- Joined
- Aug 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,140
- Reaction score
- 2,172
@fabiorem @Septimus
That sort of stuff is impossible to know. You can't say the president is him or whatever, only that it might be. Why can't the president be computer generated, or a different actor or even the real deal?
What you can prove, is that certain footage IS NOT as portrayed. Eg in the Rittenhouse trial feet disappeared:
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/2VJgRAlcKij9/
or in the UK, the briefcase changes colour on the news:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyHfzcItoFs
(I think this is was intentional to give us notice that we cannot trust what is shown on the news)
or when the nose of the plane in 911, pokes through the other side of the building - search for NOSE-OUT here (along with all the other proofs that the footage is fake):
UNDEBUNKABLE SEPCLUES - Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception
You can only prove that some footage is incoherent and does not represent reality; you can't prove a truth.
That sort of stuff is impossible to know. You can't say the president is him or whatever, only that it might be. Why can't the president be computer generated, or a different actor or even the real deal?
What you can prove, is that certain footage IS NOT as portrayed. Eg in the Rittenhouse trial feet disappeared:
View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/2VJgRAlcKij9/
or in the UK, the briefcase changes colour on the news:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyHfzcItoFs
(I think this is was intentional to give us notice that we cannot trust what is shown on the news)
or when the nose of the plane in 911, pokes through the other side of the building - search for NOSE-OUT here (along with all the other proofs that the footage is fake):
UNDEBUNKABLE SEPCLUES - Cluesforum—Exposing Mass Deception
You can only prove that some footage is incoherent and does not represent reality; you can't prove a truth.
Last edited: