Ancient Fossils are Made Up or More Recent?

[Whitewave]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-11-21 02:24:56
Reaction Score: 1

Yeah, and leave this thread for the fossils. xD

So I've been subscribed to PBS Eons channel and it's all about the evolution of animals and fossilization. I love they way they present their content, and also ancient history so what's not to love lol. I would like to see if anyone has any thoughts about it.

I'm not familiar with this one. I like the nature shows but, man!, are they heavy on the evolution propaganda. I'll have to look for the PBS channel show mentioned. Thanks for the heads up.

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: BrokenAgate
Date: 2018-12-09 07:02:44
Reaction Score: 7

I highly recommend the Thunderbolts Project. They did a great video on how fossilization can occur not only rapidly, but instantly, when electricity is involved.

 

[Deleted member 65]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: PrincepAugus
Date: 2019-01-19 02:57:35
Reaction Score: 1

I found a timeline (not official, but is very up to date) of evolution to a chicken art. Would you think it can work like that?

Chicken evolution

 

[archangelclk]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Archangelclk
Date: 2019-02-05 16:38:18
Reaction Score: 2

God forbid anyone show that Darwin was wrong. First time my youngest daughter (8 at the time) came home from school talking about having learned about evolution that day I asked her what her opinion was on the matter. She said, "c'mon, people! This isn't Digimon!" Had to LOL at that one.
Evolution within the confines of our genetic blueprint is, of course, possible and demonstrable. Evolution from one species into another is laughable. Millions, even trillions, of tiny mutations and they're ALL beneficial. Having worked as a critical care nurse for a few decades, I've never once seen or even heard of a genetic mutation that was beneficial.
I'm a Christian and not at all threatened by the possibility of evolution but I don't think that's what we're seeing. If anything, I think humanity is experiencing devolution which would conform to the physical laws of entropy. Neanderthals had larger craniums and denser bones. Giants once roamed the earth. Look at humanity now; we're pretty scrawny specimens in comparison.
When you point out the logical fallacies of Darwinian evolution people get butthurt. I don't even try to argue it anymore. "Wallow in your ignorance" is my motto. I've been to Texas and seen the human footprints in the same stratus level of dinosaur prints. There's just too much cultural and archaeological evidence to show that people actually witnessed dinosaurs. Why is that so threatening to accept?

I agree, Macro evoution is the stuff of fairy tales, we only see micro evolution or adaptation and variation with any given species or kind. And you are totally right on the deficient mutations, they are always detrimental.

I believe the Neanderthals were in fact regular humans like us, but there cranium and bone density were simply a result of longer life spans such as pre-flood and immediate post flood conditions. The bone density thickens around the brow the longer you live and other issues are a result of old age. As for the Giants(Nephilim), I believe they were the seed of the serpent in Genesis 3:15.

Post automatically merged: 2/5/19

its pretty obvious dinosaurs existed until a while ago, when they went pft just like the unicorns and dragons
however i am doubtfull on the authenticity of the ica stones, they look quite primitive and crude when compared to the civilization that existed there
on the topic of impossible fossils, what about that one that shows a shoe footprint that smashed a trilobite?

An interesting thing with the ica stones is that they depict dermal frills which according to the mainstream community was not known about dinosaurs until fairly recent. If they were fakes or not carved, it would be difficult to imagine how they knew of these dermal frills on dinosaurs.

 

[BStankman]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: BStankman
Date: 2019-02-19 21:45:41
Reaction Score: 2

Native American Artifact Wave Breakers Petrified Wood Brooklyn Beach | UAP

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: BrokenAgate
Date: 2019-03-07 17:28:22
Reaction Score: 2

I found a timeline (not official, but is very up to date) of evolution to a chicken art. Would you think it can work like that?

Chicken evolution

No, especially when the "feathers" have been shown to be non-existent or faked. It isn't hard to scratch lines in a piece of rock, or simply paint in feathery outlines, and then chemically treat it to look ancient. Who's going to check, anyway? Scientists can do no wrong, so nobody would suspect them of lying about their finds. And even if a structure doesn't really resemble feathers at all, but more like wispy hair, they'll still call it feathers.

Feathers Not Flying Over New Dinosaur Fossil | Evolution News
Is it a bird? Is it a dinosaur? No, it's a fake
How Fake Fossils Pervert Paleontology [Excerpt]

 

[Archive]

Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: RedFox
Date: 2019-09-12 06:54:03
Reaction Score: 0

we also have

the hog island petrified man

Mystery of the Hog Island petrified man

this guys who turned to soap or "soap stone"

Soapman: Man buried in 1800s has turned to soap

soap brains

Found: Dozens of Naturally Shrunken Brains in a Mass Grave

and this mad scientist in the 1700s who was turning dead people to stone

Petrifaction as Preservation: Girolamo Segato

and this.

The Madam Who Turned to Stone

The stone breast disturbs me on many levels. It also makes me worry there might be legitimacy to some of the theories that some old statues were once living. The nipples are a different color than we normally see on old Roman statues and the like (I think? I hope?), but that could easily be touched up. Very very disturbing, the idea of a mad scientist collecting a bunch of petrified tits he stole from dead people.

