Ancient-Spooks.de Bible as coded homonyms

[alltheleaves]

Adam & Eve - Ancient Spooks

It seems the site could have more detailed citations, references, bibliography. ￶Plus the tie in with Mathis triggers an alert.

Theory is the Bible contains coded control mockery using puns. This I can accept as possible based on my research around subsurface meanings of words like digital, exam, happy, for example.


Here is his Adam & Eve theory of coded homonyms and double meanings.





The story of Adam & Eve is among the most famous in the Bible, and has many layers of pun-encryption to it: In the spook layer, Adam puns with “disguise”, and Eve with “show”, so they encrypt the aristocracy’s scheme to rule us through deception. Oddly, in the same story Adam & Eve also share a role as “informants” and even “commoners”. And surprisingly, the Serpent actually stands for skeptics, who suspect the rulers are lying, and manage to talk informants into admitting the big secret!

Contents​

1. Introduction
   1. How to read this
2. The creation of disguise & show
   1. In the beginning, oppression is too obvious, so people are angry.
   2. The rulers create a disguise that is pleasant at the front.
   3. Four ways of ruling are established: crushing, worship, lying, disguise.
   4. The biggest secret is that rulers take on the semblance of commoners.
   5. The rulers create informants to watch the commoners.
   6. The informants are also disguised, denying their identity.
   7. Smart skeptic commoners guess the secret, and confront the informants.
   8. Informants reveal the deceit, and subjects create their own covers & spies.
   9. The rulers discover that their deceit has been revealed.
   10. The commoners blame the informants, and those the skeptics.
   11. The rulers curse the skeptics to get no advantage, but only hatred from normies.
   12. The rulers curse the workers to slave eternally for their lords.
   13. The rulers curse the informants to spy under stress, until they’re dismissed.
   14. The informants get disguises, but are not part of the protected rulers.
   15. The rulers implement additional wrappers around their cover.

Introduction​

Adam & Eve’s story is a very good proof that religion, and even pun-encrypted stories, existed long before the corrupt elites perverted it all. You can still see the origins from how the story goes:

1. On the 1st level, Yahweh puns with “to be” (as in “I am who I am”) which also means “creating” (“make to be”). Adam puns with “man”, and Eve with “life”. They’re all named after the official topic, a story about a creator God creating life and the first man.
2. On a 2nd level, Yahweh puns with “love”, Adam with “male organ”, and Eve with “womb”. Here, they’re all named after a parable on how humans are actually created in nature: Through physical love, when the male organ enters the womb. The ancient storytellers wove the 2 stories into 1, which would appeal to both religious & worldly oriented audiences!
3. More storytelling elements were added through secondary puns: Yahweh puns with “sin” & “punishment”, Adam with “fruit”, and Eve with “snake”. So a story arc was added where Eve meets a snake, who makes them eat fruit, and Yahweh punishes them for this sin. Adam also puns with “earth” and with “likeness”, so he was created from earth in God’s likeness.
4. Later, the whole story was perverted by the spooky elites. This is the overall form we still know. Here, Yahweh puns with “hidden”, Adam with “disguise”, and Eve with “show”. It became a secret story by the rulers, on how to hide their corrupt self through disguise & show!
5. Finally, the spook authors encrypted their version of the story word-for-word, and sometimes used the main characters for even more puns. In Adam’s case, he seems to sometimes stand for an “observer”, and sometimes for the “common man”. Eve mostly appears without a name, and Yahweh retains his main spook pun.

 

[Jef Demolder]

Amazing! Finally someone who thinks like me about ancient texts. That behind the top layer intended for fast readers, there is a basement layer intended for very slow readers, a basement layer full of jokes, riddles, allusions, parodies which completely contradict the pretended intentions of the top layer. The texts may appear as Christian (the New Testament, Eusebius, Irenaeus) or Jewish (Flavius Josephus, the Talmud, Philo, the Old Testament), or Roman (Suetonius, Dio Cassius, Tacitus, Juvenalis, Ovidius), under the ground all their basement levels are connected. And indeed, this creative inventors are very active setting up historical spectacles since 2001. I call them the gods. I have the impression alltheleaves that you refuse this hypothesis, sticking to the "boring old inbred aristocrats". But first I will read you website "Ancient Spooks" and then I will come back.

