Hello!
I sometimes have a tendency to ramble, so for a change, I'm going to jump right in. Also, my apologies for posting yet another 'Earth shape' topic. I know these can be controversial - but I hope some of these ideas I put forward are new. Certainly I haven't seen them anywhere before.
A while back I watched the Brian Austin Lambert video where he details an Earth system model. Some of the ideas weren't very new to me. Some of them were and while they were quite interesting and worth pondering, I wasn't particularly swayed by them. His doomsday scenario Plasma event was also quite interesting, but again, I didnt really buy into it.
However, he did also recommend some other videos. I didn't watch these right away. This was a few weeks later - but they were indeed VERY interesting, and it made me think more about the BAL video, but it also gave me some new ideas.
Much later, I acquired a 'crystal ball' and made some interesting observations with it, which I will come to a bit later, but they are also relevant, and possibly the most interesting part of this post.
First, let me just post the BAL video, and the videos he recommended. I want to take you on a little journey to show how I came to these ideas. If you havent seen the BAL video before, I warn you, his presentation style can be a little off-putting, but it's worth a look.
The other 3 videos are about experiments carried out by 'David LaPoint' (?). I will discuss more below. His youtube channel links to an interesting website, also. (I havent had a chance to take a proper look at this)
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/FjrgTxFvNorz/
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NogyJ0k8Kw
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpI6ikj1G-s
Basically, the 'Primer fields' videos, involve creating a ball of plasma, using powerful bowl-shaped magnets. Although they don't say it themselves, as far as I am concerned, they are basically creating an artificial sun. (Edit - I actually noticed in the video description, they do use the word Plasma Sun - but I dont recall that being specified in the actual video)
It is interesting to note a few things with the associated phenomena. Pretty much everything can be related to our 'solar system' - as well as the plasma ball (sun), they can create orbital bodies - these are basically just magnets, but it corresponds to 'planets'.
They also show various visual effects which apparently can also be observed in 'deep space' - which I am sure is no coincidence.
Also note early on in the first video, they show different spacing, and TILT of the bowl magnets.
I wouldnt be at all surprised if the tilt in the picture below is 23.4 degrees. Also note the ball shaped object between the 2 bowl magnets.
This one at about 7.45 - 8 minutes into the first video:
Plasma ball, inside another spherical shape, and a faint outline of an 'X'
Some more images below.... globes? domes? eyeballs?
I couldnt find a flat Earth map with a larger 'white' area, but you get the idea.
Anyway.... I will let you watch the videos for yourselves and draw your own conclusions.... but I think the experiment itself could very well mirror our overall environment.
Now... at one point, they show an overall magnetic toroid environment, with the bowl shaped magnets inside it. This is where I begun to wonder if this was how 'realm' really is.
If we do live in such an environment, there are 2 obvious possibilities. Below:
1) The Earth is an inverse toroid with magnetic domes at the north and south pole.
2) We live in a snow-globe type enclosure, under one of the 'bowl-magnets' (this would basically be a 'flat earth' environment, within a larger toroid structure.
A few things to note:
1) If the overall toroid structure rotates - this could account for gravity via centrifugal force. If this is the case, I would lean toward the second image being a more likely environment. (If necessary I can expand on this later - I dont want to clutter the opening post)
2) note the central golden coloured sphere - this would likely be the celestial sphere, or what mainstream would have us think of as 'deep space'. This itself, could also rotate.
3) note also the tiny orb in the centre. Quite possibly the source projection of the Sun (and possibly also the moon - more on this later in the crystal ball stuff)
4) There could well be a 23.4 degree tilt involved. Consider the toroid to be tilted 23.4 degrees, and the central orb to then project 'the sun' directly downwards. Hence, its not pointed at the centre of our environment, but towards the tropics. There may be a concentric rotation involved here.
5) This image is just a general illustration. The golden orb doesnt necessarily have to overlap the domes. The toroid sphere could be slightly 'squashed'. If our environment is under a dome, we know its measurements, but the overall toroid could be any size. It may be possible to figure this out.
