Summary
Pfister sets the start of the Great Action in the “18th century” based on architectural and art styles, and his estimation on the speed of technological development. The falsification must have begun after the invention/discovery of the printing press, while documents on parchment and papyri were fabricated in parallel to bolster the lie.
He discounts the Grecian rule, Roman Imperial rule, Franks, Alamanni, Carolingian, Roman-German rulers, and the Byzantine Empire as historical fabrication; as well as Solomon’s kingdom of Israel and the Old Testament (which is created after the Gospels). If there was any Crusade, he believes there could only been one which ended in failure.
Pfister believes the falsified history is concerned with retelling the story of the religious dispute between “absolute monotheistic religion of the East” (which denies Papal authority) and the “Trinitarian faith of the West” (which supports Papal authority); perhaps the displacement of the old religion(trinitarian, orgiastic) by a new religion? The dispute was in someway related to (perhaps triggered by?) the eruption of Mount Vesuvius - the extent of the catastrophe is unknown, though it may have been far reaching - leading to the destruction of the “holy city”, which is now known as Pompeii (but also referred to as Naples(Neapolis), Troy, Paris, Sodom, Rome and other names)
Pfister notes the dynasties and their conflicts are all based on the same template given by the “Trojan war”. The name “Troy” comes from the French “trois”=Trinity; king Priamus=Primus/the Godhead, and his son Hector=victor=Jesus who was sacrificed. The contest for “women” in the stories represents wrestling control for the church, and so are maritime conflicts: mare(MR)=Maria (Holy mother)/Rome(RM). The enemy of the Trinitarian religion is often represented Persia in the East. But Persia(PRS) is also Phrygian(PRG)=Franks=France; at the same Persia may also represent Paraclete(PRC); thus the two sides are intertwined together indecipherably.
Comments
Because Pfister believes every document was fabricated, there can be for him no evidence to base on that could reveal true history. I believe this position is too extreme: there may be documents that are (intentionally) misdated and misinterpreted, but nevertheless is genuine and tells a true history.
Center to Pfister’s contention was the conflict with the “monotheistic religion of the East”, which was never clearly clarified. Pfister points out a few examples of religious debates in history: the first council of Nicaea which settled the “Arian controversy”, Hildebrand/Gregory VII and the “Investiture Controversy”, John of Capistrano and the “reform of the Order of Friars Minor”, Martin Luther and the “Protestant reformation” and “Bern Disputation”.
Since Pfister was not knowledgeable on early Christianity, he was not aware of an early(original?) form of Christianity that does not know of an earthly Jesus Christ, but only a spiritual “Christ”(savior, or grace) that takes possession of a living person. This is basically the teachings of John (the Baptist). Pfister rightly sees John as a rival of Jesus Christ: in falsified history, the rival(i.e. John) of the Jesus figures were often killed/decapitated/sacrificed - one must therefore ask, whether John was really a follower of Christianity, or the progenitor of a new religion!
View under this light, all the aforementioned reforms may carry a different meaning; for example, Protestantism (as is known currently) promotes faith through divine revelation, which is not dissimilar to the early form of “Christianity”. I also note other historical figures named John: John Chrysostom and John of Capistrano are known as “reformers” and ascetics, and may be parallels of John the Baptist.
Here I will mention a personal observation, Krishna in Hinduism can be spelt Krista - its similarity with “Christ” should be readily noted. In Sanskrit, the name Krishna is said to mean “dark”, but dark can also mean hidden or concealed. In Bhagavad Gita, Krishna is an avatar of god who serves as the charioteer(CHRT=Christ?) to Arjuna(JN=John?); in the epic Krishna was not sacrificed unlike in the western Jesus template, and his teachings to Arjuna is similar to what I call early Christianity. Jainism(JN) is also quite close to the spelling of “John”(JN), which promotes asceticism.
Another religion to note is “Simonians”, a Gnostic sect said to be founded by Simon Magus. But Simon is also a
parallel figure to Jesus and John; if we take the consonants of Simon=SMN, remove the S, we get MN, Mani, Manichaeism. Manichaeism is said to be main rival to Christianity, and was one of the most widespread religions; but yet we know almost nothing about it now.
In my view, the “monotheistic religion” is exactly the early form of Christianity (or Gnosticism) led by the figure “John” that the “Great Action” aimed to conceal.
