Once you deliver those huge rocks, it could be easy with a crane may be. Otherwise anything is easy when we don’t have to do it ourselves, i.e. canals, pyramids, artificial lakes, etc.
Almost all of Siberia and upper Russia is covered in them. They have a different name for them there that I can’t recall at the moment. Many are buried in Ice and Snow. We’re talking places so inhospitable no one has lived there for ages. Many dolmens are above ground. There are many that are unburied though as well. Dating is not something to worry about for me. The archeologists have given us the position of having them dead to rights on their construction. Most are older than the wheel and metal by thousands of years. They then tell us though oh they had some pulleys, shovels and the dug the ground up, pulled the stone over, and dug the dirt back out. Problem is these people according to them didn’t even have the tools for basic farming. So what were they digging with? Their fingernails and hands? Sticks? That’s before we even get into the problem of the stones always coming from miles away. The archeologists have let us back them into a corner so for this I let their dating stand without argument and let them explain to me how any of these explanations make one bit of sense. They never can without then saying that oh they dug with shovels and used leverage and pulleys and logs. But according to them many of these structures predate all of that. It’s a great first step toward breaking down their ridiculous ideas and showing they have no clue.
There we go again throwing thousands of years around. Please provide sources for such information. The way presented, it sounds like a pure speculation.
I don’t worry about the dates when the archeologists tell us something so contradictory that we have them dead to rights. They say these things predate the wheel and metal. The invention of the wheel is 3500 BC. Gobekli Tepe is from 9,000 BC. Many dolmens are from 7-5000 BC. 3000 BC is the first bronze. These are the accepted dates and I don’t have time to source to such well known conventions. Civilization is 4500 BC. So prior to that they say all people were hunter gatherer nomads. That makes a lot of sense, while traveling around scrounging for animals and fruit and nuts, people without the use of metal or knowledge of the wheel were just randomly in their spare time while traveling endlessly building something like this below, 5500 years before civilization.
Well there's a dearth of dlmens here on this island, unless I've managed to avoid them all. Quite probable as I haven't wandered over the entire thing.
I do worry about the dates, and I did when I was creating this forum. As a matter of fact this is one of the reasons why this site exists, and I’m not gonna let it slip into something it was never meant to be.
You’re missing the point. That the archeologists have gotten so silly they are gift wrapping evidence that their dates are massively wrong in one way or another. If you choose to invalidate their ridiculous claims and let them off the hook then that is your choice. I think you miss the big point, that what they are asserting is impossible. It’s like saying man forged metal before the invention of fire. It’s the perfect window of attack to take down their narrative.
I apologize if I missed your point.
I totally get what you’re saying and I completely agree. This place is nice because you do keep things very orderly and on point. Some other boards are a mess and the threads devolve so badly they’re hard to read. I love what you’re doing here to keep that from happening.
I like your argument but I feel like the approach that JD and Korben took in this thread is perhaps more efficient... which is simply asking for how we arrived at these dates in the first place, because as we know, those answers are not inspiring to say the least. You can beg the question with the dates and point out how sequentially certain events don't jive with common sense and within certain debates/discussions that may be the right tact to take to open someone's eyes, but generally speaking, it's better to lop these off at the knees. Academia has gotten away with stories over substance for far too long.
Agreed
the concept was more like convincing for a person (or groups) to become a zealot(s) of some sort,
Wiseup has his version for what it's worth.
BS link, those pictures are from 1960's for a start, they didn't have diesel trucks and cranes "100 years ago" LOL
when was it somewhere else? and, where is this "somewhere else"?
