- Joined
- Mar 29, 2024
- Messages
- 57
- Reaction score
- 71
Today I was wondering why the destruction of buildings by urban fires, the houses submerged by mudslides, and the melted or petrified cities are treated separately. Perhaps they all have a single cause: Terraforming, or the retransformation of building materials into natural substances and organic systems.
When we see stone and rock, we only see hard material. Perhaps that's the misconception.
Stone and rock could actually be flesh or wood with a higher density. In terms of the theory of a living Earth with a microbiome on its surface, it makes sense that during the Earth's growth and development processes, building materials are converted into biomass so that the Earth, or rather its biome, can better utilize or restructure it.
Depending on the building material and the type of ground a building is built on, it is subject to different processes of destruction and transformation.
However, these processes occur in shorter periods than usual, so erosion plays no significant role.
Caves with stalactites and stalagmites are quite interesting, by the way.
We usually perceive them as natural underground caves with a strong calcification process. However, there are also artificial mining tunnels that form stalagmites and stalactites, as well as finds of so-called mud fossils, which strongly resemble the mucous membranes of titanic creatures.
When I visited two caves with stalactites and stalagmites a few years ago, I had the impression that they were indeed organic in nature, but somehow not quite finished. They seemed more like golems to me than fossils. If all these civilized building structures are destroyed or transformed by terraforming processes, then one has to ask whether the so-called mud fossils aren't actually evolutionary games. Human-made building structures could offer nature something like templates that it uses to create organic life. Ancient temple complexes, built with a certain symmetry, would be excellent primitive templates for such evolutionary games.
When we see stone and rock, we only see hard material. Perhaps that's the misconception.
Stone and rock could actually be flesh or wood with a higher density. In terms of the theory of a living Earth with a microbiome on its surface, it makes sense that during the Earth's growth and development processes, building materials are converted into biomass so that the Earth, or rather its biome, can better utilize or restructure it.
Depending on the building material and the type of ground a building is built on, it is subject to different processes of destruction and transformation.
However, these processes occur in shorter periods than usual, so erosion plays no significant role.
Caves with stalactites and stalagmites are quite interesting, by the way.
We usually perceive them as natural underground caves with a strong calcification process. However, there are also artificial mining tunnels that form stalagmites and stalactites, as well as finds of so-called mud fossils, which strongly resemble the mucous membranes of titanic creatures.
When I visited two caves with stalactites and stalagmites a few years ago, I had the impression that they were indeed organic in nature, but somehow not quite finished. They seemed more like golems to me than fossils. If all these civilized building structures are destroyed or transformed by terraforming processes, then one has to ask whether the so-called mud fossils aren't actually evolutionary games. Human-made building structures could offer nature something like templates that it uses to create organic life. Ancient temple complexes, built with a certain symmetry, would be excellent primitive templates for such evolutionary games.
