Immigration taking place in the West

[FiveKickers]

Hi,

I'm 28M french born from Algerian parents. I want to talk about immigration taking place in the West.
I was born in Paris suburb, in Seine Saint Denis department for those who know. I always grew up in a mixed racial environment and was used to it until few years ago where i found that there is too much of it. Whites people are fewer and fewer in where I grew up and there are territories where they just disapeared. There is something sinister going on here, it can't be just an accident of history.
I heard about Kalergi plan which seems to be true, I feel like it's mainly targeted against west whites people. Though, I still don't understand the motivation behind all this.
The rulers of West countries are whites, a lot of freemason of course and other occult societies. Why would these people want to destroy their own ethnicity ?
Later I discovered a video claiming that White Europeans are the lost tribes of Israel.
If that's true then I would understand the hate coming from part of the J people towards white for jealousy reason. J'ish would be usurpators in this story but i'm sure very very little % of J would think this way since it's a very unconventional theory.
Then what about the others zionist, freemasons, other occult societies why would there work in the destruction of White people ?
We were lied about history, about everything and certainly about the origin of mankind.

 

[Tetromino]

If you take a look at the Orphan Generations Origin thread you will find that "white people", especially Britons, were being used to repopulate the world. It's hard to give a definitive answer but that's what happened and now we're being wiped out.

 

[Breizh]

I had a chat with some guy from Mauritania in Paris a few weeks ago, he didn't speak English so didn't continue to the UK for a free hotel room. I asked and he essentially said it's advertised as a goto destination on social media and all that stuff. In England things are more serious. People who've been there for a year or so and don't speak English can vote etc. Well, we know voting is a sham anyway.

There is something sinister going on here, it can't be just an accident of history.
...
Though, I still don't understand the motivation behind all this.

Imo it's weaponised immigration for various superficial reasons but there's deeper reasons for whats going on, particularly for the UK... but they're more ineffable so tend to get overlooked. It's to do with the leylines.

The rulers of West countries are whites, a lot of freemason of course and other occult societies. Why would these people want to destroy their own ethnicity ?

There are dozens of different ethnicities within a single skin tone, it's not just 1 white people. There are many grades of albinos and many grades of melanated people. Amongst the albino peoples, the traditional jew might very well be the "king of the albinos" so to speak.

Later I discovered a video claiming that White Europeans are the lost tribes of Israel. If that's true then I would understand the hate coming from part of the J people towards white for jealousy reason. J'ish would be usurpators in this story but i'm sure very very little % of J would think this way since it's a very unconventional theory.

I presume you're referring to traditional jews.

They have nothing to do with biological jews who are generally unrepresented and unknown to most people. The biological jews make up a very small number of the population in Israel since most are spread across all the contents. Believe it or not there are traditional jewish scholars who know that they're just traditional jews.

 

[jeenam]

Whites people are fewer and fewer in where I grew up and there are territories where they just disapeared.

American here. Read up on white flight. I can't comment on your exact situation, but here in America there has been the tendency for "white" Americans to voluntarily vacate an area when immigrants or people of color begin to move in. This is not by accident. It is intentional and explicit. The reason is simple; they're choosing to cede neighborhoods to immigrants/colored people and simply move to areas that still maintain a match for their specific ethnic/socioeconomic background. They are choosing homogeneity over diversity. You might even call it "silent racism".

 

[FiveKickers]

American here. Read up on white flight. I can't comment on your exact situation, but here in America there has been the tendency for "white" Americans to voluntarily vacate an area when immigrants or people of color begin to move in. This is not by accident. It is intentional and explicit. The reason is simple; they're choosing to cede neighborhoods to immigrants/colored people and simply move to areas that still maintain a match for their specific ethnic/socioeconomic background. They are choosing homogeneity over diversity. You might even call it "silent racism".

Same in France. Absolutely same.

If you take a look at the Orphan Generations Origin thread you will find that "white people", especially Britons, were being used to repopulate the world. It's hard to give a definitive answer but that's what happened and now we're being wiped out.

On youtube some people suggest that human is an engineered race.

I had a chat with some guy from Maurantia in Paris a few weeks ago, he didn't speak English so didn't continue to the UK for a free hotel room. I asked and he essentially said it's advertised as a goto destination on social media and all that stuff. In England things are more serious. People who've been there for a year or so and don't speak English can vote etc. Well, we know voting is a sham anyway.


Imo it's weaponised immigration for various superficial reasons but there's deeper reasons for whats going on, particularly for the UK... but they're more ineffable so tend to get overlooked. It's to do with the leylines.


There are dozens of different ethnicities within a single skin tone, it's not just 1 white people. There are many grades of albinos and many grades of melanated people. Amongst the albino peoples, the traditional jew might very well be the "king of the albinos" so to speak.


I presume you're referring to traditional jews.

They have nothing to do with biological jews who are generally unrepresented and unknown to most people. The biological jews make up a very small number of the population in Israel since most are spread across all the contents. Believe it or not there are traditional jewish scholars who know that they're just traditional jews.

yeah that's why i was wondering only western whites are subject to immigration not eastern. I noticed that criminals have it easy with justice in Europe when they are non white. Ok for leylines interesting i will look into it.
Can we consider jews as a race ? I think the controllers are hiding behind them to advance the agenda. We can't blame the average jew for the worlds problem. The ones that drive the NWO agenda certainly belong to secret societies.

 

[Breizh]

Same in France. Absolutely same.

The leylines in France matter also. Britain, France and Ireland who are also getting an influx of foreigners. The Irish aren't happy. The Irish leylines too...

Can we consider jews as a race ? I think the controllers are hiding behind them to advance the agenda. We can't blame the average jew for the worlds problem. The ones that drive the NWO agenda certainly belong to secret societies.

Who are you referring to? (rhetorical question)

On this forum of all places we should discern between traditional jews and biological jews, they're entirely different people. There aren't many biological jews in Israel since most are spread across other contents including the Americas and Africa (and possibly Indian-area re Dravidians, although not 100% certain).

The biological jews are generally unknown to most people so when they talk about "jews" they usually mean the traditional ones - which is who I reckon you're talking about. Those traditional jews are just another ethnicity or sub-group amongst others, but they belong to a totally different branch to the biological jews.

 

[Darrell_Dactyll]

The leylines in France matter also. Britain, France and Ireland who are also getting an influx of foreigners. The Irish aren't happy.


Who are you referring to? (rhetorical question)

On this forum of all places we should discern between traditional jews and biological jews, they're entirely different people. There aren't many biological jews in Israel since most are spread across other contents including the Americas and Africa (and possibly Indian-area re Dravidians, although not 100% certain).

The biological jews are generally unknown to most people so when they talk about "jews" they usually mean the traditional ones - which is who I reckon you're talking about. Those traditional jews are just another ethnicity or sub-group amongst others, but they belong to a totally different branch to the biological jews.

I would like to hear more about your take on the importance of leylines, and it's relation to mass third world immigration. I have never heard this before and it greatly interests me.

In regards to your distinction of jews, I have some questions. What do you believe the genetic testing required to prove jewish ancestry prior to being accepted as a citizen of israel means? What are they looking for? What groups can be seen today that will, respectively, fall into each of the groups you outlined? Additionally, you indicated both types reside in israel, so the stated reasons for genetic testing are not as advertised, or the group distinctions you made are inaccurate. Am i understanding this correctly?

I am of the mind that the group known as jews are a distinct race. They look more like a neandthalls than homo sapien, in my opinion. They have a distinct behavior pattern that is as old as the oldest written documents, which while often shortsighted, has proven to be an effective strategy for propagation and expansion of their genetics and influence.

 

[jeenam]

In regards to your distinction of jews, I have some questions. What do you believe the genetic testing required to prove jewish ancestry prior to being accepted as a citizen of israel means? What are they looking for? What groups can be seen today that will, respectively, fall into each of the groups you outlined? Additionally, you indicated both types reside in israel, so the stated reasons for genetic testing are not as advertised, or the group distinctions you made are inaccurate. Am i understanding this correctly?

They're specifically looking for markers in mitochondrial DNA. MtDNA, if you are not aware, is inherited via the maternal line. All Jews trace their ancestry through matrilineal heritage. If your mother wasn't Jewish, you're not a real Jew from a genetic perspective. As to the groups that fit that categorization, he's referring to the Ashkenazi/Khazarian folk and the people who truly descend from those who lived in the Middle East around the supposed time of Jesus (who never actually lived or existed, btw).

Modern historians and geneticists completely avoid the fact that the rest of the true "Israelites" are scattered around the world, specifically in regions such as the Americas and Southeast Asia. Ehtiopians can also be included in the group of true "Israelites".

I recommend checking out the UB TV channel on Youtube and watching The Smartest Beast in the Field, Lost At Home and America is Egypt playlists to get a full understanding.

I am of the mind that the group known as jews are a distinct race. They look more like a neandthalls than homo sapien, in my opinion. They have a distinct behavior pattern that is as old as the oldest written documents, which while often shortsighted, has proven to be an effective strategy for propagation and expansion of their genetics and influence.

I disagree that they're a distinct "race". It would seem more likely that they've simply been indtroctrinated into a false belief sometime in the distant past by their authoritarian leadership that they are God's "chosen people". Basically they've been brainwashed and the lies have been perpetuated for so long that they do not understand how they got to the state where they have been led down a path of believing they are different than the rest of the human population. Some may like to make claims of their supposed intellectual and technological superiority, but that can easily be explained away by their having access to superior education (and I use the term begrudgingly) and technology as a direct result of their conquering and oppressing other populations. I mean, if you hoard all the good stuff for yourself, of course you're going to have a distinct advantage from a survival perspective. However, if you level the playing field, we've seen time and time again that all "races" of humans (really it's just different skin shades and regional physical adaptations) are capable of excelling in all fields, whether that be mental or physical.

 

[Jd755]

I would like to hear more about your take on the importance of leylines, and it's relation to mass third world immigration. I have never heard this before and it greatly interests me.

In regards to your distinction of jews, I have some questions. What do you believe the genetic testing required to prove jewish ancestry prior to being accepted as a citizen of israel means? What are they looking for? What groups can be seen today that will, respectively, fall into each of the groups you outlined? Additionally, you indicated both types reside in israel, so the stated reasons for genetic testing are not as advertised, or the group distinctions you made are inaccurate. Am i understanding this correctly?

I am of the mind that the group known as jews are a distinct race. They look more like a neandthalls than homo sapien, in my opinion. They have a distinct behavior pattern that is as old as the oldest written documents, which while often shortsighted, has proven to be an effective strategy for propagation and expansion of their genetics and influence.

Leylines on stolenhistory.
Search results for query: Leylines

 

[Breizh]

All Jews trace their ancestry through matrilineal heritage. If your mother wasn't Jewish, you're not a real Jew from a genetic perspective.

It somehow shifted from paternal line to maternal. Perhaps to make it easier to accumulate new members?

As to the groups that fit that categorization, he's referring to the Ashkenazi/Khazarian folk

Yes, a common label for the traditional jews. They play the part fairly well but changed many key things including making it maternal inheritance instead of paternal.

On this forum when people talk about jews they don't discern between the traditional ones and biological ones. This imo is a gross oversight and undermines the quality of the discussion. When someone doesn't discern between these 2 interpretations of jew then it's easy to group everything "jew-related" as being associated with the traditional jews. Calling them the "new jews" to distinguish them might be appropriate. Thus, you could say that the zionists are just "new jews" with an agenda.

Hypothetically - if 10 nomadic Saudi Arabians converted to Christianity then started a group with the agenda to control the local vegetable markets and demand protection money, would it be appropriate to call this a Christian gang?

Modern historians and geneticists completely avoid the fact that the rest of the true "Israelites" are scattered around the world, specifically in regions such as the Americas and Southeast Asia. Ehtiopians can also be included in the group of true "Israelites".

You could postulate that organisations owned by traditional jews have purposefully changed and obfuscated important elements and nudged the overall narrative to entirely overlook this - as it would be problematic for their jewish "identity".

I disagree that they're a distinct "race". It would seem more likely that they've simply been indtroctrinated into a false belief sometime in the distant past by their authoritarian leadership that they are God's "chosen people".

It's plausible that the people who I call traditional jews at one point chose to adapt their religion to jewish and thus adopted all the customs etc, and the name of course (hence the "new jews" label). Decades later it becomes justification for all sorts of things and everyone assumes they are undoubtedly the real jews. This influences "cultural perception & language" regarding the term anti-semitic. Semites, descendants of Shem includes a broad group of peoples (tribes or nations).

Today, anti-Semitism is a term that has come to mean “prejudice or hostility toward Jews as a religious, cultural, or racial group.” According to Encyclopedia Britannica, the word anti-Semitism was introduced in 1879 by Wilhelm Marr, a German agitator who used it to describe anti-Jewish campaigns that were taking place in central Europe at the time. The term is, in fact, a misnomer, as true anti-Semitism would imply discrimination against anyone of Semitic descent including Arabs, Ethiopians, and other Semites.

Obviously there are many implications for this discernment between traditional ("new") jews and biological jews, including a re-contextualisation of past events which involve these traditional jews (who everyone undoubtedly assumes are the real jews).

 

[Breizh]

I would like to hear more about your take on the importance of leylines, and it's relation to mass third world immigration. I have never heard this before and it greatly interests me.

This post gives a brief overview of the leyline "layout". I see it analogously to a circuit board with it's various "avenues" (lines) of copper that go from here to there - in the realm we find notable structures (both geological and architectural) on the leyline node points and along them also. With the circuit board analogy, lets say you put some very small magnets on one of the copper pathways, this will influence how it operates. Moving people is similar.

This lies beneath the obvious observation of a "clash of cultures".

 

[Oracle]

This post gives a brief overview of the leyline "layout". I see it analogously to a circuit board with it's various "avenues" (lines) of copper that go from here to there - in the realm we find notable structures (both geological and architectural) on the leyline node points and along them also. With the circuit board analogy, lets say you put some very small magnets on one of the copper pathways, this will influence how it operates. Moving people is similar.

This lies beenath the obvious observation of a "clash of cultures".

I've always thought of leylines as the nerve system of the body of Earth which is also electrical in nature.

 

[Breizh]

I've always thought of leylines as the nerve system of the body of Earth which is also electrical in nature.

Yes! Like in TCM (traditional Chinese medicine) which acknowledges the intangible energetic leylines of the body which it calls meridian channels in acupuncture.

 

[Oracle]

Yes! Like in TCM (traditional Chinese medicine) which acknowledges the intangible energetic leylines of the body which it calls meridian channels in acupuncture.

Exactly!

 

[Starfire]

This post gives a brief overview of the leyline "layout". I see it analogously to a circuit board with it's various "avenues" (lines) of copper that go from here to there - in the realm we find notable structures (both geological and architectural) on the leyline node points and along them also. With the circuit board analogy, lets say you put some very small magnets on one of the copper pathways, this will influence how it operates. Moving people is similar.

This lies beneath the obvious observation of a "clash of cultures".

I agree that the leylines are like the nervous system web of the living planet.

I looked at the leyline maps on the link. Thank you for the images. It's a little bit of a stretch for me. I do see that there are concentrations of immigrants at several of the nodes shown on the middle map. England, the American Southwest and Minnesota in particular. But I'm not seeing representations of the concentrations in France, Sweden, Germany, and some other Canadian and American cities.

I just spent some time looking at some other maps representing the less powerful leylines. There's more correlation that immigration is following leylines. Thank you for the new idea. I will think on it and see what comes.

On this forum when people talk about jews they don't discern between the traditional ones and biological ones. This imo is a gross oversight and undermines the quality of the discussion. When someone doesn't discern between these 2 interpretations of jew then it's easy to group everything "jew-related" as being associated with the traditional jews. Calling them the "new jews" to distinguish them might be appropriate. Thus, you could say that the zionists are just "new jews" with an agenda.

Obviously there are many implications for this discernment between traditional ("new") jews and biological jews, including a re-contextualisation of past events which involve these traditional jews (who everyone undoubtedly assumes are the real jews).

I agree that it is so challenging to know how to speak about Jews! But more complex than traditional and biological.

At my house we say Jew to mean regular people who follow the religion, and Zionist when we are speaking about Israel and the associated Elites. On the forum I end up using the word Jew a lot to represent the larger historical group known as Jews, but am pretty sure that the word just meant merchant in the past. When I'm talking about the group kicked out of Spain and Portugal, I call them Sephardic.

And then there's the Askhanazi/Khazarians. They are the Zionist Israelites I previously referred to. But more importantly they are Sabbatean Frankists who will use subterfuge and apostasy to achieve their aims. The occult kabbalistic religion that their leaders follow is manipulative and disregards any people not like them. Goyim are cattle to them.

But I have no issue with individual Jewish people going to Temple to get closer to God and loving their families.

So would you call the Ashkenazi traditional and the Sephardic biological?

And what about the Black Hebrews? These are the Lost Tribes that left Nebuchadnezzar's Assyria and travelled though Arabia to central and west Africa. There are many Hebrew traditions and Hebrew adjacent words in the area. When the European slavers came the African kings sold their prisoners of war. Many of these would have been the Hebrew tribes who did things differently. And they ended up as slaves in America. Some descendants have even moved back to Israel.

Would these be the biological Jews?

There is an excellent series of blogs I read in the past that I can't get to now without nuisance viruses attacking my device. The blogger is named Condir and his site is machpelahcave created with WordPress. When you access it through duckduckgo you get the viruses. When you try to access it through Google, it's not even listed as an option. There are extensive articles regarding the migration of the Lost Tribes, the African tribes that are likely of Hebrew origin, and DNA support.

--------------

Sorry for the sidetrack, but is it really a sidetrack? The OP is referring to current immigration and what is the purpose behind it. The Zionists I mentioned are very likely part of the immigration Master Plan. They are certainly forcing immigration from Gaza. They may be behind other immigration from war zones, since they are known to fund both sides of wars.

Let me reiterate that I am not talking about an entire group/race/religion of people. I am talking about a small group of powerful manipulators that hide behind a religion to avoid scrutiny.

Edited for clarification.

 

[Breizh]

I looked at the leyline maps on the link. Thank you for the images. It's a little bit of a stretch for me. I do see that there are concentrations of immigrants at several of the nodes shown on the middle map. ... But I'm not seeing representations of the concentrations in...

The weaponised immigration tactic seems to have multiple layers and purposes besides the leyline aspect. Not all the leylines nodes are necessarily being targeted per se.

I agree that it is so challenging to know how to speak about Jews! But more complex than traditional and biological.

I would tend to discern between actual Israelites (so-called biological jews) for whom the bible is written for and then other so-called traditional jews who do not abide by the bible. I also realise that some African biological jews abide by the Talmud.

At my house we say Jew to mean regular people who follow the religion,

The Israelites I'm aware of don't follow the conventional Judaic religion. For many no Torah is involved, only the bible.

And what about the Black Hebrews?

They call themselves Israelites if anything. The notion of "black hebrew" is grossly misleading since the 12 tribes include native peoples with diverse skin tones. This gives a broad outline:

I would add the Olmec label also.

The copper-skinned melanated peoples exist in both negroid (modern day black american) and more asiatic "mongoloid" styles (modern day so-called American Indian) ... although that association is a misnomer since the melanated peoples were reclassified from Indian/moor/muur to negro to coloured to black to african-american whilst the mongol-types were established as the Native American Indians. There have been discussions on this forum about the "five dollar indian" which relates to this. If you ever see a Pow Wow look for the melanated people (there might be 1 or 2!) who contrast the numerous mongoloid-type people.

Thus the Israelites 12 tribes encompasses a variety of skin tones, many which wouldn't be considered "black". Perhaps if there was a more prominent [native] Mexican Hebrew Israelite movement - would they be called "white hebrew Israelites"? or "Mexican Hebrew Israelites"? It would make more sense to simply refer to them as Hebrew Israelites in the same way we refer to Christians without specifying anything else (eg white Christians, black Christians etc).

These are the Lost Tribes that left Nebuchadnezzar's Assyria and travelled though Arabia to central and west Africa. There are many Hebrew traditions and Hebrew adjacent words in the area. When the European slavers came the African kings sold their prisoners of war. Many of these would have been the Hebrew tribes who did things differently. And they ended up as slaves in America. Some descendants have even moved back to Israel.

Would these be the biological Jews?

Those descendants are whom I referred to in one of my previous posts:

There aren't many biological jews in Israel since most are spread across other contents including the Americas and Africa (and possibly Indian-area re Dravidians, although not 100% certain).

And yes, I would discern between African jews and Africans who are descendants of Ham (Hamites). The Hamites sold African jews as slaves so most genuine Israelites don't like the Hamites. This doesn't fit the stereotypical "black hate group" ideology commonly associated with "black hebrews" since this would be melanated people (Israelites/Shemites) strongly disliking another tribe of melanated people (Hamites) based on their ethnicity.

The Israelites tend to dislike this "traditional jew" who just happens to be of a lighter "white" skin tone. The dislike is due to this traditional jew essentially stealing their identity and attempting to conceal and obfuscate the identity of the original jews via their various spheres of influence (book censorship, media, archaeological censorship, narrative manipulation and falsification etc).

There are extensive articles regarding the migration of the Lost Tribes, the African tribes that are likely of Hebrew origin, and DNA support.

So would you call the Ashkenazi traditional and the Sephardic biological?

Both would seem to be traditional types.

Whoever the so-called zionists are, and the so-called "traditional jews" (who are the majority in Israel) I don't know but in my opinion they have little to do with Israelites/biological jews beyond the name "jew". Then the question is why did they initially pretend to be jews and establish themselves as the jews? What benefit could that bring? And what was the jewish/nazi thing really about? Why were these traditional jews treated in such a manner?

 

[ViniB]

Immigtation from the brazilian perspective has been kind of interesting in a bad way, it's mostly venezuelans and haitians, going back to the early "2000s" but it rapidly intensified about 15 yrs ago, the majority of cashiers and low paying jobs are occupied by them as soon as they come here, because immigration enforcement is a joke, while brazilians fucking struggle due to absolute monetary insanity from the government.

Certain large City centers are getting a ton of muslims recently, and they're basically creating ethnic ghettos for themselves, while being dependants of govt welfare, it's the perfect combo for medium to long term disaster

What is the intent with this agenda here, idk, we're pretty screwed already as it is

 

[Frostychud]

The weaponised immigration tactic seems to have multiple layers and purposes besides the leyline aspect. Not all the leylines nodes are necessarily being targeted per se.


I would tend to discern between actual Israelites (so-called biological jews) for whom the bible is written for and then other so-called traditional jews who do not abide by the bible. I also realise that some African biological jews abide by the Talmud.


The Israelites I'm aware of don't follow the conventional Judaic religion. For many no Torah is involved, only the bible.


They call themselves Israelites if anything. The notion of "black hebrew" is grossly misleading since the 12 tribes include native peoples with diverse skin tones. This gives a broad outline:

View attachment 36140
I would add the Olmec label also.

The copper-skinned melanated peoples exist in both negroid (modern day black american) and more asiatic "mongoloid" styles (modern day so-called American Indian) ... although that association is a misnomer since the melanated peoples were reclassified from Indian/moor/muur to negro to coloured to black to african-american whilst the mongol-types were established as the Native American Indians. There have been discussions on this forum about the "five dollar indian" which relates to this. If you ever see a Pow Wow look for the melanated people (there might be 1 or 2!) who contrast the numerous mongoloid-type people.

View attachment 36129
View attachment 36136

Thus the Israelites 12 tribes encompasses a variety of skin tones, many which wouldn't be considered "black". Perhaps if there was a more prominent [native] Mexican Hebrew Israelite movement - would they be called "white hebrew Israelites"? or "Mexican Hebrew Israelites"? It would make more sense to simply refer to them as Hebrew Israelites in the same way we refer to Christians without specifying anything else (eg white Christians, black Christians etc).


Those descendants are whom I referred to in one of my previous posts:


And yes, I would discern between African jews and Africans who are descendants of Ham (Hamites). The Hamites sold African jews as slaves so most genuine Israelites don't like the Hamites. This doesn't fit the stereotypical "black hate group" ideology commonly associated with "black hebrews" since this would be melanated people (Israelites/Shemites) strongly disliking another tribe of melanated people (Hamites) based on their ethnicity.

The Israelites tend to dislike this "traditional jew" who just happens to be of a lighter "white" skin tone. The dislike is due to this traditional jew essentially stealing their identity and attempting to conceal and obfuscate the identity of the original jews via their various spheres of influence (book censorship, media, archaeological censorship, narrative manipulation and falsification etc).


View attachment 36138
View attachment 36130View attachment 36132View attachment 36134View attachment 36133View attachment 36135View attachment 36131View attachment 36139


Both would seem to be traditional types.

Whoever the so-called zionists are, and the so-called "traditional jews" (who are the majority in Israel) I don't know but in my opinion they have little to do with Israelites/biological jews beyond the name "jew". Then the question is why did they initially pretend to be jews and establish themselves as the jews? What benefit could that bring? And what was the jewish/nazi thing really about? Why were these traditional jews treated in such a manner?

I used to date a woman whose father was a Native American from the Seattle area. At some point, so the woman told me, he "found out" he was "actually a quarter black", through some kind of test I think. I'm sorry I don't remember the details better, but the man believed he was a full-blood Native American. I suspect he was correct and his "black" grandparent was also Native.

On Reddit ancestry subs I've seen several people who believed themselves to be Native American take DNA tests only to find out that "actually" they were Sephardic Jewish or Lebanese.

Regarding the OP...having lived in Paris I know the Seine-Saint Denis department (93) and for those who have never been there, it seems like there are no white people at all anymore, which is amazing considering that mass immigration in France only really began in the 60's.

To answer the question posed in the OP: the original political structure of the world was a global merchant empire with colonial outposts around the world. Members of this empire reproduced with local women and the resulting mixed children were tasked with running the colonies for the global merchant empire. They became the various royal families we find around the world. When the original global empire began to split into pieces, these royal families declared independence from the hated mother ship and set about creating nation-states under their complete control. For these nation-states to function as unified political entities, the populations within their borders had to be convinced that the nation-state was not an artificial construct but a big family. This was easier when everyone looked more or less the same, and I suspect a lot of people were moved around solely based on their physical appearance at one point to create the illusion of racial homogeneity going back "thousands of years".

This all occurred in the last 500 years.

The global empire/emporium never disappeared. For centuries they plotted their revenge against the nation-states whom they somewhat correctly saw as illegitimate upstarts. (Go back far enough and all the royal families are Jewish.) They figured out that by mixing different groups of people, the idea of the nation-state would grow weaker, which would shift power away from national political structures and towards international mercantile structures. Nation-states favor homogeneous bourgeois collectives, empires foster individualism and extreme stratification. What we are witnessing these days is the death of the nation-state and the return of the global empire as the dominant political structure on Earth. Immigration is very effective in dissolving nation-states. To take the example of France, Emmanuel Macron is an agent of the Rothschilds, and perhaps a Rothschild bastard himself. He was installed as President to destroy the French national welfare state in order that international structures might replace it. By importing millions of impoverished people from the former colonies, all national structures based on collective participation (and collective sacrifice) such as the health care system are guaranteed to fail. I remember once walking past a CAF office in the 18th arrondissement of Paris (the CAF is a welfare office) and there was a huge line outside with at least 50 people waiting to claim their benefits. There was not a single white person in the line. Well, imagine that you are a "Français de souche" and you see that. You will think: "What are all these black and brown people doing here? They are draining all the money from our public services! Not only that, they're making it easy for big international companies to cut wages in half! Our welfare state was never intended to function like this! In the next election, I am going to vote for the guy who wants to privatize [education, health care, transportation, whatever] because I don't want these outsiders stealing my resources!"

Of course, from the perspective of the immigrant waiting in line, it probably goes something like: "France colonized my country and enslaved my people. Now it's time for me to take something back."

And presto, that's how you get people to voluntarily abandon their centralized welfare states and replace them with parasitic global imperial ersatz versions which are designed to extract as much money as possible from local economies and transfer it into the offshore accounts of the descendants of the original global mafia. "Right wing" people unfairly blame the immigrants and "left wing" people unfairly blame the "racists" who recognize that mass immigration destroys the social cohesion necessary for welfare states to function. Both should stop blaming regular people, immigrant or non-immigrant, because both groups are being used. It's a very clever scheme and as far as I can see, there is no way to stop it. The only weapon against the global mafia was the nation-state, and (the paid actor) Hitler killed that idea forever (which is one of the reasons he was put in his position by the invisible empire). Nation-states come with their own serious problems as well, of course. I suppose the ideal political structure would involve some kind of balance, but these days the stateless international empire seems to have realized that there is no longer anyone out there who can stop them from transforming the entire world into what it was when the very first iteration of the empire appeared, namely a giant resource extraction colony ruled over by a tiny number of privateers.

The goal is a multi-ethnic global slave state. Thirty years ago it was still possible to believe that the goal of immigration was to bring everyone's level up, but now it is clear that the goal is to kill once and for all any social ideal which is not strictly capitalist. The goal is to strip humanity of all dignity and reduce us to subsistence levels again.

 

[Breizh]

I'd tend to vaguely agree with the various themes and would highlight one particular part:

The global empire/emporium never disappeared. For centuries they plotted their revenge against the nation-states whom they somewhat correctly saw as illegitimate upstarts. (Go back far enough and all the royal families are Jewish.)

As I wrote in response to another of your posts:

What is the assumed interpretation of Jew? Is there discernment (or even acknowledgement) between Jews by birthright and jews who adopted customs of another peoples and assumed their identity(?). Of all the forums that exist we should ensure appropriate discernment between traditional jews and biological Jews when discussing a narrative that involves Jews.

And my earlier post in this thread —

On this forum when people talk about jews they don't discern between the traditional ones and biological ones. This imo is a gross oversight and undermines the quality of the discussion. When someone doesn't discern between these 2 interpretations of jew then it's easy to group everything "jew-related" as being associated with the traditional jews. Calling them the "new jews" to distinguish them might be appropriate. Thus, you could say that the zionists are just "new jews" with an agenda.

 

[Oracle]

To answer the question posed in the OP: the original political structure of the world was a global merchant empire with colonial outposts around the world. Members of this empire reproduced with local women and the resulting mixed children were tasked with running the colonies for the global merchant empire. They became the various royal families we find around the world. When the original global empire began to split into pieces, these royal families declared independence from the hated mother ship and set about creating nation-states under their complete control. For these nation-states to function as unified political entities, the populations within their borders had to be convinced that the nation-state was not an artificial construct but a big family. This was easier when everyone looked more or less the same, and I suspect a lot of people were moved around solely based on their physical appearance at one point to create the illusion of racial homogeneity going back "thousands of years".

This all occurred in the last 500 years.

Please include sources when making broad sweeping statements as fact.