SH Archive 1893-ish Yerkes Telescope: Largest Refracting Telescope Ever

SH.org OP Username
Banta
SH.org OP Date
2019-08-28 18:00:26
SH.org Reaction Score
4
SH.org Reply Count
4

Archive

Old SH Archive
Joined
Sep 8, 2020
Messages
17,737
Reaction score
3,164
All I was trying to do was read the 1893 book that Korben linked to in this thread:

1893: 100 MPH High Speed Electric Train

But then I read something like this on the first page:

1567007198686.png

Being that we're in 1893, it immediately makes me think that it's the telescope at the Chicago Columbian Exposition. And it appears to be. Let's wiki a little bit, first Charles Yerkes:

Charles Yerkes - Wikipedia

I think he probably warrants more study, but there are too many threads here. Staying with the main topic the Yerkes Observatory, the place where the telescope ended up:

Yerkes Observatory - Wikipedia

So, the telescope was basically just a shell at the expo. Right?

Yerkes-Telescope-Worlds-Columbian-Exposition-Illustrated-Oct-1893-p202.jpg

The Yerkes Telescope, Great Revealer of the Solar System - Chicago's 1893 World's Fair

Yerkes Observatory Dedication -- October 21, 1897 | Connecting the Windy City

So, some problems here. Let's look at one of the companies cited with the production of the telescope, Alvin Clark & Sons:

Alvan Clark & Sons - Wikipedia

American company making telescopes for Russia in the 19th century. What a history of cooperation in the skies! What happened to the lens that Hale found. Hale, by the way:

George Ellery Hale - Wikipedia

Don't worry, if you read this, you'll see that he didn't really see an elf, it was a little demon. A metaphorical one. Probably.

2000JHA....31...93S Page 93

The company that is credited with the mounting and tube, Warner & Swasey:

WARNER & SWASEY CO. | Encyclopedia of Cleveland History | Case Western Reserve University

A couple more things about the telescope:

Yerkes Telescope

The 40-inch.

Getting murkier...

So, after the expo, the telescope was relocated to the newly built Yerkes Observatory:
1567012356819.png
1567012474695.png
1567012376180.png

Just the facts, Ma'am.

1567014247771.png

A World's Fair Moment: The Star that Connected 1893 and 1933

The architect, Henry Ives Cobb:
Henry-Ives-Cobb-Burnham-Ryerson-Library.jpg

Yerkes-Observatory-main-entrance.jpg








Henry Ives Cobb’s Yerkes Observatory (1897) features whimsical decorative detail reminiscent of his earlier Fisheries Building at the 1893 World’s Fair.

Yerkes Observatory Faces Uncertain Future - Chicago's 1893 World's Fair

This video from 2017 below has some more details on the telescope.

Astronomer Dan Koehler talking about different eyepieces at 5:10:

And it might be several decades before anyone uses it again.

Yerkes Observatory heirs reported slowing down the next move

And now there's some kind of a legal battle going on, with the Yerkes family being involved. Just a mess.

So, when exactly was this telescope put all together? Is it possible it was functional for the 1893 Expo? What happened to subsequent attempts to build larger ones (which, if you read through the linked document on Hale's elf, he had plans to construct a 60 inch one that seems to have fallen through)?
9347e5c87fabf0fcb65f5d9c9d00615d.jpg

6822b1164336f5f7f56f1e125de4e8eb--on-the-night-the-charles.jpg


BONUS:

Another closed observatory, the one named after our telescope manufacturers, Warner & Swasey, Just thought it looked cool.

abandoned observatory in east cleveland ohio

Abandoned Observatory in East Cleveland Ohio
The Incredible Ruins of an Abandoned Observatory
Note: This OP was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Timeshifter
Date: 2019-08-28 19:15:33
Reaction Score: 1
Perhaps they were looking for something that needed a lot of low light capability?

What could they have been searching the skies for in 1883 ish?

Something like this?

Screenshot_20190828-200712_Chrome.jpg

Source

Also came across this


'In 1890, E. S. Holden, the Director of the Lick Observatory, made the announcement in the Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, wich signalled the beginning of E. E. Barnard work in using the Crocker Astrograph to photograph the star fields of the "Milky Way" with the Willard lens, a 5 inch Dallmeyer camera. During the period 1892 to 1895 E. E. Barnard took 89 images mainly of regions near to the Milky Way'

Heres one of the said images...

20190828_201022.jpg
And the camera

willard_lens_barnard.jpg

So this Yerkes Telescope would have certainly being used for photographing small, distant objects in the 1880s. But what?

Or if indeed it was operational at the expo, maybe they were showing something to people...

:unsure:
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: wooptywoop
Date: 2019-08-29 19:23:02
Reaction Score: 1
Wow, such a wonderful discovery and great research!
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2019-08-29 19:57:35
Reaction Score: 3
This will sound pretty out there for the most. I’m considering a possibility of what we call ISS (and the satellite corps) being that secret weapon system we inherited from those who came before us.

Could it be what they were looking for? I don’t know.

The dog and pony show of us launching stuff into space would be just that, a show.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Banta
Date: 2019-08-31 17:13:42
Reaction Score: 0
So, I stand corrected on Hale looking into building a larger refracting telescope. He DID help get a 60" reflecting telescope built, almost immediately after going to the trouble to build the Yerkes Observatory:

snip.JPG
Read more: Difference Between Reflecting and Refracting Telescopes | Difference Between http://www.differencebetween.net/technology/difference-between-reflecting-and-refracting-telescopes/#ixzz5yCLTnCR

Sorry to link the whole article below, but I think it's really interesting in a lot of different ways:

Building the 60-inch Telescope
by Mike Simmons
With the dedication of the great 40-inch refracting telescope at Yerkes Observatory in southern Wisconsin in 1897, George Ellery Hale had completed the world’s largest telescope. But in the basement (??) below the 40-inch, the glass for a telescope of revolutionary size and design lay awaiting the funds that would eventually place it in its mounting in the mountains of southern California. It would be eleven more years before the 60-inch reflector of the Mount Wilson Observatory would become reality.

The 60-inch diameter disk of plate glass, 7 1/2 inches thick and weighing 1900 pounds (860 kg), was purchased by Hale’s father, William, in 1894 as a gift to help his son’s career. (BANTA: The Hales were a treasure trove of lenses and glass, I guess...) After its arrival from the St. Gobain glass works in France in 1896, the elder Hale gave the disk to the University of Chicago, which was then building the Yerkes Observatory, with the provision that a suitable mounting and housing be provided. William Hale promised to fund the grinding and figuring of the mirror himself, but his death left George Hale looking for funds for this new project. Despite some preliminary grinding of the glass by George Ritchey at Yerkes, the 60-inch would have to wait for a new benefactor.


George Willis Ritchey, on the steps in front of Yerkes Observatory around the time he built his 24-inch reflector, the prototype for the 60-inch. Photo: University of Chicago/ Yerkes Observatory

The great refracting telescopes, which use a lens to form the image, had reached a practical limit with the 40-inch (having a lens 40 inches in diameter). A larger lens would sag under its own weight (unless it was very thick and therefore absorbed too much light), but the image-forming mirror of a telescope is supported under its back-side at the bottom of the telescope tube. A reflector is also more compact – the dome housing the 60-inch reflector is only two-thirds the size of that required for the 40-inch refractor. Even with very large mirrors, which gather great amount of light from faint objects, the much shorter focal length allowed the light to be concentrated into a a relatively small, bright image with a reflector, allowing short exposure times. Also, the lens of a refractor absorbs blue light while a mirror does not. These two factors made some photographs possible with the reflector which could not be made with the large refractors. After experimenting with a new reflector, Hale soon wrote that the 40-inch refractor “is far outdone by the two-foot reflecting telescope recently constructed in the instrument shop of Yerkes Observatory” for the photography of many objects. (BANTA: Cripes, it's too bad he didn't realize this before he had Yerkes build this basically useless refracting telescope. Live and learn, I guess.)


George Ritchey’s 24-inch reflector at Yerkes, with which he tested many of his ideas for the 60-inch Telescope. It produced better photographs than the giant 40-inch refractor. (BANTA: I thought refracting would be better for photos? Man, that telescope sucked!) Photo: University of Chicago/ Yerkes Observatory

In 1902, Hale applied to the recently formed Carnegie Institution of Washington to establish a new observatory devoted to solar research on Mount Wilson. Hale proposed that a 60-inch reflector for stellar astronomy also be built as part of a “larger plan”, and he included letters of support from such luminaries as Sir William Huggins, who called large reflectors the “telescope of discovery of the future.”

