I read in some journal a while back that Einsteins wife had really wrote the thesis on relativity. When he won the 80,000 he signed the money over to his wife per their agreement? Does anyone know the particulars of that story? Is this true or bs.
I read in some journal a while back that Einsteins wife had really wrote the thesis on relativity. When he won the 80,000 he signed the money over to his wife per their agreement? Does anyone know the particulars of that story? Is this true of bs.
Just in about China building an MRI scanner that will be able to visualize features a thousand times smaller than a typical scanner. Any grand scheme like a supercomputer or an advanced MRI is always going to have a military or controlled society targeted use in China. In this case my guess is with that kind of resolution they will be able to resolve brain and body modifications from gene altering experiments on animals using CRISPR and others for a few years then people. ‘Human SOUL’ to be scanned with most powerful brain scanner EVER. If there is any countries government/military that sees its own people as machines - its China.
I think there is little that China won't do to get a military edge over the U.S and the rest of the world. For sure biorobotics with people will be a major focus there. Augmentation is gaining speed everywhere but the "robotics" aspect of augmentation will be a Chinese specialty. I of course am referring to the military and government control apparatus and not the average Chinese and especially not the Uighurs.
When a Chinese physicist says “We may for the first time capture a full picture of human consciousness or even the essence of life itself” that may be something he is looking forward to but many more people there will be thinking about how to use it for 100% effective spy and lie detection or down the road 100% effective biorobotic spy/soldier mass production.
Canada had a big influx of Chinese among others causing the same real estate bubble, then we also have the Muslim push into Europe causing all kinds of chaos, e.g., Sweden. South Africa on the verge of white genocide? All this combined with the general dumbing down through media/education/consumerism/liberalism/etc seems like an orchestrated effort to destroy what's left of culture in countries that were predominantly caucasian in recent past, no?
This reminds me of an excellent post I once read on reddit that delves into this better than I could ever hope to, and apologies if this is off topic.
Did the chinese take out Tartaria?
They are occupying their lands now
All considered personally that wouldnt surprise me.
Being the children of Hanuman and all
By the time we figure out what's going on, we will be wiped out. There is good evidence the Chinese are new inhabitants to the region of China. They could all be genetically created/manipulated from some kind of cloning facility underground or elsewhere. Supposedly they swooped in and took everything over from the previous inhabitants and began covering everything up that can prove they don't belong there. Such as the Pyramids.
Possibly, those orphan train videos make me think that it was more of forced conscription though for the average man. I have a feeling this is mostly about bloodlines and powers in charge endlessly trying to reconquer the land that was conquered by someone else.
Yeah. I do feel some of these comments could be considered racist..imo.. right, isn't racism making sweeping generalizations about a people based on small details? Just putting that out there. I think the behaviors/lack of empathy are a cultural response to trauma. Every culture has a diff way of socializing their people to behave, in response to trauma. Seems to me that the CULTURE has treated their people in a dehumanizing way, so that it feels normal to respond in the way of that young man someone described oushing past them when they had an injury. The quote from this article '“Einstein went to China at the wrong time,” said one Weibo user, describing the early years of the Chinese republic, established in 1912, which came after centuries of imperial rule. “Hunger, war, and poverty all pressed on the Chinese. How could Chinese people at the time gain Einstein’s respect?” Is very telling to me. Not only were these poor people destroyed by hunger, war, and poverty, but shamed and considered deserving of scorn. If thatis your MO as a culture, you'll do some damage. In these cases like the young man pushing past, it's def not ok, he was socialized in a f**ked up way. But theorizing/generalizing about an entire people being biorobots/soulless beings based on behavior, brings up a pretty strong sense of revulsion in me.
Try to refrain from profanity, unless quoting of course. I'll assume you must have been 'self quoting'. It's not a big problem though, Mark twain once said:
"There ought to be a room in every house to swear in. It's dangerous to have to repress an emotion like that."
There is good evidence the Chinese are new inhabitants to the region of China. They could all be genetically created/manipulated from some kind of cloning facility underground or elsewhere.
Although the majority of evidence is anecdotal, this "human wave" phenomenon is observable in other places as well. India appears to share many similar hallmarks. Vast ruinous cultural sights. i.e. Very poor effort in heritage conservation (something one might expect from a population with no historical link to the locations they occupy). Localized versions of the Greeco/ Roman pantheon. A proclivity for repetitious behaviors that favor stasis of innovation.
