Orphan generation origins

its really not a fact. technically speaking.
youd have to make a case for it to be considered a fact
even the whole 'they repopulated etc...' statement isnt fact or provable.

Point to an example of them being able to govern themselves and have a society You would want to live in.
 
I was about to bring up Haiti myself. They've been independent for over 200 years and they're still a shithole. Who exactly is holding them back here?

UN034843.jpg.webp
 
I'm going to leave the previous conversation on race in this thread, but I will come in to mention that this debate seems to be going in circles, and will spin this thread quite far off track if it continues. Unless further discussion supports the OP on the origin of orphans, I may remove posts or lock the thread. I appreciate the tough conversation being civil, and not devolving into insults or racism for the sake of it, but lets stay on track.
 
Can't wait, keep me posted, and be careful dropping names like that. Those people are dangerous.
I posted pictures from the museum they come out blurry for some reason I can email them to you I have been researching asking people but it's a instant silence must of time but I'm not going to stop I live in Baton Rouge but work all over state so i been documenting every old world building that remains in every town and collecting books so one day we will figure this out. I did find a mention of "our government was taken over by India trading company " in New Orleans history book and a book written in 30s by a young girl who used the word "administrators" several times and talked about how Easter eggs "an old pagan tradition was started after the Civil War " and by end of ww1 it was part of church regular festivities. It's shame that a girl could pick up on it but no "pastors' did. Probably bc all sold out and became tools of the satanic. US corporation
 
I posted pictures from the museum they come out blurry for some reason I can email them to you I have been researching asking people but it's a instant silence must of time but I'm not going to stop I live in Baton Rouge but work all over state so i been documenting every old world building that remains in every town and collecting books so one day we will figure this out. I did find a mention of "our government was taken over by India trading company " in New Orleans history book and a book written in 30s by a young girl who used the word "administrators" several times and talked about how Easter eggs "an old pagan tradition was started after the Civil War " and by end of ww1 it was part of church regular festivities. It's shame that a girl could pick up on it but no "pastors' did. Probably bc all sold out and became tools of the satanic. US corporation
I was trying to see if I could post clearer but it didn't work "kids for sale"
 

Attachments

  • 20250704_101133.jpg
    20250704_101133.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 194
My parents were both Scottish and English. My Scottish side I have had far harder time finding information, Scotland's People can be useless at finding anyone and dubious on information from Ancestry. One person I kept finding people saying was born in Scotland but moved to Australia, when it was clear there were two people with that name, and my supposed ancestor would be in Scotland for my mum to be born at all! It's not just orphans, my great grandfather was apparently illegitimate on my mum's side, so no chance of finding info and even his mother felt like a battle to find any information. The English I found easier despite a common surname, branches off provided many interesting detours.
 
I'm afraid it does belong on here because the evidence is clear that when the old world was repopulated they specifically chose white Europeans. They didn't choose Africans, they didn't choose Asians, they chose Europeans. My intention isn't to upset anyone but I do not appreciate those who deny reality. If you want to tell me that an African man is no different to a European man then you might as well believe the rest of the mainstream narrative.


For all we know the other races could have been creations of man or even some other entity. I'm open to all possibilities but you cannot deny reality. Zimbabwe is a classic example of what happens when Africans are in charge of everything; at the very least they need someone else to be guiding them because left to their own devices they end up destroying themselves. This civil war thread brings up some interesting points about this.

I understand this subject can be uncomfortable and I want to reiterate that my intention is not to upset anyone. No hate, just truth - that's all I'm searching for. I don't want to derail this thread either but I want to make myself clear here.
If you believe the entire world was repopulated with white Europeans then, really, what can I say? There were remnants of all kinds of people in every land across the globe after various resets. And no "white" European arrive the Amaruku to an empty land waiting to be built out. If you're on this kind of site you should know that.
 
