The sudden world wide emergence of Syphilis

Tapioca

Core Member
Active Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2023
Messages
259
Reaction score
393
I have been reading the book "The Columbian Exchange" and there is a chapter on the sudden appearance of venereal syphilis around the world in the late 15th century and early 16th century.

There are no records in any ancient culture of venereal syphilis. The variety of names it was given in the past always placed the origin in a different place.

Italians called in the French disease.
English called in the French disease, Bordeaux disease, or Spanish disease
French called it the disease of Naples.
Polish called it the German disease.
Russians called it the Polish disease.
Middle Easterners called it the European pustules.
Indians called it the disease of the Franks (western Europeans).
Chinese called it the Tang Sore - Tang was the main port used by the West at the time.
Japanese called it the Portuguese disease.

Girolamo Fracastoros pinned the word syphilis in 1520s.

Records of the late 15th and early 16th century are full of lamentations on the rapid spread of syphilis and effects which often occurred within a short time from infection. There are two theories:

1. Columbus Theory: Syphilis was brought BACK from the Americas. Syphilitic bone changes did not appear in Europe before the 1500s. Egyptian and Nubian bones did not show any trace of syphilis injuries to bones or teeth in ancient times. Paleopathologiests found American soil pre-Columbian bones displaying almost surely syphilic damage. The belief at the time was God created a disease and remedy from the same location. A sure cure was a concoction made from a Western American plant called guaiacum.


2. Unitarian Theory: Syphilis is a syndrome of a multi-faceted world wide disease Treponematosis. It had existed in pre-Columbian times but mutated into its deadly venereal form and carried by sailors around the world from and to brothels, prostitutes, etc. Medieval physicians only knew surface symptoms and may have diagnosed from many common diseases such as leprosy, small pox, scabies, etc.
 
It sounds like the author that book was not aware of the holes in those two theories.

Some excerpts from Dr. Sam Bailey's video presentation at The Shame of Syphilis - Dr Sam Bailey are quoted below:

...Once known as the Great Imitator for its non-specific symptoms...it is asserted that one infectious type of bacterium is spreading around and creating new victims. However, these tests designed to detect their presence have discredited germ theory once again...

...there is no scientific evidence to back up the claim that syphilis is contagious and caused by trypanema bacteria. The presence of the bacteria does not equate to disease, although when the underlying terrain becomes compromised, for whatever physical or psychological reason, then the bacteria may proliferate as they deal with the mess. Like other purported infectious diseases, the epidemiological data regarding syphilis has been misconstrued...

People with similar lifestyles and environmental conditions manifest similar diseases, which has nothing to do with contagion...

There is no evidence that a healthy person will develop syphilis simply by coming into contact with someone that is said to have the disease.

Nobody can "catch", but their living circumstances may invite disease in, and that is what needs to be taken care of.

More likely, conditions were unhealthy in those locations and times--whether related to environment/pollution, nutrition (lack thereof), mental (psychological/spiritual), etc.

My two cents, in light of Bailey's summary: it seems possible that broad social, technological, economic, and/or political developments, etc., may have been what "spread", leading to various forms of unwellness--not some yet-unproven, contagious, disease-causing entity.
 
Last edited:
It sounds like the author that book was not aware of the holes in those two theories.

Some excerpts from Dr. Sam Bailey's video presentation at The Shame of Syphilis - Dr Sam Bailey are quoted below:



More likely, conditions were unhealthy in those locations and times--whether related to environment/pollution, nutrition (lack thereof), mental (psychological/spiritual), etc.

My two cents, in light of Bailey's summary: it seems possible that broad social, technological, economic, and/or political developments, etc., may have been what "spread", leading to various forms of unwellness--not some yet-unproven, contagious, disease-causing entity.
Thanks for that! I never heard about either idea or had much interest in syphilis until I started reading the Columbian Exchange.

All I knew was it was blamed for many deaths and causing insanity. It has such a wide range of symptoms it seems "complications from syphilis" that kills. One "cure" was mercury so it is syphilis related poisoning?

Some who are suspected to have been infected or died were Edgar Allan Poe, Al Capone, Bram Stoker, Nietzsche.
 
Last edited:
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top