----------------------
Now, onto some observations with a crystal ball.
So, for whatever reason, I recently decided to buy a 'green crystal quartz ball'. I purchased this on Ebay from a seller in China. It was quite cheap (like $10-15 in USD), but it did take a couple of weeks to arrive.
I played around with it a bit, looking at how it caught and reflected the light and so on, and then I noticed something interesting when looking 'into' it. Behold!
I took a few pictures of this, and this is probably the best one, but it really doesnt do justice to how it looks when you simply hold it up near your eye with a light source behind. The camera doesnt capture the same clarity. Or I am simply rubbish at photography.
Now, the main reason I am sharing this, is not so much because of the bigger light, which quite obviously looks a bit like the Sun. That is simply caused by the ordinary ceiling lightbulb behind it.
I am more interested in the scattering of smaller lights behind it, which look exactly like the stars in the night sky. Now, you may just say that this is simply because of the lightbulb scattering over the curved surface or something like that, and it doesnt mean anything..... well, maybe. Kind of, sort of.
I turned the ball this way and that way, watching the 'stars' twist and turn around. And when you get a feel for how the curves warp the image - they bend more towards the edges, and less towards the middle - I suddenly realised something. The scattered lights/stars formed a kind of pattern of lines, and swirls and whorls. These lights were caused by my fingerprints on the back of the ball. Thats it. Exactly how, or why this is happening, I can't say for sure - but I am 100% certain that the 'star effect' is nothing more than my fingerprint on the back of the ball. So quite possibly what we see in the night sky, is just some kind of material or residue on a dome structure or a spherical something above the dome, either on the inside or out.
While the ball is stationary, you just see a scattering of light. It's only when you turn it and observe how the lights behave around and near the curved edges that you begin to process how they look through the refractive medium, and how they would look without it. I hope I've explained this in terms that make sense.
A while later, I had put the ball down on a paper pad, right below the light bulb, and I was walking past, and I saw something else. Behold!
Now.... I cannot tell you how difficult it was to get this shot. Basically by partially blocking the light source with the camera.
Anyway, this now makes me wonder if it may also explain the moon and its phases.
Consider this picture again:
If we imagine that the tiny green ball in the middle is the source of the sun and moon projection. Suppose it emits a focussed beam of light from the centre. Both upwards and downwards.
The beam downwards comes straight to the dome with full effect, and gives us a blazing hot sun. The beam upwards reflects back off the inside of the golden ball, and then downwards back on to our dome. It has had to travel further, so is not quite as bright and intense. But, due to whatever rotation or motions are taking place, it periodically blocks/obscures itself - which is why we have the cycle of the phases of the moon. IE - sometimes the light partially reflects back on itself, and blocks it from reaching our environment.
A few interesting things to consider.
There may be another dome environment in here with us.
The 'moon' beam, might actually be projecting the other environment to us.
I mentioned in the title that there could be things to experiment with.
If what we see in the sky is through a dome, or spherical structure - I wonder if anyone has tried to 'warp' the image with a picture editor to see if it actually represents something.
It could just be random crap residue on a dome or a sphere. But maybe it is actually a picture of some sort. I dont know much about picture editing, but is there some software you can use to warp a picture with a fish-bowl lens type effect, or vice versa? It would have to have some kind of manual ability to warp it in degrees, since we dont know the distances involved or the refractive indexes. Likewise the same thing could be tried with the moon.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds it a bit strange that the constellations are regarded as animals, and archers and all that kind of stuff.... what if by adjusting the night-sky panorama of stars with a lens effect it really does depict animals and so on. Wouldn't that really be proof of something?
Finally, I wonder if it is worth forwarding any of this ideas on to people are more involved with this topic. Like some of the people with Flat Earth Channels.... or Crow777 since he seems like a bit of a expert on the Moon. I personally dont really get involved in social media. I dont have accounts on youtube or anything like that, but if any other users have contacted these people in the past, maybe you could drop them a link or something?
---------------------------------------
I just remembered one more thing:
I sometimes have a tendency to ramble, so for a change, I'm going to jump right in. Also, my apologies for posting yet another 'Earth shape' topic. I know these can be controversial - but I hope some of these ideas I put forward are new. Certainly I haven't seen them anywhere before.
A while back I watched the Brian Austin Lambert video where he details an Earth system model. Some of the ideas weren't very new to me. Some of them were and while they were quite interesting and worth pondering, I wasn't particularly swayed by them. His doomsday scenario Plasma event was also quite interesting, but again, I didnt really buy into it.
However, he did also recommend some other videos. I didn't watch these right away. This was a few weeks later - but they were indeed VERY interesting, and it made me think more about the BAL video, but it also gave me some new ideas.
Much later, I acquired a 'crystal ball' and made some interesting observations with it, which I will come to a bit later, but they are also relevant, and possibly the most interesting part of this post.
First, let me just post the BAL video, and the videos he recommended. I want to take you on a little journey to show how I came to these ideas. If you havent seen the BAL video before, I warn you, his presentation style can be a little off-putting, but it's worth a look.
The other 3 videos are about experiments carried out by 'David LaPoint' (?). I will discuss more below. His youtube channel links to an interesting website, also. (I havent had a chance to take a proper look at this)
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/FjrgTxFvNorz/
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NogyJ0k8Kw
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpI6ikj1G-s
Basically, the 'Primer fields' videos, involve creating a ball of plasma, using powerful bowl-shaped magnets. Although they don't say it themselves, as far as I am concerned, they are basically creating an artificial sun. (Edit - I actually noticed in the video description, they do use the word Plasma Sun - but I dont recall that being specified in the actual video)
It is interesting to note a few things with the associated phenomena. Pretty much everything can be related to our 'solar system' - as well as the plasma ball (sun), they can create orbital bodies - these are basically just magnets, but it corresponds to 'planets'.
They also show various visual effects which apparently can also be observed in 'deep space' - which I am sure is no coincidence.
Also note early on in the first video, they show different spacing, and TILT of the bowl magnets.
I wouldnt be at all surprised if the tilt in the picture below is 23.4 degrees. Also note the ball shaped object between the 2 bowl magnets.
This one at about 7.45 - 8 minutes into the first video:
Plasma ball, inside another spherical shape, and a faint outline of an 'X'
Some more images below.... globes? domes? eyeballs?
Anyway.... I will let you watch the videos for yourselves and draw your own conclusions.... but I think the experiment itself could very well mirror our overall environment.
Now... at one point, they show an overall magnetic toroid environment, with the bowl shaped magnets inside it. This is where I begun to wonder if this was how 'realm' really is.
If we do live in such an environment, there are 2 obvious possibilities. Below:
1) The Earth is an inverse toroid with magnetic domes at the north and south pole.
2) We live in a snow-globe type enclosure, under one of the 'bowl-magnets' (this would basically be a 'flat earth' environment, within a larger toroid structure.
A few things to note:
1) If the overall toroid structure rotates - this could account for gravity via centrifugal force. If this is the case, I would lean toward the second image being a more likely environment. (If necessary I can expand on this later - I dont want to clutter the opening post)
2) note the central golden coloured sphere - this would likely be the celestial sphere, or what mainstream would have us think of as 'deep space'. This itself, could also rotate.
3) note also the tiny orb in the centre. Quite possibly the source projection of the Sun (and possibly also the moon - more on this later in the crystal ball stuff)
4) There could well be a 23.4 degree tilt involved. Consider the toroid to be tilted 23.4 degrees, and the central orb to then project 'the sun' directly downwards. Hence, its not pointed at the centre of our environment, but towards the tropics. There may be a concentric rotation involved here.
5) This image is just a general illustration. The golden orb doesnt necessarily have to overlap the domes. The toroid sphere could be slightly 'squashed'. If our environment is under a dome, we know its measurements, but the overall toroid could be any size. It may be possible to figure this out.
