Finials and Cavity Resonance

Very cool video. Did that require a special situation to function, like a storm in the neighborhood?
Well it looks stormy in the video which would certainly mean a higher potential difference in the air.

My comments of late in this thread have been deemed "disingenuous" and deleted so best wait for a qualified electrical engineer opinion.
Obviously those loudspeakers aren't being powered from the atmosphere because they aren't designed to be.
 
Last edited:
those loudspeakers aren't being powered from the atmosphere because they aren't designed to be.
Can you present a loudspeaker design that is meant to be powered from the atmosphere?
 
Last edited:
My comments of late in this thread have been deemed "disingenuous" and deleted so best wait for a qualified electrical engineer opinion.
Well... I have to admit that I'm having to make some adjustments to my expectations here on this new site. Weren't you a member of KD's SH? I thought I remembered someone with that handle.
 
best wait for a qualified electrical engineer opinion.

There aren't any Electrical Engineers fully qualified in all aspects of Atmospheric Energy Generation, Scalar Waves and Aetheric Physics. Those subjects were all removed from the curriculum in the 1890s!

There's a lot of information about Tesla's work available now, and a lot of it appears to be accurate, imo. However Tesla was not concerned with the operation of the old-world buildings. He was looking forward. Edison was investigating the same spark-gap free energy generation technology as Tesla, but was warned off by his financial backers around c. 1876. You can actually buy a working scale model of the technology now. It's £1500. I haven't bought one. EDIT the price has doubled since last time I looked!

As far as the old-world buildings go, it appears they were designed to resonate on multiple levels - with sound, with electro/magnetic waves, and possibly also with etheric vibrations, the mathematics of which have been lost or hidden.

I believe this resonance was an integral part of their function. Every one of these old buildings, at least in the Western world, has now had a lightning conductor fitted, which deactivates the energy generating potential imo. In their original condition, these buildings would have had conductors (finials) on top, but these filials were not connected to Earth like they are now.
 
Last edited:
A friend did some research into All Saint's Church, Northampton.

Hopefully you can see it on this google maps link
Google Maps


She went to the public records office and found some older images of the church. The antenna has been changed. I'm sorry I haven't got the time to check all these facts and give precise dates and details, these are pictures from a few hundred years ago.

This lends credence to Martin Liedtke's theory that the antennae were changed to become weather vanes. You can see the four directions here but no vane. There are several more like this in Northampton records office, I will post when I get round to it.


All Saint's Church Northampton changes antenna.jpeg
 
Last edited:
There was a similar looking aerial on this building in Dresden before WW2. No wonder they wanted to destroy it.

I think I said this already, but Martin Liedtke said ages ago that the antennae were repurposed as weathervanes to conceal their true purpose, and here we are starting to see evidence of that. He also said that bells were retrospectively fitted to towers.

Can you present a loudspeaker design that is meant to be powered from the atmosphere?

This is all contained in Meyl's book 'Communication of the Gods,' which is the subject of this thread Temples and Churches as Radio Frequency Receivers

I've already written several high level summaries of this book on the above thread. I intend to write another one at some point.

I've read Meyl's book once, fairly carefully, and I believe I am not misrepresenting him when I say the following -

1) Ancient temples were built to matching proportions / dimensions. So all the temples of Dionysis were similar to each other for example. This means they were resonant with each other, and communication could be achieved via various means. For example a pendulum swung in head office would cause pendulums to swing in sub-branches of the same cult. Meyl goes into a lot of detail how these communication systems might have worked.

In particular, he says that all the ancient Roman and Greek gods were set up in a one-to-many form of communication, so they were command and control structures, whereas the Phoenicians set up a many-to-one network which served as a means of gathering information and relaying it back to the head office.

An animal sacrifice was needed to enable voice communication. Again, I believe I am not misrepresenting Meyl to say it's actually the fine membranes around the entrails which acted as a loudspeaker, responding to the vibrations within the ether and converting them to sound.

2) Meyl says that the later design of churches with the dome structure were able to achieve direct voice communication without the need to perform sacrifices. So - St Paul's cathedral, St Peter's basilisk in the Vatican for example. And similar domed structures all over the ancient worlds, including every US state capitol building. Again, Meyl goes into detailed arguments to support this assertion.
 
Last edited:
2000px-Epsom_Clock_Tower_Surrey.jpg


Epsom clocktower with a "weather vane" on top which looks like it was added at later with the straps going around the outside of the gold finial. This would have served another purpose however and if you have watched Ewaranon's old videos you may already be aware of the significance of so-called clocktowers.

They weren't clocks they were voltmeters to measure and display the amount of voltage in the atmosphere.
s-classic-magnolia-52mm-volt-meter-p302-800_medium.jpg
 
I remember the refutation relying on the fact that coal was being mined at the time of the writing of the journal, and must therefore have always been burned inside houses (instead of safer, more elegant, and less smelly solutions such as hypocausts, and the use of hot water radiators) and that house built in 1920s were built with fireplaces and therefore all houses ever built beforehand must also have used the same primitive heating methods. Not convincing enough for me.
To this pertinent remark, I would add this: with the absolutely overwhelming number of fires that have, throughout history, ravaged cities the world over (from Rome to London, San Francisco, Charleston and Chicago...) it would be astonishing if we persisted in using a method of heating that was not only so primitive, but particularly dangerous, considering urban and domestic standards (or rather the IA's alleged but unjustifiable lack of fire safety standards in densely populated urban settlements in the 19th century) .

On the one hand, you can't describe a society that should be as wary of fire as of the plague, but which has massively adopted the custom of building fires in places containing the most flammable materials. The most famous fires, we are told, were also the most commonplace: a cow knocking over a candle in a stable, a wrong move near a curtain, a forgotten candle - you name it! Yet it doesn't bother us to pretend that quintals of coal were brought into the bedrooms and living rooms, to be burnt next to the tablecloths, doilies, carpets and sheets, quintals of carbon crackling and smouldering every week.

We know nothing about where these masses of coal were stored in the modern homes of the 19th century. Nor do we know anything about the logistics involved in bringing large quantities of ore to the towns. Nor do we know anything about the disposal of the ashes. The staff dedicated to cleaning the surfaces must have been considerable!
We are told that the Romans were already aware of the convection properties of hot water and that it was not uncommon in thermal baths for it to be circulated after having been heated below, but in the 19th century we know nothing about hot water radiators?

This narrative is totally incoherent and points to a concealment of the true function of the 1800's chimneys.
 
My thoughts: Air is a near perfect insulator unless you can ionize/polarize it, such as with radiation or oscillating a magnetic field(or just mercury). Compressed or pressurized air is a super insulator. With no ground and a capacitor/condenser(domes/balls) you can collect the charge. When the charge is full the excess leaks off. This is static electricity and shows up as st elmos fire. This electric power can be used for whatever. Pick your story. Transmitted by antennae, bells, or wire.
Main source: "Medical Electricity Röntgen Ray's and Radium" by Sinclair Tousey
 
Last edited:
Further to mercury being used in the finials. Imagine the following scenario.

The outside of the ball is grounded. Via a small hole in the top suspending the atmospheric wire via a rod into the mercury within the ball (without touching the ball) will cause the metal spin.

This may be part of a very large signal amplifier
I’ve seen “mercury antennas” that do this for the old tv signals.
However there must be some way to sense these as all the experimenters of the past have been visited by the ptb and told to take it down or face rather draconian consequences.

No free electricity for You!!!!!!
 
I look at these finials and other fixtures atop buildings of old and sometimes wonder if they are construction artefacts, each a medium through which the structure is assembled. Matter is formed from an energetic imprint or mold that is transmitted through these objects. Buildings can be erected or inserted anywhere the energy flows freely.
 
There was a similar looking aerial on this building in Dresden before WW2. No wonder they wanted to destroy it.
The Allies are the Ummah. They bombed Germany because Germans were Christian and Muslims destroy churches. We can't understand the Islamic conspiracy because we're living inside it
 
The Allies are the Ummah. They bombed Germany because Germans were Christian and Muslims destroy churches. We can't understand the Islamic conspiracy because we're living inside it
This remark is completely unfounded and irrelevant to the subject. To our knowledge, it was not Muslims who launched the Crusades over several centuries or destroyed half of the Middle East (a process that is still ongoing). Nor was it Muslims who reduced Spain from what it was during the Arab-Andalusian period to what it is today. The harmlessness of so-called ‘Christian’ cultures compared to the supposed barbarism of Muslims remains to be proven. On the other hand, the proven intermingling of different religions during the 4th century , particularly in Russian Tartary (as shown on the russians Tsars' crowns, books or coins already discussed here), invalidates your inept assertion. For what it's worth, domes, spires and other arches, colonnades and antennas are characteristics cherished by the East, and the Muslim world, including outside the East, is no exception. You are reversing things, either out of ignorance or out of adherence to an ideology that you have yet to admit.
 
This remark is completely unfounded and irrelevant to the subject. To our knowledge, it was not Muslims who launched the Crusades over several centuries or destroyed half of the Middle East (a process that is still ongoing). Nor was it Muslims who reduced Spain from what it was during the Arab-Andalusian period to what it is today. The harmlessness of so-called ‘Christian’ cultures compared to the supposed barbarism of Muslims remains to be proven. On the other hand, the proven intermingling of different religions during the 4th century , particularly in Russian Tartary (as shown on the russians Tsars' crowns, books or coins already discussed here), invalidates your inept assertion. For what it's worth, domes, spires and other arches, colonnades and antennas are characteristics cherished by the East, and the Muslim world, including outside the East, is no exception. You are reversing things, either out of ignorance or out of adherence to an ideology that you have yet to admit.
Look at the attached photograph of a German church. A pentagram and a hexagram and a cross are all employed in its design. This is because "religions" are a hoax. There is only geometry, which is what the ancient Egyptians called magic. Jesus Christ was not a Christian: he was a mathematician. If you understand geometry, you inherently understand how to create the remarkable architecture of Dresden and Tartary. Math and magic are the same word.

Ultimately all of the religions and ideologies we are fed like Islam AND what is wrongly called Christianity, even cults and fraternal orders, only exist to prevent us from understanding mathematics because math is the key to exploring space and escaping this nightmare world. That is why the Catholic Church/Roman empire wanted to make literacy illegal and possession of Bibles a crime. We are hostages.

"God" was a literal physical man called Odin who used to walk around and leave his runes on churches he built. The forces of evil could never convince humanity that the metaphysical is fake and humans are monkeys on a spinning ball if there were still statues and monuments to Thor, Freya, Baldur, Odin, and other supernatural beings, such as those the Allies blew up in the World Wars.

The conspiracy is so great that Jews censor the word "God" as G-d, not realizing that the reason they are told to do this is because if they used the word God, it would be obvious that God is just short for Godin/Odin who was once understood as a real man just as surely as people know the sky is blue.

He was probably just a friendly electrician who built all the wireless power stations as seen in this thread which are now wrongly called churches.
 

Attachments

  • 1711026895181247-1.jpg
    1711026895181247-1.jpg
    123 KB · Views: 45
  • 1650231217711.jpg
    1650231217711.jpg
    756.8 KB · Views: 54
  • 1650448190027.jpg
    1650448190027.jpg
    274.3 KB · Views: 43
Last edited:
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top