St. Paul's Cathedral - Buffalo, NY (b.1851)

SH.org OP Username
anotherlayer
SH.org OP Date
2018-07-10 02:25:12
SH.org Reaction Score
11
SH.org Reply Count
11

anotherlayer

Core Member
Active Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2020
Messages
621
Reaction score
139
Location
I'm a Patriot
Just a very short one, specific and dear to my heart. So, I wound up with this wonderful illustration of St. Paul's after seeing it a many years earlier online. I actually was met with scorn on a Buffalo Historical forum when I dared question some of the oddities contained in the illustration. Then my wife and I were sifting through an antique market about two years ago and I could hear my wife yell for me. There it was and so I bought it dirt cheap on a Sunday afternoon. So long story short, have a look at it, it's a lighthearted thread but I'd love to hear any thoughts...

Main Street, Buffalo, From St. Paul's Church
Picturesque America... Oliver Bell Bunce, William Cullen Bryant
New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1872-1874.

stpauls_1874.jpg


Here is another oil painting showing the same perspective that a friend owns:

image1.JPG



What do we know about St. Paul's Church (Cathedral):

In 1848, vestrymen of St. Paul's in Buffalo formed a building committee to erect a new stone church. Being familiar with architect Richard Upjohn’s work through his recently completed Trinity Church in New York City, they desired no other architect for the job, and immediately engaged Upjohn for the commission.

Major structural events:
  • 1849: construction started.
  • 1851: the cathedral was dedicated/consecrated.
  • 1870: the spires on top of the two towers were finished.
  • 1888: a fire caused by a natural gas explosion nearly destroyed the building.
  • 1890: the church reopened after undergoing a renovation overseen by Robert W. Gibson.
The building was listed on the National Register of Historic Places as St. Paul's Episcopal Cathedral in 1973. In 1987, the NRHP listing was revised as "St. Paul's Cathedral (Buffalo)" and the property was further declared a U.S. National Historic Landmark.

************************

So... built in 1851. This illustration is done let's say, 1873. In a short 20 years, the roof sure looks a bit dilapidated. The ivy is just out of control. The steeple is shedding it's shell.

There is a weird guy in black on top of the church carrying what appears to be a messenger bag or perhaps a painter's kit.

2-3 years prior to this illustration, two additional spires were added to two towers. This is what the church looked like after a short 20 years? And when they did the work to add the two spires, they just ignored the other steeple's that were clearly crumbling?

Who is this guy in black???

Here is what the church looked like in 1890:

Screen Shot 2018-07-09 at 9.57.55 PM.png


Here is the church again in 1900-1905:

Screen Shot 2018-07-09 at 10.07.08 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-07-09 at 10.05.44 PM.png


And here it is after the token and obligatory fire:

Screen Shot 2018-07-09 at 10.06.51 PM.png


And finally, here is what it looks like today:

Screen Shot 2018-07-09 at 10.05.17 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-07-09 at 10.15.10 PM.png


Probably nothing more than artistic license but, it's a bit odd and I thought it was neat. And I enjoy this on my wall.
Note: This OP was recovered from the KeeperOfTheKnowledge archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-10 03:35:13
Reaction Score: 3
Something to investigate it is. In the first two images where that guy in black is running... is this a roof he is running down to his death on, or a dirt hill?

Additional photo to the collection. 1908. Notice the spanking brand new building with underground windows sticking out. The photo has HD quality.

I keep on thinking that the people in these images belong to a time frame omitted from history. From that stand point this could be any other year besides 1908. It's like we are being offered to understand things differently from their real meaning.

Hmm, Buffalo is pretty fascinating. While looking for this topic related info, came up on a couple other fun things. Will share later.

So far trying to find some sort of a disaster. If that indeed is a mound of dirt next to the Cathedral, there has to be some evidence of it left.

Only found the Great Flood of 1844 so far:
Below is the original of the first two images in this thread. Titled: 1894 Wood Engraving Main Street Buffalo New York Cityscape St. Pauls Church

 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: wizz33
Date: 2018-07-10 08:18:40
Reaction Score: 1
it looks like some sort volcano or some sort of mud bomb the center is above the horizon
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-10 12:48:31
Reaction Score: 1
This vegetation on the tower should suggest what? That the building was unkept for a while?

There is only one podt fire picture that I could find.

Also a few additional church progression images can be found here.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: anotherlayer
Date: 2018-07-10 14:18:41
Reaction Score: 1
He is on top of the church! I believe he is here. I could be wrong, it's early in the day ;)

Screen Shot 2018-07-10 at 9.40.39 AM.png

Yes! What on earth storm is coming in?

That was my immediate thought, but you do see that ivy has always been growing on this church. So, sure, artist's desire to make the place older, more beat-up? I was told that this was most likely copied from a photograph. Not sure I believe that, but I would love to see that actual photo.

My impression now is that the guy in black on top of the church is the artist. Why on earth he insisted on being in the drawing, I have no idea.

I believe you might be looking for the 'The Burning of Buffalo'. It's the magical year of 1813. Here are some garbage stories:

The Burning of Buffalo, 200 Years Ago
The Burning of Buffalo, Buffalo History
The Battle of Buffalo, Black Rock

Here is my post from a bit ago on Reddit...

Screen Shot 2018-07-10 at 10.20.19 AM.png

lol.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-10 18:44:39
Reaction Score: 0
They clearly did not like photographing construction process back then :)
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: humanoidlord
Date: 2018-07-11 02:45:34
Reaction Score: 0
uh oh, there is a bunch of identical images of a moss/vine covered saint petersburg too!
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-11 03:00:19
Reaction Score: 1
Saint Petersburg got some as well. I like how for the second photo Google says, "Artificial Ruins"

 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: MoonWatcher
Date: 2018-07-11 22:30:56
Reaction Score: 2
This picture is interesting because of the subject matter. The man or boy on the roof is risking his life. For what? The original was produced late in the lives of two well-connected men. Perhaps there is an unknown symbology being shown here that's invisible to us, but important enough to be copied by the painter. This scene isn't something one would see in the course of daily life. Subject matter for paintings and such was more commonly occurring back then. I'll bet there's some kind of "widow's son" thing going on here that only a Freemason would be able to appreciate. Great eye noticing the ivy, the disrepair and the dates. I'll be keeping my own peeled for such discrepancies.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top