- Joined
- Aug 27, 2020
- Messages
- 133
- Reaction score
- 354
Background
Some here are surely familiar with Dr. Thomas Cowan as one of the vocal medical doctors since 2020 on the subject of fallacies in mainstream medicine and virology.
Event
On Wed, 2022-12-28, in his weekly live YouTube webinar, Dr. Thomas Cowan suggested that in the new year (2023), he will begin asking broader questions of import, since it appears that perhaps biology and medicine are not the only fields worth taking a step back and a solid look at with sincere, basic questions. In particular, he highlighted some favorite stolen history topics and questions, as outlined below (note, I am paraphrasing heavily from memory, not verbatim):
San Francisco in November, 1848 From Sketch by J. C. Ward Esq., Lith. of Sarony & Major, (via dsloan.com)
Dr. Thomas Cowan did not claim to have any answers to his historical questions, but he did seem excited to put these questions out there and to seek input from the internet.
Comment
While these topics are not new to us, they are not entirely cliché, either (in my opinion). I agree that it is a good time to reflect on what we know, what we think we know, and what we can and cannot say with how much confidence. To large extent this has already been done on this forum. But, now we have a place to discuss this particular intersection of independent research interests.
Some here are surely familiar with Dr. Thomas Cowan as one of the vocal medical doctors since 2020 on the subject of fallacies in mainstream medicine and virology.
Event
On Wed, 2022-12-28, in his weekly live YouTube webinar, Dr. Thomas Cowan suggested that in the new year (2023), he will begin asking broader questions of import, since it appears that perhaps biology and medicine are not the only fields worth taking a step back and a solid look at with sincere, basic questions. In particular, he highlighted some favorite stolen history topics and questions, as outlined below (note, I am paraphrasing heavily from memory, not verbatim):
- What's with the 1848 San Francisco drawing--if it was not accurate, why not?
San Francisco in November, 1848 From Sketch by J. C. Ward Esq., Lith. of Sarony & Major, (via dsloan.com)
- Does the 1878 San Francisco panorama really depict 30 years of development since the 1848 drawing (if not, why)?
- Given the historical architecture photographs, and the alleged technological factors, does the general mainstream historical story make sense, of immigration to the US, limited advancement, basically linear (?) technological progress, and yet the very impressive early city scenes and buildings?
- What's with the World's Fairs? Do they really make sense, in terms of the time frames, and having so many, all around the world?
- In the past, when confronted with the suggestion of a possibly successful major coverup, people might have replied that there's no way to keep the lid on such a thing, that word would get out--and yet, since 2020, we have witnessed in fact a giant deception that has had the truth borne only but with very limited success in propagation (and I'll add, due in no small part to the indeed extremely successful information control capabilities).
- If indeed recent history can be shown to be largely not what the main story has told, then that would be good to be able to acknowledge, to understand things overall a bit better.
Dr. Thomas Cowan did not claim to have any answers to his historical questions, but he did seem excited to put these questions out there and to seek input from the internet.
Comment
While these topics are not new to us, they are not entirely cliché, either (in my opinion). I agree that it is a good time to reflect on what we know, what we think we know, and what we can and cannot say with how much confidence. To large extent this has already been done on this forum. But, now we have a place to discuss this particular intersection of independent research interests.
Last edited:
