Coronavirus: Possible Reset

[Citezenship]

View: https://twitter.com/Bevvie112/status/1466717104628019202?s=20

 

[Deleted member 1432]

100 years ago they used the "spanish flu" to cover up the war.

Would you mind explaining that please. Do you have any examples of how that worked?

 

[dreamtime]

Would you mind explaining that please. Do you have any examples of how that worked?

I am referring to what Miles Mathis wrote here: http://mileswmathis.com/rock.pdf

This is why Huxley and Orwell and Icke were able to “predict” what is going on now: there was never any prediction involved. We were living in basically the same Matrix back then as we are now, so Huxley and Orwell weren't telling you what might happen in the future. They were telling you what was already happening in the present, but setting it in the future, as a stunt. Remember, we have been through this whole Covid thing before: it was called the Spanish flu back then, but it was the exact same script, down to the masks. And it was used for the same reason: cover. The Spanish flu covered the end of WWI in 1918, preventing anyone from asking questions about that managed war. They couldn't have people noticing how staged the whole collapse of Germany on Halloween was, with kings abdicating for no reason and Jewish socialists magically installing themselves as leaders and so on, so they invented this scary pandemic to keep everyone's eyes and minds occupied for over a year. They faked and inflated numbers, assigning all deaths in that period to Spanish flu: same thing they are doing now. By the end of that year, everyone had “moved on”. Everyone was so relieved to have survived that pandemic, they didn't think of looking back, at WWI or anything else. And most people will treat Covid the same way: they will be so grateful to have survived this “horrible pandemic”, they won't think of questioning anything else that happened in 2020, including the massive thefts from the treasuries, the fake rioting, the fake BLM events, or anything else. They will move on as fast as possible, no questions asked.​

 

[E.Bearclaw]

Perhaps this has been mentioned, but the "alien invasion" (of project Bluebeam lore) could be construed as the covid stuff, from a legal perspective.

so:
a lien invasion
ie the loss of one's in-a-lien-able rights
rights that cannot be securitised
eg freedom of movement, thought, speech, etc

Well, these rights have been/are being invaded - eg if you can't go into shops without government giving you a permission slip.

I am not sure if this is a bit out there...but if your DNA is amended, or RNA, (my knowledge of the how the vaccine effects it is limited) - is there a theoretical basis for you no longer being human, thus no longer are eligible to human rights?

 

[Citezenship]

It is certainly speculated upon.

I am not religious but there is also this.

Download Video​

 

[feralimal]

I am not sure if this is a bit out there...but if your DNA is amended, or RNA, (my knowledge of the how the vaccine effects it is limited) - is there a theoretical basis for you no longer being human, thus no longer are eligible to human rights?

Well that is one possibility. If you not a 'natural born man' but have been edited, with a corporation owning some part of you, is there a legal repercussion? Is there legal interest or conflict of ownership re your body?

The other 'lien invasion' possibility is that we are moving to a post-law situation, where what is drives what we do is not law, but more in the realm of corporate policy and cancel culture. (Mandates are not law either.) In re-framing the edges that bind what we do, law is side-stepped.

 

[Prolix]

I am referring to what Miles Mathis wrote here: http://mileswmathis.com/rock.pdf

This is why Huxley and Orwell and Icke were able to “predict” what is going on now: there was never any prediction involved. We were living in basically the same Matrix back then as we are now, so Huxley and Orwell weren't telling you what might happen in the future. They were telling you what was already happening in the present, but setting it in the future, as a stunt. Remember, we have been through this whole Covid thing before: it was called the Spanish flu back then, but it was the exact same script, down to the masks. And it was used for the same reason: cover. The Spanish flu covered the end of WWI in 1918, preventing anyone from asking questions about that managed war. They couldn't have people noticing how staged the whole collapse of Germany on Halloween was, with kings abdicating for no reason and Jewish socialists magically installing themselves as leaders and so on, so they invented this scary pandemic to keep everyone's eyes and minds occupied for over a year. They faked and inflated numbers, assigning all deaths in that period to Spanish flu: same thing they are doing now. By the end of that year, everyone had “moved on”. Everyone was so relieved to have survived that pandemic, they didn't think of looking back, at WWI or anything else. And most people will treat Covid the same way: they will be so grateful to have survived this “horrible pandemic”, they won't think of questioning anything else that happened in 2020, including the massive thefts from the treasuries, the fake rioting, the fake BLM events, or anything else. They will move on as fast as possible, no questions asked.​

I was thinking there's probably a partial truth there, then Miles said it for me:

As a controller of the opposition, Icke does tell a lot of truth.

Mathis being, quite possibly, merely a humble lieutenant of the same.

 

[Citezenship]

Well that is one possibility. If you not a 'natural born man' but have been edited, with a corporation owning some part of you, is there a legal repercussion? Is there legal interest or conflict of ownership re your body?

The other 'lien invasion' possibility is that we are moving to a post-law situation, where what is driving what we do is not law, but more in the realm of corporate policy and cancel culture. (Mandates are not law either.) In re-framing the edges that bind what we do, law is side-stepped.

There is also a patent issue, wonder WHO owns the patents.

Last time flu to cover for war, this time war to cover for flu, as above, so below and all that.

 

[matematik]

I read an opinion recently that the reason they haven't been able to implement vaccine passports or compulsory vaccination in the Anglo nations yet is because the English legal system provides much less scope for governments to impose these sorts of mandates than the Continental/Roman derived legal systems used in most non-Anglo countries, which provide much more of a legal framework for authoritarianism.

So essentially English common law really is a big structural barrier that poses major problems for the implementation of the NWO in most Anglo countries, so to fully impose their agenda in the Anglosphere they would have to engineer the complete overthrowal and reset of the English legal system, and by extension English/Anglosphere history and identity, the later of which they've already made significant inroads in achieving.

A related point that crossed my mind is that the first part of the UK to impose vaccine passports was Scotland, and Scotland is unusual in the UK/Anglosphere that it has its own legal system that is derived to a large extent from Continental/Roman law, and not English law.

I wonder if the reason Scotland was chosen first to implement this is because the legal framework there is more amenable to this sort of thing than the rest of the UK where English common law is used? Although I believe Wales also has vaccine passports now, and as far as I'm aware the legal system there is exactly the same as England, but the Welsh Assembly and Mark Drakeford seem to be a law unto themselves so what they're doing is likely illegal under common law, but they seem to have the mentality that "if Scotland can do it we can do it".

 

[feralimal]

I read an opinion recently that the reason they haven't been able to implement vaccine passports or compulsory vaccination in the Anglo nations yet is because the English legal system provides much less scope for governments to impose these sorts of mandates than the Continental/Roman derived legal systems used in most non-Anglo countries, which provide much more of a legal framework for authoritarianism.

So essentially English common law really is a big structural barrier that poses major problems for the implementation of the NWO in most Anglo countries, so to fully impose their agenda in the Anglosphere they would have to engineer the complete overthrowal and reset of the English legal system, and by extension English/Anglosphere history and identity, the later of which they've already made significant inroads in achieving.

A related point that crossed my mind is that the first part of the UK to impose vaccine passports was Scotland, and Scotland is unusual in the UK/Anglosphere that it has its own legal system that is derived to a large extent from Continental/Roman law, and not English law.

I wonder if the reason Scotland was chosen first to implement this is because the legal framework there is more amenable to this sort of thing than the rest of the UK where English common law is used? Although I believe Wales also has vaccine passports now, and as far as I'm aware the legal system there is exactly the same as England, but the Welsh Assembly and Mark Drakeford seem to be a law unto themselves so what they're doing is likely illegal under common law, but they seem to have the mentality that "if Scotland can do it we can do it".

I heard the English/Scottish law discussed in this podcast - it might interest you:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV8dDuCUEvc


They touch upon how the English constitution maintains that we have a (legal) right to bear arms!

(Fwiw, I am not very interested in legal remedies or the law in general. I think law, like all bits of the system are a stitch up. I'm mostly interested in law as something to use in self-defence.)