----------------------
Now, onto some observations with a crystal ball.
So, for whatever reason, I recently decided to buy a 'green crystal quartz ball'. I purchased this on Ebay from a seller in China. It was quite cheap (like $10-15 in USD), but it did take a couple of weeks to arrive.
I played around with it a bit, looking at how it caught and reflected the light and so on, and then I noticed something interesting when looking 'into' it. Behold!
I took a few pictures of this, and this is probably the best one, but it really doesnt do justice to how it looks when you simply hold it up near your eye with a light source behind. The camera doesnt capture the same clarity. Or I am simply rubbish at photography.
Now, the main reason I am sharing this, is not so much because of the bigger light, which quite obviously looks a bit like the Sun. That is simply caused by the ordinary ceiling lightbulb behind it.
I am more interested in the scattering of smaller lights behind it, which look exactly like the stars in the night sky. Now, you may just say that this is simply because of the lightbulb scattering over the curved surface or something like that, and it doesnt mean anything..... well, maybe. Kind of, sort of.
I turned the ball this way and that way, watching the 'stars' twist and turn around. And when you get a feel for how the curves warp the image - they bend more towards the edges, and less towards the middle - I suddenly realised something. The scattered lights/stars formed a kind of pattern of lines, and swirls and whorls. These lights were caused by my fingerprints on the back of the ball. Thats it. Exactly how, or why this is happening, I can't say for sure - but I am 100% certain that the 'star effect' is nothing more than my fingerprint on the back of the ball. So quite possibly what we see in the night sky, is just some kind of material or residue on a dome structure or a spherical something above the dome, either on the inside or out.
While the ball is stationary, you just see a scattering of light. It's only when you turn it and observe how the lights behave around and near the curved edges that you begin to process how they look through the refractive medium, and how they would look without it. I hope I've explained this in terms that make sense.
A while later, I had put the ball down on a paper pad, right below the light bulb, and I was walking past, and I saw something else. Behold!
Now.... I cannot tell you how difficult it was to get this shot. Basically by partially blocking the light source with the camera.
Anyway, this now makes me wonder if it may also explain the moon and its phases.
Consider this picture again:
If we imagine that the tiny green ball in the middle is the source of the sun and moon projection. Suppose it emits a focussed beam of light from the centre. Both upwards and downwards.
The beam downwards comes straight to the dome with full effect, and gives us a blazing hot sun. The beam upwards reflects back off the inside of the golden ball, and then downwards back on to our dome. It has had to travel further, so is not quite as bright and intense. But, due to whatever rotation or motions are taking place, it periodically blocks/obscures itself - which is why we have the cycle of the phases of the moon. IE - sometimes the light partially reflects back on itself, and blocks it from reaching our environment.
A few interesting things to consider.
There may be another dome environment in here with us.
The 'moon' beam, might actually be projecting the other environment to us.
I mentioned in the title that there could be things to experiment with.
If what we see in the sky is through a dome, or spherical structure - I wonder if anyone has tried to 'warp' the image with a picture editor to see if it actually represents something.
It could just be random crap residue on a dome or a sphere. But maybe it is actually a picture of some sort. I dont know much about picture editing, but is there some software you can use to warp a picture with a fish-bowl lens type effect, or vice versa? It would have to have some kind of manual ability to warp it in degrees, since we dont know the distances involved or the refractive indexes. Likewise the same thing could be tried with the moon.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds it a bit strange that the constellations are regarded as animals, and archers and all that kind of stuff.... what if by adjusting the night-sky panorama of stars with a lens effect it really does depict animals and so on. Wouldn't that really be proof of something?
Finally, I wonder if it is worth forwarding any of this ideas on to people are more involved with this topic. Like some of the people with Flat Earth Channels.... or Crow777 since he seems like a bit of a expert on the Moon. I personally dont really get involved in social media. I dont have accounts on youtube or anything like that, but if any other users have contacted these people in the past, maybe you could drop them a link or something?
---------------------------------------
I just remembered one more thing:
Attachments
Last edited:
