Coronavirus: Possible Reset

aussie state kidnappers takes lady away.
world state censors it?

View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/IpMPPxqDEirg/

Did see this postet elsewhere, do not know if its true because censoring🤷‍♂️

Screenshot_20220116_134407.jpg
Screenshot_20220116_134349.jpg
 
As for it's source it is likely from "that" book, witch is(sorry for the word play), open to interpretation, thus not really verifiable unless some events can be attributed to it. And this is still speculation on my part and came to me not from the covid narrative but what is happening within the crypto markets, coincidentally the start of this cycle had this result on the price of Bitcoin. The biggest and fastest single drop for quite some time. Ok a tenuous link but i think it back it up a bit and gives the event and cycle at least the merit of a possibility.



The Shmita year 2007-2008 culminated with the 2008 financial crash, seven years before that we all know what happened in September of 2001, I think you get the picture i am trying to paint here.
I did not notice but they encoded a 33 just to drive the point home, 21/2+1= 3 at 3pm exactly = 33 also 21 is three 7, seven year per cycle is another 3 so we have 333.

Screenshot 2022-01-17 at 01.33.22.png
 
I'm sure this has already been discussed, but I suspect they're going to try tearing down more old world buildings while they have us all locked down. There will be fewer witnesses. Perhaps the destruction of these buildings, and history in general, has been their primary goal all along.
 
I find it weird that the British government is completely rolling back the agenda. Today Boris Johnson has announced an end to mask wearing, no more WFH, no vaccine passports, etc. A return to total normality it would seem. I've even read speculation that they will completely withdraw the vaccines soon because of mounting evidence that they are dangerous.

What is going on here, are they seriously just giving up and throwing the towel in? I also find it strange that the UK seems to be the only country bringing the scamdemic to an end, most others are doubling down on the restrictions, covid passes, etc, if anything.
 
Is the Corona pandemic a dumbing down event ?
The wearing of masks leads to a lack of oxygen in many people and to the death of some brain cells. Maybe this is a reason why the flat earth theory is booming at the moment. Dumbed-down people, of course, might not be averse to a new Great Reset.
 
Maybe this is a reason why the flat earth theory is booming at the moment.
Immunized against satanic hoaxes (also known as bullshit), Flat Earthers are too smart to don face-diapers.

On the other hand, there is much overlap among the people I know who believe NASA / SpaceSex and those who believe their face will offend or kill unless they put a napkin on it and get injected. Ditto for Climate Change...
 
I find it weird that the British government is completely rolling back the agenda. Today Boris Johnson has announced an end to mask wearing, no more WFH, no vaccine passports, etc. A return to total normality it would seem. I've even read speculation that they will completely withdraw the vaccines soon because of mounting evidence that they are dangerous.

What is going on here, are they seriously just giving up and throwing the towel in? I also find it strange that the UK seems to be the only country bringing the scamdemic to an end, most others are doubling down on the restrictions, covid passes, etc, if anything.
On the surface this appears to be a strategic retreat, though not a complete one. So many factors not being properly reported on have led to this, including many lawsuits that will utterly destroy the narrative of these last two years. Perhaps they will feign ignorance of the dangers and will suddenly call for independent investigations and publicly roll a few heads of state. Whatever follows, they will do whatever possible to keep us deceived and in the dark while making it appear that their days of deception are over. Regardless, even this controlled strategic retreat is a victory for the people. This news will have many positive rippling effects around the world in the next coming days.
 
It's behind a paywall unfortunately

not for me thanks to my super awesome content blockers. :D

(Or maybe it blocks based on geolocation and IP.)

It's time to topple the failed lockdown elites​

The wrong people have been in charge since 2020. Scrap the last remaining restrictions and let us take back control of our lives


CAMILLA TOMINEY
ASSOCIATE EDITOR
21 January 2022 • 7:00pm

A university student called Sophie Corcoran could not have put it more starkly when she described the devastating toll Covid has taken on her generation.

Welling up over Wednesday’s announcement that secondary school pupils would no longer be required to wear masks, the Durham fresher-turned-political commentator declared tearfully on GB News: “I watched and felt like my entire life was falling apart because of what this Government did to young people.” This was a woman who ran for the Conservatives in the 2021 local elections, folks.

Recalling being in her last year of school when the draconian restrictions were first introduced in 2020, she referenced the teachers who “yelled” at Year 7 students about their masks rather than concentrating on teaching them, adding: “The head union reps come on and say this is what the school should have put in place, but they didn’t care about what this did to us.”

Yet in yet another sign of how some in the Left-wing teaching establishment have spent the pandemic prioritising themselves over pupils, we now read that dozens of headteachers are defying the Government over face-coverings in the classroom by insisting that children continue to wear them despite the official guidance being changed.

More than 100 schools have written to parents to say that pupils must carry on wearing masks in lessons, despite the Prime Minister’s announcement that they are no longer necessary.

Boris Johnson has decreed that, from January 26, they will no longer need to be worn in corridors or communal areas, either.

Naturally, the teaching unions have accused him of flouting his “duty of care” to teachers – once again demonstrating their total disregard for the wellbeing of the children in their care.

The truth is that mask-wearing in schools has never made any sense to me. Notwithstanding the lack of clarity over the efficacy of wearing non-surgical face coverings – children are arguably the least hygienic, most ineffective mask-wearers of all.

On the rare occasions when they do put them on properly, they spend most of the time fiddling with them; then when they take them off, they stuff them in the dirtiest of all pockets.

There has also always been something uniquely idiotic about requiring them to cover their faces in the classroom – where they are mostly facing forwards – but not, say, when they are all crowded around a TikTok video at a bus stop or physically bundling each other in the playground.

Moreover, it seems to be completely contradictory for the unions to argue that children must wear masks to prevent staff absences.

If dozens of teachers are still catching Covid despite their students wearing masks – then surely it suggests that face-coverings in schools are nowhere near a silver bullet?

In any case, teachers – the vast majority of whom are tripled jabbed – do not appear to be any more vulnerable to Covid than the rest of us.

Do you know the average age of a teacher in England? It’s 39, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Yet the continued hysteria in the teaching profession unfortunately speaks to a wider societal malaise. Despite the triumph of the vaccination programme, and the clear evidence that the UK is finally getting on top of the Covid-19 pandemic, too much of Britain is still in the grip of virus terror.

Even though the vast majority of omicron sufferers only have a very mild illness, you’ve still got a unique cabal of lockdown fanatics clinging to masks and other measures for dear life.

Yet anyone with any sense – and frankly, the faintest respect for civil liberties – knows that it is not just time to end Plan B restrictions but all Covid measures.

That’s what learning to live with coronavirus actually is.

Mass testing needs to go. Thanks to the billions we are still spending on lateral flow tests to tell people with cold symptoms that they’ve got the coronavirus, we are still stuck in an atmosphere of fear.

Legally-enforced self isolation should be scrapped, too – not in March, but now. Let people use their own common sense about when they should stay at home or avoid vulnerable relatives. As the public showed at Christmas, we’re generally a pretty sensible bunch.

Holiday Covid-testing should also go – purely on the experience of France after Emmanuel Macron’s ludicrous closure of the British border when omicron first hit. The other day, the country reported nearly half a million cases of the virus.

What’s the point of the costly Test and Trace system? And I think we can all agree we’ve had it up to here with the daily Covid statistics – especially given that some of them appear to be increasingly unreliable.It has emerged, for example, that 70 per cent of coronavirus patients in hospital were primarily being treated for other problems.

We have to move on. The pandemic may not be quite over, but two years is long enough to be living under a cloud of restrictions of varying levels of intensity.

We want our lives back.

Specifically, we have to take back control of lives from people who should never have been put in charge of them in the first place.

The wrong people have been in control since March 2020.

Like the unions who have slyly used Covid as a way of encouraging bone-idle behaviour (you can take 28 days off without a sick note, comrades) while attempting to extract unwarranted concessions from ministers and businesses.

Like the country’s over-mighty HR departments, which tell employees that the most important thing in the world is them, not their firm – and which happily impose endless Covid risk assessments on every aspect of working life rather than asking more important questions like: is the business going to survive so we are able to pay our staff?

Like the socialist fearmongers on independent Sage, whose advocacy of yet more restrictions often seems to have had little to do with science and everything to do with trying to hold “capitalist” Britain back.

And all those arrogant Remainer types on Twitter, ridiculing the small number of scientists who dared to question the efficacy of the measures, while revelling in the fact that said restrictions did little to stop the UK’s 15.6 million cases, and 153,000 deaths.