 

[Safranek]

So essentially English common law really is a big structural barrier that poses major problems for the implementation of the NWO in most Anglo countries, so to fully impose their agenda in the Anglosphere they would have to engineer the complete overthrowal and reset of the English legal system, and by extension English/Anglosphere history and identity, the later of which they've already made significant inroads in achieving.

This is the conclusion I came up with some time ago. It doesn't just pertain to English common law but to all countries that have a constitution based on the Magna Carta. It seems to be a different ballgame in those countries and I would be watchful regarding how they will attempt to 'erase' these rights in the legal framework in the near future.

 

[Jd755]

ALL countries are registered corporations that recognise each other. The holder of the register is the owner of the countries. That is the source of their seeming difference.
The holder of the register is not known to me. I like everyone else can speculate but knowing this wouldn't change a thing.
The only thing that keeps the shit show running is peoples compliance with it doesn't sound much and it isn't but it is truthfully all it takes. Belief can kill.

 

[Prolix]

Nice mock up (and use of Phase IV):

 

[Deleted member 1432]

I am referring to what Miles Mathis wrote here: http://mileswmathis.com/rock.pdf

I disagree with that entirely. When Felix and I were researching his The ‘Spanish Flu’ Pandemic of 1918 post we couldn't find any evidence to support anything Miles Mathis claims in any country other than America and some in Australia, although much less by comparison.

The Treaty of Versailles was heavily criticised, even in the UK.

By the end of that year, everyone had “moved on”.

That's nonsense. The Spanish Flu pandemic didn't end in 1918.

 

[Citezenship]

Just for giggles.

Download Video​

 

[Jd755]

A chap who has had enough of the lies and the problems the lies underpin. And just a reminder NO virus has EVER been isolated.
If swear words offend you and god knows why they would then do not click play.

View: https://twitter.com/democracyisdea4/status/1467092777150332936
​

 

[Citezenship]

Sorry to reduce this to meme's but this whole saga is one giant meme.

 

[Jd755]

It's a Sunday (day of the sun, if only!) and here is something to ponder in relation to the op question.

The fundamental reason why the current state of affairs exists is individual belief in something outside of self which invokes compliance with the doctrines and diktats of the something.
Of course I have just defined religion which is no surprise.

The secondary reason also arises in belief and that is the role of the enforcer is fully manned by believers. The enforcers are the believers who take the tokens on offer and force waverers to comply thus showing the remainder of the believers the raw power the religion has at its disposal.
If there are no waverers or dissenters then from among the hordes of believers come actors who will quite happily take on that singular role.

Here the most visible and forceful enforcers are the police officers. Over here they swear an oath to protect the Monarch. The secondary enforcement arm or division or department, the believers who are collectively called media, pump out the impression that the Monarch is a living being. Currently a little old lady.
For example a "Breach of the Peace" is actually missing a word as I discovered on asking a police officer "Who's peace is being broken?" and he replied "The Queens."

Consider this though.
Queen and King are mere titles for "Heads of State" in a Monarchy.
Monarchy is a method of State governance headed by a Monarch.

So in swearing an oath to protect a Monarch the police officer is in actual fact swearing an oath to protect The State not a living breathing being.

When one looks at what the police officers actually do during their "employment period" and what they do actually defend by putting their physical body in harms way it becomes obvious they are as much The State as Queen and King is.

Hardly news for some I'm sure but I feel compelled to write this out.

The police officer role is the single thing that holds up the house of cards which stand upon it. It is the thing all other State believers call in when they feel threatened. It is the thing snitches and "concerned citizens" report to. It cannot defend itself in a Court of Law or any other court. It is in many ways the literal keystone without which the house will not stand.

That there is an already existing World Order whose name we may not know but m money is on it being named The State of the World Order, is beyond argument. The level of coordination, the choice of when and where, the different methodologies being employed etc all show, not point, show this to be true.
The cloak it hides in may be ruffling it may be falling the face(s) it conceals remains concealed but it the fact it exists is now on show.

If "reset" means "going back to the initial state of being" then I would argue no the revelation of The State of the World Order is not a reset for The State of the World Order to come into being there had to have been something existing prior.
If "reset" means "changing the mind of man" then I would argue this is likely what is going on at this moment.
If "reset" means "changing the world order" then no that is not what is going on.
If "reset" means "changing the system of the world order" then possibly this is what is going on.

