SH Archive Analyze this: Egyptologists Open a Newly-Discovered Pyramid

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Muiredach
Date: 2020-01-31 11:10:24
Reaction Score: 5

:43 - "lunar landscape"

It is a quarry. It is also a pyramid. It is also a burial chamber. There was a dead body here. Somebody stole it out of the sealed tomb.

View attachment 39722

The Pharaoh has no clothes and is trying to sell some ocean front property in Arizona, which oddly enough also has pyramids.

Prophecy speaks of the man who had all the answers, I am humbled

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: angel
Date: 2020-02-03 12:25:36
Reaction Score: 1

The one to the right of the wooden box looks like a book and some hieroglyphs resemble those of Abydos

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: msadcei1
Date: 2020-02-04 00:02:42
Reaction Score: 1

A few questions to ponder:
1. "Today only a handful of pyramids survive but the remains of many more lie hidden beneath the desert sands."

• If a bunch of pyramids were destroyed, where did the building material go? Shouldn't there be more residue? Why ave they not excavated for the remains of more pyramids?

2. "This crater was the site of a large quarry."

• Does this look like a large quarry to you? Doesn't look like the excavation has been much over ten feet if that.

3. "Excavations have revealed passage that once led from the entrance to deep under the pyramid."

• How do they know where the entrance was if the above ground portion has miraculously disappeared? Look at the stairs. Were they built for hobbits?

4. "The stairs lead to an underground complex, the heart of the pyramid."

• If the heart of the pyramid is a single room, it seems like a lot of work to build one underground room.

5. "These huge blocks are protecting the only access...."

• If the multiple blocks are protecting the only access, why not move the other ones also?

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: FlyChaos
Date: 2020-02-07 05:59:12
Reaction Score: 5

• KD: I'm wondering what tree lumber was used to make this box. 3,800 years old it is. What a miracle.

There was still paint on OUTSIDE many ancient eygptian buildings in 1800AD by 1900AD it had all flaked off.

circa 1800AD circa 1840AD circa 1840AD

and in 1600sAD london:

The Museum of London’s Extraordinary Cheapside Hoard | Gems & Gemology
...An astonishing collection of jewels, discovered by chance in 1912 after centuries of concealment, is on display at the Museum of London. ........Just over a century ago, in the summer of 1912, a workman’s pickaxe struck through the floor of an old tenement house in Cheapside, London. A trio of adjoining houses there was scheduled for demolition.....One of the jewels..... is a banded agate cameo of a Ptolemaic queen, likely Cleopatra, the last pharaoh of ancient Egypt. She is depicted in the guise of the goddess Isis, wearing a vulture headdress. It is unquestionably Egyptian in origin

(off-topic, 1600sAD ppl can make harry potter horcrux, yet restroom=window for 300 more years?)

 

[Deleted member 65]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: PrincepAugus
Date: 2020-02-08 23:48:26
Reaction Score: 3

This one seems relevant lol:

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: FlyChaos
Date: 2020-02-09 04:43:29
Reaction Score: 1

This one seems relevant lol:

steps similar?

 

[realitycheck]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: realitycheck
Date: 2020-02-09 09:33:52
Reaction Score: 6

Also another thing that I find strange is total lack of any decorations/hieroglyphs on all walls and halls leading to the tomb. Usually halls leading to tomb and walls of tomb are filled with hieroglyphs and images, sometimes carved into walls but here we have only wooden box with some hieroglyphs connecting it to Egyptians - if there was no box what else is there to claim this site as Egypt pharaoh burial site? No statues, no carvings, absolutely nothing - total contrast compared with other pharaoh burial sites. Maybe he was bad pharaoh and wooden box was ok for him? Oh yes and pyramid on top of wooden box.

Let me know if I missed something that has any sign of Egypt except wooden box that can easily be moved, and if walls decorations got "washed" or destroyed then how could wooden box survive?

Usual look of burial tomb.

 

[Whitewave]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2020-02-09 10:52:53
Reaction Score: 2

It is interesting that when the Smithsonian was bequeathed to the USA by James Smithson that

So it was a money scam on the tax payers. Who is surprised?


This makes no sense. Why leave 220 million in cash to another country... that you have never been to and that has been at war with your own country?


Of course our fabled super hero swoops in to be a hero. Maybe someone called him on the phone he built?



Destroyed by fire? Please tell me this is not so.



Oh thank God it's been recovered after being lost. So lucky.

I want to see your impressive neck length?

Also why does a institute need a flag? Why is the world in the flag and not his beloved USA?

More information on this subject here: Smithsonian: Suppressed Archaeological Finds

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: dtroop
Date: 2020-03-11 15:40:55
Reaction Score: 1

One way to go about this supposed mystery is to examine it as a "crime scene", take notice of what IS there. If one does notice what IS there, one may notice a small box with soot...And if one were to study what was found in the Great Pyramid you would find a slightly larger box with soot, leading one to believe that the structure was not in fact a tomb (because no body was found in either "burial chamber"), but this would lead you away from the narrative that Egypt and Mainstream Science want you go, it would in fact lead you to idea that the box you see is an integral part of the pyramids construction. In the late 30's- early 40's there was the most convincing explanation on how the pyramids could have been built, it was based on using a dam and lock system and the area where the "burial chamber" is located is where a fire box was located to start a vacuum to draw water UP a shaft. I found the whole thing to the most be the most plausible idea I have seen.

 

[Magnus]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: MagnusOpus
Date: 2020-03-12 09:00:52
Reaction Score: 0

One way to go about this supposed mystery is to examine it as a "crime scene", take notice of what IS there. If one does notice what IS there, one may notice a small box with soot...And if one were to study what was found in the Great Pyramid you would find a slightly larger box with soot, leading one to believe that the structure was not in fact a tomb (because no body was found in either "burial chamber"), but this would lead you away from the narrative that Egypt and Mainstream Science want you go, it would in fact lead you to idea that the box you see is an integral part of the pyramids construction. In the late 30's- early 40's there was the most convincing explanation on how the pyramids could have been built, it was based on using a dam and lock system and the area where the "burial chamber" is located is where a fire box was located to start a vacuum to draw water UP a shaft. I found the whole thing to the most be the most plausible idea I have seen.

Why would these fire boxes be made out of perfectly finished granite?

 

[codis]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: codis
Date: 2020-03-12 10:33:03
Reaction Score: 0

Why would these fire boxes be made out of perfectly finished granite?

This might be an invalid question to ask, as "fire box" implies something not proven yet.
I would suggest to drop the "fire", look at the box, and ponder what could it be made for.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: OpenMind
Date: 2020-03-21 21:56:48
Reaction Score: 2

How did they get the blue lifting strops under and up the 'sealing' block, and it doesn't seem to fit well. Surely it should fit like a glove.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: jd755
Date: 2020-03-22 08:19:29
Reaction Score: 1

How did they get the blue lifting strops under and up the 'sealing' block, and it doesn't seem to fit well. Surely it should fit like a glove.

You knock in some wedges to lift the block up enough to fit a strop.
You then pass a piece of stiff wire through hooked on one end.
Hook goes through loop of strop and is pulled under the block through the gap created by the wedges.

Process repeated for the other strop.
Hang the loops of the strops onto the crane hook.
It takes the weight of the block.
Wedges pulled out.
Job done.

What those pictures do not reveal is what method was used to place the block originally.
Rolled into place from the side then buried to create an 'underground' chamber is a possibility as rolling heavy things along a hard surface is way less compliated and much much safer than lifting and lowering, but who knows.