With the founding of the the Mount Wilson Solar Observatory in 1904 (the word “Solar” was dropped from the name with the completion of the 100-inch telescope in 1917), work on the 60-inch began in earnest. After six months of grinding a rough concave surface, the exacting and tedious job of figuring and polishing the surface of the mirror began in the autumn of 1905. Because the shape of the mirror had to be perfect to within a few millionths of an inch across its five-foot surface, special care was required to insure the mirror’s accuracy. Accordingly, a special room was built where, for nearly the next two years, the opticians would slowly grind away a fraction of an inch of glass as the mirror’s final figure was produced. The room was kept at a constant temperature to avoid changes in the shape of the glass’s surface; even the distortion caused by the heat of a person’s hand could be instantly detected by the test instruments. To prevent foreign material from getting into the grinding compounds and scratching the mirror, the windows were made double and sealed tight, while outside air was filtered on entering the room. The walls and ceiling were shellacked and, during polishing, canvas was hung over the mirror while the floor was kept wet to prevent flying dust. Before anyone could enter the room, he had to don a surgical gown and cap.


In Carnegie’s optical lab in Pasadena, an unknown optician poses beside the 60-inch mirror, which has been tilted upright for testing. Ritchey’s grinding machine now rests in the Smithsonian. Photo: Carnegie/ Huntington Library

Despite these extraordinary precautions, the entire surface of the mirror was deeply scratched by an unknown substance in one of the polishing compounds one day in April, 1907, just as it was receiving its finishing touches. After 1 1/2 years of tedious labor, the mirror had to be ground back to a sphere and the figuring of the parabolic surface begun again. This time, though, the experience already gained by this mirror – almost twice the size of any other ever made – allowed them to complete the work in just four months. By September, 1907, the world’s largest telescope mirror was ready for its mount, but other equally large problems would cause further delays. (To watch a short video of Ritchey’s grinding machine, now at the Smithsonian, go here. )

The majority of the massive mounting and the steel for the dome was built by the Union Iron Works in San Francisco. The vital statistics of the mounting are truly impressive. The base is triangular, 15 feet by 9 feet in two parts, each of which weighs 3 1/2 tons. The polar axis, about which the telescope turns as it tracks the stars, is 15 feet long, and weight 4 1/2 tons despite being hollow. The cast-iron fork in which the telescope tube rides weighs 5 tons.

In order to move the telescope smoothly during long exposures and to accurately point it to almost any part of the sky, a new system had to be developed to maneuver the 22 tons of moving parts. Over the previous 30 years, astronomers had tried building telescope mounts with a trough in which mercury was used to float most of the weight of the telescope. This system had not always been successful, but Hale and Ritchey felt they could make it work on the 60-inch. A steel float, 10 feet in diameter, and weighing 4 tons, was fitted to the polar axis. With a 1/8-inch space between the trough and float filled with 650 pounds of mercury, over 21 1/2 tons of the telescope is supported, with just five percent of the weight left to be taken up by the bearings.


The polar axle, ready to be hoisted into place in the 60-inch dome. On the right, is the large steel drum that will float in a tank with only a few gallons of mercury, supporting 95% of the telescope’s weight. On the left is the gear that will slowly rotate the telescope to compensate for Earth’s rotation. Photo: Carnegie/ Huntington Library

Once again, as the mounting was nearing completion, unexpected difficulties caused delays. On April 18, 1906, the great San Francisco earthquake caused considerable damage at the Union Iron Works, but the 60-inch “escaped injury, though by the barest of margins.” (BANTA: I'm guessing a piano fell off a roof right next to it. Phew!) However, reconstruction and labor strikes caused the shipment of the mounting to be delayed for many months.

Even after the mounting was shipped, much work remained to be done by the Mount Wilson shops. The gear that would drive the telescope while it tracked the object under study would need to have the teeth cut in it. Cutting 1080 teeth in a gear 10 feet in diameter and weighing 2 tons is a big enough task, but any error would cause improper tracking of the object under study. Therefore, the cutting process had to be carried out with almost the precision of mirror-making. The 6-foot-tall clock drive mechanism, patterned after that of the Yerkes 40-inch refractor, also had to be built and installed. Many other parts, such as motors and mirror supports, were also built by the Mount Wilson staff.

Because the telescope’s design was so revolutionary, Hale wanted to test the mount before moving it up the tortuous 9 1/2 mile road to Mount Wilson, where it would be out of reach of the shops. Therefore, a special building was constructed in Pasadena in which the mounting could be tested. The world’s largest telescope, minus its mirror, was then built and tested in the city, out of the view of the night sky. (BANTA: These things never seem to get set up with all their parts! How do you test a reflecting telescope without a reflector, again??) The mounting moved as smoothly as had been hoped, and it was soon disassembled and readied for the trip to the summit. The test of its tracking accuracy had to await the mounting of the mirror and a test with the stars.

Transportation of such enormous parts to the top of a mountain was itself a major undertaking. The narrow trail over which mule teams had hauled telescope parts and supplies to the mountaintop was widened to a road that could accommodate motor traffic. After nearly a year’s work, the road was inaugurated by a brand new 1907 Franklin making the trip to the summit on May 28, 1907.

The Observatory then tested a new truck it had just received. In what might be considered state-of-the-art technology in 1907, this truck carried a generator which produced electricity for four electric motors, one on each wheel. The front and rear wheels could be steered independently in order to negotiate the sharp turns in the mountain road. Though designed for 5-ton loads, the truck proved inadequate and was rebuilt by the Mount Wilson shops. It could then take 3-ton loads to the summit, but four mules had to be added to get the 5-ton loads up the steepest slopes.


In front of Carnegie’s Pasadena shops, the special gas/electric truck is loaded with the 60-inch tube, ready for the tight curves up the mountain road. Photo: Carnegie/Huntington Library


The truck proved to be too expensive to use regularly. One man with four mules could accomplish more than the truck and three men, despite the mules’ limit of two tons per load. All of the material for the building and dome for the 60-inch telescope, 150 tons in all, was pulled to the top by mule teams. The truck was reserved for the heaviest pieces of the mounting, the most difficult of which was the telescope tube, 6 1/2 feet wide and 18 feet long, which was transported as a single piece. By July 1908, the mounting was on Mount Wilson.


The telescope tube coming up the newly widened road. Photo: Carnegie/ Huntington Library

Even the housing for this revolutionary telescope required innovations in its design. The dome, fifty-eight feet in diameter on the inside, was covered with a layer of canvas. Held in place by a metal framework, the canvas and two-foot air space between it and the sheet metal of the inner dome were designed to reduce the heating of the air on the inside during the day. The canvas was replaced by metal in 1912. To further reduce the effect of temperature variations on the telescope, the mounting was covered with blankets during the day and a refrigeration unit was planned, but these precautions have since been found to be unnecessary. A cork lining on the inside surface of the dome to prevent dripping from condensation has likewise been removed.


The 60-inch dome ready for the canvas sunshade that will minimize heating of the interior during the day. Later, this was replaced with a metal covering. Photo: Carnegie/ Huntington Library

With all of the other pieces in place, the heart of the telescope, the 60-inch mirror, was placed in the telescope on December 7, 1908. A few evenings later on December 13, the telescope was used for the first time, and the first photographs from it were taken on December 20. The great telescope at once lived up to everyone’s expectations. It gathered more than twice the light of any previous telescope and it made better use of that light. It was the first major telescope to use a coudé focus, by which light could be sent to a very large spectrograph that was not attached to the telescope. The success of the telescope was not dimmed by discovery of a periodic error in its tracking, but extra care was necessary to keep the object centered in the telescope during an exposure. In fact, this slight tracking error has served as a test of Caltech graduate students’ ability to guide the telescope properly. (BANTA: Even when we fail, we succeed. Great job.)


The 60-inch mirror, a gift from by William Hale to his son in 1894, has just been given a thin layer of sliver, ready for first light in December 1908. Photo: Carnegie/ Huntington Library

The nature of the “spiral nebulae” was a question that had been debated for many years. Were these spiral-shaped objects clouds of gas within our own stellar system, the Milky Way Galaxy? Or were they galaxies themselves, “island universes” far beyond the limits of the Milky Way? Within the first year of operation, the 60-inch telescope shed new light on this question. Even though the ability to obtain useable spectra of even the brighter stars had been a very recent development, the 60-inch at once began providing useful spectra of the much fainter nebulae and star clusters. The Andromeda Nebula was found to have a spectrum similar to that of the Sun, leading Hale to speculate that it was composed of stars. Early 60-inch photographs were the first to show “star-like condensations” in the spiral nebulae – the first photographs of stars in other galaxies. Though the definitive answer to this perplexing mystery would await Edwin Hubble’s work with the Mount Wilson 100-inch telescope in the 1920’s, the 60-inch opened the field to study. The earliest work of the 60-inch also indicated the presence of interstellar material through the absorption of blue light from distant galaxies and star clusters.


