Immigration taking place in the West

[AntiSoof]

I don't know where I read it, but the analysis that the West is being controlled, eaten away from within by foreigners, seems to me to be correct.
The cities are decaying, but everyone has a hideously ugly brand-new car. I saw electric bicycles that were supposed to cost 3,500 euros.
But meanwhile, I see window frames rotting, walls even without joints, and dreary shopping streets being spruced up with fake bricks that disintegrate within five years. More and more good shops are becoming expensive junk yards. And then there are all those strange, not-so-attractive people speaking ugly foreign languages.

So the money people are bringing poor people to Europe to destroy it. So the conclusion that EU are being eaten away from within seems right.

And everywhere, people are so stupidly 'woke'. It's a very dirty game being played. Because, as always, 'they' are behind it. The bad people, the (former?) slave drivers. And no one's doing anything about it. Because the cities are run by half-imbecile people, it seems. By 'children' who know nothing, can do nothing, and do nothing but favour bad, spoiled people.

And there's nothing that can be done about it. Television and other lying media are destroying minds 24/7. People are even offended in the medical field ('covid'). Nothing is sacred anymore. And people seem so submissively ignorant. Nobody cares. The people are no longer a unity. (If they ever were.)

 

[Breizh]

but the analysis that the West is being controlled, eaten away from within by foreigners, seems to me to be correct.

100% weaponised immigration imo.

The cities are decaying, but everyone has a hideously ugly brand-new car. I saw electric bicycles...

In the UK which famously has minimal sunshine, the "government" (aka WEF et al) is building wind farms and solar panel farms - literally putting solar panels on farmland.

They're claiming to want electric cars in use everywhere. They get shipped over on cargo ships that run on "heavy unrefined oil" and the materials used to produce said cars are mined by destroying & polluting natural habitats + underpaid Hamite (African) workers.

Meanwhile the electric cars are marketed as "green / environmentally friendly" whilst users experience fairly regular issues like exploding batteries, auto-steer swerving into oncoming traffic, “anti collision” slamming on the brakes at 70mph (due to a flying crisp packet) and all sorts of other issues (won't unlock doors, won't charge, update issues, no replacement parts which take months to ship from China etc).

Anyway, I digress.

 

[Dzharo]

They're specifically looking for markers in mitochondrial DNA. MtDNA, if you are not aware, is inherited via the maternal line. All Jews trace their ancestry through matrilineal heritage. If your mother wasn't Jewish, you're not a real Jew from a genetic perspective. As to the groups that fit that categorization, he's referring to the Ashkenazi/Khazarian folk and the people who truly descend from those who lived in the Middle East around the supposed time of Jesus (who never actually lived or existed, btw).

Modern historians and geneticists completely avoid the fact that the rest of the true "Israelites" are scattered around the world, specifically in regions such as the Americas and Southeast Asia. Ehtiopians can also be included in the group of true "Israelites".

I recommend checking out the UB TV channel on Youtube and watching The Smartest Beast in the Field, Lost At Home and America is Egypt playlists to get a full understanding.




I disagree that they're a distinct "race". It would seem more likely that they've simply been indtroctrinated into a false belief sometime in the distant past by their authoritarian leadership that they are God's "chosen people". Basically they've been brainwashed and the lies have been perpetuated for so long that they do not understand how they got to the state where they have been led down a path of believing they are different than the rest of the human population. Some may like to make claims of their supposed intellectual and technological superiority, but that can easily be explained away by their having access to superior education (and I use the term begrudgingly) and technology as a direct result of their conquering and oppressing other populations. I mean, if you hoard all the good stuff for yourself, of course you're going to have a distinct advantage from a survival perspective. However, if you level the playing field, we've seen time and time again that all "races" of humans (really it's just different skin shades and regional physical adaptations) are capable of excelling in all fields, whether that be mental or physical.

