Stolen History Part 3 - The Mystery of the World's Fairs

Maybe I missed it, but I was looking for a mention of the 1939/40 (beginning of WW2) and 1964/65 (beginning of Vietnam War) New York World's Fairs.
My uncle seemed a bit puzzled why out of his entire collection this was the one I wanted, but I know you all will understand my reasoning 😁

image.jpg
 
My uncle seemed a bit puzzled why out of his entire collection this was the one I wanted, but I know you all will understand my reasoning 😁
Of course I understand, during "64-67" was the British Invasion of the US, a "T"avistock "P"rogram to brainwash the teenagers with rock & roll plus drugs. ;)
It's researchers & posters that are needed to keep this place going not more lurkers.
I am really trying my best to attract attention here, both positive and negative, with my postings. :rolleyes:
 
When you look at the evidence we have provided, you will see many discrepancies that stand on it's own even if you don't believe our conclusions - some things simply do not add up, for example the desire to destroy most of the buildings even though they were still perfectly capable ot being used.

We are looking at a world-wide industrial-grade production of perfect classical buildings by industrialists with no apparent motivation to build like that.

Just look at the Bremen Expo, and how the very architect responsible for the Expo attacked the main building, and afterwards it went up in flames. If this isn't a smoking gun, what is? That building, if still standing, would be the absolute glory of Bremen today. Even if half of the city didn't get destroyed in WW2. I bet he had the task to destroy the building, but he wasn't able to convince the public, so in the end they decided to simply burn it down. I really like the part about Bremen in the docu. The example of the modern steel bridge is also very interesting. The Bremen Newspaper "Weserkurier" itself noted how absurd the contrast is between the modern bridge and the classical buildings - both said to be built at the same time by the same people.

Its an interesting theory that the buildings at these Worlds Fairs already existed as opposed to being freshly built for the occasion. An excuse to destroy and rebuild.

On a side-related note, there are similarities nowadays under the guise of 'major sporting events' such as the football World Cup or the Olympic Games. Cities/countries get selected to be the 'host' of such events, which then triggers off a number of new construction and development projects. New stadium/stadia to be built, as well as 'olympic villages' for the competitors to stay in, see certain areas destroyed and rebuilt afresh, with modern ugly looking buildings, and of course these projects fully comply with the Agenda 21 / 2030 program.
 
Its an interesting theory that the buildings at these Worlds Fairs already existed as opposed to being freshly built for the occasion. An excuse to destroy and rebuild.

On a side-related note, there are similarities nowadays under the guise of 'major sporting events' such as the football World Cup or the Olympic Games. Cities/countries get selected to be the 'host' of such events, which then triggers off a number of new construction and development projects. New stadium/stadia to be built, as well as 'olympic villages' for the competitors to stay in, see certain areas destroyed and rebuilt afresh, with modern ugly looking buildings, and of course these projects fully comply with the Agenda 21 / 2030 program.
I'm not totally convinced on this one. But it is harder to prove a negative. That something didn't happen.

This 19th century image of san francisco looks undeveloped. Top right of map. Numbers 10. 11. 12. Site of the 1915 exposition.
old-san-francisco-5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Furthermore, I used quote marks around the word 'docus' in an earlier reply. This was due to the fact that I was repeating the word from you, but I had never used it before and didn't really know what it meant or if it is even a word. However, somehow you managed to interpret those quote marks as a personal attack.

Sorry, last months have been rough for me.
 
Here's a little something I just came across by accident that pertains to this topic. It seems to confirm what is claimed in this SH video regarding the buildings' prior existence. Could it be possible that somehow info such as this survived to the present?

Here's a narrated video and a PDF of the allegedly actual newspaper:

On January 6, 1858 . The Raftsman Journal published an intriguing article called Antiquities in America, discussing many of the ruins and structures around this continent that have not been discussed by official history...


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8l9QV7fJ8yo


-------------------------------------------

Source: Raftsman's journal. [volume] (Clearfield, Pa.) 1854-1948, January 06, 1858, Image 1
 

Attachments

  • Raftsman's.pdf
    936.9 KB · Views: 339
Images and Quotes have just been added to the OP.
Amazing work, The Crystal Castle footage seems to be edited, avoiding the 'waterfall of flaming glass'.
Yet the comment at the very end does give a compelling "Hold your breath", as the Summer Land fires were TOXIC:
Sumer Land disaster, Facinating Horror
Just found out my Great Grand Mother attended the Chicago World fair, for her Honeymoon. Think I'll go through the old photos, if they can be located.
 
sorry, but i am not a believe in this. Thousands of old locals in the cities living in the year 1902 (time of san fransisco WF) were still alive just a few decades ago. How come they never spoke or wrote about the lies that was created about their hometown?

I think most "normies" are quite unobservant and uninterested in their local history frankly. Only a small minority actively take note of the changes in their area and an even smaller minority would ever entertain the notion that the authorities are lying to them.

When areas get redeveloped today, most people can't remember what was there even a few years before, let alone what was there decades ago.
 
I think most "normies" are quite unobservant and uninterested in their local history frankly. Only a small minority actively take note of the changes in their area and an even smaller minority would ever entertain the notion that the authorities are lying to them.

When areas get redeveloped today, most people can't remember what was there even a few years before, let alone what was there decades ago.
But it wouldnt be so much about history per se. Imagine growing up in a city area, and then suddenly at adult age hearing that this and that building was something else contradicting 100% to what you know is true. Not a single grandpa or grandma have left any question about this global phenomena.

The eroded buildings inca, baalbek, megalithic walls etc, is of course something else. I believe there is much fake history in those cases. But with the world fairs nah
We constructed the Eiffel tower, the Titanic etc
Imagine living in this booming era with no social media, less political distractions, very little regulations but a lot of opportunities. Then it seems not weird that all you could think of as a visionary creator was building huge mechanical and concrete stuff.
 
Last edited:
I perceive the World's Fairs as the first psi-op in order to demolish a good part of the buildings of the old world. You need only to organize the Fair in a zone of old buildings designated for demolition then build a few temporary ones of wood and call all the buildings new. You can even do a little white washing to create the illusion of everything just finished. After the Fair it's over you can level everything, no questions asked.

 
This was a long one, but this is by far some of the best, most comprehensive research and information that I've ever read. The sheer amount of joy I got from reading this is going to last my lifetime. We not have the structures of the past, and we may be plunged in a world of darkness, but through God and the communities we dwell, Good shall vanquish this evil. Thank you so much for writing this.
 
Other viewers have voiced this criticism before as well. It's the most common criticism of the video, you are probably the 20th person or so bringing it up.

And I do not really have an answer to this. I have many times wondered about this myself.

Possible explanations:

  • Since they build thousands of buildings, and most of them were actually temporary, people may have forgotten that some of those buildings were there already before the construction process started. Two World Wars happened afterwards, people probably had other problems.
  • Some fotos, like the one of the Chicago Railway Station, implicate the buildings show signs of relocation.
  • The mystery with the World's Fairs isn't actually that they lied about the construction timeline, but that they lied about the construction methods - maybe they covered everything up because they actually used "old-world" building methods. This would explain why they were able to build hundreds of massive buildings in often less then 1-2 years, but had difficulties documenting the construction process.
When you look at the evidence we have provided, you will see many discrepancies that stand on it's own even if you don't believe our conclusions - some things simply do not add up, for example the desire to destroy most of the buildings even though they were still perfectly capable ot being used.

We are looking at a world-wide industrial-grade production of perfect classical buildings by industrialists with no apparent motivation to build like that.

Just look at the Bremen Expo, and how the very architect responsible for the Expo attacked the main building, and afterwards it went up in flames. If this isn't a smoking gun, what is? That building, if still standing, would be the absolute glory of Bremen today. Even if half of the city didn't get destroyed in WW2. I bet he had the task to destroy the building, but he wasn't able to convince the public, so in the end they decided to simply burn it down. I really like the part about Bremen in the docu. The example of the modern steel bridge is also very interesting. The Bremen Newspaper "Weserkurier" itself noted how absurd the contrast is between the modern bridge and the classical buildings - both said to be built at the same time by the same people.

We also received some comments under the german video where people said that their grandparents talked about how the World's Fairs were a cover-up.

Additionally, we received praise by people who should know what they talk about - architects.

Here's a translation of the top comment under our german video:

Incredible! Am architect and many things were completely unknown to me from the "world exhibitions". It is so monumental what is described here that it makes me queasy when I think of the broad masses of people who have 0 idea. Thank you for the mega work!
People need to understand if anyone questioned the fixed narrative they were put into prisons or mental instructions that is a fact look it up.
 
People need to understand if anyone questioned the fixed narrative they were put into prisons or mental instructions that is a fact look it up.
Actually on stolenhistory, you are the one who looks it up and provides evidence here, not the other way around.

Please look over our rules and guidelines for how to approach participating on the site.
 
irchsoqxdsh81.jpg j6g08qqxdsh81.jpg 0h67eqqxdsh81.jpg bqc3jqqxdsh81.jpg

Sydney International Expo 1879 in Australia

Pictured here: The Garden Palace in Hyde Park.

When one enthusiast penned the hope that the exhibition would 'lead to universal brotherhood, to universal commerce, to better times, and better men, and things' he was going further than most, but few anticipated that the end would be quite as deflating as it was. At dawn on 22 September 1882, the Garden Palace spectacularly burnt down, with reports of blackened iron pieces landing as far away as Rushcutters Bay.
By this time the building was being used for occasional events and as office space for various government departments. Records, including those of land occupations, the 1881 Census details, and railway surveys, all went up in flames. So too did 300 uninsured canvasses from the Art Society's annual exhibition, the grand organ and the foundation collection of the Technological and Mining Museum (now the Powerhouse Museum).
No-one was ever charged, although arson was generally suspected. Many mourned the loss of the building, and a fresh outpouring of eulogistic poems appeared in the press, along with a new round of self criticism over the waste of it all. And more than a few people expressed some satisfaction that at least the people of Sydney now had their Botanical Gardens back.​

cb193203bccba99d2af8ed7648a7b6166a2d21f8.jpg

The Burning of the Garden Palace, seen from the North Shore

By John Clark Hoyte From the collections of the State Library of New South Wales

Garden Palace | The Dictionary of Sydney
 
By far the best in the site. Inspite of the nitpicking. I will use it in my teaching and have ordered Eliot again. More please on why the Germans got the brunt? And an idle thought; is the reason the so called white colonies are getting it so hard because they are still colonies and ruled by the prison guards? An addition would be the Bradford Exhibition of 1904, Bradford UK. The west riding a hive of totall undestroyed 'Tartaria' everywhere. Check out Piece Hall, Halifax.
Cartwright Memorial Hall and the Great Bradford Exhibition of 1904
The Bradford Exhibition featured people exhibits too. Elsewhere?
I have a thread on here re Bradford but not many Bradford people are interested. When I asked about the exhibition and my few a few years ago at the museum, I was met by maybe apathy for the want of a better word.
 
Last edited:
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top