Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: dreamtimeDate: 2019-01-08 16:13:55Reaction Score: 12
Here's my thoughts about this thing, mostly based on intuition and looking at the photos, and circumvential evidence:
In the 1800s following up with the civil war the PTB that managed to sneak into American Congress, etc., connected with the Church, subsequently did those things:
- secretly bring about "industrial revolution", which in reality meant instructing people in the know to leak certain "forgotten" knowledge into society, but this time all based on capitalist oil instead of free energy
- initiate the industrialists into a certain level of truth in exchange for money, land, native properties, and power
- give the industrialists free access to the Native architecture and structures, but make it their duty to demolish some of it after use
The idea was not to destroy all ancient architecture, but it was important to make the most impressive of it disappear, because everything was just way too obvious and the new official narrative for the USA made it extraordinary important to clear North America, because in contrast to Europe there was nothing there before (No Romans, No Greeks, etc.), except a couple of wild tribes.
They get the land and structures for a couple of pennies and put in some time to renovate everything for the purpose of the exposition, which indeed happened at the time. I can't see those guys doing anything more than building on pre-existing stuff. The expos were a great way for the new industrialist elite to bring the restricted tech into society.
Industrialists get the land for basically free, so only on paper all the American expositions made horrendous losses. You can't convince me those old school 19th century capitalists willfully burned all their money with creating insane buildings. Economics alone make the official story baseless!
In the example of the Pan Am, they need around 1 year to renovate the old buildings, add a couple of necessary plaster-based things, scoop out a couple of lakes and canals, and make a decent Return of Investment with the Expo. Then tear it all down like promised to the PTB.
The very idea of creating a city out of nowhere for a temporary happening is simply absurd. The only real temporary Expo structures were built with simple steel-structures, and they tried to keep most of it afterwards (Paris, for example). The real economics show themselves with how we do Expos nowadays: In areas that are designed to stand for decades, and house regular expos of various kinds. This is the only way anyone who puts money into this would do it.
Looking at
this painting with an open mind all I can really see them doing during the year of construction is adding a couple of electric wires to light it all at night, and tidy things up. How long does it really take to equip that area with wiring? I think even that "simple" thing can take a whole summer.
There is no evidence the buildings were temporary. They stood for years. No one would tear it down, from an economic standpoint. You would rent the area to others as long as you have a couple of decent buildings standing there. The entire area looks like it was originally built for governance and leisure, certainly not for showing technological advances. The rational, cold, capitalist mindset of industrialization does not fit with what we see here. Does anyone really think industrialists build this way? They would have simply built a temporary 10 penny steel-tent if it were up to them. There is simply no modern economics involved here, just look at the area! This was based on beauty, built in a time where money and scarcity didn't exist, created by an entirely different civilization than what occupies America today. It is exactly the kind of architecture that can stand 1000 years without crumbling to pieces, due to the unknown texture of plaster and cement which paradoxically gets harder over time.
Do you know why the quality of these Roman style buildings is so great, like they were only just built, compared to some of the "ruins" of Central European Greko-Roman buildings of ancient times, for example in Rome? Because the church only arrived in the U.S. in around 1800 with people still living that good life, living in buildings that do not age. That is why the Know-Knothing Native American Party fought against the Catholics, and why everyone was Protestant prior to the invasion. There was a global war between ca 1700 and 1900, and the church groups won for some reason, and the Protesting parties lost. The question is how did the secret group manage to subert everything everywhere? Where did their strength come from? The two World Wars were needed to seal the deal, and make us forget that conflict.
So let's look at some of the photographs of the Expo:
Oh wait, the last one is the
St. Peters Basilica in the Vatican, more than 400 years old.
If you want to see how the PTB builds when they have the opportunity, look at this
Vatican monstrosity. This is their spirit. They despise the Greko-Roman buildings they live in, because it reminds them they are occupants. But they can't live without, because the old buildings emanate a life-giving radiate energy. What they like is the exact opposite: chaos, darkness, no windows, no dignity. Their spirit is in all the post-WW architecture.
Back to the Pan Am Expo: Ultimately they tore it down because this kind of architecture and buildings were not fit for the new way of life that was introduced by the capitalists: Work like a slave, nothing great exists in the world beyond yourself. The expositions just came in conveniently, they were not created to tear buildings down specifically, it just came in handy in certain locations. Most areas that were destroyed just vanished in history without any trace. The only reason we have photographs of the Pan Am is that it was decided to create a new narrative around the area which give people a rational explanation.
"Hey, there's this enourmous Native American building area in Buffalo, what we gonna do about it?"
"Well let's demolish it all"
"But whait, what about all those expos we are financing right now. Why not let some if it stay around at least until the expos are finished"
"Ok that sounds good, so we'll also have a good explanations for all those buildings for the future generations. Lets just demolish it and shoot a couple of photos afterwards, then switch photos in the time line"
.
