I have posted this before but not in it's entire format so here it is, well worth the time.
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/VXH7C7ELjOkn/
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/VXH7C7ELjOkn/
Interesting Videos
- Thread starter dreamtime
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2020
- Messages
- 321
- Reaction score
- 316
Part 3 is the best one
I really hope this gets approved, because I have an interesting find: A 1960s cartoon that depicts construction machines destroying an entire city full of old-world architecture. Skip to the end, at the 8:34 mark.
On the surface, this cartoon is about cars, but maybe it's also a truth drop? I find the narrator's choice of words at the end quite fascinating: since this is satire, he refers to the cars as the real Earthlings, and he refers to the humans as parasites who "build huge hives or nests" (and then we are shown the old world buildings). When in fact it's the opposite: we are the real Earthlings, and these machines and their owners are the parasites. So what do we take away from that? Human beings built these structures?
I found this in an unexpected place on reddit, in a subreddit devoted to critiquing modern car infrastructure - a place which has nothing to do with old world architecture.
On the surface, this cartoon is about cars, but maybe it's also a truth drop? I find the narrator's choice of words at the end quite fascinating: since this is satire, he refers to the cars as the real Earthlings, and he refers to the humans as parasites who "build huge hives or nests" (and then we are shown the old world buildings). When in fact it's the opposite: we are the real Earthlings, and these machines and their owners are the parasites. So what do we take away from that? Human beings built these structures?
I found this in an unexpected place on reddit, in a subreddit devoted to critiquing modern car infrastructure - a place which has nothing to do with old world architecture.
Safranek
Core Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
- Messages
- 477
- Reaction score
- 1,572
Here's a documentary by Matt Walsh putting some reality into the Trans Agenda.
What Is A Woman Documentary
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Article: ‘What is a woman?’: the trans film that makes for harrowing viewing | The Spectator Australia
What is a woman? A question like this might seem like a strange premise for a 90-minute documentary. But we live in unusual times when primary school children can answer a question our leading politicians struggle to get to grips with. Matt Walsh’s film shows that ordinary people are often baffled too. His interviewees responded with confusion, obfuscation and prevarication when asked to define the word ‘woman’. A professor of women, gender and sexuality studies at the University of Tennessee was stunned into silence by the slightly harder task: ‘Can you define the word woman without using the word woman?’.
Walsh’s wife at least knew the correct answer. ‘An adult human female’, she replied – as she worked in the kitchen – adding, ‘who needs help opening this (jar)?’ Throughout the film, Walsh’s claim was that sex was real, and sex was what matters when it comes to defining womanhood. But that vignette from his home suggested that gender may also play a part, in Walsh’s life at least.
Walsh’s documentary has gone down badly. His demolition of gender identity ideology – the idea that we all have an innate gender identity – has upset the usual suspects. Rolling Stone magazine quoted the founder of the grandly sounding Trans Student Educational Resources organisation who suggested that ‘to believe what’s in (the film) requires a fantastical hatred of trans people.’
I watched it and I can’t say I agree with the hyperbole. Walsh’s interlocutors might not have been able to answer his question – perhaps because they feared being seen as unkind – but surely trans people like me deserve to be challenged like anyone else? It’s not kind to ignore the contradictions in gender identity ideology if it encourages trans people to build our lives on fantasy.
What Is A Woman Documentary
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Article: ‘What is a woman?’: the trans film that makes for harrowing viewing | The Spectator Australia
What is a woman? A question like this might seem like a strange premise for a 90-minute documentary. But we live in unusual times when primary school children can answer a question our leading politicians struggle to get to grips with. Matt Walsh’s film shows that ordinary people are often baffled too. His interviewees responded with confusion, obfuscation and prevarication when asked to define the word ‘woman’. A professor of women, gender and sexuality studies at the University of Tennessee was stunned into silence by the slightly harder task: ‘Can you define the word woman without using the word woman?’.
