Your thread your rules. No point me taking any further part in it.
Lost New Orleans
- Thread starter Frostychud
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 1,934
JD, I appreciate your participation and invite you to continue. Without your skeptical eye, I would still be embarrassing myself by hawking that smelting stack as a victory column (even if I still suspect with Trismegistus that it might be older than claimed). I just want to make sure the focus of the thread remains the big picture...
Great info...interested in hearing about what you have w/ the JFK Assassination-Nola connections...from what I understand Nola mob boss Carlos Marcello was very involved in the assassination and had connections to Oswald and Ruby...working on part of that myself with a little research I'm doing trying to tie together European events during the mid-1800s and how that tied into New Orleans migrations and Mafia origins
All I was doing was pointing out things I know to be correct. I know the chimney was a chimney and I know the fountains workings make sense from my 18 years spent learning and practising plumbing.
The location of the fountain seems odd but its construction and operation do not. You will note I do not comment on most of your posts and observations/claims for the simple reason I dont actually know very much and adding speculation though fun does muddy the waters to the point we end up doing the academics job for them.
Edit to add
The fountain and will keep it brief.
It was located where it was because;
From here Walking on Neutral Ground: New Orleans' Unique Landscape Feature | Smart Cities Dive
The man whose name is said to have been given the permission of the city to erect it is
Jackson Ogden Belknap.
He was born in Alabama and designed and sold flags.
From here Jackson Belknap - Mobile flag maker
It was primarily an advertising kiosk;
From here Iron fountain was the star of the 1870s Canal Street neutral ground, but its fate is a mystery
I don't know and didn't find any other connection between Jackson and New Orleans.
Its was considerably smaller in stature than the drawing in the newspaper suggests it was.
Last edited:
EvilNTT
Member
The biggest thing I have come across so far is Oswald working with David Ferrie, Mary Sherman and Alton Ochsner. Alton is the guy our whole massive hospital system was founded by. He was researching how to weaponize cancer for the government. He was flown to treat Juan Peron in Argentina in the 50s to treat an injury. You have CIA spooks, Marcello's mob owned businesses, Jack Ruby's hookers, Oswald fresh back from the Soviet Union with his Russian wife and Doctors at Tulane running a secret side gig growing cancer cells on mice out of apartments. It gets wild. I live amongst all of these locations. Right on Camp St. downtown, blocks from Lafayette Square, Reily Coffee, Clay Shaw's office, etc.
Helgarolfe
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2023
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 1
Is it possible that these grand buildings were able to be built because of slave labor? And that New Orleans may have been the wealthiest city in the USA because it was a port city and hub of the global cotton market? Weren't there lots of millionaires at the time? I'm new here so my brain is still very attached to the common historical narrative. But still, compelling article. Curious how so many grand palatial buildings keep burning down and falling apart in 30 to 60 years. My house is 120 years old and solid...just wood.
Definitely want to know more about the Tulane doctor mice cancer experiments!
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 1,934
PART 7 bis: WATERWORKS, OGDEN, BELKNAP, ADDENDA
It's just a drawing, and who knows when it dates from, but it corresponds to the photos as far as I can tell. Here we can see more clearly that the building attached to the facade is completely mismatched. Now, it's possible that the developers blew their entire budget on the facade to impress the people on the street, which as you point out is still common practice today, but the mismatch appears too great. They didn't even bother lining the roof up with the top of the facade. Or even with the frieze. I find it very difficult to believe that the facade and the building behind it were constructed together.
The article paints him as an outsider, but doesn't explicitly say that his ancestors were not here in 1803. Twilight language, the art of lying without lying. My guess is that you have to be descended from Resetters to get an invite. Why else would family seniority be so important? Maybe Ogden is an old spook family with ties to New Orleans.
Your response has made me curious about the state of waterworks in New Orleans. At the following article I found this photo of the 1813 waterworks, supposedly designed by Benjamin Latrobe, the guy who designed the United States Capitol Building:
Were they really putting ornate Greek porticos and columns on utility buildings in 1813, when New Orleans was still supposed to be basically a small city struggling in the swamp?
Latrobe spent the later years of his life in New Orleans, Louisiana working on a waterworks project, and died there in 1820 from yellow fever.
Is it more likely that the architect who designed the most iconic building in the United States would demote himself to podunk New Orleans to spend a decade building a small provincial waterworks, or that he was there to supervise and direct the reconstruction of the city and the waterworks was his cover?
Although this image of his waterworks appears on an 1815 map, they seem to be saying that it was never actually built. However, the image says "Fire Pump in the year 1813". Also, the accent on the E in "année" is backwards, which is a mistake that NO native French speaker would make. There's a missing apostrophe as well.
New Orleans Waterworks
Here's that 1815 map:
Here's a link to a high-resolution version:
https://tile.loc.gov/image-services...014:g4014n:ct000684/full/pct:25/0/default.jpg
(I think the map is suspicious. This thing could have been forged quite easily. Campanella refers to it.)
ADDED: Just to give you an idea of how easy it is to alter or forge these old maps at any point in time, here's another version of it I found online:
Look closely at the church at the top. They added a tower! Here's what the description of the map says:
"Jacques Tanesse’s Plan of New Orleans" - 1825 illustrated map of New Orleans. This was actually a reprinting of a map from a decade earlier with some additions, notably the temporary triumphal arch illustrated at bottom center which was erected in the Place d'Armes to celebrate the visit to the city of General Lafayette, and the central tower added to the Cathedral since the earlier illustration.
It was temporary, huh? Why would they add the arch and change the cathedral but not update the map in any other way? It doesn't make sense.
Anyway, this story may or may not be true, but either way it illustrates how easy it is to tamper with documents.
Check this out:
The system was seized after Latrobe's death to pay the debts of Latrobe and his waterworks company. It was bought by the city on May 26, 1821 for $10,000, and they sent local engineer Francis B. Ogden and William W. Montgomery, a council member and local merchant, to Philadelphia to buy pipe and other materials to finish the works. The system began working sometime in 1823, but never proved satisfactory. The pumphouse was abandoned and demolished in 1838 after new water works came on line. The maps below show Latrobe's water works and the 1836 pumping plant and reservoir built by the Commercial Bank of New Orleans.
That is Ogden #3. The coincidence is too great for me. Someone named Ogden was already involved with waterworks back in 1821. Generational spooks. Overseeing the rebuilding of New Orleans. That's how the current deceiver got his Mardi Gras Krewe invitation.
ADDED: digging deeper on the name Belknap, I found this spooky character:
William W. Belknap - Wikipedia
At his Wikipedia article we read this:
After Atlanta was taken by the Union Army, Belknap accompanied Maj. Gen. Sherman on his March to the Sea.
