View attachment 48
Map of the supposed Magna Germania in the early 2nd century AD according to Vatican Sources
Introduction
It is not difficult to see that Germany has a special role on the world stage. In many respects, Germany has played a formative role both in the past and the present. In official historiography, Germany is, so to speak, the personification of evil, and although this is a negative description, it plays one of the most important roles in this narrative - the villain is essential for a good story. However, there is much to suggest that the exact opposite is true and that our view of history has been completely turned upside down.
In the present, the Germans shine above all with their dubious ability to radically deny themselves and their own interests and borders. Germany's economic power and innovative performance is still enormous despite all adversity, and the entire construct of the European Union is primarily designed to drain this performance out of Germany so that the country cannot reach its potential. The political and legal construct in which Germany is embedded serves to suppress the German spirit. Most of the foundations for this were laid directly after the Second World War.
To understand what happened to Germany in the 20th Century, we need to go back in time, starting with the Vatican.
The great forgery operation of the Jesuit Vatican
The war against the Germans has its roots (as far as written documents are concerned) in the conflict between the Jesuit Vatican and Protestant Germany.
The eastern-german chronology critic Wilhelm Kammeier was convinced that the original documents of Germanic history had been destroyed and replaced by forged documents of Gallic-Roman history during the 15th-18th Century.
The following quotations are taken from his book "
The Forgery of German History":
"Indeed", according to the result of the Sthamer examination (I. E. Sthamer), "we can open the imperial charters wherever we want, everywhere, from Franconian time down to the 15th century, it becomes clear that behind DATA the month date and after ACTUM the location information into the completed original is artificially and retroactively inserted; often the words DATA and ACTUM were themselves added retroactively, as well as different numerical data of the annual characteristics." (p. 111/112)
From the historians you will hear that the testimonies for the existence of a papal archive (that is, a collection of all the Curia's letters, deeds, registers, files, etc., in the designated rooms carefully preserved) already date back to the 5th century and that since the times of Innocent I. the popes themselves have relied on their archives for their decisions. (...) The worldly princes and kings, on the other hand, as historical research has instructed us, has not taken the slightest steps to ensure the preservation of their documents and files in any way. (p. 213-214)
So while the rulers did not make any effort to write anything down at all until the beginning of the modern age, the church allegedly has a complete documentation of history up to the 5th century AD. This shows that the church has forged (most likely retroactively) all documents up to modern times.
The Secret Archives
This is also supported by the fact that, according to the Vatican's own statement, hardly any original documents older than 600 years are kept in the secret Vatican library. Most of the documents even date back to modern times. The official reason is that the library was destroyed or looted at regular intervals. Only in 1612 was a central library even started to be established, before that it was supposed to be a loose collection, which was kept in many different places.
Thus Maria Luisa Ambrosini describes in "
The Secret Archives of the Vatican" (1969) what turbulent developments the Vatican Library has gone through. According to this, the archives of the church were kept in at least three different places until the 11th century: the Lateran, St. Peter's and the Palatine Palace. Between the 11th and 13th centuries, however, a large part of these archives disappeared.
When the popes moved to Avignon in the 14th century, the process of transporting their archives took a total of twenty years. The various places where the archives were kept along the route were looted three times: 1314, 1319 and 1320. The western schism led to the establishment of several papal archives. The different archives of the rival papal claimants were not fully reunited until 1784 in the archives of the Vatican.
During the plundering of the Vatican in 1404, papal registers and historical documents were thrown into the streets and Pope Innocent VII fled the city. His successor, Pope Gregory XII, is said to have sold a large number of documents in 1406, including some of the papal registers.
Napoleon and the Vatican Looting
Due to Napoleon's conquest of the Vatican state, the entire papal archive was moved to Paris. In the course of this move, there was also a massive loss of documents. The insufficient financing of the retrieval operation after Napoleon's defeat led to further losses, and one scholar of the time estimates that "
up to a third of the archival material that went to Paris never returned to the Vatican." (from "Controlling the Archives: The Requisition, Removal, and Return of the Vatican Archives during the Age of Napoleon").
Forgery Operation of the Greatest Effort
We are told that the Popes resided in different places - and when they traveled for diplomatic or other reasons, they naturally took all their archives with them, since they needed them for administrative work. Judging by the official history, it is almost a miracle that the Vatican Library still exists. It is more likely that the alleged looting before the 17th century is pure invention, and that before 1612, when the library was officially founded, there had been no archives at all.
Kammeier continues:
But if it should be "true and real" that almost through all the centuries of the Middle Ages kings and emperors did not keep any registers and documents, then we are faced with the extraordinary fact that whole generations of a certain class of people did not become a bit wiser by a single degree for a long time! (p. 215) (...) One would have to accept, as I said, that the all medieval secular princes were childish clunks, not to say half-idiots. (p. 217)
However, this is extremely unlikely, because Kammeier was also able to prove that almost all church documents show signs of forgery:
The fact that forged documents with the peculiar chronological corruption and all the other peculiarities described above have been encountered throughout all the centuries of the Middle Ages, in connection with the similarity of these forgeries, requires the assumption of a late medieval scholarly forgery of the greatest order and effort. (p. 120)
The proof shows itself to us again and again from our knowledge of the similarity of the forged documents. This is due to the production method of the examined pieces, to the absolutely identical and absolutely impossible psyche of the writers behind these pieces, to the strange "coincidence" regarding the loss of almost all originals and "common originals", and finally to the existence of the forged papal registers in connection with the complete lack of worldly registers and archives. (p. 239)
The counterfeit wave of the universal forgery event strikes backwards in time, not only to the times of the Carolingians, Merovingians, but also to the times of Caesar and Tacitus; the systematic counterfeit order reached a far as to the re-writing of the works about Ancient Germania. (p. 228)
Faking Roman Architecture History
The forgery operation of the Latin Papal States is being echoed by the absence of any evidence of medieval architecture in Italy:
Viscount James Bryce writes in "
The Holy Roman Empire" (1864):
“The modern traveller, after his first few days in Rome, when he has looked out upon the Campagna from the summit of St. Peter’s, paced the chilly corridors of the Vatican, and mused under the echoing dome of the Pantheon, when he has passed in review the monuments of regal and republican and papal Rome, begins to seek for some relics of the twelve hundred years that lie between Constantine and Pope Julius the Second. ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘is the Rome of the Middle Ages, the Rome of Alberic and Hildebrand and Rienzi? the Rome which dug the graves of so many Teutonic hosts; whither the pilgrims flocked; whence came the commands at which kings bowed? Where are the memorials of the brightest age of Christian architecture, the age which reared Cologne and Rheims and Westminster, which gave to Italy the cathedrals of Tuscany and the wave-washed palaces of Venice?’ To this question there is no answer. Rome, the mother of the arts, has scarcely a building to commemorate those times.”
To be continued:
Part 1: The Forgery Operation of the Jesuit Vatican
Part 2:
The Forgery of Ancient Germanic History
Part 3:
The 30-Years War and the Reformation Lie
Part 4:
Vatican, Fascism, Hanseatic League, Germania Magna
Part 5:
Genetic Heritage, Collective Amnesia, From Past to Present
