Sandokhan's Link and Post Collection

Status
Not open for further replies.
In reality, Mers-Cov-2 is Haemophilus influenzae (not a virus, but a mycobacterium).
Dude, do your research:

Haemophilus influenzae (formerly called Pfeiffer's bacillus or Bacillus influenzae) is a Gram-negative, coccobacillary, facultatively anaerobic capnophilic pathogenic bacterium of the family Pasteurellaceae. H. influenzae was first described in 1892 by Richard Pfeiffer during an influenza pandemic.[1] He incorrectly described Haemophilus influenzae as the causative microbe, which retains "influenza" in its name.[2][3]

The bacterium was argued by some to be the cause of influenza[4] as bacterial influenza. H. influenzae is responsible for a wide range of localized and invasive infections, but influenza is caused by viruses.

Its a bacteria NOT a mycobacteria.

Mycobacterium - Wikipedia

Additionally:

Summary - Mycoplasma vs Mycobacterium

https://files.differencebetween.com...ence-Between-Mycoplasma-and-Mycobacterium.pdf
 
When are you going to learn to trust in what I write?

H. influenzae = M. influenzae (it is a mycobacterium)

Hopefully, your research goes further than vickypedia.

Scientia Ricerca Open Access | Scientific Publications | International Journals

I wrote the message regarding mers-cov-2 months ago. What are the chances that sars-cov-2 would switch cellular receptors from ACE2 to DPP4 three months later, in vivo?

Cell wall deficient mycobacterium look just like a "virus" and pass through the same filters.

Did you know that the R0 of mers-cov was between 7 and 19? It was only missing a catalyst which would have turned mers-cov into the worst pandemic of all time. The R0 of Omikron is 10.

Not only that, but multiple studies have shown that the Omicron variant itself affects the upper airways far more than the lungs, even as it’s much more transmissible than any other variant. This is exactly what happened in the later stages of 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, according to John M. Barry, author of "The Great Influenza: The Epic Story of the Deadliest Plague in History".

Current situation: high transmissibility (the fastest in the history of medical science). It is lacking a high hospitalization rate. Omikron + X = what is going to happen next.

As for the news about hantavirus, that is actually the brucella bacterium which is closely related to m. tuberculosis.
 
Dude I think you're buying into the alophathic virology religion.

I don't think it's real myself

Look up project Immanuel

Agreed.
The Germ theory is as real as the force of gravity.
Sandokhan goes to great pains to retrofit disease into theories that were disproved a century ago.
Airborne germs do not live outside the body. In general, germs live only in a moist, warm environment, in a living body or Petri dish.

The Terrain theory, on the other hand, maintains that outside toxins overpower the body's immune system -- from polluted water, food, vaccines which introduce foreign substances.
Coughing and sneezing release harmless dead exosomes from natural detoxification processes.

I've looked at the Immanuel Project, briefly. But I am weary of videos and long dissertations on theory after theory. Is it that difficult to compose summaries which effectively and briefly communicate an idea with clarity and coherence?

So what causes diseases? One of my trusted sources, The Invisible Rainbow, proposes the electric grid as the cause of so many modern ills.
That is, certain ranges of the electromagnetic spectrum interefere with the electric systems of living organisms. This includes ever-present smart phones, cell towers, 5g, microwave devices like smart meters on our buildings, hospital equipment, the whole Internet of Things.

Notice the great decline of wild birds, bees, bats, frogs, other wildlife.
Our world's life-sustaining Schumann Resonance has been spoiled.

I mean no disrespect to Sandokhan, who does his due diligence into establishment science. But the whole method of inquiry is flawed, unproven, untenable. And if may bring down civilization as we know if.
 
Terrestrial gravity is real. So is antigravity. Did you really think long and hard before responding? You think that I do not know about Bechamp and 5G and scalar weapons? When did I ever "apply due diligence into establishment science"? You must have mistaken me for someone else.

If you really want to get to the bottom of the cause of disease, then look up Reich's T-bacilli theory. Then, the T-bacilli, which have spikes, develop into mycobacterium and mycoplasma.
*********

5G is actually 4GLTE. Now, only the very best researchers know about the papers published by Vlail Kaznacheyev (5G to the nth power).
 
Last edited:
What is Terrestial gravity as opposed to Newtonian or universal or whatever it is called gravity?
 
According to the official chronology of history, I. Newton thought that there are two gravitational forces at work: a force which applies a constant pressure which accounts for terrestrial gravity, and a rotational type of force which keeps the planets/sun/moon/stars in motion. Obviously, there must be a shield or a barrier between the atmosphere and the space alloted for the planets/sun/moon.

Search in my messages for: dextrorotatory gravity, dextrorotatory subquarks, Biefeld-Brown effect antigravitational exact formula.

Extremely few historians and researchers know that Charles Ginenthal put a stop to Velikovsky, Heinsohn, Fomenko and much more, using arguments which had never been brought to light before:

New radical chronology of history

No one else was able to address them. Except for my new radical chronology of history theory.

And there was one question Velikovsky had no answer for: search for pole shift, Giza calendar.
 
"Gravity is real." Well, duh, who said it isn't? A force? not.
Specific gravity is the ratio of densities of adjacent substances.
Sandokhan's definition is dense. That is, full of theory and variables and no proof of anything. Newton, for pity's sake?? Have we not progressed at all from the horse and buggy and apple era? Gravity is electromagnetic attraction.

. . . . .

Airborne transmission of disease is impossible.
100 years ago, US Army doctors failed to sicken healthy soldiers with Spanish flu "germs" from stricken patients. The medical "profession" has known about this dirty secret for a century! and they continue to take advantage of human naivete to this day! to sell their Big Pharma concoctions and services to the suckers.

Here is a synopsis of The Contagion Myth:

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A2KLfR5Xc.dhw8cA1YXBGOd_;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9zAzIEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1642587096/RO=10/RU=https://mask-covid.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Contagion-Myth-Notes-Synopsis-1.pdf/RK=2/RS=c7Eh3uWsHDP2RFb4XWrm8xaJlZI-
 
"Gravity is real." Well, duh, who said it isn't?

Well, you did. You cannot divorce gravity from force.

The Germ theory is as real as the force of gravity.

You also wrote:

That is, full of theory and variables and no proof of anything.

Your memory surely is failing you, since the Flat Earth thread is packed full of proofs which I provided using the best arguments in the business. Make sure you read my messages in that thread again.

Airborne transmission of disease is impossible.

You haven't done your homework on the Rosenau experiments. There is much more than meets the eye with regard to those experiments.

The M.J. Rosenau experiments which had been carried out in 1918, showed two things: the astrobiological source of the pathogenic agent, and that these sailors were immune to the streptococci emitted by the infected persons.

"In the British Medical Journal of 28 July 1900, the following editorial appeared, dealing with the role of streptococci in tuberculosis: "It is a remarkable fact that…the bulk of the disturbing and dangerous features of tuberculosis are not due to the tubercle bacillus, but to streptococci and other pyogenic organisms."

The British Medical Journal’s editorial dealing with the destructive and predominant role of streptococci in tuberculosis was further confirmed when Pandemic physician Edward Rosenow reported his findings that green-producing Streptococcocus viridians were more constantly found and more destructive than any other organism associated with influenza."

Von Unruh wrote: “We have in influenza the fever, malaise, loss of weight, invasion by the organism of the same anatomical structures as in tuberculosis; we have chronic cases of bronchitis in which the influenza bacillus is constantly present; and lastly, we know that typical tuberculosis often follows an attack, however mild,of influenza.”

What is influenza?

The Great Influenza Pandemic: What Really Happened in 1918?

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.637.4817&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Wayback Machine

INFLUENZA AND THE TUBERCULOSIS CONNECTION - Part 1

INFLUENZA AND THE TUBERCULOSIS CONNECTION- Part 2

Bird flu, influenza and 1918: The case for mutant Avian tuberculosis.

SARS: Just another viral acronym?

Influenza—The Sphinx of Diseases - 1919 | GG Archives

Is the Influenza a Chinese Plague? - 1918 | GG Archives

https://www.gjenvick.com/Influenza/TheInfluenzaMysteryDeepens-1919-02.html

The fourth shot (booster) is not working at all against Omikron. A sure sign that we are dealing with a DIFFERENT pathogenic agent, i.e., Omikron is NOT Sars-Cov-2, but Mers-Cov-2 (it uses the DPP4 receptor, same as Mers-Cov).
 
The fourth shot (booster) is not working at all against Omikron. A sure sign that we are dealing with a DIFFERENT pathogenic agent
Can you show just ONE paper that clearly shows isolation of ANY variant? If you expect a 'shot' to work, you have to go through Koch's postulates. Until you have shown the isolated 'virus' causing the symptoms and shown that when transferred to an otherwise healthy host causes the same symptoms, you have NOTHING as far as REAL virology is concerned.

So instead of quoting a plethora of articles beating around the bush, start at the beginning - ISOLATION. Build on solid ground.
 