Walsh’s wife at least knew the correct answer. ‘An adult human female’, she replied – as she worked in the kitchen – adding, ‘who needs help opening this (jar)?’ Throughout the film, Walsh’s claim was that sex was real, and sex was what matters when it comes to defining womanhood. But that vignette from his home suggested that gender may also play a part, in Walsh’s life at least.
Walsh’s documentary has gone down badly. His demolition of gender identity ideology – the idea that we all have an innate gender identity – has upset the usual suspects. Rolling Stone magazine quoted the founder of the grandly sounding Trans Student Educational Resources organisation who suggested that ‘to believe what’s in (the film) requires a fantastical hatred of trans people.’
I watched it and I can’t say I agree with the hyperbole. Walsh’s interlocutors might not have been able to answer his question – perhaps because they feared being seen as unkind – but surely trans people like me deserve to be challenged like anyone else? It’s not kind to ignore the contradictions in gender identity ideology if it encourages trans people to build our lives on fantasy.
D
Deleted member 37
Guest
I watched it some days ago and I am on Walsh side for many reasons. But something is quite off for me, as always in these cases:
I'm sure the people interviewed already knew who Walsh is and who/what he represents. These hair-coloured people are always attacking everyone who disagrees with them using social-media (twitter first and foremost). So how could he manage to obtain such interviews? These people for sure signed some agreement for the use of their image. Why did they do that, if they are always on a crusade against people like Walsh?
The leftists are using propaganda in all occasions and they use it in various videos on tv and the web. Why are they so relaxed and even enjoying the interview and Walsh's humour, in some cases? Do they realise their image will be manipulated to benefit their enemies? How can they be unaware if they use this propaganda 24/7?
And last but not least the quality and production of this video is excellent. Too good to be something coming out of 'We The People'.
Last edited by a moderator:
Safranek
Core Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
- Messages
- 477
- Reaction score
- 1,572
I was thinking the exact same while watching the interviews. Money could be a motivating factor in some cases.
Once again, hiring the right person to do the job would yield this result.
Overall, the effect of the video makes the LGBTQREGBCD+ community look bad, hence the negative response from that community.
It is possible that he's another Jordan Peterson in the form of controlled opposition of course.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpo_UkZ2CW8&feature=youtu.be
Jason Breshears newest video which he says ties up many conspiracy theorists and researchers of today as far as why chronology is wrong.
"Exploring a Massive Kirkbride Asylum - Amazing 19th Century Architecture" - by The Proper People
View: https://youtu.be/Qbxb8O-DWM4?t=946
I was slightly taken aback at 15:46, when the hallway they're exploring bears an uncanny resemblance to hallways I've walked through in my high school, and my local universities. Some of the big, empty rooms shown look like they could be lecture halls/science labs. If these mental asylum walls just had a fresh coat of paint, there would be no difference between the mental asylum and the university.
The second mindblow for me happens when they show actual classrooms inside the mental asylum, with those little desks designed for elementary school students. Even having spent time in the stolenhistory community, seeing this was a real eye-opener. Mental institutions, homeless shelters, schools, universities - it seems they're all cut from the same cloth.
------------------------
[Part 2 of post - I know we're not supposed to discuss the videos at length in this thread, but 2 of my posts got merged to avoid spam.]
A few more notes on the soulless places in which humans have been confined..
My points in this part are probably obvious, but I hope to offer at least one fresh idea (hopefully). Starting off with insane asylums/psychiatric institutions as an example, namely the interiors: Psych hospitals are infamous for being barren and soulless, inspiring many works of fiction.
They've scrubbed down one of our ornate old world fire places and turned it into the above, clearly trying to make everything as barren as possible. The idea of a highly organized institution confining people to such blandness reminds me of the CIA's use of white room torture, which is probably not a new technique. Yet another way these psychiatric hospitals were trying to destroy peoples' minds.
But we all know what psych wards look like. What intrigues me is that nearly every basic apartment building in North America looks quite similar to the above photos, on the inside (minus the fireplace). However, on the outside, they tend to be even uglier than mental institutions. The abandoned asylum those guys are exploring still looks like a castle.
