the house built after the mud flood?

Just throwing things out there. If it was a nest for that type of giant bird, that would be pretty cool.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-09-06 22:15:15
Reaction Score: 7
Page 120, V3: The photographic history of the Civil War - V3, p.120

Does it look like a partial drawing? Why would they need to fake the photograph? lol

infantry_crossing_civil-war_1.jpg
And how many fake photographs do we have pertaining to this Civil War joke in general?

Like, who can explain how shadows works in this image here V3, page 142 (full image). Where is the Sun shining from?

Shadows_capitol_building_1.png
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: PrimalRed
Date: 2018-09-07 00:43:35
Reaction Score: 8
So is the civil war a coverup for the American war against native Tartarians? And were all the "slave camps" actually Native American industrial centers?

And those photos with all the women dressed as men, okay that adds a new dimension for sure. I haven't written about it but there is a huge transgender facet to the NWO and the members of the Satanic cult... they strive to be androgynous as Baphomet- neither male nor female. It's known as "Elite gender inversion" and if you look at royal families etc you see transgender individuals not only permeating mainstream politics and media but going going way back in the royal bloodlines.

So was civilization reset with only a bunch of NWO transgender individuals left after the disasters to climb out of their deep underground bases and stage history for this cycle? If so, where the hell do our normal bloodlines come from? Were our ancestors all incubated in underground test tubes and given fake memories?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: sharonr
Date: 2018-09-07 01:19:03
Reaction Score: 3
No, no, no. Modern times maybe, but back then, STAGED photos were still used, like Hollywood today, actors (or tresses), maybe trany back then, don't know. I think they used actors/tresses likely, to me, or mannequins, and as a poster pointed out, they couldn't find anything else (onlyl lady mannequins exsited?). Mannequin bodies, pasted on faces. We are all here today, so we were born of man and woman as far as I know. Possibly the US against the Federal Army, a new nation/corporation that was taking over the independent areas. The Tartaries could be earlier in history. Who knows? Have not gotten into V3. Looks like it is going to be interesting. Off work tomorrow. Look forward to it.
I personally think this could be referring to the date. Ones and sevens are tricky. Thanks!
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Apollyon
Date: 2018-09-07 17:30:50
Reaction Score: 1
They f**ked that bottom one up big time
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-09-07 22:17:26
Reaction Score: 3
I believe I read somewhere on there that it was built as a bandstand and even listed a name for the guy responsible. Be nice to have a better look at the thing. Sure looks like a big nest.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-09-08 00:39:16
Reaction Score: 3
You are absolutely right, there it is:
general carlin and staff in ringgold.jpg
But this is the cheesiest explanation they could come up with. Did they really have time, and whatever else to get that thing built in 1864?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: sharonr
Date: 2018-09-08 10:48:05
Reaction Score: 7
I've mostly ignored the drawings and the posed pictures of the troops only because I feel they could be staged at any time. I was a fine arts major and drawing the picture, for example the one of the troops in the top picture, would have taken time. Was it drawn from a photo? I think both the pictures are just slight of hand. The bottom photo is a partial photo, but drawn in trees in the foreground and people. I'm shaking my head. I am still going to look into the next volume. All of the volumes because personally, I think there is some truth in these volumes although the story is a complete lie.

I'm still curious what people think of the dead bodies.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-09-08 11:21:09
Reaction Score: 13
I think the entire need to stage the Civil War photos is a necessity rather than a desire to share history with those to come.

We are so used to the explanation of the “early days of photography” that are blinded by it.

If it was an authorized staging, was it a private company foing things for profit, or was it a government run staging?


If it was a private venture, what’s the name of the business which profited?

For if it was a government run photoshoot, I do not believe in their good intentions for a second.

What’s the official time frame of the staged photos anyways? As far as I know, the government was unable to even pay for those chair photographs, or chose not to, which changes nothing.

I personally think we are being swayed to think a certain way, hence all this photos and doctored images. Having only 5 photographs of General Lee, three of which were taken at the same time is a joke.

And just like I asked in s different thread, where is s single photo of the United States government session, congress, senate or whatever?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: anotherlayer
Date: 2018-09-08 12:19:11
Reaction Score: 9
i've had that very similar question about churches in medieval paintings . how's come we never see any paintings of people sitting i church?
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top