And this:
From October 8 to October 10, 1871, a devastating fire burned and destroyed much of Chicago, killing hundreds of people and causing $200,000,000 (nearly $4 billion in 2018) in damages. Over 100,000 citizens were left destitute and homeless.[62] Belknap took prompt action on October 9, ordering food sent from St. Louis, tents from Jefferson Barracks, and two companies of troops from Fort Omaha to help keep peace and order.[62] On October 10, Belknap in writing a dispatch to Lt. General Philip Sheridan stated that the fire was "...a national calamity. The sufferers have the sincere sympathy of the nation."[62] Belknap ordered military officers around the nation to send supplies to Chicago "liberally and promptly".[62] In his Annual Report to President Grant in December 1871, Belknap praised the War Department for the efficiency of operations in aiding the homeless and destitute of the Chicago Fire within hours of notification, while the fire was still in progress.[63] Belknap also praised Sheridan and the several companies of troops under his command for keeping law and order in the ruined city.[63]
So Belknap, who was Secretary of War from 1869 to 1876, in other words during the timeline of the fountain, was a top Resetter involved with both the Sherman's March to the Sea architectural demolition psyop and the similar 1871 Chicago Fire psyop. He was also a big player in Reconstruction. It seems more likely to me that the fountain was named or nicknamed after this highly visible character and the flagmaker was inserted later to break the connection for some reason.
Digging deeper, this guy was heavily involved in the destruction of pre-Reset relics:
In 1873, the construction of the Americas' first steel arched bridge, named after James B. Eads, was nearing completion in St. Louis.[73] Belknap, under influence from the Keokuk Packet steamliner company, was opposed to its completion. He desired that the bridge be torn down, so steamers would not have to lower their smokestacks to sail under it.[73] (...) Belknap argued that according to federal law, the Secretary of War had the authority to prevent obstruction of the Mississippi River.[74] In response, Grant reminded Belknap that Congress had authorized the construction of the bridge,[74] and that Congress would probably not authorize money to tear it down. He overruled Belknap's decision, and told Belknap in person, "You certainly cannot destroy this structure on your own authority...General, you had better drop this case."[75] Belknap was embarrassed, stood up blushing, bowed to President Grant, and left the meeting.[75] The Eads Bridge was completed in 1874 and is still in active use today.[76]
The Eads Bridge looks like a perfect candidate for investigation here. My guess is that the huge stone piles are pre-Reset and the steel span is what was being built. Were there two factions in the government, one which wanted to repurpose the old infrastructure and one which wanted to get rid of it all? He desired that the bridge be torn down, so steamers would not have to lower their smokestacks to sail under it. This is laughable. He desired that it be torn down because it was Old World. Belknap seemed to be of the opinion that ALL pre-Reset remnants had to be destroyed. More on that in Part Eight.
In 1872, photographer Mathew Brady went bankrupt; his possessions, including photographs and negatives, were sold to satisfy creditors.[77] In 1874, the owner of a warehouse in New York City offered a set of over 2,000 Brady negatives for sale; Belknap authorized their purchase for $2,500.[78] The negatives were not packed or transported with care, and by the time the War Department took possession, about one-third of them were damaged or destroyed.[78]
As a result of Belknap's initiative, the War Department acquired over 6,000 images of the Civil War era, including photos of prominent military and government officials, battlefields, and defensive works.[79] This collection was subsequently combined with other collections of Brady photos which were purchased by the federal government; they were later catalogued, and are maintained by the National Archives and Records Administration and the Library of Congress.[80]
So this guy was ALSO involved in the staged and fake Matthew Brady photo psyop! He may even have directed it.
The wooden staging, the double hidden hand, the creepy Resetter watching everything from the corner, the benchwarmer Lincoln stand-in who doesn't even look like the main actor...of course it makes sense that the guy who tore everything down (Belknap) would also be involved with the fake coverup stories and photos.
Otto Didactic demolishes this photo in his paper, "Matthew Brady is a Fake-Ass Bitch":
Abe Lincoln and the Fake Founding Fathers
I will stop with Belknap here as it takes us too far afield, but do read his incredible Wikipedia entry. He deserves his own thread.
Latrobe is probably worth checking out.
too.
ADDED: I dug a little deeper on that arch added to the map. Supposedly it was built in 1825 to welcome General Lafayette, another probable ghost. Here's a drawing of it:
Here's an article about it by the same guy who wrote the article about the fountain:
When Lafayette visited New Orleans in 1825: A remembrance in time for July Fourth
Out front, on the Place d’Armes — remember, this was 26 years before it was renamed Jackson Square — was erected a massive triumphal arch “of admirable architecture and excellent design,” as Lafayette’s secretary, Andre-Nicholas Levasseur, would later describe it.
Designed by city engineer Joseph Pilié, it was built on a wooden frame and covered with canvas, but it didn’t look like canvas, thanks to the convincing work of Antonio Fogliardi, then among the city’s leading theatrical scene painters, who made it look like stone.
So it was made out of painted canvas. Got it. But wait, if it was only a temporary structure made of canvas, why was it added to that 1825 update of the 1815 map? Another contradiction. The story of Lafayette's visit is all gussied up with the usual stupid color details that tell me the spook scriptwriters are having a good laugh. Lafayette moves into the Cabildo. An old woman offers to wash his underwear. Who knows, maybe it's true.
Looking more closely at Jackson Square, I found the following two images from this article at the Historic New Orleans Collection (a serious archive):
This is the cathedral as it appears today. The photograph is dated "1850 or 1851". Compare it to the following image from the same article:
This drawing is dated...1856. Oops, wrong cathedral. Here's what the article has to say about that:
A newspaper illustration depicts a crowd at the inauguration of the Andrew Jackson statue on February 9, 1856. However, several of the details of the drawing are innacurate, such as St. Louis Cathedral, which is shown as it would have appeared in the 1840s, rather than with the new facade and towers dating from 1850 and after. The Pontalba buildings, built in the late 1840s, are also left out. (THNOC, bequest of Boyd Cruise and Harold Schilke, 1989.79.16.4)
A brief history of Jackson Square: from a soldier's stomping ground to tourist attraction | The Historic New Orleans Collection
I love the way they just run past this. This image appeared in the local newspaper. They’re saying the newspaper illustrator just forgot the old cathedral had been torn down a decade earlier.
Unbelievable mockery. They show us to our face that they are lying and don't even respect us enough to give us a plausible explanation for this impossible error. They don’t even bother giving us an implausible one.
I will begin to hit the Civil War in Part Eight, coming soon.
Yes. Here's another image of the Toulouse Street Bank from Part Six:
That may be. We don't have an image or diagram of the fountain itself inside the ornate gazebo. It had to be quite small in any case, barely bigger than a birdbath. I have a hard time imagining people crowding around to watch a dinky little mechanism. I mean, fountains are not that exciting, people have seen them before. As an advertising concept a regular fountain is pretty lame. It had to be something more special than that. I also find myself wondering where the water was pumped from. This is in the middle of the broadest street in America in 1870. What was the state of plumbing in New Orleans then? Is it possible that there was no pipe and the fountain was entirely powered by the gazebo? It's also strange that September, 1870 is one of only two months between 1860 and 1880 for which Times Picayune archives are completely unavailable online (the other is June, 1864).
I checked this guy out online, almost no information. It's always possible that he's just a ghost name attached to the fountain and that it was put up by other people. There's a museum in New Orleans called the Ogden Museum of Southern Art, in an old brick building, run by a rich "philanthropist" named Ogden. In an interview online we see this:
Your response has made me curious about the state of waterworks in New Orleans. At the following article I found this photo of the 1813 waterworks, supposedly designed by Benjamin Latrobe, the guy who designed the United States Capitol Building:
Latrobe spent the later years of his life in New Orleans, Louisiana working on a waterworks project, and died there in 1820 from yellow fever.
Is it more likely that the architect who designed the most iconic building in the United States would demote himself to podunk New Orleans to spend a decade building a small provincial waterworks, or that he was there to supervise and direct the reconstruction of the city and the waterworks was his cover?
Although this image of his waterworks appears on an 1815 map, they seem to be saying that it was never actually built. However, the image says "Fire Pump in the year 1813". Also, the accent on the E in "année" is backwards, which is a mistake that NO native French speaker would make. There's a missing apostrophe as well.
New Orleans Waterworks
Here's that 1815 map:
https://tile.loc.gov/image-services...014:g4014n:ct000684/full/pct:25/0/default.jpg
(I think the map is suspicious. This thing could have been forged quite easily. Campanella refers to it.)
ADDED: Just to give you an idea of how easy it is to alter or forge these old maps at any point in time, here's another version of it I found online:
"Jacques Tanesse’s Plan of New Orleans" - 1825 illustrated map of New Orleans. This was actually a reprinting of a map from a decade earlier with some additions, notably the temporary triumphal arch illustrated at bottom center which was erected in the Place d'Armes to celebrate the visit to the city of General Lafayette, and the central tower added to the Cathedral since the earlier illustration.
It was temporary, huh? Why would they add the arch and change the cathedral but not update the map in any other way? It doesn't make sense.
Anyway, this story may or may not be true, but either way it illustrates how easy it is to tamper with documents.
Check this out:
The system was seized after Latrobe's death to pay the debts of Latrobe and his waterworks company. It was bought by the city on May 26, 1821 for $10,000, and they sent local engineer Francis B. Ogden and William W. Montgomery, a council member and local merchant, to Philadelphia to buy pipe and other materials to finish the works. The system began working sometime in 1823, but never proved satisfactory. The pumphouse was abandoned and demolished in 1838 after new water works came on line. The maps below show Latrobe's water works and the 1836 pumping plant and reservoir built by the Commercial Bank of New Orleans.
That is Ogden #3. The coincidence is too great for me. Someone named Ogden was already involved with waterworks back in 1821. Generational spooks. Overseeing the rebuilding of New Orleans. That's how the current deceiver got his Mardi Gras Krewe invitation.
ADDED: digging deeper on the name Belknap, I found this spooky character:
William W. Belknap - Wikipedia
At his Wikipedia article we read this:
After Atlanta was taken by the Union Army, Belknap accompanied Maj. Gen. Sherman on his March to the Sea.
And this:
From October 8 to October 10, 1871, a devastating fire burned and destroyed much of Chicago, killing hundreds of people and causing $200,000,000 (nearly $4 billion in 2018) in damages. Over 100,000 citizens were left destitute and homeless.[62] Belknap took prompt action on October 9, ordering food sent from St. Louis, tents from Jefferson Barracks, and two companies of troops from Fort Omaha to help keep peace and order.[62] On October 10, Belknap in writing a dispatch to Lt. General Philip Sheridan stated that the fire was "...a national calamity. The sufferers have the sincere sympathy of the nation."[62] Belknap ordered military officers around the nation to send supplies to Chicago "liberally and promptly".[62] In his Annual Report to President Grant in December 1871, Belknap praised the War Department for the efficiency of operations in aiding the homeless and destitute of the Chicago Fire within hours of notification, while the fire was still in progress.[63] Belknap also praised Sheridan and the several companies of troops under his command for keeping law and order in the ruined city.[63]
So Belknap, who was Secretary of War from 1869 to 1876, in other words during the timeline of the fountain, was a top Resetter involved with both the Sherman's March to the Sea architectural demolition psyop and the similar 1871 Chicago Fire psyop. He was also a big player in Reconstruction. It seems more likely to me that the fountain was named or nicknamed after this highly visible character and the flagmaker was inserted later to break the connection for some reason.
Digging deeper, this guy was heavily involved in the destruction of pre-Reset relics:
In 1873, the construction of the Americas' first steel arched bridge, named after James B. Eads, was nearing completion in St. Louis.[73] Belknap, under influence from the Keokuk Packet steamliner company, was opposed to its completion. He desired that the bridge be torn down, so steamers would not have to lower their smokestacks to sail under it.[73] (...) Belknap argued that according to federal law, the Secretary of War had the authority to prevent obstruction of the Mississippi River.[74] In response, Grant reminded Belknap that Congress had authorized the construction of the bridge,[74] and that Congress would probably not authorize money to tear it down. He overruled Belknap's decision, and told Belknap in person, "You certainly cannot destroy this structure on your own authority...General, you had better drop this case."[75] Belknap was embarrassed, stood up blushing, bowed to President Grant, and left the meeting.[75] The Eads Bridge was completed in 1874 and is still in active use today.[76]
In 1872, photographer Mathew Brady went bankrupt; his possessions, including photographs and negatives, were sold to satisfy creditors.[77] In 1874, the owner of a warehouse in New York City offered a set of over 2,000 Brady negatives for sale; Belknap authorized their purchase for $2,500.[78] The negatives were not packed or transported with care, and by the time the War Department took possession, about one-third of them were damaged or destroyed.[78]
As a result of Belknap's initiative, the War Department acquired over 6,000 images of the Civil War era, including photos of prominent military and government officials, battlefields, and defensive works.[79] This collection was subsequently combined with other collections of Brady photos which were purchased by the federal government; they were later catalogued, and are maintained by the National Archives and Records Administration and the Library of Congress.[80]
So this guy was ALSO involved in the staged and fake Matthew Brady photo psyop! He may even have directed it.
