Chapultepec Castle, in a 1521 map

[greengrey]

curious thing:

the Chapultepec Castle, large building in a forest, in mexico, appears in a 1521 map.

the Castle:

The Chapultepec Castle, big building in Chapultepec forest, appears in a 1521 map!

until today, I didnt know that the Castle had that ovals.

it looks like they built over the top of it.

mexico, tenochtitlan, was conquered in 1521 , and the castle is already in the map titled "Tenochtitlan, 1521".

map in :
https://www.loc.gov/resource/gdcwdl.wdl_00503/?r=0.416,0.61,0.128,0.059,0
the site says:
How the map came to Sweden is not known..
publication 1550.

"in 1530, Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor and Archduke of Austria, decreed the Chapultepec forest as the property of Mexico City.
Since then, the viceroys of New Spain frequented the place to walk, rest and hunt deer, hares and rabbits. During the rule of Luis de Velasco y Ruiz de Alarcón, a palace was built on one of the slopes of Chapultepec that would serve for the next couple of centuries as a temporary accommodation site for the viceroys before their arrival in the capital of New Spain, although it would also be used for entertainment events. After suffering severe damage from the explosion of a nearby powder magazine in the mid-18th century, the site was abandoned despite an initiative by the Spanish Crown to be used as the Acordada prison."

the castle was supossed to start to be built under the government of Luis de Velasco y Ruiz de alarcon. but he arrived to mexico city in november 25, 1950.
he died on july 25, 1564.

the curious thing is that: Chapultepec Castle existed in the Tenochtitlan 1521 map, before it was started to be built after 1551? ....


and, at the bottom of the map:

 

[solarbard]

Great find. This is why I come on this site.

 

[Ameth]

This is solid work.
This is what im finding in my research too.
Indications that a civilizations infrastructure was already in place here before that period in history,
before the dates of construction we are given today,
structures from a cycle before the one we are currently living
The present cycle beginning around the 1500s time

the holy roman empire is the two headed eagle of rome,
one for the pope as head of the roman faith,
at that time that was Leo X
better known as Giovanni di Lorenzo de' Medici
who was of that Medici family,
the same one that ran the banking of Florence and the catholic world.
the other eagle head was for,
the head of the roman empire,
the emperor of all rome.
That guy was Charles V.
Who as you have already stated was :
Holy Roman Emperor,
Arch duke of Austria
BUT he was also,
King of Spain
and Lord of the Netherlands
So we have a royal who owns all the major european armies and fleets,
a pope who owns the banking and finance of all europe
and an entire religion of followers ready to act upon their every command.
combining all that with the introduction of jesuits to japan in that same century.
and then in the next century the discovery and colonisation of Australia and Northern America.

This speaks to me of a force reclaiming that which they presume to be theirs.
It indicates a pre knowledge of these specific areas of earth.
My interpretation of the conquest of the aztecs,
is that they came back with the sun for this current cycle circa 1500ad.
reFounded their new version of Rome in Austria,
and its finance and religion in The Vatican state.
had access to maps and information via the vaticans archives and vaults.
determined which areas woud be available next to them.
Then headed to these locations intent on reclaiming their cyclical fore fathers lands.
They quickly and decisively attacked the aztec people who offered little resistance
burned any writings they had incase they held prior cycle knowledge
and reclaimed all the structures existing there of pre cyclical roman origin.
passing them off as new buildings of a conquering nation.
repeating the process in the north less than a hundred years later as well.

I think this has happened more than once as well.
The Cycle priors inception point was circa 352ad
likely a little sooner than that,
i deem that cycles romans to be the constantinople romans,
as that seems to be the hub location for those romans,
as is austria for the present cycles romans.
Constantine 1 or 2 was emperor at the start of the last cycle,
the whole process of invasion and incursion seems to have occured similarly during that cycle also.
Those romans seeming to reclaim that which their ancestors left similarly,
but to the east as opposed to the west.
It was the constantinople romans who left the buildings which Charles V reclaimed as his own,
indicating they had access to these lands towards the end of their respective cycle as well.
thats my interpretation.

Just goes to show our understanding of this period is severely lacking
essentially that which we deem to be many countries today is really just one king or emperors domain.
Thanks for the post.

 

[LuciusAurelian]

I remember studying the assault of this building back in military history at the academy. It is interesting because even back then as a late teen I questioned how the US Army and Marine Corps maintained lines of logistics that deep in a foreign nation in the 1840s.

The tactical infantry assault on such a structure on elevated terrain would be a nightmare even with modern weapons. The historical account states that the building was originally built as a luxury residence and not a fortification. Therefore, it was vulnerable to the mighty cannon that the U.S. military managed to haul with them. The artillery barrage managed to demoralize a spirited defense and enable the structure to be breached and seized.

It definitely makes one wonder what transpired after seeing what canons and fires wrought during the U.S Civil War. It was always strange to me that the conventional weapons of the past seemed to bring much more destruction on urban areas than kinetic energy munitions, precision guided bombs, cluster bombs and 70-ton armored vehicles rolling through these same areas ever could now.

 

[Quiahuitl]

It definitely makes one wonder what transpired after seeing what canons and fires wrought during the U.S Civil War. It was always strange to me that the conventional weapons of the past seemed to bring much more destruction on urban areas than kinetic energy munitions, precision guided bombs, cluster bombs and 70-ton armored vehicles rolling through these same areas ever could now.

There's an explanation of this in chapter 9 of the document Atmospheric Energy - a Retrospective

 

[LuciusAurelian]

Thank you!