...that when the old world was repopulated they specifically chose white Europeans. They didn't choose Africans, they didn't choose Asians, they chose Europeans.
This is likely because more melanated beings tend to be more rebellious and difficult to control. Repopulating an area with these types of beings wouldn't make sense for the controllers.
 
Last edited:
This is likely because more melanated beings tend to be more rebellious and difficult to control. Repopulating an area with these types of beings wouldn't make sense for the controllers.
This is likely because more melanated beings tend to be more rebellious and difficult to control. Repopulating an area with these types of beings wouldn't make sense for the controllers.
Or they weren't able to recreate melanated beings. Who are more spiritual, due to said melanin which absorbs sun & has a pineal gland which doesn't calcify. Th Egyptians described a blonde, blue eyed race who they said had a proclivity for trouble making who they called "Tamahu- the created ones".
 
If you believe the entire world was repopulated with white Europeans then, really, what can I say? There were remnants of all kinds of people in every land across the globe after various resets. And no "white" European arrive the Amaruku to an empty land waiting to be built out. If you're on this kind of site you should know that.
First, let me say that nobody lives on a globe; the only "across the globe" is the one that's in the clutches of the German Royal of Britain.

I think both of you have some truth in what you're presenting. Of course, that's just my view on the matter.

The civilization of the past, the builders of starforts, cathedrals, palaces, castles, temples, canals, statues... were white and free and don't had a parasite. The face appearance was little different, like the statues, very very rare with someone.
I've seen a few (two, :p) Russians and one from Azerbaijan with the same face features as what I believe to be the past civilization.
Something I noticed in common among the three: they live in rural areas, "poor". It's sad to say this, but it's as they are what's left of that civilization with on memory.

I have no idea where the white orphans came from. The hypothesis I put forward is that they are the children of those who were locked up in the enormous asylums.

I don't have that romanticized view of repopularization.
White people were slaves, and today we remain slaves without even realizing it.

I'm afraid it does belong on here because the evidence is clear that when the old world was repopulated they specifically chose white Europeans. They didn't choose Africans, they didn't choose Asians, they chose Europeans.

You talk as if it were some kind of competition or a purchase decision and something to be proud of. "They went into the "Repopulating World" store looking for the best model and chose the White model European edition, and it was delivered by train."

The term White Europeans, why ? And does a Black European even exist? Why you don't say Black or White?
Russia is 33% of Asia (30% of the world) and Russia is the largest and most populous country in Europe , Russian people are asians.

How can a Japanese person and an Indian person still be considered the same race? Why hasn't anyone confronted the idiot who made that definition? Everyone just accepts and repeats whatever is thrown at us. It's like downloading and uploading; everyone just accepts and installs without even knowing why. It's gets my nerve


My intention isn't to upset anyone but I do not appreciate those who deny reality. If you want to tell me that an African man is no different to a European man then you might as well believe the rest of the mainstream narrative.
And why would anyone say such stupidity? We are all different and we are not equal.
I've understood this since I was a child. All five of my senses, plus the sixth sense, validate this basic truth.

Even among people of the same race, they are different. But... I don't know why, but this, let's say, rule, doesn't apply in just one place: Brazil.

I'm not talking about children of parents of different races. Whatever the race—white, black, Chinese, Indian, mixed race—they all become Brazilian. And I'm not talking about nationality or any legal classification. Nowhere else in the world does anything similar happen.

They act and react and like and think the same way, from poor to rich has almost no influence, whether they live in the north in the middle of the Amazon or 4,394 km south on the border with Argentina. At the same time they don't assimilate with Latin America, even though they have the third longest land border in the world, 16,885 kilometers with Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, Paraguay, Uruguay, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana. The populations of all these countries resemble each other and all of Latin America.

I'm not saying this is good or bad
For all we know the other races could have been creations of man or even some other entity. I'm open to all possibilities but you cannot deny reality.
Actually, for all we know, man cannot create anything, much less life.

I actually find it absurd how anyone can refer to the creation of something identical to themselves in such a banal way. It's as if she had never observed or been aware of her own body.
When have you ever witnessed someone creating people, or creating life? Never, and nothing even remotely similar; that is to say, television completely manipulates and controls people's minds.

We can't even build like a the old building a palace, only boxes ou other geometric basic shape, Then they praised an architect when he puts various geometric forms together without the slightest harmony and calls it Modern Architecture. Look this new egyptian museum, that is a cheap warehouse. And is not because is there in Africa, anywhere in the world we ONLY can build this kind of box building. They build this museum so close to the pyramids, that's embarrassing, and that's clear evidence that whoever built the pyramids (the Irish Magian priesthood of Iesa) is not part of the same civilization as ours; ours is primitive.

And there are people who believe in quantum computers, humanoid robots, rockets to Mars, election...

Zimbabwe is a classic example of what happens when Africans are in charge of everything; at the very least they need someone else to be guiding them because left to their own devices they end up destroying themselves. This civil war thread brings up some interesting points about this.

How much time did you spend researching Zimbabwe to say this? Excuse me, but the only classic example is your own, speaking about something with conviction and certainty without ever having investigated. I didn't know anything about Zimbabwe, I had vague memories from decades ago of what television showed: Black people, extreme poverty, sick or starving children, extreme heat, problems and more problems... but one thing that was never mentioned was "the chosen ones."

That land has been controlled by "the chosen ones" since the beginning, since the 1800s. They run the country like Sir Roland "Roy" Welensky. Southern Rhodesia was the name and sense 1930’s was openly total control by then and well establish Rhodesian Zionist Council and the Rhodesian Jewish Board of Deputies late changed to later being renamed the Central African Zionist Council and Central African Board of Jewish Deputies in 1946.

In 1965, the white minority government of Southern Rhodesia, under Prime Minister Ian Smith, unilaterally declared independence as Rhodesia, in response to British demands that the colony be handed over to black majority rule. Rhodesia was then subject to international sanctions, and black nationalist organizations began an insurgency, known as the Rhodesian Bush War, which lasted until 1979, when the Rhodesian government agreed to settle with the black nationalists. By the time the Rhodesian Bush War ended in 1979

They grew tired of being parasitized by "the chosen ones," being exploited and revolted (which this revolted was certainly caused by "the chosen ones" themselves).

The techniques used to corrupt men and women work in a developed white society, imagine what it would be like in an underdeveloped black society surrounded by other countries where they are in the same situation as there. Black people have difficulty to perceiving beyond what is explicit, what facilitated be so easily manipulated. They tend to act on emotion, not in reality or common sense. It's more reaction than action. Whatever difficulty arises in life, any normal setback that occurs in everyone's life, they react to it in extremes without limits. That's why the level of violence is so high; they are very sexualized, they get angry easily, are easily offended, and selfishness. It doesn't matter which country. Imagine there. "The chosen ones" only reveal who they are when it's convenient, and black people don't distinguish between white people and "the chosen ones." Even though it's obvious, just look at their face.

Then you add a public debt estimated at around 21 billion dollars, representing a debt-to-GDP ratio of 97%, a debt incurred to finance the civil war. In other words, "the chosen ones" take out loans from the bank of "the chosen ones" in the name of all the Black people in the country and hand over this loan to the military complex controlled by "the chosen ones," where 90% disappears and 10% is converted into weapons and scrap military equipment used to control and oppress all the Black people in the country, and they have to repay this loan plus interest. Esta eh a "civil war"

If Zimbabwe is a classic example? A classic example of "the chosen ones" nature.


I understand this subject can be uncomfortable and I want to reiterate that my intention is not to upset anyone. No hate, just truth - that's all I'm searching for. I don't want to derail this thread either but I want to make myself clear here.
I understand what you mean, but what you use to "support" what you are presenting is not the truth and/or is a half-truth or distortion.

This is a piece of advice: if you are looking for the truth, the first thing you have to do is accept that everything is false and relearn everything. You have to research what you want to know with facts and evidence.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top