Otto Didactic demolishes this photo in his paper, "Matthew Brady is a Fake-Ass Bitch":
Abe Lincoln and the Fake Founding Fathers
I will stop with Belknap here as it takes us too far afield, but do read his incredible Wikipedia entry. He deserves his own thread.
Latrobe is probably worth checking out.
too.
ADDED: I dug a little deeper on that arch added to the map. Supposedly it was built in 1825 to welcome General Lafayette, another probable ghost. Here's a drawing of it:
When Lafayette visited New Orleans in 1825: A remembrance in time for July Fourth
Out front, on the Place d’Armes — remember, this was 26 years before it was renamed Jackson Square — was erected a massive triumphal arch “of admirable architecture and excellent design,” as Lafayette’s secretary, Andre-Nicholas Levasseur, would later describe it.
Designed by city engineer Joseph Pilié, it was built on a wooden frame and covered with canvas, but it didn’t look like canvas, thanks to the convincing work of Antonio Fogliardi, then among the city’s leading theatrical scene painters, who made it look like stone.
So it was made out of painted canvas. Got it. But wait, if it was only a temporary structure made of canvas, why was it added to that 1825 update of the 1815 map? Another contradiction. The story of Lafayette's visit is all gussied up with the usual stupid color details that tell me the spook scriptwriters are having a good laugh. Lafayette moves into the Cabildo. An old woman offers to wash his underwear. Who knows, maybe it's true.
Looking more closely at Jackson Square, I found the following two images from this article at the Historic New Orleans Collection (a serious archive):
A newspaper illustration depicts a crowd at the inauguration of the Andrew Jackson statue on February 9, 1856. However, several of the details of the drawing are innacurate, such as St. Louis Cathedral, which is shown as it would have appeared in the 1840s, rather than with the new facade and towers dating from 1850 and after. The Pontalba buildings, built in the late 1840s, are also left out. (THNOC, bequest of Boyd Cruise and Harold Schilke, 1989.79.16.4)
A brief history of Jackson Square: from a soldier's stomping ground to tourist attraction | The Historic New Orleans Collection
I love the way they just run past this. This image appeared in the local newspaper. They’re saying the newspaper illustrator just forgot the old cathedral had been torn down a decade earlier.
Unbelievable mockery. They show us to our face that they are lying and don't even respect us enough to give us a plausible explanation for this impossible error. They don’t even bother giving us an implausible one.
I will begin to hit the Civil War in Part Eight, coming soon.
Last edited:
If you don't mind.
You are more au fait with the street layout of New Orleans than I so could you please point me in the direction of the map that covers canal street. I don't even know which volume to look at!
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps | Tulane University Digital Library
You are more au fait with the street layout of New Orleans than I so could you please point me in the direction of the map that covers canal street. I don't even know which volume to look at!
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps | Tulane University Digital Library
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 1,934
Volume 2, sheets 29 and 30
Cheers, much appreciated.
Belknap was a crook plain and simple and I agree further investigation of him is too distracting. As for Mathew Brady. His card was marked in this thread from the archive.
SH Archive - Is General Robert E. Lee dead in this 1865 photo?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 1,934
PART EIGHT: NORMAN’S NEW ORLEANS AND ENVIRONS
In today's installment I will change my approach again. Everyone who has read this far has seen what New Orleans used to look like. There will be more words than images today.
Let me start by citing a comment left in 2018 by PrincepAugus from the old SH site:
The American Civil War was an actual civil war, but rather than what we've been told to about the Northern Union states vs. the Confederate South over state rights and slavery, it was a war of a free nation of some sort, probably related to the Old order, against the "Federals" Which I think is some kind of imperial name than a nation-state name. The Confederate "Antebellum architecture" and way of life was the real issue to be erased by a worldwide history-erasing operation going on in this "WWII" at this time. After the war ended and Abraham Lincoln was crowned the "fasci" ruler, the victors started to make wax figures and sets to not only cover up real history, but also to humiliate the so-called "Confederates".
KorbenDallas thinks the global wars of the 1850-1870 period could be considered World War 3, with the "Napoleonic" wars being WW2 and the wars of the 1770's being WW1.
My research into New Orleans so far suggests something like this. The very speculative hypothesis I would like to advance at this point is roughly as follows:
New Orleans was an important city in pre-Reset North America. It was destroyed in a war sometime around 1800, perhaps in 1815 during the Battle of New Orleans. For the next fifty years, the city was fixed up and prepped for repopulation. I imagine that Resetters came and went constantly during this time, guiding the operation. There must have been a crew of supervisors coming and going from Washington, people like Latrobe, Ogden, and Montgomery, as well as an administrative body living in New Orleans. I suspect the French Quarter was their headquarters, but most of the work was taking place across Canal Street. Perhaps illiterate African slaves were used for manual labor. After all, who would listen to anything they might have to say afterwards? At the end of the “Civil War”, which I put in quotations because I think the story we are told is a coverup for the final stage of preparation, the city was finally ready to be launched. Now that the original military operation of prepping the city was finished, the slaves brought over by the Anglo resetters from Africa to do the dirty work could be “freed” (transitioned to classic economic slavery). I believe that New Orleans history transitions from scripted to real at this point. Or, to be more precise, the history of New Orleans is mostly fake before 1803, and mostly real but heavily edited from 1803 to 1865. In 1867, New Orleans has its cotillion at the Paris World Exposition. Spook photographer Theodore Lilienthal prepares 150 high-quality photos of the recently renovated city for the Emperor Napoleon III.
I promised some “empty city” marketing photos, here are a couple:
I suggested in Part Seven that Tulane/MIT spook (I assume he’s a spook) Gary Van Zante might have forged these photos, supposedly found in a vault in Switzerland in 2000. I now think it’s more probable that the photos were already pasteups in 1867 and Van Zante’s job was just to update the photo trickery using modern techniques. Remember, these photos were taken to convince investors in Paris in 1867 to put their money in New Orleans. None of these people would ever see the city themselves. I suspect that in 1867 the average level of visual literacy concerning photographs was very low, and it must have been easy to pass off crude pasteups as real images.
Hypothesis: each Reset city was run by a different group of venture capitalists/speculators who competed with each other to attract immigration and investment from the European powers. These are the mystery men posing in top hats in all those photos of ruined cities we find. They are the men paying for the cities to be rebuilt, hoping to get a big return on their investment. Were the European World’s Fairs of the era like today’s trade shows, where startups advertise their products and companies to potential investors? All the major European leaders were present at the 1867 World’s Fair. I can imagine them meeting in private with different groups of entrepreneurs hawking the next crop of “new” Southern and Western spec cities after the first successful wave of East Coast colonization. I can imagine deals being made in which kings and emperors sell X number of serfs and skilled laborers to the Resetters for repopulation. Poland and Germany “bought” Chicago, Sweden “bought” Minnesota, France and Italy “bought” New Orleans, etc. The entrepreneurs must have put a lot of time and money into getting their PR packages ready. Part of that would be glossy photographic brochures and part of it would be written marketing propaganda. One of the selling points would probably be the degree to which the entrepreneurs could demonstrate their mastery of spycraft and spookery. I can imagine different groups of Resetters meeting up after hours and swapping tips. I can imagine the Japan crew and the New Orleans crew comparing notes over drinks and making deals of their own.
(Actually we have a famous spook who sold both New Orleans and Japan – I am talking about Lafcadio Hearn.)
The Resetters were privateers. Conquer a city, exterminate, enslave, and/or re-educate the remnant populations, fix the ruins up, open the city for immigration and investment, and then run the place for profit. Is this the origin of the different Reset clans? I mean, this business model is still practiced today. Companies like (New Orleans-based) Freeport McMoran just buy villages from corrupt leaders in Indonesia, kick everyone off the land, stick them in camps, and rape the ground for profit. China is doing this in Africa right now.
(In other words, Zardoz is a documentary. So are (genius) spook John Boorman’s other films, Deliverance and Excalibur.)
Here we also have a clue as to the origin of the post-Civil War institution of Jim Crow in the South. The Resetters who brought the new African slaves over and impoverished the previous mixed-race population of the Old South left racism as a legacy that would eternally (1) humiliate the conquered territory, (2) guarantee eternal political strife, (3) offer a pretext for Reconstruction (=occupation), and (4) distract everyone from the Reset. This dead horse is STILL being flogged, probably because it works so well.
The subject of this post (as well as the next one) is a book I have brought up a few times, Norman’s New Orleans and Environs, supposedly published in 1845 and heavily cited by today’s spook historians. My theory is that this book was actually written around 1865 and formed part of the marketing package shown to European investors like Napoleon III. Most of the book consists of a detailed description of infrastructure, including costs and dimensions of all relevant structures such as the gas works, the cotton press, the hospitals, etc. (In the spinoff thread about the Mint column/smokestack, Jd755 digs into the technical archives and shows us that the information given to us about the gas works at least is completely fictional.)
The reason I believe the book was not written in 1845 is because it contains numerous anachronisms that would be obvious to anyone living in New Orleans at that time, but which could plausibly be written off twenty years later after an intervening planned war. If the book were marketed to an audience of European and Northern investors there would also be very little chance that the writers would get caught. The book was clearly written to “sell” New Orleans to somebody, as we will see. Question, were investors under the impression that the book had actually been written in 1845, or were they aware that the history was fake and simply knew how to read between the lines? Perhaps there were two classes of investors being targeted by the book, one in the know and one not in the know. The former could expect a good return, and the latter could expect to be fleeced…like today.
The even better alternate possibility is that the book was indeed written, printed, and registered with the Library of Congress in 1845, then simply stored in the basement of the Masonic lodge to be rolled out twenty years later. After all, these people appear to plan way ahead. This hypothesis would explain one of the enigmas we’ve encountered: the dome on the First St. Charles Hotel. The book includes a drawing of the hotel with the dome:
I suspect that this book is the original source of the confusion we saw in Part Two. Is it possible that they intended to slap a new dome on the (pre-Reset) St. Charles to pimp their asset up and then simply ran out of money, as so often happens with production companies when a project encounters unforeseen complications? In other words, the Resetters had already gone to the trouble of writing and seeding the book in the archives in 1845 in order to use it twenty years later, but now they had to explain the embarrassing fact that there was no dome on their hotel. Presto, invent a fire, hire a hack artist to paint it, and the propaganda book can still be used later.
Thinking about it, this would also possibly explain the other dome visible in that 1855 drawing of the Custom House being "built". There WAS a dome on the pre-Reset structure, but it was damaged and too difficult or expensive to repair, so in the end it was decided just to get rid of it and go with a flat roof.
The most interesting thing about the book is that it gives us a glimpse of the original direction the spooks clearly wanted to take the narrative at this point in history, a direction that was clearly later overruled. We get our first look at this direction early on:
They are almost openly admitting that the cities were already there. These people speak in coded language at all times. This is simple logic: if you wish to engage in deception, you need to find a mode of expression that fulfills two functions. You must communicate to other deceivers that you are one of them and you must maintain plausible deniability for those on the outside. It is a mode of expression that follows a more subtle logic than the idiotic literal and falsifiable mode of expression that is forced on the peasants to close their minds, and which the peasants, as peasants, insist is the only mode of expression possible, which must be highly amusing to the cryptographers who literally invented the weapons of Aristotelian logic, document-based historiography, and “scientific rationalism”. “He’s just kneeling! He’s just crossing his arms! So what if he’s wearing a black and white tie! I have one too! He’s not talking about buried cities in the United States, you idiot! He’s talking about the Mayan temples in Nicaragua!”
We will see more evidence of this in the book. What I read between the lines here is the following. At the point in time when this book was written, the Resetters intended to keep as much of the old infrastructure as possible and reuse it. At some point the decision was made (by hardliners like the previously seen Mr. Belknap) to completely erase the pre-Reset history of the United States, which is probably why we see so many of these incredible buildings being torn down all the way up to the 1970’s. We saw 1894 as a date in which three separate old structures were torn down in New Orleans and 1895 as the date in which the (possible) antiquitech “Fountain” was deactivated and the streetcars switched to combustion power. This is also right around when gas automobiles were being introduced (electric cars came first). Speculative hypothesis: sometime around 1895, “they” took a very hard turn towards increased control, kind of like we saw happening in 2020 with the Corona rollout, which announced a change in herd management style from social-democratic to technocratic-authoritarian, for the Western cattle at least.
“The older buildings are of ancient and foreign construction”. Keep in mind that according to the official narrative, the oldest buildings in New Orleans date from the mid-18th century and were simple French and Spanish Creole cottages and plantations, hardly “ancient and foreign” in 1845. Mockery.
The spooks had not yet settled on their fire narrative yet at the moment this book was written. Remember, in Part One we saw that there were two “Great Fires”, one one Good Friday, 1788 (the priest who refused to ring the bell) and one in 1794. In this book they occur in 1778 and 1796!
and
These guys are so busted...I'm starting to get embarrassed for them.
So far I have encountered two obvious references to Masonry and two startling possibly encrypted references (more below):
Ten lodges!
So they find a way to plug the Polar Star Lodge on Gravier Street at the same time as they salt in a false narrative that the area on the other side of Canal Street from the French Quarter, known as either the American Sector or the Faubourg St. Mary, is some kind of distant, alien territory. Gravier Street is two blocks past Canal Street. But since there is no map in the book, who’s going to notice? This is one of those details that reveal the book was intended to deceive people from out of town.
The next hamfisted attempt to hide the true (pre-Reset) nature of the American Sector is even more ridiculous:
This is just idiotic. Remember, they sell the First St. Charles Hotel as real and even give us a handsome drawing of it. That’s the 185-foot tall second-biggest dome in the United States after the US Capitol, remember? It was supposedly located two blocks past Canal Street. The French Quarter, which this fake Frenchman has apparently never left, measures fourteen by six blocks. The St. Charles would be visible for miles. Yet the Frenchman who lives less than a mile away doubts its existence. Is this some kind of mocking Masonic humor?
Here is another passage in which the previous residents of New Orleans are mocked and insulted, and a winking reference is made to mysterious sudden appearance of the city:
As if by magic…to the astonishment and confusion of those of the ancient regime who live in a kind of seclusion…
Was the French Quarter a re-education camp and prison for Creoles separated from the American Sector by a canal? I’m serious. Were they not allowed to leave? Here we have a clue that PrincepAugus' theory that the citizens of the previous political order were accustomed to more freedom is correct. We also saw a hint of that in the Campanella article cited in Part Three in which the "Creoles" are scandized by the privatization and enclosure of the riverfront commons. Also, still to this day, black New Orleanians refer to this neighborhood as the French QuarterS, which suddenly makes sense: that's where the French were quartered!
To whom beautiful and extensive blocks of buildings have appeared in the morning, as though they had sprung up by enchantment during the night.
Again, they admit everything if you know how to read between the lines.
Here the author is a little more generous with the Creoles:
"They were once...considered as the patricians of the land."
Something tells me this is just marketing. Remember, they want whoever is reading this book to invest in the city. They can’t rag on the Creoles too hard.
After describing the Creoles and the Yankees who live in New Orleans, the author introduces us to one more population group. This one blew me away. Read the whole thing carefully:
He is talking about the Resetters! A minority of men who have “few if any parallels in the world.” They are "nondescript" (they practice crypsis). They are an “amphibious race of human beings” that claim relationship with alligators. Are they telling us they are reptilians? Are they telling us they are descended from that fish god we see all over Babylon? Or are they just telling us they are the heirs of the immortal Phoenician Navy, as Miles Mathis would probably say? “They are a class entirely by themselves, unique, eccentric, original”. In the gushing last paragraph the author, probably some high-ranking spook council, is simply describing Freemasons and Resetters. Above all, they are destined TO GOVERN AT ALL TIMES. This is how our masters think. These are the megalomaniacal thoughts going through their minds as they LIE to us constantly.
(Suddenly I realize that the nautical origin of the word govern is not a coincidence.)
I mentioned earlier that the book appeared to be (1) conceived as marketing propaganda and (2) backdated.
Here the Masonic language is almost explicit. “Let us be up and doing, to fulfil our part of the mighty achievement”. He’s talking about the importance of fraternity in realizing the Great Work. I think he is also tipping his hat that the book was written or released later than its official publication date. There are constant passing references to brotherhood like the following:
"Mixed Multitude" is a coded reference to the Egyptians (Masons) who accompanied the Jews during the Exodus. There are winks like this all over the place. I am not going to copy them all.
The following passage is amusing and shows that the press has always been Masonic Reset propaganda:
"Almost beyond belief"...they themselves are shocked by how easy it is to brainwash the orphans. I wouldn’t be surprised if the people who wrote this book were the literal editors of the newspapers listed here. Here they are advertising to investors that they have the infrastructure in place to keep the imported orphan population hypnotized and controlled.
I wanted to add the following two passages concerning the levee system to Part Five, but editing appears to have been locked, so I will add them here. We get the following two references to the levee system:
And:
Remember, my hypothesis is that one of the goals of the book is to provide a plausible fake history of the city. Here we have 380 miles of levees six to eight feet high that are wide enough to function as highways in 1816 when Louisiana was basically empty according to the official narrative. I am not saying that I believe those numbers to be accurate, although they might be. I am saying that the story is impossible no matter what. The authors are in a bind. They cannot demolish the levees the way they demolished the old buildings because then they would lose their investment completely. The river would destroy it. They cannot admit they were already there in their current form, but they also cannot say they were built overnight, because that would be too obviously impossible. So they settled on the compromise of having them slowly grow over a hundred invented years. This explanation is implausible, even impossible, but they had no choice.
I think I am out of photo attachments, so I will stop here. More in Part Nine.
In today's installment I will change my approach again. Everyone who has read this far has seen what New Orleans used to look like. There will be more words than images today.
Let me start by citing a comment left in 2018 by PrincepAugus from the old SH site:
The American Civil War was an actual civil war, but rather than what we've been told to about the Northern Union states vs. the Confederate South over state rights and slavery, it was a war of a free nation of some sort, probably related to the Old order, against the "Federals" Which I think is some kind of imperial name than a nation-state name. The Confederate "Antebellum architecture" and way of life was the real issue to be erased by a worldwide history-erasing operation going on in this "WWII" at this time. After the war ended and Abraham Lincoln was crowned the "fasci" ruler, the victors started to make wax figures and sets to not only cover up real history, but also to humiliate the so-called "Confederates".
KorbenDallas thinks the global wars of the 1850-1870 period could be considered World War 3, with the "Napoleonic" wars being WW2 and the wars of the 1770's being WW1.
My research into New Orleans so far suggests something like this. The very speculative hypothesis I would like to advance at this point is roughly as follows:
New Orleans was an important city in pre-Reset North America. It was destroyed in a war sometime around 1800, perhaps in 1815 during the Battle of New Orleans. For the next fifty years, the city was fixed up and prepped for repopulation. I imagine that Resetters came and went constantly during this time, guiding the operation. There must have been a crew of supervisors coming and going from Washington, people like Latrobe, Ogden, and Montgomery, as well as an administrative body living in New Orleans. I suspect the French Quarter was their headquarters, but most of the work was taking place across Canal Street. Perhaps illiterate African slaves were used for manual labor. After all, who would listen to anything they might have to say afterwards? At the end of the “Civil War”, which I put in quotations because I think the story we are told is a coverup for the final stage of preparation, the city was finally ready to be launched. Now that the original military operation of prepping the city was finished, the slaves brought over by the Anglo resetters from Africa to do the dirty work could be “freed” (transitioned to classic economic slavery). I believe that New Orleans history transitions from scripted to real at this point. Or, to be more precise, the history of New Orleans is mostly fake before 1803, and mostly real but heavily edited from 1803 to 1865. In 1867, New Orleans has its cotillion at the Paris World Exposition. Spook photographer Theodore Lilienthal prepares 150 high-quality photos of the recently renovated city for the Emperor Napoleon III.
