Sandokhan's Link and Post Collection

[sandokhan]

Black Sun = Tiamat = Rahu = Fenrir. Tiamat emits the laevorotatory subquarks.

From the Enuma Elish:

He sliced her in half
Half of her he put up to roof the sky,
Drew a bolt across and made a guard to hold it.
Her waters he arranged so they could not escape.

Tiamat was in the shape of a disk (as are all planets/stars). At that time, Venus and Mercury were the satellites of Jupiter. Tiamat was split into two halves: Rahu (Black Sun) and Ketu (Shadow Moon).

A subquark consists of some 14 billion bosons. Jupiter, Venus and Mercury emit bosons, Rahu and Ketu produce the subquarks, upon having received the bosons from Jupiter. The visible Sun emits quarks.

The existence of Rahu is proven by the solar Allais effect, the presence of Ketu is evidenced by the lunar Allais effect.

In Bulgarian there are two different words for Light: svetlina and Videlina. Svetlina designates physical light and has the same root as of the verb which means “to shine”, whereas Videlina, designates the spiritual Light and is formed from the root of the verb which means “to see”. Videlina is the Light which enables us to see the spiritual, invisible world; it was Videlina that was condensed into material form and gave us svetlina, physical light».

The light from Rahu has a very deep red color, the light from Ketu has a violet color, the light from Jupiter is the color green.

 

[sandokhan]

Not only is that idea ludicrous on steroids, our carnival ride is mounted on a roller coaster, or a bullet train that rockets through a total vacuum at mind-numbing speeds.

Sure, but you have to PROVE your assertion. This is where the Michelson-Gale experiment is used to destroy geocentrism. The Galileo Was Wrong treatise, over 1000 pages of heavy duty proofs and insights, could not prove the Michelson-Gale experiment wrong. As soon as any geocentrist mentions that the Earth does not rotate around its own axis, the heliocentrists will show the results of the MGX experiment. Should any geocentrist protest and say that the formula used in the experiment is not actually the Sagnac effect equation, the heliocentrists will smile and state: "fine, show us the CORRECT formula".

Here is the correct Sagnac effect formula for the MGX:

Advanced Flat Earth Theory



As for the galactic orbit of the solar system:

A solar system in motion with respect to the Vega star would be wholly incompatible with Kepler's first law, since, within that frame of reference, this motion (the circular helices on a right cylinder) must change the eccentricities of some of the planetary orbits to an extent which far exceeds the observed values.

Therefore, Kepler's first law contradicts the accepted fact of current astronomy that the entire solar system moves toward the star Vega on a helical path.

The tridimensional orbits of the Sun/Planets, would be circular helices on a right cylinder, which completely contradicts the planar elliptical orbits of the planets, in the heliocentric theory. A planar elliptical orbit would be possible if and only if the whole system is at rest (with respect to the rest of the Galaxy, in the round earth theory), and not moving toward Vega with 20 km/s.

Both Kepler's first law and the fact that the geometrical shape of the movement of the solar system towards the star Vega must a be a helix, cannot be true at the same time.

 

[FarewellAngelina]

Not only is that idea ludicrous on steroids, our carnival ride is mounted on a roller coaster, or a bullet train that rockets through a total vacuum at mind-numbing speeds.

Sure, but you have to PROVE your assertion. This is where the Michelson-Gale experiment is used to destroy geocentrism. The Galileo Was Wrong treatise, over 1000 pages of heavy duty proofs and insights, could not prove the Michelson-Gale experiment wrong. As soon as any geocentrist mentions that the Earth does not rotate around its own axis, the heliocentrists will show the results of the MGX experiment. Should any geocentrist protest and say that the formula used in the experiment is not actually the Sagnac effect equation, the heliocentrists will smile and state: "fine, show us the CORRECT formula".

Here is the correct Sagnac effect formula for the MGX:

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

View attachment 22409

As for the galactic orbit of the solar system:

A solar system in motion with respect to the Vega star would be wholly incompatible with Kepler's first law, since, within that frame of reference, this motion (the circular helices on a right cylinder) must change the eccentricities of some of the planetary orbits to an extent which far exceeds the observed values.

Therefore, Kepler's first law contradicts the accepted fact of current astronomy that the entire solar system moves toward the star Vega on a helical path.