Let’s not forget the so-called “progressives” who have used twisted morality to damn those of us who want freedom as selfish. Or the jumped-up politicians of the devolved administrations, who have used the pandemic for their own ends, seemingly imposing measures for reasons of politics not of public health.

Or the saintly Jacinda Ardern, whose failed Zero Covid policies have devastated New Zealand’s economy.

And while we should give a heartfelt thank you to all those who have cared for the diseased and the dying, please now spare us the militant medics (often closet Corbynistas) spouting anti-Tory propaganda on the BBC.

We’ve spent two years being dictated to by the sort of insufferable jobsworths who delight in telling others how to live their lives. This pandemic has been a gift to the invisible high-vis jacket wearers of the world. Now we finally have a chance to unmask them.
 
I find it weird that the British government is completely rolling back the agenda. Today Boris Johnson has announced an end to mask wearing, no more WFH, no vaccine passports, etc. A return to total normality it would seem. I've even read speculation that they will completely withdraw the vaccines soon because of mounting evidence that they are dangerous.

What is going on here, are they seriously just giving up and throwing the towel in? I also find it strange that the UK seems to be the only country bringing the scamdemic to an end, most others are doubling down on the restrictions, covid passes, etc, if anything.
I don't think so. I think it heralds the end of Phase 1. I think the key strategic goal is 'bio-medical ids/passports/wallets' - if they back away from that, then we are saying something.. I think whatever retreat occurs, ids will remain a part of the plan. Ids to get out of your house are an essential part of the technocratic dream. I actually think testing will move to phones, and it is planned that there will be a daily phone test for citizen participation.

What was at risk perhaps, was the masses trust in their authority - they have to fall back before there is serious loss of trust in the governance structures. In the eyes of most, government can still plausibly argue that they were just doing whatever-it-was in good faith - and carry they masses with them.

They wouldn't want to lose that means of control - threat of force is better that the actual use of force on an enraged public. IMO.
 
The government repealing these things is meaningless and purely ass covering from a legal perspective.

The damage is done, the UK public have had their egos stroked for two years, and had a complex social engineering program carried out against them.

The government has completed that now, they switched off the machine because they believe the job is complete
 
I don't think so. I think it heralds the end of Phase 1. I think the key strategic goal is 'bio-medical ids/passports/wallets' - if they back away from that, then we are saying something.. I think whatever retreat occurs, ids will remain a part of the plan. Ids to get out of your house are an essential part of the technocratic dream. I actually think testing will move to phones, and it is planned that there will be a daily phone test for citizen participation.

What was at risk perhaps, was the masses trust in their authority - they have to fall back before there is serious loss of trust in the governance structures. In the eyes of most, government can still plausibly argue that they were just doing whatever-it-was in good faith - and carry they masses with them.

They wouldn't want to lose that means of control - threat of force is better that the actual use of force on an enraged public. IMO.
The ultimate wet dream of the techno psycho is the ability to turn on or off someones ability to live, remotely, maybe for even thinking incorrectly.
One takeaway from this is just how powerful they think an individual can be otherwise they would not go to so much trouble.
 
The ultimate wet dream of the techno psycho is the ability to turn on or off someones ability to live, remotely, maybe for even thinking incorrectly.
One takeaway from this is just how powerful they think an individual can be otherwise they would not go to so much trouble.
I agree.

An actualised individual is someone who is inclined not to outsource their thinking - they keep their reasoning 'in house'. Someone who reasons for themselves may (justifiably) reject provided thought forms/structures. Providing the requisite thought forms to collectivise us is the job of the collectivists or system administrators - these are the foundations of control.

So, individual thinking is a threat, especially if it involves rejection of those provided, collectivising ideas, and even more so if that rejection is based in reason and truth - the output of one's reasoning might be understood and relayed to another for their verification. Truth is even more infectious than a virus!
 
I agree.

An actualised individual is someone who is inclined not to outsource their thinking - they keep their reasoning 'in house'. Someone who reasons for themselves may (justifiably) reject provided thought forms/structures. Providing the requisite thought forms to collectivise us is the job of the collectivists or system administrators - these are the foundations of control.