Samuel Noah Kramer (Samuel Noah Kramer - Wikipedia) wrote in his book History Begins at Sumer (History Begins at Sumer : Samuel Noah Kramer : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive) that the Sumerians thought they were the Chosen People. Sumerians were NOT semitic. Hebrews lived in the Sumerian cities for many years during the Babylonian captivity. Why they were captured is another story and difficult to establish veracity. Hebrews had assimilated to the point where they thought Hebrews and Sumerians were much the same people. Abraham's father, Terah, was even a priest in the temple at Ur. So the Hebrews thought they were Chosen People as well.
Abraham would have been very familiar with Sumerian history, including that of the Flood, and took all Sumerian myths and legends with him, including the idea of The Chosen People which Kramer suggests Abraham truly believed applied to him as some part of the Sumerian people - except that Abraham now worshipped only one God, not the many of the Sumerians.
When the Sumerian cuneiform tablets were finally translated and the history the Jews claimed for themselves in the Old Testament was shown to be Sumerian history that had been plagiarised - and I say plagiarised because the non-semitic Sumerian names and places had been changed to Semitic names and places, probably at a much later date in Judaic history - then there was an agreement between the Rabbis and the Vatican to keep this information hidden - to not disturb the status quo. This was just before WWI. The Vatican stood to have its foundations shaken as well if people become aware of the truth of the Old Testament. So for two world wars the priests kept blessing the men being sent to the slaughter and having them believe they were doing the right thing and they would go to heaven if they died on the battlefield.
As for any type of intellectual superiority - it seems to me that Jews lack creativity but are great copiers.

 

[Frostychud]

Samuel Noah Kramer (Samuel Noah Kramer - Wikipedia) wrote in his book History Begins at Sumer (History Begins at Sumer : Samuel Noah Kramer : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive) that the Sumerians thought they were the Chosen People. Sumerians were NOT semitic. Hebrews lived in the Sumerian cities for many years during the Babylonian captivity. Why they were captured is another story and difficult to establish veracity. Hebrews had assimilated to the point where they thought Hebrews and Sumerians were much the same people. Abraham's father, Terah, was even a priest in the temple at Ur. So the Hebrews thought they were Chosen People as well.
Abraham would have been very familiar with Sumerian history, including that of the Flood, and took all Sumerian myths and legends with him, including the idea of The Chosen People which Kramer suggests Abraham truly believed applied to him as some part of the Sumerian people - except that Abraham now worshipped only one God, not the many of the Sumerians.
When the Sumerian cuneiform tablets were finally translated and the history the Jews claimed for themselves in the Old Testament was shown to be Sumerian history that had been plagiarised - and I say plagiarised because the non-semitic Sumerian names and places had been changed to Semitic names and places, probably at a much later date in Judaic history - then there was an agreement between the Rabbis and the Vatican to keep this information hidden - to not disturb the status quo. This was just before WWI. The Vatican stood to have its foundations shaken as well if people become aware of the truth of the Old Testament. So for two world wars the priests kept blessing the men being sent to the slaughter and having them believe they were doing the right thing and they would go to heaven if they died on the battlefield.
As for any type of intellectual superiority - it seems to me that Jews lack creativity but are great copiers.

According to Gunnar Heinsohn, "Die Sumerer Gab Es Nicht", the Sumerians didn't exist. It's an archaeological fraud.

Andrey Pustogarov argues quite logically that the reason all of these pre-Biblical civilizations were "discovered" (forged) by British and especially German "archaeologists" in the mid-to-late 19th century is because they were attempting to create a new power structure/ideological movement that would do an end run around the (also fake) Jewish/Christian version of history. By taking Biblical stories like the Flood, Adam & Eve, whatever, and forging myths that supposedly preceded them, they were undermining Judeo-Christianity's claim to historical precedence and preparing the ground for what would later evolve into Nazism. According to this reading, all the German/British "Aryan" fantasies of the early 20th century would be just another fake narrative designed to capture power in the present.

