Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Dielectric
Date: 2020-06-16 17:55:51
Reaction Score: 3
You don't necessarily need evidence for earth being a flat plane. There is plenty, if you open your eyes (and mind) but it's not where I would start.
The entirety of NASA and indeed every other space agency's claims are all proveably false.
If you still believe that this "machine".
https://history.nasa.gov/ap11ann/kippsphotos/5927.jpg
that appears to be made from curtain rods and black paper, traversed an infinite vaccuum, with a pressure differential that would crush our most advanced military submerines in an instant, then you may well have been deceived.
A few questions for you to ponder about the heliocentric beliefs you hold.
How can a pressurised system (earth's atmosphere, 14.7psi) exist in an infinite vaccum without the necessary antecedent of a container (or firmament)?
That breaks the second law of thermodynamics...
How can a rocket propel itself in a vacuum? Also breaks the second law of thermodynamics.
How can you not feel the acceleration of the earths orbit?
How is it that we can see 1200 miles with infrared photography, with no curvature in sight?
Sorry for the length of this reply. It's as brief as I can make it.
Well I'm glad you replied and I'm even happier I edited my original post. To clarify my position, let me state that I don't care whether the earth is flat or not, what I care about is figuring out how to get off of it to see what's is what, and ultimately that's what really matters.
There is no disagreement from me that what we have been told isn't right. Nobody is going to agree with you more than I will about that. If you can explain the physics of a flat earth so that they also can explain how a UFO might work, and without resorting to magic like Einsteinian Physics requires, then I will be much more inclined to give the flat earth hypothesis more credence.
Now about these questions you've asked; I am not really the person who should answer the questions you've raised. If I were to be a prosecutor or a lawyer I wouldn't be seeking someone like myself out to answer the questions you've raised, that would be stupid, but then again would I seek out a person like your own self to answer them? That doesn't mean we shouldn't be asking questions. It just means the level of competency may not be able to adequately provide a satisfactory explanation because of our own limitations.
What we need to remember are the guiding principles of an investigator; just because we can't get a satisfactory explanation for one question, that failure doesn't necessarily invalidate an entire hypothesis, and nor does the failure to answer one or more questions automatically validate another secondary hypothesis, and we may not even be asking the right questions.
The bottom line here is that the questions you're asking are not the right questions. They are questions which have been provided to you by others, much like Einsteinian Physics was once provided as a pat answer to such questions, and which today the even more ludicrous quantum theory is seeking to augment. These and the questions you've raised are all designed to guide you in to a kill box.
The earth is neither a vacuum bottle nor a pressurized cylinder. It loses it's atmosphere at a relatively steady rate. The atmosphere itself is magnetic and magnetically conductive, which is what the surrounding space is also made from, and which comprises a magnetically conductive/reactive field. Let me define that a field is an all pervasive substance, meaning it is everywhere, in every place, and at all times.
Until you can look at the questions you've raised and answer them for yourself, and without resorting to magical imaginary things like glass domes and other complete horse shit, such as bendable "Space+Time" like some other jackass, it will be a waste of energy and time on my part to carry this any further.
If you seriously want to understand you're going to have to read Ken Wheeler's book which is a field theory of how Universe Works. It's been called the Dielectric Simplex Theory. Others here on SH have read this and know what I'm talking about when I say you need to read this. You can download and read it for free.
Uncovering the missing Secrets of Magnetism : Ken L Wheeler : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
I can not tell you how much time I wasted trying to make sense of Einsteinian Physics in order to understand how a flying saucer could levitate. I finally came across Harold E. Puthoff's papers only to discover that what's required to "Bend Spacetime" (which would be necessary to make a UFO work according to Einsteinian physics) requires energy on a planetary scale. Later Puthoff told Steven Greer that wasn't how it worked (that antigravity didn't work according to the physics of Einstein), but that if he told him or others how it worked, then he and his entire family would be killed. OK, so there you have it. Einsteinian physics is a contrived counter intelligence program designed to keep secret the working which enable UFO's, and hence travel among the Star's.
Well ya know by the time that happened I was already about 99.9% sure that Einsteinian Physics was not right and that revelation of Harold's about needing energy on a planetary level really cinched it for sure, and yet there they were, the UFO' and I know they are real because I've seen them myself and when I say I've seen them I mean like you see a car driving by on the highway. So ya know I was pretty frustrated.
The thing here is that if you read Ken's book then maybe you will be able to put together a hypothesis of how a flat earth would work and maybe that would make more sense. I don't know but I do know right now you are a supporter of that hypothesis. If it is right, as you and other maintain, then there is no way that Ken's field theory should not be able to be applied to understanding how a flat planet would work to create weight in mass, which is what we know as gravity, and do so in a workable manner.
Having said that, Wheeler himself, like myself, deny it's possible but maybe we don't yet see something. I'm not going to say something is impossible when I do not have proof of that, but I can say it's unlikely based on what I understand and everything else ken Wheeler has put together is spot on. So while everyone else is either denying Alexey's flying junk pile (seen in the video) is a fraud or else seeing imaginary fishing lines, the oldest shill claim there is, it's Wheeler's dielectric simplex theory which actually explains what's taking place, not only with the Alexey device but with UFO's. Basically people are seeing that previously posted video and responding exactly like they were looking at a UFO and that says something.