SH Archive The Sun is a Black Hole (Video)

[Archive]

​

Probably one of the coolest alternative theories I've discovered lately.

A Year Ago, the Sun Disappeared. This Year, a NASA Probe Travels to 'Touch' It.

A Year Ago, the Sun Disappeared. This Year, a NASA Probe Travels to 'Touch' It.​

DISCLAIMER: The above theory requires acceptance of "the standard model" of space physics. I think it's fine that many of you question the validity of it, and even question the shape of the Earth. This theory will NOT jive with that. But please don't just say "this is fake because the earth is flat".

Personally, I do believe in outer space and that we do live in a vast, nearly limitless realm of matter. I also believe we're being completely lied to about our history, and our origin. I also don't think being on a lonely pebble makes us worthless, because I also believe our consciousness transcends our limited earthly perspective: we are what happens when the universe observes itself. That should make you feel pretty special, as a rock is the universe NOT aware that it even exists.

That said, I would love to here your thoughts on the video itself and how it connects these ancient images to be direct and scientific explanations of the Sun and how it works. I really love how it starts by explaining how our interpretation of the Cross is completely wrong.

Note: This OP was recovered from the KeeperOfTheKnowledge archive.

Note: Archived Sh.org replies to this OP: The Sun is a Black Hole (Video)

 

[Akanah]

The thunderboltsproject claims that stars and the sun must be made of diocotron-instabilitys in form of a ring. Stable diocotron-rays could merge into a star/sun and neither do have a hole at the center. The center of our "galaxy" could be a weak diocotron-instability of a old sun which ancient people have seen on sky. The saturn-cult and egypt ra-cult could also based of this old sun. Maybe after this old sun the earth was getting dark for years befor another sun came her or was made.

 

[JWW427]

Some have said that the sun is a portal and draws in most of its energy from higher dimensions, which is why some star disappear before astronomer's eyes.
It may be a plasma accelerator of some kind.
In. metaphysics, the sun is said to have a soul, hence all the sun temples like the Rome Pantheon.

 

[Potato]

For those of you that don't have 1:13:13 of spare time to watch it all I will provide a summary:

Our sun is a black hole and a stargate. They claim that much of the symbolic imagery of our ancestors depict this, although they supply no actual evidence to support this claim. They show a bunch of pictures of ancient art and just tell you that "these 10 circles are really planets", for example.

 

[SuperTrouper]

For those of you that don't have 1:13:13 of spare time to watch it all I will provide a summary:

Our sun is a black hole and a stargate. They claim that much of the symbolic imagery of our ancestors depict this, although they supply no actual evidence to support this claim. They show a bunch of pictures of ancient art and just tell you that "these 10 circles are really planets", for example.

After sungazing for a while, you can work this out yourself. Also, that you are "it".

 

[Potato]

After sungazing for a while, you can work this out yourself.

Hmm, I did try sungazing for a while, never saw a black hole though. I did find it very relaxing.

I see this is part 5. Maybe they provided some additional connection to writings or documentation in the other parts. Not sure I can sit through that many hours of footage to find out.

 

[Phillness]

I still can't make exactly what the sun is. Maybe it's a couple of things depending on how you look at it, like all things seem to be. Maybe like we play different roles in everyday life nome mutually exclusive. I still feel every explanation scientific or not I've come across has some ring of some truth to it.
Tough the classic fusion model seems outdated to me.
Nowadays I'm trying to look through different lenses at all things.

I'm still grasping and trying to Get a grip at what ken wheeler points at, even through the arrogance he presents info with, trying to come to conclusions that satisfy both scientifically views and metaphysical aproaches is what I'm trying to explore. Finding common denominators assures me some how of some solidity on the knowledge.
Anywho, from what I get from him (and I maybe completely wrong), stars and black holes are kind of points where aether is disturbed and either:
it's energy is inducted at this plane of inertia of a toroidal magnetic field by centrifugal forces creating time and space and ultimately it's experience called life. Kind of like everything being made of hard light, witch is the aether'a high energy slowed down in different frequencies and speeds of induction. (Stats being the point of induction).

Or this perturbation is over and centripetal forces bring it back to it's normal energy and speeds back to the aether through black holes.

This ties in with some other readings I gathered. Like if we take the aether as some flowing infinite energy at high speeds, I think it a kin to what I've seen described in so many ways: infinite intelligent energy, counsciousness, god, infinite unmanifest potential... and so on.
Sometimes I think I got it, but can't decide on witch language to use to describe it.

I got to wheeler through Itzhak Bentov, who invented medical devices still in use today, and delved into altered states of counsciousness, where he found some answers for himself (kind of like Tesla is said to have done).
I think I posted this somewhere on the .org site. From 1978 but these ideas ressonante with me and have something to it even if not 100%, it's a language that makes sense to me. He sees the sun and everything as both black and white holes, feeding and feeding back on/to this infinite energy:


View: https://youtu.be/KMbeK_6ATxQ

 

[Akanah]

Now, I believe in ancient times we maybe had a plasmasun which developed from a diocotron-ring to a hexagonal Star and one day this sun died and the earth was flooded with the plasma of it. Through this plasma which had flooded the earth there was be a effect of plasma welding it could created a hexagonal big crater near the southpole and in the middle of this crater there arise first a compacted moutain. Maybe this moutain looks later like a pyramide before it splitt of the ground and was formed into a bullet which arise to the sky because of electrostatics or a magnetic field. This story ist comparing to the story of the dragonpearl which was spit out from a dragon (plasmacurrent.) And the look of an dragonpearl is like the the look of our current sun. On weekend I had a look of our sun throught a telescop and I recognized the sun was golden with a blue plasmacloud arround it. It looks like the dragonpearl and like a anode sun, a sun which have a solid metallic body with plasma arround it and not a body full of plasma.
But if our current sun isn´t full a plasmasun she must be smaller and closer to earth as scientist tell us and will be the second sun of our world, a sun which was created after the dead of a first sun from ancient times. And because of this idea the dragonpearl also could be the true ancient comet venus and sirius. Anyway I am wondering about the influence of venus or sirius in ancient times. How could a star or a planet have much influence for earths weather if it is not the closest star, like our sun ? It does not fit for me. On the other hand a closer current sun could explain effects of climate change or strange sunbeams which suggest our sun is a closer skybody.
[automerge]1603348371[/automerge]
Additionally planets on sky could be fake. I also believe stars in zodiac are fake and the moon could be a artifical satellit because of the moon-earth-map from the 17. century I recently found and had post in another thread.

 

[iskander]

DISCLAIMER: The above theory requires acceptance of "the standard model" of space physics. I think it's fine that many of you question the validity of it, and even question the shape of the Earth. This theory will NOT jive with that. But please don't just say "this is fake because the earth is flat".

No, not because the earth is flat (why always bringing up this psyop ?).

But black holes are just a virtual construct, derived from a singularity (division by zero) of the mathematical framework behind "relativity".
But a mathematical equation not necessarily reflects reality, it is just an abstract model.
The map is not the landscape.

Black holes don't exist.
But like faithful religious believers interpret every observation inside their pantheon, most "scientists" interpret every observation in the framework of the dominant theory.
Especially if their job, funding and livelihood depend on it ...

 

[ViniB]

But black holes are just a virtual construct, derived from a singularity (division by zero) of the mathematical framework behind "relativity".
But a mathematical equation not necessarily reflects reality, it is just an abstract model.
The map is not the landscape.

The entirety of the heliocentric cosmology is a virtual construct backed up by CGI and equations, it's all make believe