- Joined
- Sep 25, 2020
- Messages
- 21
- Reaction score
- 32
What country are you in? I have yet to hear about that happening in Canada, but I expect it might when the people stop lining up to be euthanized, umm, I mean, immunized.
Coronavirus: Possible Reset
- Thread starter AgentOrange5
- Start date
What country are you in? I have yet to hear about that happening in Canada, but I expect it might when the people stop lining up to be euthanized, umm, I mean, immunized.
I received my pamphlet and invitation through today.
It came with a helpful 'guide to phase 2 of the programme' pamphlet.
It had some wording in, that was interesting to my s elf. In a section titled "About the types of vaccine"
"In the UK several different types of covid vaccines will be used during 2021. The vaccines will only be approved on the basis of large studies of safety and effectiveness."
"Over 30 million people in the UK have been vaccinated against..."
Now I read this, will only, excerpt as indicative that they haven't been approved, and that the rollout of the vaccine itself is the large study. I mentioned it to my GF, and she said she see's what I am saying. But also that she would read it as that that is just clarifying that the approval process is based upon large studies. To which, I said, I see what you are saying. However, I think that if large studies had been done, the wording should surely be The vaccines have been approved on the basis of large studies of safety and effectiveness.
It came with a helpful 'guide to phase 2 of the programme' pamphlet.
It had some wording in, that was interesting to my s elf. In a section titled "About the types of vaccine"
"In the UK several different types of covid vaccines will be used during 2021. The vaccines will only be approved on the basis of large studies of safety and effectiveness."
"Over 30 million people in the UK have been vaccinated against..."
Now I read this, will only, excerpt as indicative that they haven't been approved, and that the rollout of the vaccine itself is the large study. I mentioned it to my GF, and she said she see's what I am saying. But also that she would read it as that that is just clarifying that the approval process is based upon large studies. To which, I said, I see what you are saying. However, I think that if large studies had been done, the wording should surely be The vaccines have been approved on the basis of large studies of safety and effectiveness.
Me too.
I guess the logical extension, which has already been shown here and most are of the opine of, is that this rollout is the large study. Nonetheless, from this limited sample the NHS appears to be wording in the same way.
I also noted that the letter was addressed to myself without a legal title. I have previously informed them that I have no legal title, so I guess that could be why, although they have never amended any other such correspondence. However, that it is odd. I wonder whether they are actually trying to get consent from the human rather than the legal fiction.
That is interesting, however it is way out of the norm because it would need to come from a human as the corps can only communicate with corps, or maybe we are seeing a crossing over of the realms.
Name in the birth register entry is the states property as is the address on the envelope.
Noted, I did feel I was missing something. To both of you. Thanks, The logic of my thought process is however that this vaccine is a transaction(?) of an occult kind, in the pure meaning of the term, i.e that there is something hidden. Which again is kind of obvious. As opposed to limited and delimited by maritime law. In short, it struck me as odd, and still to this point does. Ever since I became aware of the legal fiction comment, I have noticed that any letter from an authority comes with a legal title attached. So when one is absent it strikes me as weird. And I wonder why. However having come across admin plenty of times before, it is most likely just my favourite sort of error. A clerical one.
All post is sent and delivered to an address aka state property . Addressee is of no relevance to the delivery.
NHS, blessed be its name, is the state offering something to a citizen of state through the content within the envelope.
Neither state, NHS, citizen can speak or listen. It takes a living being to commit fraud by acting in fraud using a legal name address d.o.b to gain a benefit from the offer. In the case of COCO the vaccine is the benefit being fraudulently obtained.
Were vaccines administered by force then in the states legal system no-one is committing fraud and the state holds 100% liability for consequences arising.
Despite appearances rule buy authority requires the explicit not implicit consent of the ruled.
NHS, blessed be its name, is the state offering something to a citizen of state through the content within the envelope.
Neither state, NHS, citizen can speak or listen. It takes a living being to commit fraud by acting in fraud using a legal name address d.o.b to gain a benefit from the offer. In the case of COCO the vaccine is the benefit being fraudulently obtained.
Were vaccines administered by force then in the states legal system no-one is committing fraud and the state holds 100% liability for consequences arising.
Despite appearances rule buy authority requires the explicit not implicit consent of the ruled.
I don't see this standard being applied to anyone else on this site. People can talk about demons taking control of people who have had the vaccination or it being performed by mysterious PTB, etc., yet if I say some of the messages on here are conjecture, I get called out by a moderator.
So...I need to provide opposing research to these "facts?"
Got it. Thanks.
I will stop posting here since my opinions don't match the Alex Jonesesque fear mongering and ATS style of documentation.
Interesting sentence from this document.
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
This standard is applied literally all over the site, constantly.