 

[Frostychud]

@alltheleaves Thanks for sharing the link. This is "Gerry", a guest writer at the Miles Mathis website whose "Ancient Spooks" series is among the best work there. I wasn't aware that he had his own site.

@Jef Demolder , you pose the question of the authorship of the ancient texts. I would like to suggest a hypothesis somewhere in between "the gods" and "the spooks".

I am a psychoanalyst. My job consists of listening to free association all day. Free association is a technique invented by Freud that lures unconscious discourse to the surface of consciousness, where it can be snared. The unconscious mind has very little in common with the conscious mind. To be more precise, unconscious language has very little in common with conscious language. Conscious language is linear, logical (...or paralogical), syllogistic, literal, diachronic, and univocal. There is generally only one layer of meaning in conscious speech and reasoning. It is a very unwieldy and information-poor way of communicating. It is algebraic rather than geometric. It has its advantages, however, the first of which is that it slows thought down, which can be a good thing. I write better with pen and paper than on a computer, after all.

Unconscious language, on the other hand, is allusive, multilayered, metaphorical, self-contradictory, opaque, synchronic, and equivocal. Most of all it is holographic, meaning that it is constructed in such a way that an astonishing, even infinite amount of information is layered into the "geometric" symbols it produces, most notably in dreams. The unconscious is a natural holographic cryptographic technology. We're all walking around with Enigma machines in our heads. If the unconscious is a quantum computer, the conscious mind is an abacus.

Here's the thing. The unconscious is broken. What do I mean? I mean that it appears to be cut off from whatever informational source/stream/flow it was originally designed to cipher and decipher. The dreams and other unconscious constructs that haunt my patients are as idiotic as they are brilliantly encrypted. They are idiotic in the sense that the puns we uncover during analysis do not reveal some deep cosmic truth but rather lead back to bits and pieces of language that were overheard, misunderstood, and delusionally interpreted in childhood. Uncovering old puns cobbled together by a desperate, orphaned unconscious is the central work of psychoanalysis. The liberating effect of the analytic process is NOT a result of coming into contact with one's "true self" so much as it is realizing that our deepest dreams, desires, and identities are the artifacts of a quantum coding machine attempting to construct meaning from random, faulty input. Patients at the end of analysis generally learn to laugh at how stupid the whole thing is. Think of James Joyce cackling alone in his room as he gives free rein to his unconscious, churning out holographic prose full of nested resonant punning which ultimately means nothing even as it procures for us an intellectual thrill, that of seeing the unconscious in action and admiring its awesome power. That's Finnegans Wake. It's brilliant, but unreadable...for me at least. (I once had a girlfriend whom I would qualify as "crazy" who read it like a Robert Ludlum novel.)

If we try to retro-engineer the tech, it inevitably leads us to the conclusion that the original input stream is missing. Our unconscious is constantly on the hunt for signs. That's what it was made to do: recognize symbols and decode them. Paranoid schizophrenia is nothing but the extreme version of this phenomenon. This is why the unconscious seizes on so much "noise" in childhood: it recognizes that all these words and symbols around us have a signifying essence, but where there "should" be a center, should be a coherent message, there is none. So it constructs one. Since it makes no sense from either an evolutionary or a design point of view that we would all be saddled from birth with integrated delusion machines, which is what the unconscious becomes in the absence of an outside "voice", I can only conclude that the world we once lived in was one in which the signal to noise ratio was much higher, and in which the unconscious was bathed in a stream of symbols that it could easily understand.

So, what does this have to do with Gerry and Jef's hypothesis? It seems logical to me that this astounding piece of biological antiquitech in our brains proves that we were once plugged into some kind of informational stream that has been cut off or throttled down. In other words, we were all once connected to some kind of plasma Ethernet. I imagine that all one had to do at any moment was look at one of the many "mysterious formations" in nature (a flower, a ripple pattern, tea leaves, etc.) to decipher some holographically encoded message from the gods. Theoretically, something as "simple" as a flower could encode the entire history of the universe. Today I suspect that there is nothing to be deciphered there, whereas before we were constantly "addressed" by the patterns around us, constantly reminded of the true Logos emanating from some intelligent and benevolent (?) center.

I borrow the term "mysterious formation" from this excellent video:
View: https://youtu.be/PDrkHw1Nq4I?si=GO2EwjWmp_ZFIGOq


If we assume that our hidden rulers are people (and/or gods) who have a better idea of the old world and its wonders than we do, it makes sense that they would practice (a degraded version of) punning and cryptography, as that is the hallmark of the "original language" of man before the Fall. Symbols are more potent that words because they act directly on the unconscious. Yet there is something idiotic about the way our masters practice symbolism. Think of all the predictive programming they abuse us with. Look at all the ways they sneak their code words and gang signs into popular media. Look at how stupid and ugly their "art" and "entertainment" is. In my opinion, they are simply aping, in crude, mechanical fashion, the natural unconscious. Their symbols and metaphors lack navels. No matter how ingeniously they are constructed, they can all be decoded, whereas true unconscious symbols are bottomless and put us in contact with the deepest mysteries of existence. These idiotic pyramids, 33's, 666's, etc. that they stick everywhere are ultimately childish and empty. It just shows that they are NOT gods. In my opinion, the real gods communicate through symbols that are always new, always fresh, and always alive. They are like single-use passwords tailored to us and us alone. They emerge at crucial moments in our lives and guide us forward in ways that we cannot grasp with our conscious minds. Often the appearance of a new and mysterious symbol in a dream heralds a turning point in analysis.

(I have to break my response into two parts as it exceeds the word limit)

 

[Frostychud]

(Continued) In my opinion, the kind of punning that Gerry reveals on his website is mostly human in nature. I say this because it has a mocking, artificial character. It produces neither joy nor delight. It's just the familiar old boot to the face. Now, I suspect that the people who conceive these puns are under demonic influence. I imagine them putting themselves into some kind of trance state in which wandering plasma intelligences ("demons"), which "think" in a way more akin to AI than "God", lend them some of their computing power, but without true divine Logos behind it. Basically, the human unconscious is some kind of divine technology that has fallen into the hands of usurpers with no imagination. The only thing they can think to do with this tech is stultify it with the same repetitive symbols. They do this in order to stop us from receiving the ultra-faint signal of the authentic Logos, whose symbols are always singular and new.

I don't want to paint all ancient texts with the same brush, first of all because I haven't read enough of them. I've never had any kind of authentic emotional response to an ancient work, but again, I'm not very well-read in the classics, so it doesn't mean much. Books like Melville's "Moby Dick", Kierkegaard's "Fear and Trembling" or Samuel Beckett's "How It Is" all "hit" me in a way that I can only describe as physical. What they have in common is that they were written from a position of naked, solitary, awed terror in the face of a silent Real that is beyond our capacity to comprehend. Whereas what always strikes me about ancient texts is that they have no recognizable voice. I can't identify with the author. Maybe this is simply due to translations, or maybe I simply haven't read the right texts (I cannot say it often enough: I am not well-read in the classics). But books like Josephus, or the Bible, or Homer, or the other texts discussed by Gerry come across to me as anonyous or inhuman on first reading, as if they were written by AI. Jesus Christ in particular is completely unconvincing. In this sense I think Jef Demolder is correct to attribute their composition to "gods", if we specify that these "gods" are simultaneously hyperintelligent in a purely technical sense (=able to effortlessly construct holographic puns) and deeply stupid in an emotional sense (=unable to use their intelligence for anything besides control). I assume these gods use "spooks" as intermediaries here on Earth.

I once attended a few lectures by the well-known Rosicrucian Shakespeare expert, Peter Dawkins. He was a very charming man. Knowing a bit about Rosicrucianism, I was able to spot some of his winking/coded references to communication with angels (the lecture was for regular university students, not initiates). What I learned from his lecture was how unbelievably saturated with symbolism Shakespeare is. Every word, every visual detail in the original engravings, every letter was somehow full of code. I didn't get a "Satanic" vibe from this guy at all, on the contrary, but then again, the Enemy is a deceiver skilled beyond our ability to imagine. Robert Temple (the Sirius guy), whose mindblowing "New Science of Heaven" I recently finished (it's about intelligent plasmas) is either a Rosicrucian or Rosicrucian-adjacent (he's interviewed on their website). He also seems like a benevolent character (although Michael Hoffman, who is a very good writer, claims he is a dangerous and wicked deceiver). It would make sense to me that there are people out there who know what this "tech" is, and who want to preserve the ancient arts of metaphor, poetry, encryption, in short semantic holography, in order that they might serve the Logos. It would also make sense to me that there would be other people/entities out there, more opportunistic in nature, who have capitalized on the incredible power that this broken tech offers them, namely the power to substitute their own puny voices for the silent or nearly-silent Logos. Of course, it's always possible that the reason they have LIED to us about our true history is because we would be incapable of fulfilling some larger purpose here on Earth if we knew the truth too easily. But somehow I doubt that. I think these small-g "gods" who wrote our fake/coded history are probably just parasites who can only flourish in the current historical configuration, namely a realm in which the World Tree/Stairway to Heaven has been deactivated. All we need to do is look into the dissociated, demonically possessed eyes of Lady Gaga ("Gaga" supposedly refers to the planet Pluto in "ancient Sumerian"...a good example of one of their stupid puns that produces nothing) to know that this witch is here to kill us with her pseudo-holographic spells, not to shepherd us through some sophisticated negative dialectic towards the true Logos. Or you could just listen to her songs, which employ banal, hypnotic rhythms and harmonies to keep our minds trapped in familiar low-level emotional zones.

Compare the slime we are fed with real poetry, which I would define as language that is summoned from the unconscious, whose signification exceeds the comprehension of the poet, and which acts directly on the body of the audience, bypassing consciousness and effecting subtle positive change on the emotional and even the physical level. See Robert Graves' "The White Goddess" with its descriptions of the training of ancient Welsh and Irish poets, who were feared and revered by kings for their ability to wield language.

The puns Gerry reveals are NOT the work of great poets, nice people or nice gods. They are the work of entities that despise us. I think that he is onto something important.

ADDED: I just read Gerry's text on Josephus, and it's a banger: Josephus: War of the Jews - Ancient Spooks

 

[alltheleaves]

Very interesting responses. There's something called a tulpa. With enough people believing, fiction can become real.

So, even I, who has skeptically researched the 45 or so guys at Cambridge, Oxford and Westminster who rewrote the Bible around 1600-10....and dived deep into double meanings and the veiled shadow green language of the birds...would like to share a heartfelt Chris de Burgh song from the 70s.

Spaceman Came Travelling.

Peace and goodwill...and love for the Child.

and...merry christmas.

 

[HawaiiGuy]

I simply don't have the energy to invest in another religious hole. Good luck though, love this site and it's amazing posters.

 

[Seiya]

I simply don't have the energy to invest in another religious hole. Good luck though, love this site and it's amazing posters.

the same here. The bible is about the human body, how to function the connection of our body with the sky. And is real and can be view and experience by anyone.

In my view anything different of this is just imagination. One thing I learned from a true philosopher was that any idea must be presented with a demonstration of the real experience that the author had to support what he is presenting.

 

[Tomkat]

(Continued) In my opinion, the kind of punning that Gerry reveals on his website is mostly human in nature. I say this because it has a mocking, artificial character. It produces neither joy nor delight. It's just the familiar old boot to the face. Now, I suspect that the people who conceive these puns are under demonic influence. I imagine them putting themselves into some kind of trance state in which wandering plasma intelligences ("demons"), which "think" in a way more akin to AI than "God", lend them some of their computing power, but without true divine Logos behind it. Basically, the human unconscious is some kind of divine technology that has fallen into the hands of usurpers with no imagination. The only thing they can think to do with this tech is stultify it with the same repetitive symbols. They do this in order to stop us from receiving the ultra-faint signal of the authentic Logos, whose symbols are always singular and new.

I don't want to paint all ancient texts with the same brush, first of all because I haven't read enough of them. I've never had any kind of authentic emotional response to an ancient work, but again, I'm not very well-read in the classics, so it doesn't mean much. Books like Melville's "Moby Dick", Kierkegaard's "Fear and Trembling" or Samuel Beckett's "How It Is" all "hit" me in a way that I can only describe as physical. What they have in common is that they were written from a position of naked, solitary, awed terror in the face of a silent Real that is beyond our capacity to comprehend. Whereas what always strikes me about ancient texts is that they have no recognizable voice. I can't identify with the author. Maybe this is simply due to translations, or maybe I simply haven't read the right texts (I cannot say it often enough: I am not well-read in the classics). But books like Josephus, or the Bible, or Homer, or the other texts discussed by Gerry come across to me as anonyous or inhuman on first reading, as if they were written by AI. Jesus Christ in particular is completely unconvincing. In this sense I think Jef Demolder is correct to attribute their composition to "gods", if we specify that these "gods" are simultaneously hyperintelligent in a purely technical sense (=able to effortlessly construct holographic puns) and deeply stupid in an emotional sense (=unable to use their intelligence for anything besides control). I assume these gods use "spooks" as intermediaries here on Earth.

