Archive
Old SH Archive
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2020
- Messages
- 17,737
- Reaction score
- 3,167
Hi all,
I am a lurker here and I love reading other peoples materials and research on different things so eventually I thought I would post my own. There is a scientist by the
name of John Sanford, I believe he is a plant geneticist who due to his education was a committed Darwinist but later on due to his research concerning genetic entropy he abandoned Darwinism. There is a video (interview) of him on YouTube giving a general description of his research. The link is below if you have time. The Book is called genetic entropy
Basically what he says (I am in the processing of reading his book) is that the overwhelming amount of genetic mutations that humans are accruing are actually deleterious in nature and that there is no way that random mutations (the back bone of Darwinism) could generate life on this planet that we see. Biologist in order to counteract act this say that natural selection is powerful enough to weed out these genetic mutation but he provides a lot of evidence to say this is not. There are also many other things that he discusses and he sites many prominent biologists and scientists to back up his case.
But his main conversion is to life on this planet being young (humans) because he does not see how humans beings could be alive right now if they were existing for hundreds of thousands of years with this sort of genetic entropy going on. I think this stuff ties into many themes that are discussed on this forum. The idea of there being an "old world" that may have been spiritually advanced and because of cataclysms and the like that this was lost and maybe we lost some abilities (telepathy etc). The myth about the tower of babel alludes to humans being able to speak "one language" before god confused the languages and spread people out. I think this alludes to humans having an ability that maybe we lost along the way due to our genomes degrading, I think that if there was an "old world" were humans may have been different then I think that the global flood or cataclysm would have changed our genetic material in a bad way. There is another scientific article that I am going to link below that shows that most of the harmful mutations arouse in the past few thousands years. Their dating may be off though.
Past 5,000 years prolific for changes to human genome
Here are some reddit threads which discuss this topic more in depth (with some skeptical commentary)
I was wondering if other posters here are aware of any other hard evidence that would point to the earth and humans being "different", it could be atmospheric or the like. I remember a poster here talking about an experiment concerning electromagnetism where it was applied to plants and made them healthier and stronger. Some people state that before the floods or cataclysms that there would have been some sort of electromagnetic force in the air that would have made things taller. I also saw something here having to do with carbon dioxide and rats.
I am a lurker here and I love reading other peoples materials and research on different things so eventually I thought I would post my own. There is a scientist by the
name of John Sanford, I believe he is a plant geneticist who due to his education was a committed Darwinist but later on due to his research concerning genetic entropy he abandoned Darwinism. There is a video (interview) of him on YouTube giving a general description of his research. The link is below if you have time. The Book is called genetic entropy
Basically what he says (I am in the processing of reading his book) is that the overwhelming amount of genetic mutations that humans are accruing are actually deleterious in nature and that there is no way that random mutations (the back bone of Darwinism) could generate life on this planet that we see. Biologist in order to counteract act this say that natural selection is powerful enough to weed out these genetic mutation but he provides a lot of evidence to say this is not. There are also many other things that he discusses and he sites many prominent biologists and scientists to back up his case.
But his main conversion is to life on this planet being young (humans) because he does not see how humans beings could be alive right now if they were existing for hundreds of thousands of years with this sort of genetic entropy going on. I think this stuff ties into many themes that are discussed on this forum. The idea of there being an "old world" that may have been spiritually advanced and because of cataclysms and the like that this was lost and maybe we lost some abilities (telepathy etc). The myth about the tower of babel alludes to humans being able to speak "one language" before god confused the languages and spread people out. I think this alludes to humans having an ability that maybe we lost along the way due to our genomes degrading, I think that if there was an "old world" were humans may have been different then I think that the global flood or cataclysm would have changed our genetic material in a bad way. There is another scientific article that I am going to link below that shows that most of the harmful mutations arouse in the past few thousands years. Their dating may be off though.
Past 5,000 years prolific for changes to human genome
Here are some reddit threads which discuss this topic more in depth (with some skeptical commentary)
I was wondering if other posters here are aware of any other hard evidence that would point to the earth and humans being "different", it could be atmospheric or the like. I remember a poster here talking about an experiment concerning electromagnetism where it was applied to plants and made them healthier and stronger. Some people state that before the floods or cataclysms that there would have been some sort of electromagnetic force in the air that would have made things taller. I also saw something here having to do with carbon dioxide and rats.
Note: This OP was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP are included in this thread.