Ritchey’s photograph of M31, the Andromeda Galaxy, taken with the 60-inch on September 17, 1917, shortly before the completion of the 100-inch Telescope. Photo: Carnegie Observatories

In 1909, the program for the world’s greatest telescope included stellar photography, parallax measurements, nebula and clusters photography and stellar spectroscopy. Exposure times for photographs ranged from about three minutes for bright planetary nebulae to 11 hours for some galaxies and clusters. Thirty-one photographs and three spectra were taken of Halley’s comet during its last pass by Earth in 1910. Some new techniques, such as photographic photometry, were first attempted with the 60-inch in those early years. Hale also encouraged visiting astronomers from other observatories to travel to southern California to use the 60-inch telescope. Two of the first visitors were E.E. Barnard, who used the telescope to study Mars and Saturn, and Ejnar Hertzsprung now remembered for the famous Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) diagram.

When Hale founded the Mount Wilson Solar Observatory, he expected the night-time work of the 60-inch telescope to add considerably to our understanding of the Sun, which he called a “typical star.” It has done that and more. For 85 years, the 60-inch telescope has been in use almost every clear night, becoming one of the most successful and productive telescopes in history. According to Dr. Allan Sandage, “The Mount Wilson 60-inch telescope was the granddaddy of them all, where many of the problems of telescope design and solutions were first understood.” Today, the telescope has taken on a new role as the largest telescope in the world made exclusively available for public viewing. The 60-inch now inspires future generations with its unrivaled heritage and its exquisite window on the Universe.

Building the 60-inch Telescope


Here's the thing though, that telescope isn't the first one that Hale dragged up Mount Wilson:

Telescope: Snow Solar Telescope

Capture.JPG
The Snow solar telescope (1906)

Hale was founding observatories all over the place. Here's a picture of the one he built out back of his family home in 1890 or 1891 (all dates in Hale's life are murky. For instance, it seems like he was working for several colleges at around the same time, depending on the source):
apf6-00670r.jpg
Kenwood Observatory

Complete with all the wires and 'nilla skies you'd expect for "circa 1899".
 
Assembled_60inch_telescope_tube_on_truck_for_transport_to_Mount_Wilson_Observatory-e1488521819...jpgMetal_tube_of_the_60inch_telescope_being_transported_along_a_road_on_Mount_Wilson-e1488552795642.jpg
Complete with all the wires and 'nilla skies you'd expect for "circa 1899".

These two pics from the post above show the ludicrously small wheels of the 'special' truck used to cart this precision optical equipment up Mount Wilson to the observatory site. And what looks like solid rubber tyres.

You can make what you will of whether the telescope was really dragged up there by the horse/gas/electric combination implied by the second picture - with its barrel resting on a wooden frame at just one point halfway along its length. Or why - per Banta's text - one man and four mules proved more effective than the gas/electric motor.

Banta ended the post with a comment about 'nilla skies. The following Mount Wilson construction pic is from 'Australian Telescope' (Russian) by kbogam (AKA Pavel Verkhof AKA Alexander Alekseev), (English translation). It is buried away in one of that page's carousels of pics.

Screenshot at 2021-03-27 07:17:02.png
What happened in the top right-centre?

Banta's text and picture note Carnegie funded the Mount Wilson build, and is the source/owner of the pics.

The following is a clip from one minute, 15 seconds into Brothers of the Serpent podcast, episode 202.

They are reading from The Hidden History of the Human Race by Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson. The clip hints that evidence for human evolutionary theory was 'found' using money provided by private sources, in this case Carnegie. The process may not have followed scientific principles as we understand them. Mount Wilson gets a mention in this clip but with no explanation of what the problem with Mount Wilson might be.

For that, Banta's piece above and Pavel Verkhof's piece both deserve a careful read.

Taken together, and with The Hidden History of the Human Race, what I think we see is:
  1. Early observatories housed technology that humans didn't fully understand.
  2. The technology housed in them was not originally optical telescopes; they housed something else.
  3. Humans moved examples of the technology to far and/or high parts of the world.
  4. The vehicles we are told they used used to move the 'telescopes' and the construction materials were not up to the task.
  5. In one Mount Wilson image, the sky appears to have been cleansed of what was possibly a lighter-than-air vehicle, while ground conditions look inappropriate for weird, small wheeled trucks.
To the best of my knowledge, Britain's observatories - which seem to be the origin of some of this kit - were described by John Wheale in a book called London Exhibited 1852, apparently just after humans took them over. However, the observatories chapter is missing from the online copies of London Exhibited 1852 that I found. So, if anyone has it, I'd very much like to see that observatories chapter.

London Exhibited is well worth reading even without the missing chapter. The guide seems to have been written for visitors to London's Great Exhibition. I think it may also have been written to help lock in who owned what in Britain shortly after new owners took possession. It is especially interesting for the chapter on Ducal Residencies in London.
 
Last edited:
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top