Sars-Cov-2 is not a virus. That is why it will never be isolated. Sars-Cov-2 = M. avium, which is accompanied by Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Dr. Lawrence Broxmeyer did isolate M. avium in patients with Covid-19 back in the spring of 2020 (I posted the references from the very start).

The Chinese researchers, back in the spring of 2003, did isolate a new form of Chlamydia pneumoniae in patients with Sars-Cov.

As to how new variants come about, there are two possible ways: astrobiology and/or biological scalar weapons (by comparison 5G or 6G is a stroll in the park).

The key to understanding what is going to happen next is related to HSP (heat shock proteins). Believe or not, Sars-Cov-2 and M. bovis have identical segments of genetic code, including HSP.

Read the next to the last reference in my last message: pneumonic plague and influenza.
 
According to the official chronology of history, I. Newton thought that there are two gravitational forces at work: a force which applies a constant pressure which accounts for terrestrial gravity, and a rotational type of force which keeps the planets/sun/moon/stars in motion. Obviously, there must be a shield or a barrier between the atmosphere and the space alloted for the planets/sun/moon.

Search in my messages for: dextrorotatory gravity, dextrorotatory subquarks, Biefeld-Brown effect antigravitational exact formula.

Extremely few historians and researchers know that Charles Ginenthal put a stop to Velikovsky, Heinsohn, Fomenko and much more, using arguments which had never been brought to light before:

New radical chronology of history

No one else was able to address them. Except for my new radical chronology of history theory.

And there was one question Velikovsky had no answer for: search for pole shift, Giza calendar.
Looking at the exact formula , if I have the right one, am i right in thinking you have replaced the costant imaginary r with the formula for the area of a circle?

The dextrorotatory quark thingy reminds me of nonsense poetry , no offence intended, quarks gyring and gimbaling - Lear and Joyce

Maxwell's stuff , well no one has ever measured the velocity of light , the constant c is pure science fiction .

I think all that lot belongs with the stuff of "visionaries scientists" such as Einstein,Tsiolkovsky , A.C.Clarke , Lear and Joyce.

What is the method of attractive force in your terrestial gravity , would it be magnetism?
Meant to say volume of a sphere, not area of a circle
 
This may explain sunrise and sunset and why clouds can be lit from above and below while the sun's altitude is fixed.

It doesn't. You can't have it both ways. The map which features a fixed altitude orbital motion for the Sun/Moon was introduced by the archenemies of the FES, as were the unipolar map and the UA (universal acceleration).

The Sun does rise and set. We have definite photographic evidence:

2003 Total Solar Eclipse - Antarctica - Fred Bruenjes
antarcticeclipse_bruenjes_big.jpg

Cosmology of the Desana tribe:

desanaworld_zps6l2jiopj.jpg

Creator Sun = Black Sun = Fenrir = Rahu
Moon brother = Shadow Moon = Ketu

Again, for the absolute proof regarding the rising Sun on a FE, follow the links in my previous message.
 
This may explain sunrise and sunset and why clouds can be lit from above and below while the sun's altitude is fixed.

It doesn't. You can't have it both ways. The map which features a fixed altitude orbital motion for the Sun/Moon was introduced by the archenemies of the FES, as were the unipolar map and the UA (universal acceleration).

The Sun does rise and set. We have definite photographic evidence:

2003 Total Solar Eclipse - Antarctica - Fred Bruenjes
View attachment 19580

Cosmology of the Desana tribe:

View attachment 19581

Creator Sun = Black Sun = Fenrir = Rahu
Moon brother = Shadow Moon = Ketu

Again, for the absolute proof regarding the rising Sun on a FE, follow the links in my previous message.
That eclipse
This may explain sunrise and sunset and why clouds can be lit from above and below while the sun's altitude is fixed.

It doesn't. You can't have it both ways. The map which features a fixed altitude orbital motion for the Sun/Moon was introduced by the archenemies of the FES, as were the unipolar map and the UA (universal acceleration).

The Sun does rise and set. We have definite photographic evidence:

2003 Total Solar Eclipse - Antarctica - Fred Bruenjes
View attachment 19580

Cosmology of the Desana tribe:

View attachment 19581

Creator Sun = Black Sun = Fenrir = Rahu
Moon brother = Shadow Moon = Ketu

Again, for the absolute proof regarding the rising Sun on a FE, follow the links in my previous message.

This may explain sunrise and sunset and why clouds can be lit from above and below while the sun's altitude is fixed.

It doesn't. You can't have it both ways. The map which features a fixed altitude orbital motion for the Sun/Moon was introduced by the archenemies of the FES, as were the unipolar map and the UA (universal acceleration).

The Sun does rise and set. We have definite photographic evidence:

2003 Total Solar Eclipse - Antarctica - Fred Bruenjes
View attachment 19580

Cosmology of the Desana tribe:

View attachment 19581

Creator Sun = Black Sun = Fenrir = Rahu
Moon brother = Shadow Moon = Ketu

Again, for the absolute proof regarding the rising Sun on a FE, follow the links in my previous message.
Is that photo of the Antarctic eclipse meant to be proof of a rising sun? Breunjes himself describes this photo on page 64 thus

"The image below is a highly processed composite of four images that’s intended to be a
more artistic representation of what the eclipse felt like."

Anyone can look up the details of the 2003 solar eclipse in Antarctica - Solar altitude is given by Nasa as 13degrees at the start to 15 degrees at the finish but here we see the eclipse presented on the horizon .

Did it even occur ? Who is this Breunjes guy ? I'm confused. Genuine questions these.

https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEplot/SEplot2001/SE2003Nov23T.GIF

That's a quick link giving details .
 
Fred Bruenjes is one of the world's greatest photographers. In the photograph we can see the Black Sun (actually a very deep red) as it is passing in front of the Sun; at the same time, the Moon is orbiting BEHIND the visible Sun. On a flat earth it is clear proof that the Sun is rising (or setting), as there is no atmospheric refraction effect which would place the Sun, in that image, at an altitude of 3000 miles. How do we know precisely that it is the Black Sun which is causing the solar eclipse? We have the Allais effect, which cannot be explained by modern science.

"The image below is a highly processed composite of four images that’s intended to be a
more artistic representation of what the eclipse felt like."

The image itself was not touched, except for the color:

I have increased the color saturation slightly to better show the green thru red corona colors, otherwise the image is truthful.

Here is the unprocessed image:

http://www.moonglow.net/eclipse/2003nov23/CRW_4632a.jpg

As for the inverted earth theory (concave earth), I was the first to bring this hypothesis to the FES many years ago, using the only known work which can explain the orbits of the Sun/stars/planets in such a context:

Inverted Earth theory:

The Concave Earth Hypothesis

This is how it works on IE:

[torg] Europa [part 2 of ?] Chapter 1 pt 2 (shape of the cosm section)

Allais effect:

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

The IE hypothesis has the same problems as do the Hollow Earth or Solid Earth conjectures: one has to account for the curvature.
 
Fred Bruenjes is one of the world's greatest photographers. In the photograph we can see the Black Sun (actually a very deep red) as it is passing in front of the Sun; at the same time, the Moon is orbiting BEHIND the visible Sun. On a flat earth it is clear proof that the Sun is rising (or setting), as there is no atmospheric refraction effect which would place the Sun, in that image, at an altitude of 3000 miles. How do we know precisely that it is the Black Sun which is causing the solar eclipse? We have the Allais effect, which cannot be explained by modern science.

"The image below is a highly processed composite of four images that’s intended to be a
more artistic representation of what the eclipse felt like."

The image itself was not touched, except for the color:

I have increased the color saturation slightly to better show the green thru red corona colors, otherwise the image is truthful.

Here is the unprocessed image:

http://www.moonglow.net/eclipse/2003nov23/CRW_4632a.jpg

As for the inverted earth theory (concave earth), I was the first to bring this hypothesis to the FES many years ago, using the only known work which can explain the orbits of the Sun/stars/planets in such a context:

Inverted Earth theory:

The Concave Earth Hypothesis

This is how it works on IE:

[torg] Europa [part 2 of ?] Chapter 1 pt 2 (shape of the cosm section)

Allais effect:

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

The IE hypothesis has the same problems as do the Hollow Earth or Solid Earth conjectures: one has to account for the curvature.
I like the Allais and associated JRA effects. Completely demolish the mainstream gravitational cosmological big bang bollox solar system view of the universe.

He might well be a great photographer but how did he get the eclipse to occur on the horizon when the sun was at 15 degrees of elevation? Has he released the video footage?

Will have a look at the links later out of genuine interest.
 
Well, I'll ask you one last question: How does a lunar eclipse happen on Flat Earth?

No.

How does a lunar eclipse happen in the context of heliocentrism? Because no one can explain it.

I don't think anyone has proven how a lunar eclipse happens.

I have. Many years ago.

At the beginning of history there were NO solar/lunar eclipses. There were two suns: our present sun and the second sun (which is the present day moon). 24 hour daylight. Once Tiamat became the Black Sun and the Shadow Moon (Rahu and Ketu), that is when we had our first eclipses, and the second sun became the moon.