 

[Frits]

From this:Exploring the technology of Prof. Nigel Cheese: Quantum Battery
To this: 128 years of lies.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzNYvXskJdQ
Viktor Schauberger stated that oil is just a by-product of water and its generated in the Earth's crust and that it is a part of the atmospheric cycle that even goes beyond the moon (moon is part of the Earth's atmosphere) and that the universe beyond behaves like water (why are astronauts confronted with water in their suits during a so-called walk? Or is the ISS hidden somewhere in a large kind of swimming pool, or the earth is some kind of air bubble contained in a liquid).

 

[MerLynn]

Viktor Schauberger stated that oil is just a by-product of water and its generated in the Earth's crust

Victor was long on theory and short on practical. Oil is NOT a "by product". Oil IS water with a South Pole Positive Field Energy.

"Generate" belies the nature of Magnetics, To interpret Schauberger LITERALLY, it means that EVERYTHING is a By-Product of Water.

The "electric Universe" is a fallacy as long as they hold 'electrons' to be part of some mythical 'structure' and the source of all energy.
Electricity with 'electrons' fails to comprehend the Magnetic Nature of Water and the Magnetic Nature of EVERYTHING.
"Primary Water" is 'made' by the Earth by literally transmuting rocks, soil, aggregate into Pure Water.
Crude Oil is 'made' by the earth by literally transmuting rocks, soil, aggregate into OIL,
Primary Water is 'made' by a Dominant North Pole Field Polarity whilst OIL and COAL are 'made' by a dominant South Pole Field Polarity. The Earths Rock Strata or layers or plates act as Field Generators within the Vessel "Earth" from the Fields of Magnetism within the earth and surrounding space.
This Transmutation is entirely a Magnetic Principle of controlling the Polarity of the Field Generated within Water. MonoPoles are still a 'theory' today while we have a whole 'Field Science' based upon their utilization.
With the ability to generate specifically one of the 4 Magnetic Poles or Nodes of Magnetism within a vessel of water or runny concrete, the Vessel of 'fluids' can either be transmuted into oil or pure water and even COAL or "natural" Gas.
One would think the Science of Neutral Plates for Magnetic Water production of OIL was far more revolutionary than exposing Rockefeller Lying to the world for 120 years when the following experiment also destroys the global warning carbon zero scam being used to depopulate the farmers from earth.


View: https://rumble.com/vhodfb-full-unedited-version-of-oil-from-water..html

 

[MerLynn]

A definition of a "Fossil"

"A fossil is any preserved remains, impression, or trace of any once-living thing from a past geological age. Examples include bones, shells, exoskeletons, stone imprints of animals or microbes, objects preserved in amber, hair, petrified wood, oil, coal, and DNA remnants". Wiki of all places.

When I was at Petrified Forest I took pictures of "quartz crystals" at the centre of the Petrified Logs. Until I saw this I had never read this before that Carbon can Transmute into Silicon Dioxide. We transmuted water with a Magnetic In-Line Cell, to completely plug it up with brand new beach sand when it was being used to treat river water. It follows that 'some' quartz crystals are actually Petrified Wood. Modern science is fake. All of it.

Earth is a Petrifying Planet. Everything eventually turns into 'stone'. Earth is a South Pole Positive Magnetic Sphere. But its the TYPE of Stone that should be investigated. Opals that are Organic remnants of bones and teeth are now a piece of Jewellery. We value it for its 'Fire' rather than the origin of these 'rocks'. Our FOCUS is shifted from the science to the material esthetics of greed. COAL is Petrified Water. This 'turning to stone' is a South Pole Positive Field Effect. The "earth" returning to Primary Water is a North Pole Negative Field Effect. Compression and Expansion according to Walter Russell.
Implosion and Explosion according to Field Science.


View: https://rumble.com/vh7v87-im-plosions-and-ex-plosions-demo.html

 

[Just]

From this:Exploring the technology of Prof. Nigel Cheese: Quantum Battery
To this: 128 years of lies.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzNYvXskJdQ
Viktor Schauberger stated that oil is just a by-product of water and its generated in the Earth's crust and that it is a part of the atmospheric cycle that even goes beyond the moon (moon is part of the Earth's atmosphere) and that the universe beyond behaves like water (why are astronauts confronted with water in their suits during a so-called walk? Or is the ISS hidden somewhere in a large kind of swimming pool, or the earth is some kind of air bubble contained in a liquid).

The air bubbles and water in the suits of astronauts is - in my opinion - because they haven’t gone into ‘space’ and the footage was used of the underwater training that was done in preparation for a launch. This question was asked of one of the Apollo astronauts- Buzz Aldrin? - asking why there were air bubbles- and he declined to answer the question.

 

[Deleted member 37]

I'm fascinated by the possibility that various precious minerals (gold included) are the fossilized version of resins secerned from trees. Giant trees should therefore be the origin of gold mines and their 'veins' should be the long streams created by those resins.

I read somewhere someday that gold is a very superficial mineral. That would be consinstent with a tale of fallen trees.

You are free to think it's bull****, but I'm totally stuck with this thing.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZCXRixkW5E

edit: in any case I would like to ask a question. How come these precious minerals are found in 'veins', and not randomly? I would guess it's because the original materials which they are made of were part of a single 'body' preceding the given mineral. Otherwise gold, for example, should be randomly found everywhere, if it had not a common origin from a preceding 'material'. Don't know if my question/observation is clear enough, hope so.

edit2: if any of this is true, I would guess someone is very aware of it, so it should be useful to look for connections between trees and precious minerals and/or precious stones. Anybody knows of any connections between the extractive industry and plantations?