In other words, the echoes & resemblances between Hebrew and Sumerian history noted by Kramer can also be interpreted backwards. I strongly suspect that Kramer was initiated into the "Sumeria" fraud and tasked with supervising and expanding it, although of course I have no proof for that. He learned his Assyriology from the Arno Poebel, the German author of a Sumerian grammar still in use today. I may be going too far here, but "Arno Poebel" sounds like a fake name to me. "Pöbel" in German is a derogatory term for "Volk" or "people" considered as a collective mass. (Poebel is another way of writing Pöbel.) "Arno Poebel" = Are No People?

This might explain why Heinsohn chose to entitle his book, "There Were No Sumerians", which sounds a little strange in German. Was this a wink to Arno Poebel? I wrote a long review of one of Heinsohn's books here (check my history) and came to the conclusion that he is, among other things, a propagandist for Israel and a champion of its fake history. So it would make sense that he would push back against the "competing team" and their equally fake fable.

I also tried to find Kramer's grave on Findagrave, and I couldn't find anything. Keep in mind that even my most obscure ancestors are indexed on that site (I've used it to find and visit their tombs), so it's difficult to imagine that the grave of a public figure like Kramer would be missing from the registry. I wonder if "Samuel Noah Kramer" is some kind of coded pseudonym, and if the man we see in the photos is an actor.

As for the relationship with this thread, Fomenko argues, if I recall correctly, that the concept of nationality was only invented much later, because the original global political system was that of a worldwide merchant empire which moved populations around at will and mixed them as they saw fit. Race and nationality only emerged as identifying markers when the first nation-states formed in reaction to the decline and collapse of the original empire. Pustogarov, Tamansky, and Grishin & Melamed all suggest some variation on this version of history. According to them, forced immigration is therefore the original form of serf management, one that predates collectivization of identity in conjunction with a "homeland" through grand national narratives. If we accept this theory, then the use of organized mass immigration by today's "elites" is just a return to time-tested principles of imperial power. At least that's my interpretation.

Also, Abraham's name reveals he is a fake character. "Avram" means "exalted father" in Hebrew and "Avraham" means "father of many nations". Imagine if the first president of the United States was named "Presidad Founderman". Whatever historical truth can be found in the Abraham story is probably heavily encrypted and quite different from the manifest content of the legend.

 

[SonofaBor]

As for the relationship with this thread, Fomenko argues, if I recall correctly, that the concept of nationality was only invented much later, because the original global political system was that of a worldwide merchant empire which moved populations around at will and mixed them as they saw fit. Race and nationality only emerged as identifying markers when the first nation-states formed in reaction to the decline and collapse of the original empire. Pustogarov, Tamansky, and Grishin & Melamed all suggest some variation on this version of history. According to them, forced immigration is therefore the original form of serf management, one that predates collectivization of identity in conjunction with a "homeland" through grand national narratives. If we accept this theory, then the use of organized mass immigration by today's "elites" is just a return to time-tested principles of imperial power. At least that's my interpretation.

During this lifetime, I've seen "up close" two nationalist movements. First, in Taiwan (circa, 2000); second, in the United States (right now). Certainly, they are "imagined communities"-- as Anderson described nationalist movements. I'd like to write-- based on my own desperate wish-- that they can be understood simply as "serf management" or as "horizontal rule" (Hross). But I can't, entirely. What I saw in Taiwan was a society becoming increasingly exhausted by its role in the Empire of commerce. From 1960 or so to the late 1990s, just about every neighborhood was organized into unofficial work units (Small and Medium-sized Businesses in the official discourse) by local people-- more aggressive and intelligent than others-- who saw opportunity. Contracts could be had, primarily from American, Japanese and European manufacturers and traders (i.e., businessmen). "Made in Taiwan" was stamped on products consumed around the world. A small but significant portion of the local population became rich. Extreme poverty pretty much disappeared. Families could grow in size, and they did. But the cost was heavy. Pollution -- oh Taiwan is a beautiful island with beautiful people -- from small and large industries brought all sorts of diseases. Traditional values of people, land and community were busted apart to be recollected as nostalgia. When I left around 2008, the population was, if not in decline, then verging on it. Everywhere, women from Vietnam and Indonesia were working to take care of elders and/or serve as wives. Taiwanese like and accept them because they were, as they said, "more traditional." That is, they filled roles that were not being filled as Taiwan accelerated into prosperity. Businesses moved to China for "cheap labor"-- that is, to keep the same old money flow going. Businesses that remained on the island began to import labor. It was at this moment that Taiwanese nationalism emerged. Fantasies of prosperity and real social degeneration all at once. The response was yet another fantasy, Taiwan-as-such.

This idea-- Taiwan-- covers all sorts of contradictions, including the import of labor and the willingness and desire of Taiwanese to take the bait, as it were, of the big global cash machine. I see the same thing in the USA. I think people really want a better world. They make do as best they can. To be honest, we really don't manage ourselves very well, however. We fall for cons, ignore reality, suffer loss and grasp for solutions. We also feel anger and guilt. In Taiwan, the anger got aimed at the old overloads of Taiwan-- the Nationalist Party, which moved to Taiwan from China in 1949. I thought it pretty absurd-- like hating on Jews. It was a defeated managerial regime that found its survival in Taiwan. It was colonialist-- certainly early, as it imposed the new (born in the 1920s) Chinese "traditional" language on the people. People have a right to be angry about that and even over-throw it. But I don't see a lot of wisdom in the urge to define oneself against one's imagined enemy-- just like I don't see a lot of wisdom in American "patriots", who dream of getting rich (just like before) by buying heavily into silver or whatever. What is really changing? The same-old dreams prevail. Pretty good chance they're getting sold a bill of goods, called AI, this time around. Why is it a bill of goods? Because, to my mind Americans appear unwilling and unable to grieve what they themselves have done and failed to do. We weren't wise during our last chance. People did try-- even the hated woke. Before they emerged as anti-clowns, a prevailing and serious sense of guilt ran through America about internal and external (wars) destruction. People were welcoming to foreigners. Was that a bad thing? Not really. But they also wanted them to prop up society. To serve as wives and workers. The slaves got strong doing so. And we ......?

If there is an upshot for Stolen History it is probably this: weakening societies take slaves to stave off internal degeneration.

 

[ViniB]

If there is an upshot for Stolen History it is probably this: weakening societies take slaves to stave off internal degeneration.

Why would a government need to "import" slaves if it's own citizens are virtually slaves on every aspect of their lives?

It makes more sense if the thinking is like: oh the goyim are going insane, quickly let's bring in the 60 IQ dummies that we created because they’re more obedient and will not have the capacity to think critically and question all the shit we're doing

 

[SonofaBor]

Why? Because the people have lost themselves in pursuit of $ and status and pleasure. In other words, it is the people who need the slaves to fill the roles they have themselves stopped filling. I've seen it my entire life.

 

[Breizh]

If there is an upshot for Stolen History it is probably this: weakening societies take slaves to stave off internal degeneration.

In other words, it is the people who need the slaves to fill the roles they have themselves stopped filling. I've seen it my entire life.

In the UK "legal" migration has been occurring for decades. Particularly polite and self-respecting Caribbeans & Hindu Indians who work in various areas of society and respect the British culture (whatever that may be).

More recently it's a generic mass of people from various countries. Word on the street is that England (lets use that example as i'm from there) is great for undocumented migrants who get lots of free stuff from the government. Some are literally given money (£10,000+) to leave.

 

[SonofaBor]

Immigrants become the solution to problems-- like depopulation-- that occur on a mass scale when societies weaken.

Let me explain further via songs and personal reflections of American cultural life.

"The Immigrant," 1978, was written by the great American country songwriter and performer, Merle Haggard:

American ranching consists of a mansion
Where illegal immigrants do much of the labor by hand
They sneak 'em through customs till time comes to bust 'em
Then haul 'em back over the border to their own native land

With a ragged sombrero and not much dinero
They'll be back again when the ole Rio Grande's down low
Border patroller, don't stop a stroller
'Cause the Mexican immigrant is helping America grow

Viva La Mexico, go where they let you go
Do what you can for the land
Take home dinero and buy new sombrero
And come back again when you can

What makes a gringo use smart aleck lingo
When he stole this land from the Indian man way back when
Don't he remember the big money lender
That put in a Lincoln parked where his Pinto had been?

The almighty peso that gives him the say so
To dry up the river whenever there's crops to bring in
Is this a good neighbor to take all his labor
Chase him back over the border till he's needed again?

Viva La Mexico, go where they let you go
Do what you can for the land
Take home dinero and buy new sombrero
And come back again when you can

Haggard is very clear and cutting. He was himself of immigrants-- from Oklahoma to California during the Depression. Californians didn't like them "Oakies" too much. They saw it as an invasion. A few years after his parents arrived, Haggard was born in a remodeled boxcar in 1937 and grew up poor near the railroad town of Bakersfield, CA. By 1978, he was rich and famous. He could identify with the immigrant and see the hypocrisy of the land owners.

I'm pretty sure Haggard wrote this song for his middle-class audience in 1978-- not for the immigrants or hypocrites. I was 14 then. Society was starting to go really weird and weaken. As I have noted elsewhere, I heard it first in the music. I couldn't see or understand the larger trends. But I do know this: I was working at a restaurant as a dishwasher (kids can't do that so early now); my neighborhood was of mixed classes (my dad was a trucker; my good friend's dad was the mayor) and people got along; most of the parents came from farming backgrounds-- they were serious people, born about the same time as Haggard, who knew that life wasn't guaranteed. We kids picked strawberries in the summer for money. In the 1980s, this all started to rip apart. The first thing to happen was the berry fields disappeared; they were replaced by McMansions. People like my dad were slaughtered by regulations-- born of a new bottom-line managerial class. My mayor neighbor's family probably lives in a gated community somewhere-- though his parents remained until their deaths. I submitted myself to education-- very difficult for me-- and left behind my own "old world" for a life of "freedom and pleasure" (see below) in the academy.

"Everybody Wants to Rule the World" was a hit in 1985 and said it all-- the recognition, darkness, paranoia, remorse and conformity-- that began to prevail:

Welcome to your life
There's no turning back
Even while we sleep
We will find you

Acting on your best behavior
Turn your back on Mother Nature
Everybody wants to rule the world

It's my own design
It's my own remorse
Help me to decide
Help me make the

Most of freedom and of pleasure
Nothing ever lasts forever
Everybody wants to rule the world

There's a room where the light won't find you
Holding hands while the walls come tumbling down
When they do, I'll be right behind you

So glad we've almost made it
So sad they had to fade it
Everybody wants to rule the world

I can't stand this indecision
Married with a lack of vision
Everybody wants to rule the -
Say that you'll never, never, never, never need it
One headline, why believe it?
Everybody wants to rule the world

All for freedom and for pleasure
Nothing ever lasts forever
Everybody wants to rule the world

In pursuit of "Freedom and Pleasure," babies weren't born; elders weren't cared for or heard; people forgot how to fix things; strawberries were imported; people began to believe the stock market would go up forever-- and if not, their bonds would protect them. Meanwhile, regulations expanded, the environmental movement emerged (on paper-- serious power), and a mass psychosis of conformity over took the new "rulers." 2020 exposed a lot of this.

Large scale immigration, both legal and illegal, began sometime in the 2000s. It solved depopulation and labor problems when "everybody wants to rule the world."

Of course there are those who really rule the world; and I bet this pattern of growth, decline and replacement is well known to them. They know, too, that we don't manage ourselves very well. We usually don't know what we have until its gone.

 

[jeenam]

Of course there are those who really rule the world; and I bet this pattern of growth, decline and replacement is well known to them. They know, too, that we don't manage ourselves very well. We usually don't know what we have until its gone.

The capitalist system is dependent upon the exploitation of humans as a purely disposable resource. I'd imagine that most folks here are well aware of these facets of the system:

• Lands are conquered/invaded for access to natural resources.
• The local populations of the conquered/invaded lands are exploited to acquire/process and then export the natural resources.
• The majority of the wealth generated from the aquisition of the local natural resources is never returned/re-invested into the local economies.
• The small amount of wealth that is allowed to remain localized could easily be classified as "subsistence level"; enough to keep the locals alive to continue aquisition and export activities.
• As the local economies are drained of their natural vitality the locals are then forced to migrate away from their homeland in search of decent employment.
• Migration to wealthier nations that can at least offer a job, which the locals no longer have access to because of the transformation of their local economies by the exploitative nature of the capitalist system, then occurs.
• Wealthy nations openly accept migrants from the exploited territories.
• Migrants desperate for work fill the menial labor workforce of wealthier nations that invaded/conquered the lands from which they were forced to leave due to how their homelands were exploited in the first place.

Make no mistake about it. And again, I'm sure most of the folks here have some semblance of this reality, that the system is designed to work in this manner. The folks at the top of the system have no care for even their own local populations of the same "nationality". There is no differentiation when it comes to human labor as an exploitable resource. They do not care if the people being exploited are native to the local culture of the nations doing the conquering. The key thing to remember is that the illusion that the local regions to which immigrants migrate to and the locals of the regions to which they are migrating into are in no way viewed as unique or separate. They are one and the same - exploitable human capital. The infighting that occurs between locals and migrants is simply an ancillary issue, and really, a non-concern for those doing the exploiting at the top. The inter-cultural conflict is viewed as collateral damage. Unavoidable, but at the same time, having no direct consequences to the investing class who profit from the systems.

 

[SonofaBor]

I'm sure most of the folks here have some semblance of this reality, that the system is designed to work in this manner. The folks at the top of the system have no care for even their own local populations of the same "nationality". There is no differentiation when it comes to human labor as an exploitable resource. They do not care if the people being exploited are native to the local culture of the nations doing the conquering. The key thing to remember is that the illusion that the local regions to which immigrants migrate to and the locals of the regions to which they are migrating into are in no way viewed as unique or separate. They are one and the same - exploitable human capital. The infighting that occurs between locals and migrants is simply an ancillary issue, and really, a non-concern for those doing the exploiting at the top. The inter-cultural conflict is viewed as collateral damage. Unavoidable, but at the same time, having no direct consequences to the investing class who profit from the systems.

I'm not really certain that you are responding to my post because-- as in the AI thread-- you plaster over everything with well-known theories. As noted many times-- the Eagle/Phoenix has two wings. The discourse of the anti-capitalists, Marxism, can help people understand the plight of people but only to a point. Subjective experience is totally washed out-- it gets white-washed and plastered with rhetoric and slogans.

As I noted, I have watched the process "up close and personal" my entire life. I don't think "the they" get away with their plans if people weren't pretty much half crazy.

Wisdom may be very rare (see the Meno) or impossible; and people may not be able to solve their own problems. That's why they/we almost always grab the money. When they/we do that, everything good is traded for nothing.

My point is that people lose their very awareness of what life is when they take the money. They grab the money and lose everything. This weakens society. And immigrants can be trucked, flown and walked right in.

 

[Breizh]

That's why they/we almost always grab the money. When they/we do that, everything good is traded for nothing.

The bible was right.

 

[jeenam]

I'm not really certain that you are responding to my post because-- as in the AI thread-- you plaster over everything with well-known theories. As noted many times-- the Eagle/Phoenix has two wings. The discourse of the anti-capitalists, Marxism, can help people understand the plight of people but only to a point. Subjective experience is totally washed out-- it gets white-washed and plastered with rhetoric and slogans.

As I noted, I have watched the process "up close and personal" my entire life. I don't think "the they" get away with their plans if people weren't pretty much half crazy.

Wisdom may be very rare (see the Meno) or impossible; and people may not be able to solve their own problems. That's why they/we almost always grab the money. When they/we do that, everything good is traded for nothing.

My point is that people lose their very awareness of what life is when they take the money. They grab the money and lose everything. This weakens society. And immigrants can be trucked, flown and walked right in.

It was a reply to your post; otherwise I wouldn't have quoted it.

A "weakening" of society has nothing to do with assimilation or migrant populations in the context of my reponse. The immigrants are more less forced to migrate due to destruction of resources and normalcy of their previous lives. I find it hard to believe the locals of the invaded locales willingly wanted to take the money. They were never given any choice to begin with. They never chose to be invaded or exploited. They never had a choice in the matter. The locals can't go back to living their previous lifestyles because their lands have been seized and terraformed and simply no longer exists. So where are they going to go? They're forced to go somewhere they can survive.

Also, I don't think people are half crazy. They are indoctrinated into false beliefs of history and the operation of societies and that makes them exploitable.

 

[ViniB]

My point is that people lose their very awareness of what life is when they take the money. They grab the money and lose everything. This weakens society. And immigrants can be trucked, flown and walked right in.

Love for money is the root of all evil, that's an absolute truth. However, unless society collapses today or tomorrow, money will still be a part of our reality, because the belief in it is so high.

A barter & trade based society would be a dream to come true, but appart from local communities, not much is being done in that regard

The greater irony, is that once society finally collapses, immigration stops with it......

 

[SonofaBor]

Or, the immigrants get to experience the new world after we're left behind-- living on reservations....

 

[jeenam]

Or, the immigrants get to experience the new world after we're left behind-- living on reservations....

Yes. Exactly. We're on the same page. It essentially comes down to people not having reasonable choices, imho.

 

[SonofaBor]

"On the same page"-- indeed.

 

[AntiSoof]

The bible was right.

Yes: 1 Timothy:6

10 "For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.". (KJ)

I also find the Bible a very wise book.

So, it's always follow the money.

To much love/lust for money, and money is like rotten water as opposed to living water.

 

[SonofaBor]

To much love/lust for money, and money is like rotten water as opposed to living water.

Yes, but here is the rub: money is a pure abstraction. It is neither good nor bad. What is bad is the "lust." And what is the lust for? It is not for money itself. It is for security and pleasure. People, even the rulers of this place, want to be secure and have fun....forever. (Thus, the song: "Everybody Wants to Rule the World").

What does this to do with immigration? Security and pleasure cannot be guaranteed. Yet, people want them. The system-- the world system of finance (more on that later)-- feeds on this predilection.

At first, immigration provides helpful functions for a society that is beginning to crack from its lusts. In "The Immigrant"-- American rancher trades bondage to money lenders to acquire a mansion and a fancy Lincoln car. To pay the debt, they bring in immigrants. The governments looks the other way; for it is a minor problem from the standpoint of administration. It may be a huge red flag to people like @jeenam and our moderator @ViniB (and to the John Birch Society in the 1960s), but the government (insofar as it governs much at all) must also be concerned with produce production for people across the country and issues of international balance of payments, etc. Years go by. The corruption becomes institutional. People in other fields of commerce say, "We demand some of that support, too!" The government adjusts. Most people don't care. People plan-- depending on the preservation of the corruption. Only pockets of people here and there grow more concerned. Eventually, the entire economy becomes dependent. People, in pursuit of security and pleasure, only now begin to realize they have neither. And yet, the immigrants are everywhere doing what the people (during the "good old days") used to do-- including caring for children and elders, fixing things, building things, and picking berries.

The grandmasters of global finance don't need to plot. They traded. Trading is natural-- e.g., barter. But these people are trading at scale. Scale requires abstraction. What did they trade? They traded the insurance from their network in the form of financial instruments for the continued allegiance of people. This trade gave all parties security from overthrow. And it allowed the pleasure boat to continue out to sea.

Upshot for Stolen History: I think that the Old System, from the 12th to 16th century, could be called Baal/Yahweh. But this was overthrown in the 17th-- see the 30 Years War. A new system emerged afterwards-- the Robot points to 1692. (Also, see this post on the emergence of printing in 1700 or so).

 

[Breizh]

A brief visit to Poland with it's lack of uncontrolled migration. Poland has issued more work visas for people outside the EU than all other EU countries over the past ~4 years.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvqRWnKFCjo