The Falsification of the History of Early Christianity, W. Kammeier (Auto-Translated)

The Falsification of the History of Early Christianity, W. Kammeier (Auto-Translated)

Log in to download

OBRYprojekt

Contributor
Active Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
39
Reaction score
96
When a historical analysis of the bible is made, the historian assumes the role of "liberal theologian" and the problem with texts by liberal theologians is that they transit the rational sphere of history and man's relationship with God.

Imagine you find a text that says right away: if you read this to the end you will be inexcusable about your future. If you accept the text you live, but if you reject it you die.

Well, this is the case of the Bible, there is no middle ground. A liberal theologian is a travel guide that will show you only the supposed problems of historical interpretation of the Bible.

He starts from the beginning of the trip knowing he will die at the end and wants to convince you that his rational approach is superior. Ultimately, there is no such thing as a "liberal theologian", he is just a liberal who steals the label of theologian to take on the role of guide on the journey that leads to hell.
 
I was taught at school that, shortly after Jesus departed, his disciples all woke up one day and found they could do the same things as Jesus. These supernatural abilities spread like wild fire, more and more people joined the group and so on. The Roman Empire considered this a threat so they began persecuting the christians. Nonetheless, Christianity flourished and many people found they could do amazing things.

I always wondered what happened to them, and recently have come across the idea of the millenial reign and all the amazing buildings and so on which are still being erased from our history.
 
I was taught at school that, shortly after Jesus departed, his disciples all woke up one day and found they could do the same things as Jesus. These supernatural abilities spread like wild fire, more and more people joined the group and so on. The Roman Empire considered this a threat so they began persecuting the christians. Nonetheless, Christianity flourished and many people found they could do amazing things.

I always wondered what happened to them, and recently have come across the idea of the millenial reign and all the amazing buildings and so on which are still being erased from our history.
Deu 13:1 If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises among you, and he gives you a sign or a wonder,
Deu 13:2 and the sign or the wonder comes to pass, of which he spoke to you, saying, “Let’s go after other gods” (which you have not known) “and let’s serve them;”
Deu 13:3 you shall not listen to the words of that prophet, or to that dreamer of dreams; for YEUE your God is testing you, to know whether you love YEUE your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
Deu 13:4 You shall walk after YEUE your God, fear him, keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and you shall serve him, and cling to him.
Deu 13:5 That prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death, because he has spoken rebellion against YEUE your God, who brought you out of the land of Mitsrym, and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to draw you aside out of the way which YEUE your God commanded you to walk in. So you shall remove the evil from among you.

There is a serious problem existing between Old and New Testament ideas. And virtually no one talks about it with any degree of intelligent objectivity.
 
There is a serious problem existing between Old and New Testament ideas. And virtually no one talks about it with any degree of intelligent objectivity.
Two. Different. Gods.

The Old Testament God is apparently the Demiurge. The demiurge is given many names in the Gnostic scriptures, but the three most common ones are Yaldabaoth (also spelled “Ialdabaoth”), Samael, and Saklas. “Saklas” comes from the Aramaic word for “fool,” and “Samael” is Aramaic for “Blind God” or “God of the Blind.” The meaning of “Yaldabaoth” is uncertain. The Gnostic text On the Origin of the World fancifully translates it as “Youth, move over there,” but no word or string of words that sounds like “Yaldabaoth” meant that in any ancient Mediterranean language. “Yaldabaoth” is somewhat close to “child of chaos” in Aramaic, but that’s still a stretch, as is the intuitively plausible suggestion that it could be a condensed form of “Yahweh, Lord of Sabbaths.”


The God that Jesus and his Apostles worship is supposed to be the All Father. For the Gnostics, God was nothing like the image of a stern but kind old man in the clouds that, rightly or wrongly, many of us think of when we think of the Christian God. Instead, he was utterly ineffable and inhuman – something that couldn’t be accurately characterized in any human language. You couldn’t even say that he created the world, because that was the work of another, lesser, more human-like being (the demiurge). The Gnostics referred to God as “the One,” “the One Who Is,” “the Great Invisible Spirit,” “the Unknown Silent One,” “the Abyss,”, “the non-being God,” and other such deliberately mysterious designations.

The problem between Old and New testaments is that they are two different Gods. The Jews worship the god of the OT, and The Christians follow the teaching of Jesus and worship the god of the NT. It gets even more substantive when you look into the Synagogue of Satan, or the idea that many “Jews” believe that salvation lie in sin, if that were the case their God should be evil, and the Gnostic scriptures literally say this. Strange as it may at first seem, this, too, was probably a good-faith interpretation of Christian scriptures that were already widespread, popular, and authoritative in the Gnostics’ time. After all, the Gospel of Luke (4:6) and the Gospel of Matthew (4:8) assume that Satan is the ruler of the physical world when Satan offers Jesus the world in exchange for his worship. Likewise, the Gospel of John mentions an evil “ruler (demiurge) of this world” in no less than three places (12:31, 14:30, and 16:11). Luke (10:18) and John (12:31) both speak of Satan or a Satan-like entity ruling the earth from the sky and being vanquished by Jesus’s ministry. 1 John 5:19 is even more blunt: “We know that we are God’s children, and that the whole world lies under the power of the evil one.”
 
This is a big step making this resource available BUT it seems to have passed most people by the way...
I'm looking for the appendices, One by Roland Bohlinger and another by Wolfgang Zarnack, if anyone can throw some light please.
 
Two. Different. Gods.

The Old Testament God is apparently the Demiurge. The demiurge is given many names in the Gnostic scriptures, but the three most common ones are Yaldabaoth (also spelled “Ialdabaoth”), Samael, and Saklas. “Saklas” comes from the Aramaic word for “fool,” and “Samael” is Aramaic for “Blind God” or “God of the Blind.” The meaning of “Yaldabaoth” is uncertain. The Gnostic text On the Origin of the World fancifully translates it as “Youth, move over there,” but no word or string of words that sounds like “Yaldabaoth” meant that in any ancient Mediterranean language. “Yaldabaoth” is somewhat close to “child of chaos” in Aramaic, but that’s still a stretch, as is the intuitively plausible suggestion that it could be a condensed form of “Yahweh, Lord of Sabbaths.”


The God that Jesus and his Apostles worship is supposed to be the All Father. For the Gnostics, God was nothing like the image of a stern but kind old man in the clouds that, rightly or wrongly, many of us think of when we think of the Christian God. Instead, he was utterly ineffable and inhuman – something that couldn’t be accurately characterized in any human language. You couldn’t even say that he created the world, because that was the work of another, lesser, more human-like being (the demiurge). The Gnostics referred to God as “the One,” “the One Who Is,” “the Great Invisible Spirit,” “the Unknown Silent One,” “the Abyss,”, “the non-being God,” and other such deliberately mysterious designations.

The problem between Old and New testaments is that they are two different Gods. The Jews worship the god of the OT, and The Christians follow the teaching of Jesus and worship the god of the NT. It gets even more substantive when you look into the Synagogue of Satan, or the idea that many “Jews” believe that salvation lie in sin, if that were the case their God should be evil, and the Gnostic scriptures literally say this. Strange as it may at first seem, this, too, was probably a good-faith interpretation of Christian scriptures that were already widespread, popular, and authoritative in the Gnostics’ time. After all, the Gospel of Luke (4:6) and the Gospel of Matthew (4:8) assume that Satan is the ruler of the physical world when Satan offers Jesus the world in exchange for his worship. Likewise, the Gospel of John mentions an evil “ruler (demiurge) of this world” in no less than three places (12:31, 14:30, and 16:11). Luke (10:18) and John (12:31) both speak of Satan or a Satan-like entity ruling the earth from the sky and being vanquished by Jesus’s ministry. 1 John 5:19 is even more blunt: “We know that we are God’s children, and that the whole world lies under the power of the evil one.”
"The problem between Old and New testaments is that they are two different Gods. The Jews worship the god of the OT, and The Christians follow the teaching of Jesus and worship the god of the NT."
There is only one God. Christians and Jews worship the same god. "Yahweh". Jesus, born a Jew and raised in the Jewish faith. Jesus did not create a new god or a new religion; but he changed the message and way God was worshipped. In 324 AD, at the council of Nicaea the Christian bishops designated Jesus as the "reincarnation" of Yahweh the Creator God.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top