Moreover, on a genetic level. The complete dominance of a single phenotype, devoid of any meaningful diversity. i.e. Brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation. These are indicators of genetic manipulation. Supposedly hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution and these sub groups have no genetic variation? In a smaller population sample that might be understandable, say an isolated group like the Australian aboriginals. But zero genetic variation in the worlds two biggest populations? How is that possible, if we are to following Darwin's model, the theory of evolution.
A quote from Wikipedia on Biodiversity:
Terrestrial biodiversity is usually greater near the equator, which is the result of the warm climate and high primary productivity.
Is India not found closer to the equator than say Europe? Is southern China, the most concentrated population zone not in a temperate, often tropical climate? To follow this reasoning to its logical conclusion... How about the legitimate native inhabitants of the actual thirteen Equatorial countries? Ecuador, Colombia, Brazil, Sao Tome & Principe, Gabon, Republic of the Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda, Kenya, Somalia, Maldives, Indonesia and Kiribati.
All these places contain populations with a percentage of genetic diversity so low, that it is -to use an academic phrase, "statistically insignificant." All these populations just like China and India display the same traits, brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation. The only exceptions are found in the Northern hemisphere/ *cough* centre of the flat earth) in Europe and northern Asia where we find Black, brown, blonde and red hair as well as Brown, hazel, green and blue iris pigmentation.
This raises another most baffling question: How do recessive traits such as blue eyes (The absence of pigment) express themselves in an individual If dominant genes over-ride recessive genes? Does the out of Africa theory make any sense? There is no case in which an individual with brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation can repeatably and reliably produce Blonde, blue eyed offspring.
Only in some rare cases do we have say, an individual of African/ Oriental decent give birth to offspring afflicted with the genetic mutation commonly known as albinism:
Albinism is a congenital disorder characterized in humans by the complete or partial absence of pigment in the skin, hair and eyes.
How is the notion that Northern Europeans are the result of exclusively African Albinos mating habits resulting in new haplogroups more a of a valid hypothesis than Genetic engineering in antiquity?
We aren't making this up for fun. These are the FACTS.
For those reading this who get their nose out of joint over this stuff. Don't shoot the messenger as they say.
Hi, what is this in reference to?
Hanuman is the Monkey god, yes? Is there some link to the use of 'Han' in Han Chinese? What is meant by "...the children of Hanuman?"
Thnks
In the Mandela Effect community there is a term for people who don't seem to be affected by the shifts in reality (or rather instantly accept the new version without question) called "synthetic robotoids". It's part tongue in cheek but the description is valid on many levels. As the idea goes- consensus reality is constantly uploaded to everyone, probably during sleep, and those without a "soul" readily accept their new program without question while true humans will retain their memories and notice the difference in reality.
Can a pure robotoid actually exist? I'd argue that the technology isn't there for it to be possible, you need to have a biological hybrid that can get its energy from metabolism, respiration etc. Then the question becomes- why use any synthetic parts- why not just take a plain old human and program the hell out of it until it functions practically like a robot.
We call these the "sheeple" and they are almost like perfect worker drones if you think of it. I, as a semi intelligent conscious "real" human am perpetually amazed at how stupid these creatures can be who are supposedly part of my own species. I often wonder if they are even real at all or are just characters in a dream, or programs in a computer.
Real people tend to have an aura of consciousness and you can sense that they are dreaming you just as much as you are dreaming them. Synthetics on the other hand are totally asleep and when you look deeply into them there's really not much there inside.
I would, as an idealist, really love to believe that everyone has a divine spark and is capable of self realization. I'm just not seeing the evidence of it.
Often, even with the divine spark, if you meet a person at 5yo,.then at 16, then at 21 and on and on they would seem as a different person if they are seeking and growing (often by traumatic experiences); still others repeat lessons leaving and living a tearfull existence till they've had enough and seek ernestly. Remember, every action has an equal and opposite reaction (karma); so let us remember to be humble or find ourselves humbled. We are here to learn how to live in love while under constant duress and against our carnal desires.
SO, biorobots perhaps and it is an interesting theory, but is it only speculation? The pharisees had golums and in fact we see in medieval drawings these tiny creatures, so in modern times sure.
Sorry, but without answers at that questions we go nowhere: we are starting new threads and keep numbering the trees without seeing the forest! Before banning me on metabunk.org different accounts keep telling me that Mississippi is flowing uphill because of gravitation, even if the gravitation vector is running in an almost opposite direction!
The families which are running the Earth for our infrared owners are not stupid; if tomorrow they are going to pass legislation in order to help us, for example releasing the patents of so called "free energy" which in reality are orgone transformers, the day after tomorrow the process of punishing and replacing them will begin without any hope for us in an abolishment of our slavery!
We badly need orgone transformers in every home if we wish to avoid cannibalism and massive reduction of mankind, proceeding like the inventor of the Joe Cell (an orgone transformer) which released his invention for free and gave detailed explanation to anybody who came and ask!
In less than a decade, when the long distance food transportation will became history because of missing oil and millions of jobs will disappear from the same reason, people will start to realise that there are not enough animals for hunting and they will start to hunt each other in order to survive! Your gold reserves will not matter as you cannot eat them and the bodyguards payments and food cost will deplete them rapidly. Without oil there is no army and no country!
Of course, I am speaking the average Joe and not the elites which already have orgone transformers in their subterranean cities!
Man I hear you, but these things were called out in writings and prophecy for millenia, likely because it is a repeat cycle of resets. People die and are reborn or graduate.
Yeah, biorobots, androids, cryptids and much more! We see through a veil only partly. Visible light is a VERY limited wavelength. We are missing over 90% of reality.
Try to refrain from profanity, unless quoting of course. I'll assume you must have been 'self quoting'. It's not a big problem though, Mark twain once said:
However, that particular room is not Stolen History.
Although the majority of evidence is anecdotal, this "human wave" phenomenon is observable in other places as well. India appears to share many similar hallmarks. Vast ruinous cultural sights. i.e. Very poor effort in heritage conservation (something one might expect from a population with no historical link to the locations they occupy). Localized versions of the Greeco/ Roman pantheon. A proclivity for repetitious behaviors that favor stasis of innovation.
Moreover, on a genetic level. The complete dominance of a single phenotype, devoid of any meaningful diversity. i.e. Brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation. These are indicators of genetic manipulation. Supposedly hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution and these sub groups have no genetic variation? In a smaller population sample that might be understandable, say an isolated group like the Australian aboriginals. But zero genetic variation in the worlds two biggest populations? How is that possible, if we are to following Darwin's model, the theory of evolution.
Is India not found closer to the equator than say Europe? Is southern China, the most concentrated population zone not in a temperate, often tropical climate? To follow this reasoning to its logical conclusion... How about the legitimate native inhabitants of the actual thirteen Equatorial countries? Ecuador, Colombia, Brazil, Sao Tome & Principe, Gabon, Republic of the Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda, Kenya, Somalia, Maldives, Indonesia and Kiribati.
All these places contain populations with a percentage of genetic diversity so low, that it is -to use an academic phrase, "statistically insignificant." All these populations just like China and India display the same traits, brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation. The only exceptions are found in the Northern hemisphere/ *cough* centre of the flat earth) in Europe and northern Asia where we find Black, brown, blonde and red hair as well as Brown, hazel, green and blue iris pigmentation.
This raises another most baffling question: How do recessive traits such as blue eyes (The absence of pigment) express themselves in an individual If dominant genes over-ride recessive genes? Does the out of Africa theory make any sense? There is no case in which an individual with brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation can repeatably and reliably produce Blonde, blue eyed offspring.
Only in some rare cases do we have say, an individual of African/ Oriental decent give birth to offspring afflicted with the genetic mutation commonly known as albinism:
-Wikipedia.
How is the notion that Northern Europeans are the result of exclusively African Albinos mating habits resulting in new haplogroups more a of a valid hypothesis than Genetic engineering in antiquity?
We aren't making this up for fun. These are the FACTS.
For those reading this who get their nose out of joint over this stuff. Don't shoot the messenger as they say.
Post automatically merged:
Hi, what is this in reference to?
Hanuman is the Monkey god, yes? Is there some link to the use of 'Han' in Han Chinese? What is meant by "...the children of Hanuman?"
Thnks
@Recognition, please don’t bring the term of “racism” to this forum where no hate is involved, and where people look at things from the observational point of view. Period.
Instigate racism related discussions anywhere but on this SH forum. Won’t be tolerated here.
While I will not get tangled up in whatever argument you two are about to have, I would like to note that you are somewhat incorrect regarding genetic diversity. Outward appearance is not a good indicator of it, since Africa has the greatest amount of genetic diversity in the world according to research, which, if you simply pay attention to outward appearance, would appear to be nonsensical as basically all of them have dark skin, black hair and brown eyes. It would take a more closer look to determine that, oh yeah, there are actually naturally different shades of dark skin, very different facial and body structure and different environmental adaptions among them. By comparison, Europeans weirdly have pretty mid-tier to low genetic diversity, despite the existence of different hair and eye colors (two of which - red hair and green eyes - are supposed to be fairly rare abnormal mutations). While African parents CAN occasionally give birth to a white child that is not an albino (albino Africans have traditional African bone structure anyway - nobody would mistake them for a European) because of DNA mutation, it is so statistically rare that it can be ruled out as the origin of paler-skinned humans and might as well not exist.
Try to refrain from profanity, unless quoting of course. I'll assume you must have been 'self quoting'. It's not a big problem though, Mark twain once said:
However, that particular room is not Stolen History.
Although the majority of evidence is anecdotal, this "human wave" phenomenon is observable in other places as well. India appears to share many similar hallmarks. Vast ruinous cultural sights. i.e. Very poor effort in heritage conservation (something one might expect from a population with no historical link to the locations they occupy). Localized versions of the Greeco/ Roman pantheon. A proclivity for repetitious behaviors that favor stasis of innovation.
Moreover, on a genetic level. The complete dominance of a single phenotype, devoid of any meaningful diversity. i.e. Brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation. These are indicators of genetic manipulation. Supposedly hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution and these sub groups have no genetic variation? In a smaller population sample that might be understandable, say an isolated group like the Australian aboriginals. But zero genetic variation in the worlds two biggest populations? How is that possible, if we are to following Darwin's model, the theory of evolution.
A quote from Wikipedia on Biodiversity:
-Wikipedia.
Is India not found closer to the equator than say Europe? Is southern China, the most concentrated population zone not in a temperate, often tropical climate? To follow this reasoning to its logical conclusion... How about the legitimate native inhabitants of the actual thirteen Equatorial countries? Ecuador, Colombia, Brazil, Sao Tome & Principe, Gabon, Republic of the Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda, Kenya, Somalia, Maldives, Indonesia and Kiribati.
All these places contain populations with a percentage of genetic diversity so low, that it is -to use an academic phrase, "statistically insignificant." All these populations just like China and India display the same traits, brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation. The only exceptions are found in the Northern hemisphere/ *cough* centre of the flat earth) in Europe and northern Asia where we find Black, brown, blonde and red hair as well as Brown, hazel, green and blue iris pigmentation.
This raises another most baffling question: How do recessive traits such as blue eyes (The absence of pigment) express themselves in an individual If dominant genes over-ride recessive genes? Does the out of Africa theory make any sense? There is no case in which an individual with brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation can repeatably and reliably produce Blonde, blue eyed offspring.
Only in some rare cases do we have say, an individual of African/ Oriental decent give birth to offspring afflicted with the genetic mutation commonly known as albinism:
-Wikipedia.
How is the notion that Northern Europeans are the result of exclusively African Albinos mating habits resulting in new haplogroups more a of a valid hypothesis than Genetic engineering in antiquity?
We aren't making this up for fun. These are the FACTS.
For those reading this who get their nose out of joint over this stuff. Don't shoot the messenger as they say.
Hi, what is this in reference to?
Hanuman is the Monkey god, yes? Is there some link to the use of 'Han' in Han Chinese? What is meant by "...the children of Hanuman?"
Thnks
Agreed, I don't believe that those traits are formed from Albinism. I think that's one of the common Cultural Marxist talking points now that the whole out of Africa thing is starting to fall apart. The facial structure, body structure, hair, and several other features are totally different from Africans of the European types of humans. But other humans differ from each other as well. I believe some kind of genetic engineering was most likely done. There are so many items that I have a strong inclination are true in the media but I won't put 100% trust in them. The movie 'Enemy Mine' comes to mind. I think they get a kick out of putting hints in their programs and think we are too stupid to realize that they are showing us the truth or at least some truth. I would reply with more detail to your post but I was just heading to sleep when I noticed it, I'm extremely tired.
Africa has the greatest amount of genetic diversity in the world according to research, which, if you simply pay attention to outward appearance, would appear to be nonsensical as basically all of them have dark skin, black hair and brown eyes.
Can you please point to where I used skin colour as a metric for any points I have made. You're need to qualify all racial discussion by skin tone is quite disconcerting.
I see you want to say something on the subject above but your post was a little bit "rambly". Could you condense it into a couple of bullet points perhaps. What part of the discussion do you want to go over, maybe one major point you disagree with would be a good starting point.
Good link. The whole predictive programming aspect. How hollywood brags about their evil plots. Hiding in plain sight.
Some way, some how, the bad guys have latched onto our world and are sapping it dry. It's hard to argue against this kind of theory. No healthy leadership would leech off of its population base so recklessly. We are clearly a conquered peoples.
The clone armies were pivotal in this take over, they make for very docile underlings. Very convenient for the bad guys. Almost like it was intentional.
Can you please point to where I used skin colour as a metric for any points I have made. You're need to qualify all racial discussion by skin tone is quite disconcerting.
I made a reference to skin color as part of an overall comment on how Africans actually vary quite a bit in terms of appearance, despite a quick first look seemingly affording one the luxury of assuming that "black hair, brown eyes" means little genetic diversity. All of it was part of a response to this little tidbit in your comment:
"All these places contain populations with a percentage of genetic diversity so low, that it is -to use an academic phrase, "statistically insignificant." All these populations just like China and India display the same traits, brown/ black hair, brown/ black iris pigmentation. The only exceptions are found in the Northern hemisphere/ *cough* centre of the flat earth) in Europe and northern Asia where we find Black, brown, blonde and red hair as well as Brown, hazel, green and blue iris pigmentation."
Where you assume that because one set of people look more different on the outside than another, this corresponds to more genetic diversity. If you thought I was going to go off at you with "that's racist" accusations, I'm not here for that and I have no interest in it.
I read the article and another two more related ones, great stuff here. It says that there is more genetic diversity between Africans themselves than compared to the other hapolgroups combined.
Although the study's main focus was on Africa, Tishkoff and her colleagues studied DNA markers from around the planet, identifying 14 "ancestral clusters" for all of humanity. Nine of those clusters are in Africa. "You're seeing more diversity in one continent than across the globe," Tishkoff said.
In the cluster of African DNA markers on the far left of this graph there are more distinct variations of African than there are other racial groups combined. In other words, of all the types of dessert one can choose from, there are more distinct variations of ice cream flavour than there are other types of dessert to choose from such as cake or pastries or fruit salads.
This is apples and oranges. Further more how does this disprove the clone theory. The article admits that the rest of humanity has far fewer variations. This was the original point.
It says Two international research teams have compiled a genetic map of Europe, revealing little genetic diversity between the various nationalities. But the differences are enough to tell which country an individual comes from
Again, this only further hammers home the point that we are genetically engineered. Fascinating that Africans have more "genetic variation" than any other group and yet they all possess brown/black hair and iris pigmentation. And yet, Europeans have far fewer genetic variations but some how demonstrate an enormous amount of pigmentation variation.
This reminds me of a story I read online from a tin foil hat type guy. (Made for rather good reading mind you.) He said when the original tribes of Europe were cloned by the gods, they were given varying shades and colours so as to tell them apart. As it was stated that each had their different roles and allegiances and this method was used by the gods to keep track of them.
Sounds cool, not sure how he came across such information. Maybe he just made it up. Some how it makes sense though. What other purpose would it serve, you yourself said such outward differences are meaningless. Totally, ya know, just colours and stuff.
Citation please. Also if true, I think this is in reference to the flura & fauna. Not the humans.
Citation please.
Can you please point to where I used skin colour as a metric for any points I have made. You're need to qualify all racial discussion by skin tone is quite disconcerting.
I see you want to say something on the subject above but your post was a little bit "rambly". Could you condense it into a couple of bullet points perhaps. What part of the discussion do you want to go over, maybe one major point you disagree with would be a good starting point.
Post automatically merged:
Good link. The whole predictive programming aspect. How hollywood brags about their evil plots. Hiding in plain sight.
Some way, some how, the bad guys have latched onto our world and are sapping it dry. It's hard to argue against this kind of theory. No healthy leadership would leech off of its population base so recklessly. We are clearly a conquered peoples.
The clone armies were pivotal in this take over, they make for very docile underlings. Very convenient for the bad guys. Almost like it was intentional.
Indeed, I find it interesting when they put quotes as they do in the Matrix about how us few that are aware and conscious of what is going on are just some kind of anomaly that shouldn't exist in the vast swathes of programmed goyim.