The tridimensional orbits of the Sun/Planets, would be circular helices on a right cylinder, which completely contradicts the planar elliptical orbits of the planets, in the heliocentric theory. A planar elliptical orbit would be possible if and only if the whole system is at rest (with respect to the rest of the Galaxy, in the round earth theory), and not moving toward Vega with 20 km/s.

Both Kepler's first law and the fact that the geometrical shape of the movement of the solar system towards the star Vega must a be a helix, cannot be true at the same time.

Am always wary of any formula that uses the conventional symbol c .

Completely fictional value . When the maths don't fit use a constant as the saying goes.

 

[grav]

Both Kepler's first law and the fact that the geometrical shape of the movement of the solar system towards the star Vega must a be a helix, cannot be true at the same time.

We take different paths to arrive at the same destination.

The Atom theory is a miniaturized solar system.
In both models, a central object exerts a gravitational field around which other objects orbit in elliptical patterns.

The creators of both fictitious and unproven theories used, as FarewellAngelina has pointed out, another fiction, the c constant to represent the speed of light.

The whole tangled ball of lies can never be pulled straight as long as C is allowed to justify the false math. We also must recognize many other assumptions that are just like criminals who testify in favor of other criminals. In our case, the Atom, gravity, space-time, fictional constants, Vega.

All these hypothetical ideas were constructed to deny the luminiferous aether.

 

[sandokhan]

Am always wary of any formula that uses the conventional symbol c .

One of the most important debates in science today is whether the speed of light is variable or is a constant, no one is concerned with the symbolism. My formula proves the following facts:

1. The Earth is stationary. Not the MGX experiment, nor the RLGS (ring laser gyroscope experiments) have recorded/registered the true Sagnac effect, all they have been able to detect is the Coriolis effect, which is much smaller in magnitude.

2. The speed of light is superluminal (c + v1 + v2 term).

3. Finally, we can solve the biochirality mystery, one of the deepest of modern science:

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

4. Both the RET and the IET (inverted earth theory) are invalidated since now we have a justification (existence of ether) for Wolfgang Pauli's formula:

Advanced Flat Earth Theory


The Atom theory is a miniaturized solar system.

Well, the images taken with the scanning tunneling microscope prove something else:

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

 

[sandokhan]

AMYLOIDOSIS AS ETIOLOGY OF SEVERE COVID AND LONG COVID (my latest remarks on the subject)

 

[sandokhan]

SH Archive - 400 year old Sahara Desert, or why people forgot everything they knew about Africa

California as an island:

New radical chronology of history

New radical chronology of history

"No other researcher on the subject of the new chronology of history (including Fomenko/Nosovsky) would dare to acknowledge that as recently as 1760, California was actually an island. That is when the Grand Canyon was formed and Siberia became a frozen desert: 1761-1769 AD. That is when the last great cosmic/geological cataclysm had occurred."

The cosmic cataclysm which had been envisioned by Velikovsky to have occurred some 3,500 years ago, actually took place some 260 years ago.

I repeat: the phenomenon or subject matter known as "stolen history" is possible only within the context of geocentrism (flat earth theory). If the Earth had been rotating around its own axis and had been orbiting the Sun, then that means the axial precession is a real astronomical event, i.e., the historical records starting from Hipparchus and Ptolemy all the way to the Gregorian calendar reform are also correct (if the Earth is spherical and undergoes an axial precession while history has been forged, then the heliocentrists will have to explain the nature of the cosmic catastrophe which had caused the Giza plateau to be inundated by sea water up to a height of 100 meters).

Advanced Flat Earth Theory

My hypothesis is that the radius of the flat earth is 6,363.63 km, and since the Sun is undergoing a westward precessional movement of 1,5 km per year, that would mean that history is at most 339-340 years old (divide 6,363.63 by 6, the result by 2, and then divide the final number by 1,5). If anyone else desires a new chronology of history, like A. Fomenko, then he will have to prove that the radius of the Earth is much greater than the alloted 6,363.63 km (a larger radius means we can add more years to the 339-340 years interval). For FET to be true, that means that the Gregorian calendar reform had never occurred.

The proponents of RET tend to forget that the equations of the planetary orbits are valid only for a period of a couple of hundred of years (three hundred years at most):

Advanced Flat Earth Theory