- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
- Messages
- 211
- Reaction score
- 643
Be careful with this one, it's not what you think. I initially thought this was legit too, but good old James Corbett put me right
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DawyMdbRQSU
Coronavirus: Possible Reset
- Thread starter AgentOrange5
- Start date
Be careful with this one, it's not what you think. I initially thought this was legit too, but good old James Corbett put me right
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DawyMdbRQSU
Be careful with this one, it's not what you think. I initially thought this was legit too, but good old James Corbett put me right
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DawyMdbRQSU
Hey Bob, do you really think James Corbett is legit??
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Messages
- 186
- Reaction score
- 344
Be careful with this one, it's not what you think. I initially thought this was legit too, but good old James Corbett put me right
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DawyMdbRQSU
I hope it's not. I hope all of this is fake somehow.
I've recently come across the theory that nanotech will be phased out in vaccines to control peoples minds and while that sounds insane anything feels possible now. Nanowires degrading fast would call for regular vaccinations, which would make sense. All the pieces are there, it just seems to be a question of what order they will phase things out in...
I thought exactly this when watching the uk version, the arrest of Santa, or satan as i like to call him.
One would think that they are really trying to get some kind of revolution going, i am guessing so they can put troops on the street.
Apparently the police with red caps and lapels here in the uk are military intelligence, so the army is already directing things, never a good sign!
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
- Messages
- 211
- Reaction score
- 643
Be careful with this one, it's not what you think. I initially thought this was legit too, but good old James Corbett put me right
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DawyMdbRQSU
Hey Bob, do you really think James Corbett is legit??
Yes, I think he's a good guy. He made one of my favourite videos, the 5 min 911 summary, which is great to play to people who still believe the official story. Why do you ask though? I've never had reason to doubt him so far.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98
Be careful with this one, it's not what you think. I initially thought this was legit too, but good old James Corbett put me right
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DawyMdbRQSU
Hey Bob, do you really think James Corbett is legit??
Yes, I think he's a good guy. He made one of my favourite videos, the 5 min 911 summary, which is great to play to people who still believe the official story. Why do you ask though? I've never had reason to doubt him so far.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98
Quite a few have had some serious doubts , mostly concerning the amount of content he puts out and maintains that he is a one man band coupled with the exposure he has, i do like the guy and he has a good way of narrating but i have never herd anything original from him.
Also i think he is not to well liked over on the september clues forum which is the go to place for that psyop for me at least.
The term making cream from someone else's milk comes to mind.
But i am willing to be proven wrong as ever!
Be careful with this one, it's not what you think. I initially thought this was legit too, but good old James Corbett put me right
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DawyMdbRQSU
Hey Bob, do you really think James Corbett is legit??
Yes, I think he's a good guy. He made one of my favourite videos, the 5 min 911 summary, which is great to play to people who still believe the official story. Why do you ask though? I've never had reason to doubt him so far.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98
Quite a few have had some serious doubts , mostly concerning the amount of content he puts out and maintains that he is a one man band coupled with the exposure he has, i do like the guy and he has a good way of narrating but i have never herd anything original from him.
Also i think he is not to well liked over on the september clues forum which is the go to place for that psyop for me at least.
The term making cream from someone else's milk comes to mind.
But i am willing to be proven wrong as ever!
First, I do question Corbett as a source. I have never seen original content from him as you alluded to in your comment. But I don't really care one way or the other. Always use discernment with these guys.
Second, I only watched the first part of the Corbett video. I stopped after he said "Trust me, that is not Bill Gates." Whenever somebody says 'trust me' I immediately don't. He seems to be saying that Bill Gates was not the guy in the video. So what? Everybody knows about BG and his 'vax the world' holy war. I'm sure BG is up to date on vax tech, even if he was not the guy in the video. Even if the whole video is fake, it really doesn't change anything.
Wow, Corbett you really saved the world this time. It wasn't BG in that creepy god gene CIA vax lecture...I can sleep easy tonight...
A
Akanah
Guest
One thing I must also say. The Corona-Virus is contagious with wear a mask. So masks are not useful. This could only be if the virus is smaller than scientist tell us or it could be contagious about the mind as a mentally virus.