I'm not claiming that psychiatric institutions and apartment buildings were erected at the same time simultaneously (although some of them could have been?), but it feels like apartments in North America took a bit of inspiration from psych wards, or perhaps prisons. Apartments that we're required to pay for, that we're expected to live in, inspired by psych hospitals.. I find that a tad disturbing and cruel, and if there's any truth there, it points to the prison-like nature of the society our controllers have confined us in. It's like they've carefully crafted a cold and bleak zoo for us. If we want a glimpse of what future they have planned for us, perhaps we need not look further than the inside of a mental asylum: an eternal hell of blandness and emptiness.
(To be fair, it's not just apartment buildings that have soulless interiors. Lots of buildings are designed this way on the inside. Libraries for example.)
These are two apartment buildings my family and I have been living in here in Canada, for several years. I find the features.. interesting, let's say that. Strikingly cubic forms. Monotone, bland color. Small square windows, lined up in neat rows. No arches, just sharp corners and edges. Again, I'm reminded of prisons and mental hospitals, speaking from a purely aesthetic point of view. These buildings are 99% sure to be new constructions, as opposed to old world buildings which have been scrubbed down. But I've wondered, do any examples exist of modern buildings which are actually old world buildings in disguise?
View: https://youtu.be/Qbxb8O-DWM4?t=946
I was slightly taken aback at 15:46, when the hallway they're exploring bears an uncanny resemblance to hallways I've walked through in my high school, and my local universities. Some of the big, empty rooms shown look like they could be lecture halls/science labs. If these mental asylum walls just had a fresh coat of paint, there would be no difference between the mental asylum and the university.
The second mindblow for me happens when they show actual classrooms inside the mental asylum, with those little desks designed for elementary school students. Even having spent time in the stolenhistory community, seeing this was a real eye-opener. Mental institutions, homeless shelters, schools, universities - it seems they're all cut from the same cloth.
------------------------
[Part 2 of post - I know we're not supposed to discuss the videos at length in this thread, but 2 of my posts got merged to avoid spam.]
A few more notes on the soulless places in which humans have been confined..
My points in this part are probably obvious, but I hope to offer at least one fresh idea (hopefully). Starting off with insane asylums/psychiatric institutions as an example, namely the interiors: Psych hospitals are infamous for being barren and soulless, inspiring many works of fiction.
They've scrubbed down one of our ornate old world fire places and turned it into the above, clearly trying to make everything as barren as possible. The idea of a highly organized institution confining people to such blandness reminds me of the CIA's use of white room torture, which is probably not a new technique. Yet another way these psychiatric hospitals were trying to destroy peoples' minds.
But we all know what psych wards look like. What intrigues me is that nearly every basic apartment building in North America looks quite similar to the above photos, on the inside (minus the fireplace). However, on the outside, they tend to be even uglier than mental institutions. The abandoned asylum those guys are exploring still looks like a castle.
I'm not claiming that psychiatric institutions and apartment buildings were erected at the same time simultaneously (although some of them could have been?), but it feels like apartments in North America took a bit of inspiration from psych wards, or perhaps prisons. Apartments that we're required to pay for, that we're expected to live in, inspired by psych hospitals.. I find that a tad disturbing and cruel, and if there's any truth there, it points to the prison-like nature of the society our controllers have confined us in. It's like they've carefully crafted a cold and bleak zoo for us. If we want a glimpse of what future they have planned for us, perhaps we need not look further than the inside of a mental asylum: an eternal hell of blandness and emptiness.
(To be fair, it's not just apartment buildings that have soulless interiors. Lots of buildings are designed this way on the inside. Libraries for example.)
These are two apartment buildings my family and I have been living in here in Canada, for several years. I find the features.. interesting, let's say that. Strikingly cubic forms. Monotone, bland color. Small square windows, lined up in neat rows. No arches, just sharp corners and edges. Again, I'm reminded of prisons and mental hospitals, speaking from a purely aesthetic point of view. These buildings are 99% sure to be new constructions, as opposed to old world buildings which have been scrubbed down. But I've wondered, do any examples exist of modern buildings which are actually old world buildings in disguise?
