Questionable Ancient Egypt megathread

[Broken Agate]

The recent story about how "scientists" just revealed a lost branch of the Nile that supposedly "helped" the builders of the pyramids bring in supplies to build.

What the what? Everyone knows this, yes there was a river there that went right to the pyramids, it is not there anymore because Egypt was hit by some huge catastrophe that changed not only the course of the river but obliterated the landscape and that is why it is so barren. If you look at the landscape from drone view, one can see the devastation must have come in a huge wave, heat, water or both.

And you can see loads more stuff just under the surface. Why aren't the Egyptologists digging it all out to see what it is? Why aren't LIDAR planes flying over the whole land to see what else shows up? It's because they make loads of money off tourism at the pyramids, they don't want to take away from that. And they don't want to possibly dig up something that could cast doubt on their carefully crafted nonsense about the ancient "Egyptians," whoever they really were.

 

[Frostychud]

Pardon me if this has already been posted somewhere. This is very low-hanging fruit so I'm sure it's old news to some of you.

How Howard Carter Discovered King Tut's Golden Tomb

Written by the Smithsonian, so from the mouth of the forgers themselves. It's a highly romanced description of Howard Carter's discovery of King Tut's tomb in 1922.

The fact that this event was so publicized is already almost enough to prove it was a hoax.

What inspired me to share today are the two following photos of King Tut's antechamber just after they were opened for the first time in "over 3300 years" (note the 33).

Everything is just piled up like in someone's attic. But most of all there is no dust. I mean none. And everything just looks new and crisp. Okay, the cave was sealed. But somehow I suspect that even in a sealed cave, objects decompose and create dust over thousands of years.

So they just brought this random teenage kid to Egypt because he had artistic talent.

I guess you would have to be able to copy them if you're going to forge them.

The article is full of numerological signaling (doubled numbers, 3, 13, 33, 36, etc.). For example:

See how they finagle a way to give us 3 and then 12 in succession twice in a row? That can either be interpreted as 3 × 12 or 36 (666) OR 3 followed by 1+2 for a 33.

Fairy tale backstory + new-looking photos + blatant numerological signaling = fake discovery.

 

[FarewellAngelina]

The first photo reminds me of a documentary that was shown was shown on British tv a few years ago. That big square patch on the back wall was said to be where Carter broke into the tomb well before the official announcement of the discovery. He removed many valuable items which were later found at his home when he died.

The cover up big square patch of new plaster never quite blended in - as we see in the photo.

Now we were taught at school that robbers had already found the tomb but were disturbed and the tomb entrance was resealed in the distant past.

All seems a bit dubious now and being on this website made me think a bit, unusual I know.

The room looks like it has been ransacked . Maybe the robbers got away with the valuable stuff, if there was any. The position of the tomb already known. Empty maybe?

Carter breaks in through the back wall , deposits valuable objections and perhaps even Tut himself. Cleans up a little bit . Comes back later to find Tut and thus contributes to the mainstream deception of Egyptian History.

Was able to find that the documentary was on channel 4, 2005. Only thing I could find. Until today.

This morning found many links/articles had appeared , how nice AI. One here for starters.
Howard Carter stole Tutankhamun’s treasure, new evidence suggests

Perhaps the curse of king Tut tomb is just the psychos cleaning up the loose ends.

How Howard Carter Discovered King Tut's Golden Tomb

Some hints by those masters of cover up.

 

[Just]

The first photo reminds me of a documentary that was shown was shown on British tv a few years ago. That big square patch on the back wall was said to be where Carter broke into the tomb well before the official announcement of the discovery. He removed many valuable items which were later found at his home when he died.

The cover up big square patch of new plaster never quite blended in - as we see in the photo.

Now we were taught at school that robbers had already found the tomb but were disturbed and the tomb entrance was resealed in the distant past.

All seems a bit dubious now and being on this website made me think a bit, unusual I know.

The room looks like it has been ransacked . Maybe the robbers got away with the valuable stuff, if there was any. The position of the tomb already known. Empty maybe?

Carter breaks in through the back wall , deposits valuable objections and perhaps even Tut himself. Cleans up a little bit . Comes back later to find Tut and thus contributes to the mainstream deception of Egyptian History.

