COINTELPRO Techniques for Dilution, Misdirection and Control of an Internet Forum

[luddite]

You cannot leave it at that!
I'd pm you but cannot hence asking in public.
Please elaborate. What have you noticed going on?

I did try. haha. Like most, I'm being forced to observe the hyperfast psyop progress that is covering all internet and non-internet channels.

Decades ago, a psyop was multi month to years duration. Iraq war, Afganistan, 9/11 etc. Since covid I've noticed the speed of psyops have increased and there are more all at once. That's just my opinion and I have no proof on that.

As an example, US elections, George FLoyd were then replaced swiftly by Ukraine. A few months later that got swiped to the side and was replaced by Israel/Palestine. Since Ukraine the hoards of bots and also the brainwashed/NPC have really taken up the banner to wave for their new favorite problem to support. The reason I came back to this thread is that I needed a refresher due to seeing so many different kinds of cointel and I felt that I was close to believing some of it(but thankfully I never did).

It seems to me that the quality control of messaging and co-ordination of the messengers is really poor which I can't imagine why. They seem to be skipping any build up and just go straight to guilt tripping, and responding to the op really fast (bombing, invading, annexing).

It is lightening fast honestly. You miss a day and so much happens.

Just my thoughts. No facts to base this on....just feelings

 

[Gladius]

Decades ago, a psyop was multi month to years duration. Iraq war, Afganistan, 9/11 etc. Since covid I've noticed the speed of psyops have increased and there are more all at once. That's just my opinion and I have no proof on that.

As an example, US elections, George FLoyd were then replaced swiftly by Ukraine. A few months later that got swiped to the side and was replaced by Israel/Palestine. Since Ukraine the hoards of bots and also the brainwashed/NPC have really taken up the banner to wave for their new favorite problem to support. The reason I came back to this thread is that I needed a refresher due to seeing so many different kinds of cointel and I felt that I was close to believing some of it(but thankfully I never did).

Perhaps the way you feel time passing changed since 2000's, but Ukraine was "replaced" by Israel/Palestine after almost 2 years, not a few months. Same with covid.

Iraq/Afghanistan weren't as long as you imagine, they also took a media focus of about 1-2 years. They then became prolonged conflicts with reduced media attention save when something big happened there.

 

[luddite]

Perhaps the way you feel time passing changed since 2000's, but Ukraine was "replaced" by Israel/Palestine after almost 2 years, not a few months. Same with covid.

Iraq/Afghanistan weren't as long as you imagine, they also took a media focus of about 1-2 years. They then became prolonged conflicts with reduced media attention save when something big happened there.

I don't doubt you, maybe its the rapidity of which they are being replaced. No gap between them that makes it feel like they are shorter....either that or im feeling time different... it's probably a bit of both.

 

[Jd755]

We have a truthful saying hereabouts that puts the media machine in its proper perspective;

Yesterdays news is tomorrows chip paper.

 

[Deleted member 1432]

I have been watching an old BBC TV documentary series called 'The Rock 'N' Roll Years'. It covers 1956 to 1985. I thought it was just going to be about music, but it also covers world events. It's quite depressing in a way. I remember much of it, but it's interesting to see it all from my 'older and wiser' perspective.

The whole thing is like watching a game. A game designed to scare the shit out of everyone. There's the Cold War crap as an excuse to develop Weapons of Mass Destruction. There was also the Space Race (using the same technology) with its comic book attempts to make everyone feel small and insignificant. There's constant civil wars in Africa. Anti-Apartheid riots in South Africa and southern USA. Race riots in the UK following the British Commonwealth trick of giving UK passports to all the former colonies. Half of the UK parliament was trying to regulate immigration while the other wanted to increase it from the 40,000 of the first year.

They replaced the WWII conflict with the Communist vs. Capitalist one. That developed into the Cold War - a stalemate that could only be broken by total annihilation. Throughout all of this 'Red vs. Blue' charade there was also the 'Black vs. White' one with immigration as its volatile fuse. Back in 1963 there were staged 'news' reports of a black man knocking on the doors of suburban London houses looking for lodgings and being turned away by white middle-class housewives. Then came the riots.

The younger generations who were living through this, watching their future vanish up the arse of a nuclear missile, were whipped up into a frenzy of rebellion against everything - 'The Establishment' as it used to be called back then. This happened through the newly created 'pop culture' - checkout the lyrics of Bob Dylan's "The Times they are a Changing" for example. Of course, drugs were promoted as another means to rebel and escape all the fear and misery, but rebellion and being spaced-out are not the best bedfellows so everything collapsed into a mush of flower-power and free love.

This game has been going on for centuries and it's all about conflict, fear, misery and suffering. 'They' create two sides and then sit in the middle goading each one against the other. There's no point to any of it, it's just chaos for the sake of chaos. I agree that lately it's more manic, more hurried, one could even say 'desperate'. Those who were once the goaders in the middle now seem to be taking direct action.

I'm only up to 1964 in the documentary, I'm not sure if I will make it all the way to 1985.

PS: This comment was all 'opinion' and bias, so if it offends anyone I apologise in advance.

 

[polymath]

I have been watching an old BBC TV documentary series called 'The Rock 'N' Roll Years'. It covers 1956 to 1985. I thought it was just going to be about music, but it also covers world events. It's quite depressing in a way. I remember much of it, but it's interesting to see it all from my 'older and wiser' perspective.

The whole thing is like watching a game. A game designed to scare the shit out of everyone. There's the Cold War crap as an excuse to develop Weapons of Mass Destruction. There was also the Space Race (using the same technology) with its comic book attempts to make everyone feel small and insignificant. There's constant civil wars in Africa. Anti-Apartheid riots in South Africa and southern USA. Race riots in the UK following the British Commonwealth trick of giving UK passports to all the former colonies. Half of the UK parliament was trying to regulate immigration while the other wanted to increase it from the 40,000 of the first year.

They replaced the WWII conflict with the Communist vs. Capitalist one. That developed into the Cold War - a stalemate that could only be broken by total annihilation. Throughout all of this 'Red vs. Blue' charade there was also the 'Black vs. White' one with immigration as its volatile fuse. Back in 1963 there were staged 'news' reports of a black man knocking on the doors of suburban London houses looking for lodgings and being turned away by white middle-class housewives. Then came the riots.

The younger generations who were living through this, watching their future vanish up the arse of a nuclear missile, were whipped up into a frenzy of rebellion against everything - 'The Establishment' as it used to be called back then. This happened through the newly created 'pop culture' - checkout the lyrics of Bob Dylan's "The Times they are a Changing" for example. Of course, drugs were promoted as another means to rebel and escape all the fear and misery, but rebellion and being spaced-out are not the best bedfellows so everything collapsed into a mush of flower-power and free love.

This game has been going on for centuries and it's all about conflict, fear, misery and suffering. 'They' create two sides and then sit in the middle goading each one against the other. There's no point to any of it, it's just chaos for the sake of chaos. I agree that lately it's more manic, more hurried, one could even say 'desperate'. Those who were once the goaders in the middle now seem to be taking direct action.

I'm only up to 1964 in the documentary, I'm not sure if I will make it all the way to 1985.

PS: This comment was all 'opinion' and bias, so if it offends anyone I apologise in advance.

Confusion, chaos and neuroticism are the end goals of whatever thinks it is in control. Even this forum is a small win simply by gathering disonctent and awake souls in one place. To gather here with an inquisitive mind and.a sense of detachment helps, but those who get worked into a frenzy looking for answers only add to the anxious energy however good the intentions may be.
I wonder if the series dives int Sympathy for the Devil? I think that song is both telling truths and manipulating its audience into believing it is to blame for the chaos. The "Devil" couldn't exist without a key part of our nature: reactionary and easily stimulated.

 

[Quiahuitl]

The FBI manual for infiltrating internet forums was released by wikileaks a few years ago. Sorry I don't have a link to it. I did however read it at the time.

The recommended procedure was -

1) Gain the trust of the forum, by largely agreeing with people, going along with the consensus, contributing useful nuggets of information etc.

2) Once trust established, attack prominent figures in the alternative information movement. I.E not particularly people within the forum, bigger targets. Like Russell Brand for example. Or David Icke. Or whoever is currently gaining traction.

 

[Gladius]

1) Gain the trust of the forum, by largely agreeing with people, going along with the consensus, contributing useful nuggets of information etc.

2) Once trust established, attack prominent figures in the alternative information movement. I.E not particularly people within the forum, bigger targets. Like Russell Brand for example. Or David Icke. Or whoever is currently gaining traction.

More like:
1. Install shady characters in position of influence in alternative spheres I.E Russel Brand
2. Attack prominent figures I.E Russel Brand to dismantle trust and make room for the next fake truth "guru", keeping the questioning masses in a loop since they always need a mainstream character to represent their alternative thoughts.