I'm sure there are other definitions that can be applied to the word "reset" which may make more sense and if you have one please drop it in here as frames of reference are as rare as hens teeth in the murky world of stolen history.

If you define your self in the terms of The State of the World Order then you can be changed by the Orders doctrines and diktats. By terms I mean Name Address Date of Birth. Together these 3 things, none of which belong to you, are your marker of compliance with the Orders doctrines and diktats. It matters nought what country/corporation you tell yourself you live in or where on the earth plane your physical body is at any given moment these three things combine into a citizenship valid across the entirety of The Jurisdiction of The State of the World Order.

Citizenship is the thing used to beg the State to give. It is the fundamental upon which EVERY State 'benefit'/'penalty' rests.
It is a gift of State and can be withdrawn at any moment which then renders you outlaw in anarchy.
QR code, grain of rice microchip, mobile phone, passport, licence, papers etc are only given to believers who have use ID entity.
The ID entity is Citizenship.

So to shatter The State of the World Orders illusion of reality it requires the individual to accept the have been conned and lied to since their birth, they are not their name, they did no create the name, their body, the address nor the date of birth nor the calendar used to invoke the date of birth and after what is often a period of remorse and anger and wanting to "stick it to the man" quietly and as completely as one can stop acting as Citizen, revoke all State paper by destroying it or returning it and instead live life to the full always with an eye or ear to helping other wavering believers come to a decision to leave the State as effectively as they can.

Protests do nothing rejection on the other hand...

Life on earth is a joyful experience though to know and appreciate joy it has to have sadness as its companion.
Do no harm, the Law in its entirety.

 

[Akanah]

If you define your self in the terms of The State of the World Order then you can be changed by the Orders doctrines and diktats. By terms I mean Name Address Date of Birth. Together these 3 things, none of which belong to you, are your marker of compliance with the Orders doctrines and diktats. It matters nought what country/corporation you tell yourself you live in or where on the earth plane your physical body is at any given moment these three things combine into a citizenship valid across the entirety of The Jurisdiction of The State of the World Order.

Citizenship is the thing used to beg the State to give. It is the fundamental upon which EVERY State 'benefit'/'penalty' rests.
It is a gift of State and can be withdrawn at any moment which then renders you outlaw in anarchy.
QR code, grain of rice microchip, mobile phone, passport, licence, papers etc are only given to believers who have use ID entity.
The ID entity is Citizenship.

So to shatter The State of the World Orders illusion of reality it requires the individual to accept the have been conned and lied to since their birth, they are not their name, they did no create the name, their body, the address nor the date of birth nor the calendar used to invoke the date of birth and after what is often a period of remorse and anger and wanting to "stick it to the man" quietly and as completely as one can stop acting as Citizen, revoke all State paper by destroying it or returning it and instead live life to the full always with an eye or ear to helping other wavering believers come to a decision to leave the State as effectively as they can.

Protests do nothing rejection on the other hand...

Life on earth is a joyful experience though to know and appreciate joy it has to have sadness as its companion.
Do no harm, the Law in its entirety.

It´s the idea of the "Reichsbürger" in Germany to give up the state documents but what what can you do then ? We personally can only plant our own vegetables in the spring and other things we have to buy. Where else can we get what we need without money or state documents? We can also sew, but where will the fabric come from? Should we start to keep sheep ? But we have to buy them somewhere first. You must realize that it is not easy to get out of the state.

 

[feralimal]

You must realize that it is not easy to get out of the state.

Its a question worth thinking about though, isn't it? And do you mean the state or control structure? Corporations are as much a part of this system as the governance side of things.

Personally, I think you can consider your choices. How do you spend your times and money? Are you spending it on mega corporations? Are you putting on the mask? Are you making yourself difficult? Are you proactively engaging with the system? All useful questions.

I think the moral position, if the control structure is a force for evil, is to refuse of accede to its demands. Make it force you. Make the person come up to and waste their time, explain to you the whys and wherefores - no need to be aggressive. Of course is is fine to use the system to buy food/live - but where can you withdraw, what else can you do?