The trouble with academia.

A nice little article I found on Wiki of all places . Rhenium187 decays to osmium187 with a half life decay rate of 41,000,000,000 years but this can vary down to about 33yrs. You've got to laugh .
Wait, what?? This level of variability borderlines with making crap up! I knew it was bad but omg
I do recall C14 - C12 decay rate being "adjusted" a few times over the decades. Think this was due to tree ring dating not agreeing with given radiometric dates if I recall.
Yes, and chronology was the choosen tool for the adjustments, but that is a bigger problem since chronology is also made up quite a bit. It's like patching a hole with a bigger hole
 
Yes the academics simply make things up.
 
Well, that takes radiometric dating out of the scientific method for me . Decay rates may be assumed to be variable for all isotopes if science is to to be taken seriously. Would take a big stretch of the imagination to trust any of the isotope decay rate dates .
Yet the standard npc response against any criticism to radiometric dating goes like this Screenshot_20240109-151852.jpg

Edit: i just found out another example, a bit more extreme: There is another example of bound-state beta decay influencing radioactive decay, and this one is downright weird: Dysprosium-163. Dy-163 is stable. But if you strip off all of its electrons, it can have a bound-state beta decay into Holmium-163 with the electron going into the unoccupied K or L shell. Fully ionizing this normally non-radioactive isotope gives it half-life of just 47 days. I’ll claim that’s an infinite increase in rate.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top