I once attended a few lectures by the well-known Rosicrucian Shakespeare expert, Peter Dawkins. He was a very charming man. Knowing a bit about Rosicrucianism, I was able to spot some of his winking/coded references to communication with angels (the lecture was for regular university students, not initiates). What I learned from his lecture was how unbelievably saturated with symbolism Shakespeare is. Every word, every visual detail in the original engravings, every letter was somehow full of code. I didn't get a "Satanic" vibe from this guy at all, on the contrary, but then again, the Enemy is a deceiver skilled beyond our ability to imagine. Robert Temple (the Sirius guy), whose mindblowing "New Science of Heaven" I recently finished (it's about intelligent plasmas) is either a Rosicrucian or Rosicrucian-adjacent (he's interviewed on their website). He also seems like a benevolent character (although Michael Hoffman, who is a very good writer, claims he is a dangerous and wicked deceiver). It would make sense to me that there are people out there who know what this "tech" is, and who want to preserve the ancient arts of metaphor, poetry, encryption, in short semantic holography, in order that they might serve the Logos. It would also make sense to me that there would be other people/entities out there, more opportunistic in nature, who have capitalized on the incredible power that this broken tech offers them, namely the power to substitute their own puny voices for the silent or nearly-silent Logos. Of course, it's always possible that the reason they have LIED to us about our true history is because we would be incapable of fulfilling some larger purpose here on Earth if we knew the truth too easily. But somehow I doubt that. I think these small-g "gods" who wrote our fake/coded history are probably just parasites who can only flourish in the current historical configuration, namely a realm in which the World Tree/Stairway to Heaven has been deactivated. All we need to do is look into the dissociated, demonically possessed eyes of Lady Gaga ("Gaga" supposedly refers to the planet Pluto in "ancient Sumerian"...a good example of one of their stupid puns that produces nothing) to know that this witch is here to kill us with her pseudo-holographic spells, not to shepherd us through some sophisticated negative dialectic towards the true Logos. Or you could just listen to her songs, which employ banal, hypnotic rhythms and harmonies to keep our minds trapped in familiar low-level emotional zones.

Compare the slime we are fed with real poetry, which I would define as language that is summoned from the unconscious, whose signification exceeds the comprehension of the poet, and which acts directly on the body of the audience, bypassing consciousness and effecting subtle positive change on the emotional and even the physical level. See Robert Graves' "The White Goddess" with its descriptions of the training of ancient Welsh and Irish poets, who were feared and revered by kings for their ability to wield language.

The puns Gerry reveals are NOT the work of great poets, nice people or nice gods. They are the work of entities that despise us. I think that he is onto something important.

ADDED: I just read Gerry's text on Josephus, and it's a banger: Josephus: War of the Jews - Ancient Spooks

Great post frosty one. Real quick, re poetry, Miles Mathis has a couple good ones from mid November...and I don't even like poetry...

Also, since psych is your field, do you have any thoughts regarding the notion that the subconscious isn't a natural part of human consciousness? That it's actually just a construct that's been injected into our ideology by the bad guys to sort of mask the real damage that centuries of micro and macro trauma have inflicted on our minds?

As far as gods or humans or whatever you wish to call the a**holes who took over what isn't theirs, I give them no respect on any level...

 

[Akanah]

I once noticed that the Greek-Roman gods Ares & Athena or Mars and Venus wear helmets on their heads that look like sperm heads.
I also had to laugh at a goddess called Eileithyia, because in German that clearly sounds like "Eileiter" for fallopian tubes in English. Incidentally, Genesis in the Bible could also describe embryogenesis. To be honest, I'm surprised how the biological gods of enlightenment of an intelligent human civilisation have become rain or thunder gods. I would argue that the ancients knew very well how biological reproduction worked and taught it openly. Perhaps modern scientists don't want us to realise that ancient people were perhaps smarter than we are today.

 

[alltheleaves]

I once noticed that the Greek-Roman gods Ares & Athena or Mars and Venus wear helmets on their heads that look like sperm heads.
I also had to laugh at a goddess called Eileithyia, because in German that clearly sounds like "Eileiter" for fallopian tubes in English. Incidentally, Genesis in the Bible could also describe embryogenesis. To be honest, I'm surprised how the biological gods of enlightenment of an intelligent human civilisation have become rain or thunder gods. I would argue that the ancients knew very well how biological reproduction worked and taught it openly. Perhaps modern scientists don't want us to realise that ancient people were perhaps smarter than we are today.

chiron is/￶was a "genetics life sciences" company with the minotaur logo of a man-horse.

fellow who worked there pointed to the logo and said. "that's what we do here".

 

[Oracle]

Good discussion starter @alltheleaves .I agree with the layers of messages concept, see it a lot in literature as well as real life. Love that you posted that song, second single I ever bought! The first was the Logical Song by supertramp. Both addressed some deep need in my psyche at a tender age.

@Frostychud , Would love to see you start a thread with your two first comments, or on that theme. I've a lot I'd like to respond to, but don't want to take the thread off topic.

 

[AntiSoof]

Interesting article. Let us never forget that the Bible was NOT written to be read by the common people! It was probably written for (and by?) the top of the church people, not for the people. It is a war book, a book of conquest, a book with a moral doctrine, a book to live together as a (certain) family, and so on. And the book was written as a family book for one family. Now that the book is 'on the street' and times have changed, and not always for the better. But again; try to understand that you are reading a forbidden book if you are not part of the top. Introducing yourself to that immediately gives you a different, clearer understanding of what you are reading. At least, this is my idea.

 

[Frostychud]

The Old Testament is full of stories about younger siblings usurping the birthright of older siblings. There are so many that it’s almost too obvious. This fact hasn’t gone unnoticed by Biblical scholars, but I think I might have a new interpretation.

Here’s an incomplete list:

• Cain, Abel, and Seth. The Lord prefers the younger sibling Abel’s offering to that of Cain. After Abel’s death, the blessing passes to Seth and his progeny.
• Shem, Ham, and Japeth. From a Christian point of view at least, Japeth, the youngest of Noah’s sons, can be seen as inheriting the eventual blessing.
• Isaac and Ishmael. The Lord prefers the younger Isaac to the older Ishmael, whose descendants become Muslims.
• Jacob and Esau. Jacob tricks his father into giving him the blessing that was originally intended for the firstborn Esau. Jews see themselves as Jacob fighting against Esau (Rome, Edom) to this day. Europeans are seen as descendants of Esau.
• Rachel and Leah. The younger daughter Rachel is the favorite, and bears Joseph.
• Joseph is the eleventh of the twelve children of Jacob/Israel, but is the favorite.
• The twins Zerah and Peretz. Zerah stuck his hand out of the womb first, where a red thread was tied around it. He was then pulled back into the womb by Peretz, who then came out first, effectively usurping Zerah’s position as firstborn. This is apparently where the red Kabbalah thread bracelet that goy Kabbalists like Tucker Carlson and Madonna can be seen sporting originated.
• Moses is the younger brother of Aaron, but is preferred by the Lord.
• David is the youngest of eight children, and far from the most impressive, but he is chosen by the Lord to be the King of the Jews.
• Solomon is the last child mentioned in the list of David’s sons, and was chosen by David to succeed him.

This is too many to be a coincidence. So, what is the deal with younger and especially youngest siblings inheriting the blessing?

There’s a guy named Sean Hross who used to make videos, and perhaps still does, in which he basically trespasses on private property in France, Germany, and above all Switzerland to get footage of the castles and private residences of the elite. He makes a pretty good case that Switzerland has been the head of the snake since the Crusades, which makes intuitive sense to me. Anyway, in one of his videos, he explains that the Templars were above all a fraternity composed of the disinherited younger brothers of the royal houses of Europe. In those days, the eldest son got everything (primogeniture) and the younger brothers were disinherited and shipped off to bugger each other in monasteries. Hross argues that these brothers banded together and hatched a scheme to overthrow their hated fathers and eldest brothers through covert action.

From a game theory point of view, it makes sense. For any given social order to be stable and eternal, some people (in fact, almost everyone) must always be "unfairly" excluded from power. This mechanism of exclusion must be violent, absolute and without appeal for the empire to persist. The system of primogeniture ensures that estates never get broken up and power flows smoothly from generation to generation. However, it also ensures that there will be lots of disgruntled, disinherited, scheming younger brothers around. It would be perfectly logical for these well-educated younger brothers to figure out that their only hope of taking power lies in banding together and always putting the brotherhood first. This strategy would of course be even more effective if they countered the empire’s open exercise of power with a covert form of power based on deception. In other words, from a game theory point of view, the feudal primogeniture system can be seen as inevitably generating its Hegelian antithesis, a secret revolutionary mafia. With a little imagination you can even associate the first system with heterosexuality and the second with homosexuality. Ritual sodomy as well as ritual orgies (which make it impossible to determine paternity) could be seen as practices imbued with sympathetic magic to combat primogeniture metaphorically. Perhaps the “ancient” tradition of sacrificing the firstborn also originated as a ritual inversion of primogeniture that would prove one’s loyalty to the brotherhood once and for all. Note the ritual in orthodox Judaism called Pidyon HaBen in which the firstborn baby is presented on a platter (!) to a Kohen priest with a symbolic monetary payment to “redeem” him. The argument has been made by many scholars that the Levite priest class (Kohens are a subset) was actually a completely foreign power structure from "Egypt" that “kidnapped” the original polytheistic Hebrew tribes to mold them into some kind of proto-Spartan, proto-Communist revolutionary body to be deployed against the world. (Note that no one really knows with absolute certainty where Biblical Egypt was; it may well have referred to southern France, for example.) I can imagine something like this: the alien Levite brotherhood/mafia rolls into Judea, or wherever (as well as whenever) these events took place, and basically gives their new slaves a choice: either sacrifice your firstborn for real, or pay us to let you keep him. In either case the message is clear: the younger brothers are in charge…

Freud, who was in B’nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant...what covenant is that? The Biblical covenant with God, or the secret revolutionary covenant that the younger brothers established between themselves?), goes as far as to suggest that civilization began when the first band of brothers united to depose the tyrannical father who ruled over his family cruelly and arbitrarily. I now see this myth, presented in Totem and Taboo, as a blatant wink to Freemasonry. Freud also released a book in 1939 arguing that Moses was not a Jew but an Egyptian, showing very clearly where his allegiances lay: not with the poor brainwashed Hebrew dupes offering their children to be redeemed, but with the Egyptian Levites running the con.

What the successive generations of "Chosen" patriarchs have in common is NOT some "pure bloodline". Remember, Esau, Ham, Ishmael, etc. are also family members, and there are several moments in the Bible where Gentiles are grafted onto the "pure" line. So blood is NOT the determining factor. Is the Old Testament saying that a patriarch is determined as such by his zeal in betraying and undermining the stable "visible" social order in the name of some obscure ideal of eternal subversion? Actually, thinking about it, this structure reminds me of Sade's (excellent) "Justine, or the Misfortunes of Virtue" in which the innocent, pious and stupid Justine keeps falling into the hands of one sadistic libertine rapist/counterfeiter/murderer after another, never learning her lesson. The individual fiends don't necessarily know each other personally, but they constitue a solid ideological fraternity of vice and deception nonetheless.

So…my idea…is the strange persistence of the theme of younger brothers usurping older brothers, often through outright treachery and deception, another clue that the Bible was written in Europe in the middle ages by the “brotherhood” Sean Hross describes? Did they keep passing the blessing on to the younger sons in their synthetic Bible as a winking reference to themselves? One of their symbols is the phoenix, which periodically catches fire and burns, only to be reborn from its ashes. Well, isn’t that what’s happening here? Isn’t the bloodline constantly being “reborn from its ashes” in the sense that it is turned on its head every few generations by this generational inversion? Isn’t this nothing but the communist principle of permanent revolution expressed genealogically? And doesn’t this strategy generate an endless number of splinter groups (Jews from Jacob, Muslims from Ishmael, Christians from Esau, and on and on) that can be weaponized against each other to torpedo any attempt made by a rogue brother to put his family above the brotherhood itself?

I may as well also add here that I always found it a most impossible coincidence that Jesus was betrayed by Judas and the religion of the people who "killed Jesus" is today known as "Judaism". However, if the Bible were written much later, this makes sense. The word "Judaism" apparently only emerged in the 18th century (?) as a synonym for the Israelite or Hebrew religion (this is also when the six-pointed star, previously an occult symbol, was laundered into the "Star of David"). Was the word "Judaism" coined then by the brotherhood of forger-subversives as an esoteric reference to the successive "Judases" or traitors in the Bible? In other words, "Judas the God-killer" was the original "Jew", and the words "Judah" and "Judea" were retroactively inserted at earlier points in the story to provide a fake backstory for the "real" (magical) substance of this word. Might we attempt a similar interpretation of the word "Gentile" as well, which has etymological connections with "Gentry", "Gentleman", etc., i.e. the "legitimate" nobility established through primogeniture? Are "Jews" and "Gentiles" nothing but code words for "younger brothers" and "older brothers"?

ADDED: This would offer a tentative "solution" to another puzzle of history. There are no post-Biblical Jews in Dante's Inferno, not even among the usurers. Isn't this unusual, considering that Jews were supposedly blamed for everything during the Renaissance? Judas, however, is imprisoned in the lowest level of Hell reserved for...traitors to their lords, called "Judecca", right before Satan. Is this simply because "Jews" hadn't been "reinvented" yet?

 

[greatscot]

Ain in kabbalah sounds like the Sumerian God Anu/An. Remember that vowels are not real letters and can usually be altered or removed without changing meanings. Sumerian religion and Judaism seem to be the same thing and basically correct. "Historians" should have noticed the Anu/Ain correlation but they're all bought off. Also if Sumerians are Jews, the Sumerians had blue eyes, so Jews have blue eyes too. That would be the origin of the "Aryan ubermensch" concept (note mensch is a Hebrew word). People with blue eyes probably have stronger sensitivity to psi phenomena which manifests as Ashkenazi being at increased risk of "schizophrenia"

 

[Frostychud]

Returning to this important thread.

I've read about 1/3 of Roman Piso's "Piso Christ", available free for download online.

'Piso Christ': The Other Side Of The Jesus Story. Free Version.

The author, who writes using a pseudonym, claims that the New Testament, as well as all other texts of classical antiquity, were written by a committee of closely related royals whom he identifies as the Piso family. He claims to be a descendant of this family. He claims that this name must be reconstructed, as they purposely hid it and split it up among their various pseudonyms to maintain crypsis. In his version of history, the Pisos have always been the "power behind the throne", both Roman and Jewish. @Jef Demolder, the author goes into great detail about one of your themes, namely the committee around the fictitious "Flavius Josephus" and the intertextuality between supposedly "pagan" classical literature and the Bible, all of which he claims were written together by the same family committee. He claims that Philo of Alexandria, Jesus Christ, and Flavius Josephus were all copies of the same person, Arrius Piso. He claims that Christianity was created as an ideological weapon to maintain the institution of slavery at a time when the issue was dividing society. He goes into great detail about the incredibly complex puns employed by the Piso family to transmit multiple messages simultaneously. The portrait he paints of the Royals is exactly the same as the portrait painted by Gerry, the author of the Ancient Spooks site. They are ruthless. They hate and mock non-Royals, whom they see as cattle to be exploited with no mercy. They are completely non-religious and non-ideological. They operate under many different front identities. They care only about sadistic sex and power. Piso believes that the New Testament is full of encoded references to their favorite pastime, raping and killing children. This is also what the renegade Greek scholar Ammon Hillman seems to argue (he would probably add "drugs" to power and sex). This book was written in 2007, so, long before Pizzagate and Epsteingate, in other words before the idea that the "elites" were above all pedophiles and cannibals had entered general circulation. The last part of the book is about the "Royal Language", i.e. punning. I haven't gotten there yet but so far the book has been a very worthwhile read.

Like Joseph Atwill and Flavio Barbiero, he adheres to mainstream chronology. Actually, this book could be described as a paranoid sequel to Flavio Barbiero's "The Secret Society of Moses". Like Piso, the author of that book all but admits that he is a Flavian himself. And guess what, the Flavians and the Pisos are closely related, according to Piso.

I've read a lot of different interpretations of Acts, but this is a new one, and somehow has the ring of truth:

​

The Acts of the Apostles is full of filthy sex commentary and in fact the travels of “Paul” in the Acts are really there as an advertisement for the most popular brothels in the Roman Empire, placed there to inform all readers where the places were – so that the people who they were tempting could travel to them for “sex” vacations. That this is so should be obvious to anyone who has seriously studied the New Testament.​

 

[SonofaBor]

I borrow the term "mysterious formation" from this excellent video:

I want to note that I found this series (six videos) very interesting. Thanks.