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

Advanced Flat Earth Theory (lunar Allais effect)

He might well be a great photographer but how did he get the eclipse to occur on the horizon when the sun was at 15 degrees of elevation?

Then, you have just discovered a huge discrepancy in the storyline put forth by modern astronomy.
 
Last edited:
Eclipses During 2003

This is the info for the 2003 eclipses .

About the two suns . I recall whilst studying earth sciences ,the carboniferous period particularly, there was a school of thought that the earth had extremely slow or no rotation which led to the huge swampy forests resulting in the vast coal seams found all over the world. These were hard to fit into the day/night scenario.

Two suns makes more sense .

The Allais and JRA effects (named after Profs Jevardin , Rusu and Antonescu ) occur when any two "solar system" objects align with earth . Even alignment with minor planets such as Juno and Ceres has an effect. I'd say any planetary bodies inside the dome or firmament . Hard to find anything on the net about this

https://file.scirp.org/pdf/IJAA_2014030411294841.pdf

Could only find this and it's not the original stuff but may be of interest .

Antarctica is off limits - what we are shown is what the Aholeocracy want us to believe.
 
The Bundahishn (the most fantastic treatise in pre-Flood cosmology and astronomy) tells that at a certain time in the past, the Earth had 24 hour a day light, coming from two Suns (the visible Sun and our present Moon) and that there were no solar or lunar eclipses.

Then, the Black Sun and its companion (the heavenly body which does bring about now the lunar eclipse) caused the first solar and lunar eclipses, in a cosmic catastrophe which is still recalled in various legends around the world.

"Aborigines of the New World: “the Sun and the moon had equal light in the past."


At the other end of the world the Japanese asserted the same: the Nihongi Chronicle says that in the past "the radiance of the moon was next to that of the sun in splendor."


Traditions of many peoples maintain that the Moon lost a large part of its light and became much dimmer than it had been in earlier ages.


The memory of a world without a moon lives in oral tradition among the Indians. The Indians of the Bogota highlands in the eastern Cordilleras of Colombia relate some of their tribal reminiscences to the time before there was a moon. "In the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens," say the tribesmen of Chibchas.


Traditions of diverse peoples offer corroborative testimony to the effect that in a very early age, but still in the memory of mankind, no moon accompanied the Earth."

The description of the first solar eclipse:

"The evil spirit [Ahriman] went toward the luminaries." "He stood upon one-third of the inside of the sky, and he sprang,
like a snake, out of the sky down to the earth." It was the day of the vernal equinox. "He rushed in at noon," and "the sky was shattered and frightened." "Like a fly, he rushed out upon the whole creation, and he injured the world and made it dark at midday as though it were in dark night. And noxious creatures were diffused by him over the earth, biting and venomous, such as the snake, scorpion, frog, and lizard, so that not so much as the point of a needle remained free from noxious creatures."

sunmoon180.gif

Those who have a problem with SIMULTANEOUS SOLAR/LUNAR ECLIPSES should read the following:


From America, Christopher Columbus also wrote to the king and the queen of Spain about the simultaneous eclipses:

This that I have said is what I have heard. What I know is that the year 94 I sailed in 24 degrees to the west in 9 hours, and it could not be mistake because there were eclipses: the sun was in Libra and the moon in Ariete.

Navegación: Documentos: carta Colón 4

Esto que yo he dicho es lo que he oído. Lo que yo sé es que el ańo de 94 navegué en 24° al Poniente en término de nueve horas, y no pudo haber yerro porque hubo eclipses: el sol estaba en Libra y la luna en Ariete.


Now, "Columbus" is NOT describing a selenelion (both the Sun and the eclipsed Moon can be observed at the same time in the RE theory): he used the words "hubo eclipses" (were eclipses), there were a solar and a lunar eclipse occurring at the same time.


As can be seen here, the Santiago-Sydney flight on the Flat Earth map is supposed to take around 40 hours, whereas in reality it takes a 14-hour direct flight.

https://stolenhistory.net/attachments/l-png.19637/

That is the unipolar map, having been delivered to the FES by its archenemies.

This is the bipolar map, which I delivered to the FES:

https://wiki.tfes.org/images/thumb/7/7b/Sandokhan_map.png/450px-Sandokhan_map.png

There is no such thing as Rahu/Ketu.

Then, by all means, explain the Allais effect.

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

Also, the claim that "the surface of the water is ALWAYS flat" is nonsense.

Explain how four trillion billion liters of water adhere to the outer surface of a sphere. Make my day, and invoke attractive gravitation.
 
Nothing "orbits" anything and gravity is made up to pretend that things do.

AEZkcKS.jpg

That is all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top