Last edited:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcUitBbwevQ&ab_channel=VASILIS
Has anyone seen something like this before? Controllers trying to pass off a carboard cutout of a building as the real thing? Might've fooled someone who was forced into an asylum and just got their lobotomy (joke).
Last edited:
Sharing a video I found on happenstance, depicting the Tunguska expedition
View: https://youtu.be/fCobkxLAm_U
please notice 3:12
I assume the readers here are familiar with the 1xxx and ixxx deception, this video suggests there is a high possibility that the old way of writing i-xxx was still in use in (some areas of) Russia up to early 20th century
View: https://youtu.be/fCobkxLAm_U
please notice 3:12
I assume the readers here are familiar with the 1xxx and ixxx deception, this video suggests there is a high possibility that the old way of writing i-xxx was still in use in (some areas of) Russia up to early 20th century
busy.baci
Deleted
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2022
- Messages
- 346
- Reaction score
- 719
busy.baci
Deleted
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2022
- Messages
- 346
- Reaction score
- 719
I've always liked the work of Ludwig Boltzmann. I've read his work a dozen years ago, his thought process is amazing from a physics perspective. What he really did was to brainstorm and simulate dynamics of particles exposed to thermodynamics laws in an enclosed and very specific environment. The laws of Entropy are some of the most thought provoking ideas for me in relation to a guided creation, especially the thought experiments notoriously known as: the Boltzmann's brains, the arrow of time, the increase of entropy even if time is defined as a scalar force and might go backwards.
Remember the film "Tenet"? It was based on the laws of entropy from Boltzmann's equation intertwined into a single reality which includes negative and positive entropy, meaning both time arrows could coexist going in totally opposite directions in the same enclosed environment. How about that?
Remember the film "Tenet"? It was based on the laws of entropy from Boltzmann's equation intertwined into a single reality which includes negative and positive entropy, meaning both time arrows could coexist going in totally opposite directions in the same enclosed environment. How about that?
View: https://youtu.be/551S5Kkq8yQ
This is a good video for general public, too bad very few new chronolgists are making good videos. But this one is worth it and its also somewhat shareable.
(PS. Use the autotranslate to english subtitles if needed.)
Same thing with “2000 mules” I reckon - a form of manufactured discontent, so that people will be focusing on things like the gender agenda rather than, say, the inflation
*
this is an interesting channel that got recommended to me on YT
View: https://youtu.be/exTSP163sRg
D
Deleted member 37
Guest
It seems the Thunderbolts Project has finally opened to recentism. In particular to Heinsohn's recentism, since he is a 'Velikovskian' as much as Thornhill and Talbott. I remember the discussions on their website where they absolutely refused this approach and had nothing but complains when hearing Fomenko's name. I bet they still are not going to discuss Fomenko though, since these academicians, even when outside academias, are always fighting each other.
Good news though. Here the video:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox1vGJLL8MI
Good news though. Here the video:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox1vGJLL8MI
Very good indeed. They also used Total War music, which is even better!
Last edited by a moderator:
"The Christianity Psyop Exposed"
w/ Adam Green & Charles Giuliani
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OrY54WX3ymdc/
w/ Adam Green & Charles Giuliani
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OrY54WX3ymdc/
The sequel to the french recentisme / "Chronology 2.0"
Chronology 2.1 (almost 2 hours)
(As always turn on english subtitles if needed)
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mE3GlCCGytM
Chronology 2.1 (almost 2 hours)
(As always turn on english subtitles if needed)
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mE3GlCCGytM
D
Deleted member 37
Guest
Is it just me or the subtitles here are slightly worse than the previous one? In any case amazing video again.
Safranek
Core Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
- Messages
- 477
- Reaction score
- 1,572
The subtitles seem fine to me and yes, I agree its a 'must watch' video for those interested in chronology. I especially like the ending in this one.
D
Deleted member 37
Guest
Here the other one: Interesting Videos
Similar threads