So, individual thinking is a threat, especially if it involves rejection of those provided, collectivising ideas, and even more so if that rejection is based in reason and truth - the output of one's reasoning might be understood and relayed to another for their verification. Truth is even more infectious than a virus!
Indeed, something I said somewhere else.

I am going to go out on a limb here and say it matters not who holds the reigns as long as the people think that the reigns need holding, this is our main problem that we outsource our own authority, it's ok we all spent 12 or so years being trained to do it.

Spooky.
 
Indeed, something I said somewhere else.

I am going to go out on a limb here and say it matters not who holds the reigns as long as the people think that the reigns need holding, this is our main problem that we outsource our own authority, it's ok we all spent 12 or so years being trained to do it.

Spooky.

To be contrarian, what's the alternative though? Self-rule ie anarchy? Maybe this would work in some close-knit countries/societies, but in a "diverse" and atomised country like the UK I don't think I would trust the intentions and goals of many of my fellow "countrymen" enough to relish the idea of some sort of anarchic "system" with no government or police.

As far as I can see if you have a diverse country with authorities that have a weak or sometimes non-existent grip on law and order, you end up with societies like Brazil or South Africa. Is that desirable to most people?

Clearly the current state institutions are unfit for purpose, but I think a country like the UK needs some sort of central authority and law overseeing things.

It seems to me if you do away with state authorities and promote the mentality that everyone should just do their own thing, what THEY think is right, then rather than everyone pulling together for the good of society as a whole unhindered by the state, many are just going to see this as an opportunity to enrich themselves through thuggery and corruption, especially when they believe there will be no repercussions.

Maybe I'm just overly misanthropic though?
 
Last edited:
To be contrarian, what's the alternative though? Self-rule ie anarchy? Maybe this would work in some close-knit countries/societies, but in a "diverse" and atomised country like the UK I don't think I would trust the intentions and goals of many of my fellow "countrymen" enough to relish the idea of some sort of anarchic "system" with no government or police.

As far as I can see if you have a diverse country with authorities that have a weak or sometimes non-existent grip on law and order, you end up with societies like Brazil or South Africa. Is that desirable to most people?

Clearly the current state institutions are unfit for purpose, but I think a country like the UK needs some sort of central authority and law overseeing things.

It seems to me if you do away with state authorities and promote the mentality that everyone should just do their own thing, what THEY think is right, then rather than everyone pulling together for the good of society as a whole unhindered by the state, many are just going to see this as an opportunity to enrich themselves through thuggery and corruption, especially when they believe there will be no repercussions.

Maybe I'm just overly misanthropic though?
I don't think you're overtly misanthropic - I think you are realistic. Most people are not able to take care of themselves. So, without strong guidance you would get into a situation of roaming gangs, etc - it would definitely get worse. Even worse in places like the UK, we do not have the equalising access to weaponry - this is outside of most hands. Whoever has the arms, gets to rule. Which brings us right back to where we were... We are currently ruled by people who have access to force.

I'm not going to say that this is right though. Perhaps you can argue it has been "stable". But none of this is "right". Might (force) is not right - it is just might.

A couple of further points - just to address a couple of misconception I think you are making about anarchy, at least as I understand it. Its not that there are no rules - that's not it. To me, its that there are no written rules about right and wrong, no legal system. We all have an innate moral system - this is how we should know what is right to do or not. And it is even ok to make mistakes. In brief, it is often called the golden rule - or do unto others as you would have done to you. Or cause no harm. This is the only principle required and it is innate. You only need laws if you plan to get people to do bad things and call that right - eg making people wear masks or be excluded from shops.

Also, to see how this might work in practise - when you say have a family gathering the group does not need a book of rules or guidance. People just act naturally and that is fine. If someone takes an action that harms you, you can and should respond. Others can act in support of you, if they like. These are their moral choices. All choices come with responsibility. Even where you call the police to act on your behalf - these aren't morality-free choices, even if it feels far from us. So, its not that there are no rules - its that one takes responsibility for one's actions. If someone tries to harm you, you have the right to respond in self-defence.

Police etc to me may seem like external providers of order - but this is only because we have been taught this line of thinking (in indoctrination centers we call schools and even by family). People are generally good, kind and naturally harmonious - order is pretty spontaneous, imo. But if people in general are morally confused and are taught to see the rule book as a valid stand-in for their morality - they can actually cause harm (instigate violence) but call it good. We see examples of this all the time - doctors, police even teachers are initiating harm against other on account of their (unproven) beliefs but feel empowered to act as they do because they accept another's authority over themselves (eg a sergeant, the rule book).

So, if you look at who is actually causing problems, it almost always turns out that it is those people who have been told to do something but are not engaging their personal morality - they believe that their superior in their chain of command really does have the moral right to direct them. In the final analysis, order followers are the problem and instigate violence. The elite are free to make whatever suggestions they like - the culpability lands on those taking the actions.

The way I see it - anarchy - self-ownership, personal responsibility etc - is just the start, and its a long road. As I have seen in memes you can't comply your way out of tyranny - anarchy is not complying. We're at the point where we can kick the can down the road a bit more, or start paying the price for sticking our heads in the sand, pretending that the moral decisions we make do not apply to us, because 'an authority' told us to do it.

Finally, as a real interesting story to listen to to get your head in the right place, I like to recommend this:
“…And Then There Were None” – Film, Literature and the New World Order : The Corbett Report
https://www.corbettreport.com/mp3/andthentherewerenone.mp3
(just try and get used to the wierd narration - its worth it imo.)
 
Last edited:
To be contrarian, what's the alternative though? Self-rule ie anarchy? Maybe this would work in some close-knit countries/societies, but in a "diverse" and atomised country like the UK I don't think I would trust the intentions and goals of many of my fellow "countrymen" enough to relish the idea of some sort of anarchic "system" with no government or police.

As far as I can see if you have a diverse country with authorities that have a weak or sometimes non-existent grip on law and order, you end up with societies like Brazil or South Africa. Is that desirable to most people?

Clearly the current state institutions are unfit for purpose, but I think a country like the UK needs some sort of central authority and law overseeing things.

It seems to me if you do away with state authorities and promote the mentality that everyone should just do their own thing, what THEY think is right, then rather than everyone pulling together for the good of society as a whole unhindered by the state, many are just going to see this as an opportunity to enrich themselves through thuggery and corruption, especially when they believe there will be no repercussions.

Maybe I'm just overly misanthropic though?
Having had the pleasure of spending some time deep enough into the wilderness(central Brazil to be exact) that it takes a couple of days for law enforcement get on the scene, they are only required in the most extreme cases which is much rarer than you would think. This was mostly possible by way of something know as local justice(probs not correct translation), or jungle justice, basically if you are a thief and get caught you will most likely get a bullet fired into you hand, not only to scare the crap out of you but to let other kind folks know that you have been punished, do something worse or get caught doing the same over and over and it is likely you will be forced to dig your own resting place, this kind of system very quickly weeds out the men from the boys, this may seem like it would toughen the criminals but believe me it has the opposite effect. When in the little village for the second time i hired a brand new car(the road to the village was 15km on a dirt road away) and all the time i was there we left not brand new but very expensive electronics lying around. My friend left his ipad in a bakery and we came home by car and did not realise till after we went back the next day and someone had returned it, I can tell you after living in good and bad parts of the UK that this is most unlikely to happen.

I did not have any trouble with the police out there but my friend did as he was out there for a year and the only problems he had was that the local(town not village) took his bike from him as he was not licensed, they did not charge him with anything just strait up took his property under the threat of being shot.

I also heard stories of the police over stepping the mark and feeling the bite of this kind of justice but never witnessed it.

Sometimes we are told that we can't do without this or that but in my experience and my experience only, this more often than not turns out to not be the case.

Funnily enough in the cities in Brazil that i did spend some time in(Sao Paulo and Rio) i did feel scared and threatened, mostly by the local mallitia wearing police uniforms and some times by the criminal underclass that those environments attract.

If you need an outside authority to let you feel safe then that is how you feel, i am not knocking you for it at all, i used to think this also but i have had enough experiences at home and abroad at least allow me to question why i needed it.

Meanwhile in this country I have been the victim of some pretty brutal violence from those claiming to have an authority over me, much more so as a youngster but I still see the UK police as Britains most well organised, well funded and most criminal gang, this is not just a suspicion as i have the physical and mental scars to prove it and also all the paperwork to back it up, I have been compensated a lot for it but I also have never had an admission of guilt. This just my own perspective.
 
Back
Top