SH Archive 1891 Pterodactyl Hunt in California

SH.org OP Username
KorbenDallas
SH.org OP Date
2018-08-25 23:58:50
SH.org Reaction Score
6
SH.org Reply Count
13

KD Archive

Not actually KorbenDallas
Active Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2020
Messages
4,691
Reaction score
1,500
I do find some things hard to believe, for they sound way too far fetched and unrealistic. At the same time, I understand, that this lack of trust of mine is based on two major aspects:
  • I was taught that all the dinosaurs became extinct 65 mln years ago
  • I have never seen a living dinosaur
Yet, the abundance of the 19th, and early 20th century publications pertaining to recovering, killing, observing, and in some cases photographing of the supposedly extinct prehistoric beasts, at the very least, raises some questions.
  • Why do we place so little trust into the above mentioned accounts?
  • Can every single article be a hoax?
  • Why would newspapers publish articles which contain "yellow press" type of information?
And the most obvious answers to the above questions I could come up with were: I was taught that all the dinosaurs became extinct 65 mln years ago, and that I have never seen a living dinosaur.

Our traditional science ridicules and laughs at those people, accusing them of sensationalism, greed for fame and all other sorts of disgraceful things. Clearly, they do have reasons like, Tombstone’s Flying Monster, to claim hoaxes and fakes. But wouldn't it take a hoax, or two to discredit the entire story line?

Well, may be we should revisit those 100 year old stories, and make our own judgement.

pterosaur_fresno.jpg

Below you will find two of the most famous 19th century pterosaur cases. Look through, and if you feel like it, share your opinion with other forum members.
Gunning for Dragons in 1891
Pterodactyls-1891-02.jpg
August 5, 1891, issue of the Los Angeles Herald
Los Angeles Herald, Volume 36, Number 107, 5 August 1891

The Pterodactyl Hunt of 1890
tombstone_monster.png
Tombstone epitaph., April 26, 1890

This story was proven to be a hoax based on the fake photograph allegedly published along side of this story. I personally did not see that photograph in the newspaper.

t-bird.jpg wounded-sontag.jpg

While the photograph clearly appears to be a product of some creative genius, it does not explain the actual article. Indeed, there were very successful attempts to discredit the story.
  • One of those involved the alleged poor economic situation in Tombstone in 1890. But that very same newspaper paints a different picture. It's enough to take a look at the actual contents (including commercial ads section in the back) to question this "economic" reason.
+ Tombstone Lodges doing fine...
lodges_tombstone.png

  • The other reason is more scientific in its appearance. The article claims that the creature's wingspan was 160 feet. By comparison, Queztalcoatlus, the largest known pterosaur, had a wingspan of 36-39 feet, less than one-fifth that of the Tombstone flying monster. While 160 feet definitely sounds like way too much, it only sounds strange when compared to what we know today, or to what we are allowed to know.
One way or the other, we did have an article published, and below are the contents of the article. The judgement is all yours.

Tombstone epitaph., April 26, 1890

Contemporary pterosaur sightings

usa-sightings-published-2017.jpg
A nonfiction-cryptozoology author has analyzed reports of non-extinct pterosaurs, commonly called “pterodactyls” or “flying dinosaurs,” and found how sightings relate to thirty-three states (and Washington D.C.) of the United States. Jonathan Whitcomb, of Murray, Utah, has been receiving emails, and an occasional phone call, over a period of 13 years, from eyewitnesses from five continents, and most reported sightings are in North America.

Using 161 sighting reports, which Whitcomb chose after eliminating ones that had too much potential for misidentification of a bird, he found that California and Texas had the most, at 27 and 11, but he ascribed that to higher human populations in those two states. (On this list, seventeen U.S. states had no reported sightings.) Other findings surprised Whitcomb.

When correlated with human population, using six million as a typical U. S. state, the winner for most reported sightings of living pterosaurs is Hawaii, with 44.1. Second place, at 19.5, goes to Utah, and Oklahoma is third with 11.2.

Statistics on Living Pterosaur Sightings in the USA
Live Pterosaur
Pterosaurs Not Extinct

* * * * *
KD: I'm pretty sure that Photoshop can work both ways. If we have a photograph depicting an unwanted object, all it would take is one "original" photograph, where that unwanted object would not be not present.

So, there it is. We have old articles, unknown authenticity photographs, scientific denial, and a whole lot of questions.
Note: This OP was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: AiahAvezred
Date: 2018-08-26 02:14:44
Reaction Score: 1
Here's an interesting thing about animals: they all look the same. Pick one type of animal, hell pick 10, image search them. Then, try to find as much variation as there is in those hoax photos.

Or you can believe that the only 4 pteros ever to caught and photographed are all from different species
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Apollyon
Date: 2018-08-26 02:48:40
Reaction Score: 3
This is a good thread to tug on. I'm not saying I believe those photos to be legit but I will say that there is enough circumstantial evidence to suggest (not so woolly) mammoths lived very recently in northern Siberia why not giant birds as well

Liakoff island
Ancient horse found perfectly preserved in Siberian permafrost
Giant birds
More giant birds
ichthyosaur
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: BStankman
Date: 2018-08-26 09:04:46
Reaction Score: 1
I am not going to deny the existence of big birds.
But I am thinking these stories are maybe cover for the Thunderbird.
Which sounds like it is in use at least 10 years before the Wright brothers.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-08-27 15:31:10
Reaction Score: 1
I don't know of anyone in Oklahoma that has seen a pteradactyl. Supposedly, Oklahoma is one of the hot spot areas for sighting them. We have some really big birds here but they're identifiable (chicken hawks, turkey vultures, etc.). Did have a big shadow fly over me while driving. Wing span was as wide as my truck. Happened too quickly to see what it was and, as I was driving 60mph, I didn't try taking my eyes off the road to look in the rear view for it. Still don't think it was a pteradactyl but who knows? Will have to watch the sky more carefully when I'm out and about.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Wyrdling
Date: 2018-12-15 11:50:48
Reaction Score: 7
This thread peaked my interest. A large avian creature is depicted on the Urbano Monte map carrying off an elephant near the 'Antarctic' coastline near South America. Note the shape of its head in comparison to the above photos already posted.

ptero.jpg
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: moriyah
Date: 2019-02-14 07:00:55
Reaction Score: 1
One thing about people activities; there has to be a vested interest to produce a show. Ego is one thing, money is another, there are not too many others at all.
The other factor is 'conspiracy'. It is extremely hard to keep a secret; like a 'conspiracy to deceive with a hoax'.
Anyone who really studies wildlife, as in plants, animals, birds, reptiles, knows there is tremendous variation within a single species. Even then; Cannabis genus has only two species but thousands of strains. Oregano is one genus but at least 120 species. Rose is one genus with 145 wild species and over 22,000 hybrids.
50 yrs ago I was reading reports from 100yrs before that and there was so much 'stuff' that nobody would believe today but then...the Smithsonian would be there as fast as the Men in Black to take away the evidence. Especially Giant Skeletons.
How many people have been close enough to a Grizzly or Wolf to say "it was just like that other wolf I ran into yesterday"? Not many I would guess.
I do note that these 'hunting party's' were well armed and smart enough not to hunt a dinosaur on their own risk. Safety in numbers!!!
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top