I promised some “empty city” marketing photos, here are a couple:
Hypothesis: each Reset city was run by a different group of venture capitalists/speculators who competed with each other to attract immigration and investment from the European powers. These are the mystery men posing in top hats in all those photos of ruined cities we find. They are the men paying for the cities to be rebuilt, hoping to get a big return on their investment. Were the European World’s Fairs of the era like today’s trade shows, where startups advertise their products and companies to potential investors? All the major European leaders were present at the 1867 World’s Fair. I can imagine them meeting in private with different groups of entrepreneurs hawking the next crop of “new” Southern and Western spec cities after the first successful wave of East Coast colonization. I can imagine deals being made in which kings and emperors sell X number of serfs and skilled laborers to the Resetters for repopulation. Poland and Germany “bought” Chicago, Sweden “bought” Minnesota, France and Italy “bought” New Orleans, etc. The entrepreneurs must have put a lot of time and money into getting their PR packages ready. Part of that would be glossy photographic brochures and part of it would be written marketing propaganda. One of the selling points would probably be the degree to which the entrepreneurs could demonstrate their mastery of spycraft and spookery. I can imagine different groups of Resetters meeting up after hours and swapping tips. I can imagine the Japan crew and the New Orleans crew comparing notes over drinks and making deals of their own.
(Actually we have a famous spook who sold both New Orleans and Japan – I am talking about Lafcadio Hearn.)
The Resetters were privateers. Conquer a city, exterminate, enslave, and/or re-educate the remnant populations, fix the ruins up, open the city for immigration and investment, and then run the place for profit. Is this the origin of the different Reset clans? I mean, this business model is still practiced today. Companies like (New Orleans-based) Freeport McMoran just buy villages from corrupt leaders in Indonesia, kick everyone off the land, stick them in camps, and rape the ground for profit. China is doing this in Africa right now.
(In other words, Zardoz is a documentary. So are (genius) spook John Boorman’s other films, Deliverance and Excalibur.)
Here we also have a clue as to the origin of the post-Civil War institution of Jim Crow in the South. The Resetters who brought the new African slaves over and impoverished the previous mixed-race population of the Old South left racism as a legacy that would eternally (1) humiliate the conquered territory, (2) guarantee eternal political strife, (3) offer a pretext for Reconstruction (=occupation), and (4) distract everyone from the Reset. This dead horse is STILL being flogged, probably because it works so well.
The subject of this post (as well as the next one) is a book I have brought up a few times, Norman’s New Orleans and Environs, supposedly published in 1845 and heavily cited by today’s spook historians. My theory is that this book was actually written around 1865 and formed part of the marketing package shown to European investors like Napoleon III. Most of the book consists of a detailed description of infrastructure, including costs and dimensions of all relevant structures such as the gas works, the cotton press, the hospitals, etc. (In the spinoff thread about the Mint column/smokestack, Jd755 digs into the technical archives and shows us that the information given to us about the gas works at least is completely fictional.)
The reason I believe the book was not written in 1845 is because it contains numerous anachronisms that would be obvious to anyone living in New Orleans at that time, but which could plausibly be written off twenty years later after an intervening planned war. If the book were marketed to an audience of European and Northern investors there would also be very little chance that the writers would get caught. The book was clearly written to “sell” New Orleans to somebody, as we will see. Question, were investors under the impression that the book had actually been written in 1845, or were they aware that the history was fake and simply knew how to read between the lines? Perhaps there were two classes of investors being targeted by the book, one in the know and one not in the know. The former could expect a good return, and the latter could expect to be fleeced…like today.
The even better alternate possibility is that the book was indeed written, printed, and registered with the Library of Congress in 1845, then simply stored in the basement of the Masonic lodge to be rolled out twenty years later. After all, these people appear to plan way ahead. This hypothesis would explain one of the enigmas we’ve encountered: the dome on the First St. Charles Hotel. The book includes a drawing of the hotel with the dome:
Thinking about it, this would also possibly explain the other dome visible in that 1855 drawing of the Custom House being "built". There WAS a dome on the pre-Reset structure, but it was damaged and too difficult or expensive to repair, so in the end it was decided just to get rid of it and go with a flat roof.
The most interesting thing about the book is that it gives us a glimpse of the original direction the spooks clearly wanted to take the narrative at this point in history, a direction that was clearly later overruled. We get our first look at this direction early on:
We will see more evidence of this in the book. What I read between the lines here is the following. At the point in time when this book was written, the Resetters intended to keep as much of the old infrastructure as possible and reuse it. At some point the decision was made (by hardliners like the previously seen Mr. Belknap) to completely erase the pre-Reset history of the United States, which is probably why we see so many of these incredible buildings being torn down all the way up to the 1970’s. We saw 1894 as a date in which three separate old structures were torn down in New Orleans and 1895 as the date in which the (possible) antiquitech “Fountain” was deactivated and the streetcars switched to combustion power. This is also right around when gas automobiles were being introduced (electric cars came first). Speculative hypothesis: sometime around 1895, “they” took a very hard turn towards increased control, kind of like we saw happening in 2020 with the Corona rollout, which announced a change in herd management style from social-democratic to technocratic-authoritarian, for the Western cattle at least.
The spooks had not yet settled on their fire narrative yet at the moment this book was written. Remember, in Part One we saw that there were two “Great Fires”, one one Good Friday, 1788 (the priest who refused to ring the bell) and one in 1794. In this book they occur in 1778 and 1796!
So far I have encountered two obvious references to Masonry and two startling possibly encrypted references (more below):
The next hamfisted attempt to hide the true (pre-Reset) nature of the American Sector is even more ridiculous:
Here is another passage in which the previous residents of New Orleans are mocked and insulted, and a winking reference is made to mysterious sudden appearance of the city:
Was the French Quarter a re-education camp and prison for Creoles separated from the American Sector by a canal? I’m serious. Were they not allowed to leave? Here we have a clue that PrincepAugus' theory that the citizens of the previous political order were accustomed to more freedom is correct. We also saw a hint of that in the Campanella article cited in Part Three in which the "Creoles" are scandized by the privatization and enclosure of the riverfront commons. Also, still to this day, black New Orleanians refer to this neighborhood as the French QuarterS, which suddenly makes sense: that's where the French were quartered!
To whom beautiful and extensive blocks of buildings have appeared in the morning, as though they had sprung up by enchantment during the night.
Again, they admit everything if you know how to read between the lines.
Here the author is a little more generous with the Creoles:
Something tells me this is just marketing. Remember, they want whoever is reading this book to invest in the city. They can’t rag on the Creoles too hard.
After describing the Creoles and the Yankees who live in New Orleans, the author introduces us to one more population group. This one blew me away. Read the whole thing carefully:
(Suddenly I realize that the nautical origin of the word govern is not a coincidence.)
I mentioned earlier that the book appeared to be (1) conceived as marketing propaganda and (2) backdated.
The following passage is amusing and shows that the press has always been Masonic Reset propaganda:
I wanted to add the following two passages concerning the levee system to Part Five, but editing appears to have been locked, so I will add them here. We get the following two references to the levee system:
I think I am out of photo attachments, so I will stop here. More in Part Nine.
Last edited:
There is a map in the book. Its one of the ones I was looking at yesterday for the other thread.
https://www.loc.gov/resource/g4014n.ct000243/
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 1,934
Interesting, the scan I am reading (a first edition) does not include this map. Perhaps it was folded up inside and not scanned, or only included with later editions (which would also argue for the whole project being a forgery). I have attached the PDF I am using.
ADDED: Apparently the map was sold separately:
The book ends with a real bang. I will be including it in part 8 bis.
ADDED: Apparently the map was sold separately:
Attachments
Yep read through a lot of that. Its available in HTML form here but again no map.
Norman. "Norman's New Orleans and Environs."
Until very recently in American prisons, voluntary racial segregation was notably less common in Louisiana prisons than in other states. Not sure what it could mean, maybe just centuries of living together resulted in less friction. Of course the modern media divide-and-conquer has done damage.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 1,934
PART EIGHT bis: MORE NORMAN'S
I will conclude the Norman's book with a last few choice excerpts.
I include this reference to the Orleans Theater because of the developer's name, John Davis. We saw that name before, remember? Rezin Davis Shepherd, the Resetter spook and possible fictional character who nursed Judah Touro back to health? Now, it so happens that the most iconic New Orleans architect of the twentieth century was named Arthur Q. Davis. He designed that awful library we saw. He also designed the Superdome. Something tells me you need pull to get that contract. As with the Ogden name, three strikes and you're out. Arthur is Jewish, so I assume the others are too. What does that mean anyway, "Jewish"? I think that the Resetters agreed to divide themselves into multiple front groups, and for whatever reason it would appear that a disproportionate number of them play "Jews" in public. Why?
(1) For the Resetters to maintain their power, they have to control finance, government, and the media. This inevitably entails more visibility than they would prefer.
(2) The best way to hide their control is by inventing a front group, "Jews", complete with an alien appearance and fake front religion, to take the blame. As in wrestling, someone has to play the heel.
(3) Most Jews are not in on the con, but emulate their betters and in so doing become useful tools for the Resetters, just as blacks, whites, Christians, etc. are all unwittingly used in different ways to maintain the deception. It's all theater. At the deepest level there are only deceivers and dupes. Still, I suspect that elite Jewish origins, like peerage origins, are usually clue that we may be dealing with a Resetter.
And then of course there's Jefferson Davis, who was from Woodville, Mississippi, just nine miles from the Louisiana state line. His Secretary of State was the spooky New Orleans Jewish lawyer, Judah Benjamin, who is buried in Père Lachaise cemetery in Paris, which appears to be a very big honor for a spook.
I will stop here with the Davis name, I don't want to get lost in genealogy. Maybe it's significant, maybe not.
Here's where that article I cited in 7bis got the unbelievable "four thousand seats" detail about the St. Charles theater:
"Rose from the ashes of its predecessor like the phoenix"...LOL. I am pretty sure this theater never existed.
But the single most incriminating passage in the entire book is the unbelievable conclusion, which I will share in full:
Note the magisterial "thirty...three" on page 188 to cap it off. The mockery here is cruel. They use the words "desecration" and "annihilation" because they are desecrators and annihilators, even if they convince themselves that they only destroy to recreate. I can imagine their jackal laughter as they pass this shack off as an old relic. It is this gratuitously cruel humor that reveals how dark they really are. Read this passage again. They are giving it to us good and hard here, telling us they destroy beauty for mere pleasure:
This is what in your face boasting and jeering looks like.
"Swept New Orleans as it was into the shade of oblivion."
You happy with your Great Work, creeps?
I will conclude the Norman's book with a last few choice excerpts.
(1) For the Resetters to maintain their power, they have to control finance, government, and the media. This inevitably entails more visibility than they would prefer.
(2) The best way to hide their control is by inventing a front group, "Jews", complete with an alien appearance and fake front religion, to take the blame. As in wrestling, someone has to play the heel.
(3) Most Jews are not in on the con, but emulate their betters and in so doing become useful tools for the Resetters, just as blacks, whites, Christians, etc. are all unwittingly used in different ways to maintain the deception. It's all theater. At the deepest level there are only deceivers and dupes. Still, I suspect that elite Jewish origins, like peerage origins, are usually clue that we may be dealing with a Resetter.
And then of course there's Jefferson Davis, who was from Woodville, Mississippi, just nine miles from the Louisiana state line. His Secretary of State was the spooky New Orleans Jewish lawyer, Judah Benjamin, who is buried in Père Lachaise cemetery in Paris, which appears to be a very big honor for a spook.
I will stop here with the Davis name, I don't want to get lost in genealogy. Maybe it's significant, maybe not.
Here's where that article I cited in 7bis got the unbelievable "four thousand seats" detail about the St. Charles theater:
But the single most incriminating passage in the entire book is the unbelievable conclusion, which I will share in full:
"Swept New Orleans as it was into the shade of oblivion."
You happy with your Great Work, creeps?
Last edited:
Mind blowing! In a just world your findings on New Orleans would be blowing up the internet. Unfortunately we currently don't live in that world. You're spot on about cities being investments. People tend to forget or not realize that countries, cities and municipalities are corporations just like those traded on the NASDAQ. That's why they say incorporated and corporate limits. And all businesses allowed to operate on said turfs are companies within a corporation. I believe the reset was designed to attract investors to the New World (which is actually the Old World) and hence we have certain ethnicities congregating in certain regions back in the 1800s. You have done such a great job with this. I'm still working on the New Orleans and Mafia history and their various connections and that'll take me a little bit. Your work is great inspiration brother.
https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1402&context=masters_theses
Good research paper on Italians in Nola (as well as the political move to make Italians "White Americans")...around page 32 discusses the recruiting efforts to bring Sicilians and southern Italians to Nola...I'm sure there was PLENTY of this in the earlier days of the reset before the Civil War and Reconstruction that have been destroyed and hidden
EvilNTT
Member
When I was in college (in NOLA) my Louisiana history course only briefly covered Italian history with the "War of the Oranges" and then it was never really mentioned again. New Orleans mafia history is also extremely vacant in the movie industry too.
Similar threads
