SH Archive Do we have photos/evidence of giant Japanese?

[greatscot]

What bearing does this statement have on the simple op question "Do we have photo evidence of giant Japanese?"
Wandering this forum dropping statements about words looking the same or sounding the same to you and them making a claim without any links or hints as to why you think the claim has merit adds nothing to the op.
Why not make a thread of your own where you can simply quote the word association you have noticed and add in your thoughts based upon it. One after the other as you find them. Hell you could even provide a direct link to the post which triggered your word association to help the sites SEO.

In this case the link would be.
SH Archive - Do we have photos/evidence of giant Japanese?

After reading this hostility, I am now certain that Samurai teachings originate with the Apkallu. Oannes also sounds like Uranus. Are we going to pretend that is a coincidence too? Of course there isn't evidence for etymological connections between words--humanity's universal language was confounded by a malevolent force. That doesn't mean there aren't still lingering connections.

Again, this is related to Thomas Lockley and the black samurai hoax because western governments are at war with blue-eyed Sumerian men of renown (giants) and have been for ages. The Axis powers also believed the Japanese were Aryan, and this is surely related to the current topic.

If anything, the problem is asking for something as preposterous of photographic evidence of giant Japanese when every museum is instructed to destroy OOPARTs. You might as well ask Indiana Jones to steal one

 

[Jd755]

After reading this hostility, I am now certain that Samurai teachings originate with the Apkallu. Oannes also sounds like Uranus. Are we going to pretend that is a coincidence too? Of course there isn't evidence for etymological connections between words--humanity's universal language was confounded by a malevolent force. That doesn't mean there aren't still lingering connections.

Again, this is related to Thomas Lockley and the black samurai hoax because western governments are at war with blue-eyed Sumerian men of renown (giants) and have been for ages. The Axis powers also believed the Japanese were Aryan, and this is surely related to the current topic.

If anything, the problem is asking for something as preposterous of photographic evidence of giant Japanese when every museum is instructed to destroy OOPARTs. You might as well ask Indiana Jones to steal one

I am not saying you are not onto something all I am saying is it would carry more weight if you created your own thread and put your copiuos word assciations in there so that those who may find merit in your statements can see them all in one place.
If thats hostility I'm Indiana Jones.

And just because you asked. No Oannes does not sound like Uranus. Pronumciation of the spoken word is dependent on dialect and the native tongue of the speaker and local accent.

 

[greatscot]

I am not saying you are not onto something all I am saying is it would carry more weight if you created your own thread and put your copiuos word assciations in there so that those who may find merit in your statements can see them all in one place.
If thats hostility I'm Indiana Jones.

The trick is trying to triangulate the original source, the root cause, of popular myths and legends. We have to trace history using visual similarity, pictures, not words that were rewritten by corrupt regimes. There has to be a way to put all confirmed historical imagery of giants in one file, Japanese artifacts/paintings/statues in another file, and scan them for commonalities. Nobody does history like that, of course, because we would actually learn the truth

 

[Jd755]

The trick is trying to triangulate the original source, the root cause, of popular myths and legends. We have to trace history using visual similarity, pictures, not words that were rewritten by corrupt regimes. There has to be a way to put all confirmed historical imagery of giants in one file, Japanese artifacts/paintings/statues in another file, and scan them for commonalities. Nobody does history like that, of course, because we would actually learn the truth

I am talking about a thread with each of your observations being put in as separate entries not as one long file but a collection of comments. Just as all of the threads on here are structured.

To be frank all I see in your posts is word associations and statements based on the associations be they sounds or visual. You never post any links to anything that may assist someone interested enough to dig deeper into the background that led to the word asociation or the triangulation you now speak of.
If perchance there are no links and your associations all come out of what you happen to be reading at the time then you could simply say so at beginning or end of your comment.
Were you to set up your own dedicated thread you could put this statement of how you arrive at your associations in your opening post never having to mention it again.

 

[Jd755]

An observation.
Island people, forest people, mountain people generally tend to have a small stature. I stress generally. Within any population there are outliers. In the case of Japan and I suspect Britain to a lesser degree, it is a forested mountainous island. It is therefore going to be unlikely to produce taller people let alone people so tall they could be given the term giant.