Specifically, you made a claim to which a moderator replied and suggested that you read over the hundreds of replies to this thread that do, in fact, have quite a bit more to them than conjecture. Your choice instead was to paint this entire thread with a broad brush and call it all conjecture.
There is plenty of interesting information, documentation, speculation, predictions, and theories in this thread - all are allowed. But if youre going to come in here and paint with broad strokes and call it an “ATS” style thread - don’t be surprised if you’re asked to expand on your thoughts.
Stumbled upon these in the internet.
Contains good bits. I haven't read it fully.
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4344/htm
Edit: the too speculative rest deleted.
Contains good bits. I haven't read it fully.
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4344/htm
Edit: the too speculative rest deleted.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
- Messages
- 337
- Reaction score
- 946
INDIA: When the Health Department team arrived at the Sisoda village in Uttar Pradesh to vaccinate them, the villagers ran to the shore. When the team surrounded them at the shore almost 200 villagers jumped into the river Saryu to escape forceful COVID-19 vaccination.
MEANWHILE IN TORONTO, CANADA:
MEANWHILE IN TORONTO, CANADA:
You have to wonder why in a country where a vial of insulin will set you back $40 they are not charging a whole lot more for the shot.
https://groupenroll.ca/how-much-does-insulin-cost-in-canada/
Just a quick scan through that article and we get this.
Studies estimate that 33% of the Canadian population has some form of diabetes or prediabetes. Experts project that number to rise as stress rates go up, and our collective lifestyle habits deteriorate.
Always with the 33, I wasn't even trying and it's just there, if there was ever a dictionary that translated numbers to pictures the number 33 would have this next to it.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2020
- Messages
- 21
- Reaction score
- 32
It's true. In several provinces in Canada, not sure about all, kids as young as 12 can get vaccinated without parental consent. In Ontario and British Columbia so far, they have come up with multiple step reopening plans that depend on declining cases, declining hospitalizations, and over 70% of the population being vaccinated. In other words, lockdown forever. If any police have a problem with this, they aren't saying much.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2020
- Messages
- 21
- Reaction score
- 32
The Chinese biological laboratory in Wuhan is owned by Glaxosmithkline, which (accidentally) owns Pfizer!" (the one who makes the vaccine against the virus which was (accidentally) started at the Wuhan Biological Lab and which was (accidentally) funded by Dr. Fauci, who (accidentally) promotes the vaccine!
"GlaxoSmithKline is (accidentally) managed by the finance division of Black Rock, which (accidentally) manages the finances of the Open Foundation Company (Soros Foundation), which (accidentally) manages the French AXA!
"Soros (accidentally) owns the German company Winterthur, which (accidentally) built a Chinese laboratory in Wuhan and was bought by the German Allianz, which (coincidentally) has Vanguard as a shareholder, who (coincidentally) is a shareholder of Black Rock," which (coincidentally) controls central banks and manages about a third of global investment capital.
"Black Rock" is also (coincidentally) a major shareholder of MICROSOFT, owned by Bill Gates, who (coincidentally) is a shareholder of Pfizer (which - remember? Sells a miracle vaccine) and (coincidentally) is now the first sponsor of the 'WHO!
Now you understand how a dead bat sold in a wet market in China has infected the WHOLE PLANET!"
"GlaxoSmithKline is (accidentally) managed by the finance division of Black Rock, which (accidentally) manages the finances of the Open Foundation Company (Soros Foundation), which (accidentally) manages the French AXA!
"Soros (accidentally) owns the German company Winterthur, which (accidentally) built a Chinese laboratory in Wuhan and was bought by the German Allianz, which (coincidentally) has Vanguard as a shareholder, who (coincidentally) is a shareholder of Black Rock," which (coincidentally) controls central banks and manages about a third of global investment capital.
"Black Rock" is also (coincidentally) a major shareholder of MICROSOFT, owned by Bill Gates, who (coincidentally) is a shareholder of Pfizer (which - remember? Sells a miracle vaccine) and (coincidentally) is now the first sponsor of the 'WHO!
Now you understand how a dead bat sold in a wet market in China has infected the WHOLE PLANET!"
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2020
- Messages
- 59
- Reaction score
- 132
It already came. They did a short reportage about dementia yesterday or yesterday again.
D
Deleted member 1432
Guest
There are many reports coming through to various groups in Telegram from Indian people warning that all the CV news from India is totally fake. They are refusing the vaccine and it's not compulsory. There is also virtually zero mask wearing. (Could all be fake itself of course.) Reports such as the one above are to scare 'rejectors' in other parts of the world, imo.
They've cancelled plans for "vaccines passports" in the UK apparently, although the majority of businesses here seem to have no qualms about enforcing the "guidelines" with no need for the government to legally oblige them to do so. So I guess why would they bother making it law when the majority of businesses seem quite happy to enforce such policies any way?