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
- Messages
- 211
- Reaction score
- 643
These guys have well and truly crossed the line for me.
https://davidicke.com/2020/12/01/th...or-protesting-jackboot-johnsons-nazi-britain/
https://davidicke.com/2020/12/01/th...or-protesting-jackboot-johnsons-nazi-britain/
6079SmithW
Deleted
Me too Bob.
I was at the two big protests but I couldn't go to this latest one. I would have been arrested for sure as I'm a 'trouble maker'.
But I'm having to take a step back from keeping up with the new$, as it makes me really angry.
Also, I think that what is happening is merely what people collectively want to happen.
People have been shunning personal responsibility for years - and this is the result. This is what they've wanted all along, and quite a lot of them are thoroughly enjoying it
I was at the two big protests but I couldn't go to this latest one. I would have been arrested for sure as I'm a 'trouble maker'.
But I'm having to take a step back from keeping up with the new$, as it makes me really angry.
Also, I think that what is happening is merely what people collectively want to happen.
People have been shunning personal responsibility for years - and this is the result. This is what they've wanted all along, and quite a lot of them are thoroughly enjoying it
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2020
- Messages
- 467
- Reaction score
- 1,449
The news makes money and justifies their existence by making people angry. People go back and read listen to get angry/upset. This pavlovian dopamine pumping response is all they really have left going for them now that advertising isn't going to well for the big players. Covid is a gift from lucifer for them.
Like all the other good psy ops we have a healthy(sick) dose of predictive programming!
View: https://youtu.be/M3BkTOrBsOU
[automerge]1606946163[/automerge]
At least this guy is being honest with us and himself, i share his views!
View: https://youtu.be/dGnkSU7GLqc
View: https://youtu.be/M3BkTOrBsOU
[automerge]1606946163[/automerge]
At least this guy is being honest with us and himself, i share his views!
View: https://youtu.be/dGnkSU7GLqc
Last edited:
This is Matthew Hancock announcing the “milestone” of an MHRA approved “vaccine” to the House of Commons yesterday. He reiterated his promise that “no vaccine will be used until its safety and effectiveness have been clearly established”. He added that the Pfizer formulation had been “subjected to the closest scrutiny of the MHRA” and been given “a clinical authorisation”. “This,” he stated baldly, “is a vaccine we can all believe in”. He finally bragged that “this is the first vaccine in the world to have achieved regulatory approval for use against Covid19”.
Mr Hancock lied to the House. He further lied to BBCNews viewers earlier in the day, as he told them, “when this vaccine is rolled out, things will get better and we will all return to normality and the things we love”. He doesn’t know that – he cannot know that – and this is emphatically not what the MHRA Pfizer decision says.
I apologise now for having to resort to The Science Bit. It is however vital that this reckless little man is held to account. I am indebted to Slog reader Martin for digging out the somewhat obscure links on the MHRA website. The reality of what the regulator has decided blows Hancock’s claims out of the water.
You can get the full strength of such “approval” as has been given here.
These are the key facts about the Pfizer-Biontech product’s assessment under Reg174 at the MRHA:
The MHRA was given just five days to study the mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Hancock called this “the closest scrutiny”.
Its safety and effectiveness have not been “clearly established”.
The Pfizer product has been given a temporary, narrow approval under the emergency Covid19 legal instruments so eagerly approved by our braindead MPs earlier this year.
Following Halfcock’s triumphalist Commons announcement yesterday, not a peep has emanated from Her Majesty’s Opposition pointing out the Grand Canyon of gap between what the Health Secretary claimed, and what the MHRA has “approved”.
Further evidence of how the British Establishment now does what likes, free from fear of any resistance of a legal, judicial or constitutional nature.
Manflu Halfcock lied when he said this is a vaccine we can all believe in. He lied when he said it had full regulatory approval. He lied when he said safety and efficacy had been established. He lied when he assured the House that this was the beginning of a return to normal.
But then, I’d imagine over-exposure to a Prime Minister who lied about Newscorp phone hacking, Elm House paedophilia, Yeo taxi emissions, Skripal guilt and the EU Withdrawal Agreement might well have that effect on an over-promoted Secretary of State.
Source
Mr Hancock lied to the House. He further lied to BBCNews viewers earlier in the day, as he told them, “when this vaccine is rolled out, things will get better and we will all return to normality and the things we love”. He doesn’t know that – he cannot know that – and this is emphatically not what the MHRA Pfizer decision says.
I apologise now for having to resort to The Science Bit. It is however vital that this reckless little man is held to account. I am indebted to Slog reader Martin for digging out the somewhat obscure links on the MHRA website. The reality of what the regulator has decided blows Hancock’s claims out of the water.
You can get the full strength of such “approval” as has been given here.
These are the key facts about the Pfizer-Biontech product’s assessment under Reg174 at the MRHA:
- This medicinal product does not have a UK marketing authorisation but has been given authorisation for temporary supply by the UK Department of Health and Social Care
- It has no approval at all for people aged under 16
- The administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should be postponed in individuals suffering from acute severe febrile illness
- No interaction or contraindication studies have been performed. In the absence of compatibility studies, this medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products.
- COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination
- It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk
- The effects of the vaccine on fertility are unknown
- Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Coronavirus Yellow Card reporting site Homepage | Coronavirus (COVID-19)
The MHRA was given just five days to study the mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Hancock called this “the closest scrutiny”.
Its safety and effectiveness have not been “clearly established”.
The Pfizer product has been given a temporary, narrow approval under the emergency Covid19 legal instruments so eagerly approved by our braindead MPs earlier this year.
Following Halfcock’s triumphalist Commons announcement yesterday, not a peep has emanated from Her Majesty’s Opposition pointing out the Grand Canyon of gap between what the Health Secretary claimed, and what the MHRA has “approved”.
Further evidence of how the British Establishment now does what likes, free from fear of any resistance of a legal, judicial or constitutional nature.
Manflu Halfcock lied when he said this is a vaccine we can all believe in. He lied when he said it had full regulatory approval. He lied when he said safety and efficacy had been established. He lied when he assured the House that this was the beginning of a return to normal.
But then, I’d imagine over-exposure to a Prime Minister who lied about Newscorp phone hacking, Elm House paedophilia, Yeo taxi emissions, Skripal guilt and the EU Withdrawal Agreement might well have that effect on an over-promoted Secretary of State.
Source
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
- Messages
- 337
- Reaction score
- 946
Just re-posting a great comment I came across.
If the masks work—Why the six feet?
If the six feet works—Why the masks?
If both of the above work—Why the lockdowns?
If all three of the above work—Why the vaccine?
If the vaccine is safe—Why protect it with a no liability clause?
If the vaccine is safe---Why not test it on animals first before using it on humans?
If SARS-CoV-2 exists—Why has it never been isolated?
If SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated—How can an effective vaccine be developed?
If the RT-PCR test works—Why so many false positives?
If Kary Mullis, the inventor of the RT-PCR test who conveniently died in August 2019, says his test shouldn’t be used to diagnose infectious diseases—Why use it to detect SARS-CoV-2?
If there is an epidemic---Why so many empty hospitals?
If large numbers of people are dying from SARS-CoV-2---Why so many fake causes of death on death certificates?
If SARS-CoV-2 exists—Why give doctors financial incentives to diagnose SARS-CoV-2?
If the official COVID-19 narrative is defensible—Why censor people who dispute this narrative?
I am thinking of calling this helpline,
https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...-the-signs/domestic-abuse-recognise-the-signs
All the signs are there!
hope a few see this and watch the interview
This man is far more qualified than Fauci. Max Planck Institure and then University of Mainz, Germany. Here is what he said on Fox News.
Fox immediately scrubbed their archive of the interview.
It is no longer on the network archive, but thankfully many people have DVRs and a record of this interview should go VIRAL.
Again, as John Stuart Mill and the founders argued, a free society thrives in a free market of ideas.
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi from Germany got it to the point - Laura Ingraham
F
Felix Noille
Guest
These reports are the equivalent of an entertaining reality show for the elite.