Was able to find that the documentary was on channel 4, 2005. Only thing I could find. Until today.

This morning found many links/articles had appeared , how nice AI. One here for starters.
Howard Carter stole Tutankhamun’s treasure, new evidence suggests

Perhaps the curse of king Tut tomb is just the psychos cleaning up the loose ends.

How Howard Carter Discovered King Tut's Golden Tomb

Some hints by those masters of cover up.

Also possible that things were added not taken away and that the ‘Ancient Egyptian’ civilisation is altogether fake to cover up the fact that the pyramids and obelisks were actually a form of technology.

 

[FarewellAngelina]

Also possible that things were added not taken away and that the ‘Ancient Egyptian’ civilisation is altogether fake to cover up the fact that the pyramids and obelisks were actually a form of technology.

That was the point I was putting forward - not clear enough, could never multi-task.

One of the links I read suggested that Carter moved the relics out via airplane in three visits. Maybe the whole lot was put in there through that hole in the wall.

When the mainstream admit he stole some , found after his death, then it seems a nice way of tidying it all up whilst keeping the "history" of Egypt intact.

He may have fashioned the relics and deposited them as ordered by Lord Carnivore. Makes more sense to me .

 

[ViniB]

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/nclnqq1sbJ8?si=HFCxoli2akfcjOOo


Ah yes, the good old arrogance of the mainstream clown. By his own "logic" not even the tool would work, because the quartz abrasive would destroy the copper tool in the process

 

[Seiya]

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/nclnqq1sbJ8?si=HFCxoli2akfcjOOo


Ah yes, the good old arrogance of the mainstream clown. By his own "logic" not even the tool would work, because the quartz abrasive would destroy the copper tool in the process

How many sarcophagus Serapeum Of Saqqara he made using the super easy tool?

The sarcophagus Gemenefhorbak was made using the same toll?

 

[Frostychud]

This post will be haiku short.

I recently visited an entire museum dedicated to Ancient Egypt in Germany.

There was an exhibit with artifacts arranged in chronological order from 4000 BC onwards, all the way to the Roman Era, so you could "see" the gradual evolution.

Here are two vases from the same exhibit, located about twenty feet apart, with the dates provided by the museum:

Separated by over two thousand years.

I wonder how they determined that?

 

[crystallize]

Is that a wheel at the bottom left?

 

[ViniB]

This post will be haiku short.

I recently visited an entire museum dedicated to Ancient Egypt in Germany.

There was an exhibit with artifacts arranged in chronological order from 4000 BC onwards, all the way to the Roman Era, so you could "see" the gradual evolution.

Here are two vases from the same exhibit, located about twenty feet apart, with the dates provided by the museum:

View attachment 32548​

View attachment 32549​

Separated by over two thousand years.

I wonder how they determined that?

The difference to me is that the "1300BC" looks a lot uglier, because style and shape are pretty much the same

 

[feralimal]

View attachment 32550​

Is that a wheel at the bottom left?

That photo always reminds me of theatre props.

 

[Seiya]

View attachment 32550​

Is that a wheel at the bottom left?

Look this pile of rubbish!

Are you (official) saying that the same people who created ridiculously symmetrical statues like this bellow is the same that made all this rubbish in the picture above. That's insane even as a suggestion

and this:

 

[feralimal]

Look this pile of rubbish!

Are you (official) saying that the same people who created ridiculously symmetrical statues like this bellow is the same that made all this rubbish in the picture above. That's insane even as a suggestion

View attachment 32551​

and this:

What is going on with that left shoulder?

I thought the black stone was typically black granite (ie a solid, very hard block) but it looks like it must be a black render over sandstone, and bits of the render have fallen off. Or perhaps the arm had fallen off but was restored/reinstated with the sandy coloured plaster to hold it in place.

Is there more info on this image, to double check the official story?

 

[trismegistus]

What is going on with that left shoulder?

I thought the black stone was typically black granite (ie a solid, very hard block) but it looks like it must be a black render over sandstone, and bits of the render have fallen off. Or perhaps the arm had fallen off but was restored/reinstated with the sandy coloured plaster to hold it in place.

Is there more info on this image, to double check the official story?

Based on nothing but my theories on "Ancient Egypt" the statue is thousands of years old but the black render is less than 250 years old (assuming its not the other way around and the sandstone is a filler to restore the statue)

 

[Udjat]

The global drought around 4,200 years ago, the Nile changed course around the same time, and the reason may be because of the supposed volcanic eruption on "Deception Island" in Antarctica. A connection or just another front?

 

[jeenam]

The global drought around 4,200 years ago, the Nile changed course around the same time, and the reason may be because of the supposed volcanic eruption on "Deception Island" in Antarctica. A connection or just another front?

I suggest you search the forums for the threads with maps of Africa pre-1700. The whole nonsense of northern Africa turning into a desert through natural causes seems like a load of baloney based on maps that show the entire continent wholly populated. Wherever you see a desert understand that it was not created through natural processes. They were the result of intentional destruction on a massive scale.

 

[Udjat]

I suggest you search the forums for the threads with maps of Africa pre-1700. The whole nonsense of northern Africa turning into a desert through natural causes seems like a load of baloney based on maps that show the entire continent wholly populated. Wherever you see a desert understand that it was not created through natural processes. They were the result of intentional destruction on a massive scale.

Yes, if you read my other comments you would understand that I do agree with you. What is really interesting is that when they discovered the "lost city" in Luxor they called it Egypt's "Pompei". How many sites around the world do you hear them give that title? "The Golden City", is pure evidence, to me, that there was a major catastrophe to have hit Egypt. They claim that a bustling city was just left and over time covered with sand. I am sorry but that is pure crap! It looks as if people may have been there but were taken out by this catastrophe because they left everything, everything that would be vital to a human being living in those times. All the clay pots and everything else that was left behind looks like it was imbedded in soft mud and then left to harden, almost like the stones at Pumapunku.

Map shmap!

 

[jeenam]

Yes, if you read my other comments you would understand that I do agree with you. What is really interesting is that when they discovered the "lost city" in Luxor they called it Egypt's "Pompei". How many sites around the world do you hear them give that title? "The Golden City", is pure evidence, to me, that there was a major catastrophe to have hit Egypt. They claim that a bustling city was just left and over time covered with sand. I am sorry but that is pure crap! It looks as if people may have been there but were taken out by this catastrophe because they left everything, everything that would be vital to a human being living in those times. All the clay pots and everything else that was left behind looks like it was imbedded in soft mud and then left to harden, almost like the stones at Pumapunku.

Map shmap!

OK good to read. All one needs to do is look at pictures of Timgad to realize the place was obliterated. Check out these posts from falsehistory.com as the site maintainer has been doing a lot of investigation into the topic of destruction.

The Hidden History of the Arabian Desert

The Hidden History of Dakota Badlands

He also creates videos on those very same topics as well.

 

[Gladius]

Check out these posts from falsehistory.com as the site maintainer has been doing a lot of investigation into the topic of destruction.

The Hidden History of the Arabian Desert

His articles are interesting but his research is sloppy. How can someone who researches maps not be familiar with "Arabia Felix" and attribute it to an ancient German name?
In another case he claims the "empty quarter" is where multiple cities used to be, while the map clearly shows the location was empty back then as well.
I did like the thesis but he clearly suffers from some pre-established bias on a subject that must be free of it. ("Fallen angles spoke German")

 

[Seiya]

What is going on with that left shoulder?

I thought the black stone was typically black granite (ie a solid, very hard block) but it looks like it must be a black render over sandstone, and bits of the render have fallen off. Or perhaps the arm had fallen off but was restored/reinstated with the sandy coloured plaster to hold it in place.

Is there more info on this image, to double check the official story?

I don't think this is the case with this statue. From the early photographs of so call The Temple of Luxor you can see how much smashed this place was badly and half barry in soil and water. This patch in his shoulder I believe was done in 1800s when they put this temple together and removing some evidence that do not fit in the narrative the british created to this place.

Your thought is correct, the black stone is black granite solid and this statue was made with black granite solid.
Have a look in this part. You can see clearly a broken part and it is solid

So what ever happened in this place, was extreme powerful to break it. Then 1800's they have to "glue" all parts together and "plaster" with sandy stone is the best ours civilization can do. Look thee walls

I don't know the official history but I can guaranty is a lie. this and any other statue in egypt they are chinese, and it is so obvious to me. And that's why a destruction of the faces.